Hi, it's me again. Today's the day. I
think in like 4 hours at time of
recording my video will go down and I
filed a counter claim because genuinely
wholeheartedly I believe that the claim
was misplaced. But that's not all I've
been doing. Over the last few days, as
many of you have seen, I've been active
on Twitter sharing the responses I've
got directly from YouTube support. They
have passed my concerns over to the
copyright team and came to the
conclusion that KP isn't abusing
copyright. Now, on a surface level,
YouTube's response seems reasonable.
They aren't actually in the business of
determining what is and isn't for use
and what is actually infringing
copyright. Their business is forwarding
claims. So, I cannot and will not expect
them to make the assessment here. But
that's never been my point. The point
isn't whether or not KP is right within
striking my channel, which she isn't, by
the way. It's the manner of which she
does it maliciously. The point is that
KP isn't striking anyone based on
copyright issues and she strikes based
on anger and subjective feelings.
There's a reason she only struck people
that either wronged her or are heavily
critical of her. Me copies the OP block
internet adjacent and that's a problem.
YouTube may not be in their right to
determine fair use, but they are within
their right to determine malice and act
accordingly. And sad malice has been
proven to them repeatedly. Now, YouTube
knows that KP is striking on invalid
terms and they are complying with it
because they're more scared of a weed
addicted pissing on the couch Disney
adult, possibly smelling an inkling of
legal misconduct she couldn't even
pursue, then they are willing to uphold
the integrity of their platform. KP is
striking people up to the point of
risking channel terminations in
Beckett's case, for example. And YouTube
expects us to sit, hand her personal
information to KP, and wait when a
solution is right there. I'm not calling
for KP's channel to be deleted. That's
weird and performous as [\h__\h] But I am
calling for YouTube to assess the
situation, remove the false copyright
strikes, and then panalyze KP
accordingly. This is a case of a
YouTuber with over 120,000 subscribers
silencing creators at 12th their size
for the sole crime of being pissed at
her for spreading false allegation,
lying to everyone involved, peddling his
a allegations for personal grievances,
and are actively striking and privacy
claiming videos that don't allow this
pattern to continue. YouTube has since
confirmed that they refused to take
action, pointing to the legality being
on KP's side. Fine, then counter strike
it as see if mommy and daddy paid to
take me and others to court KP. Now, on
a side note, KP has literally no light
to stand on. I've explained the fair use
mechanic in the last update. I'm not
doing it again, and I don't need to. But
let me address a few counters you might
hear from KP moving forward. They're
just re-uploading my scripts and draft
wrong. We're parodying them and you and
that is protected under FUS. By
definition, a parody is a comedic
commentary about a work that requires an
imitation of the work. Therefore,
parodies are used copyrighted works for
the purposes that fair use was designed
to protect. Added on to that is the fact
that our works are transformative,
adding our own visuals, our own voices,
and even art. In my case, they're using
my original works and are leaking things
I didn't put out yet. Correct. but in a
transformative manner. In your own words
that you broke by striking it, by the
way, you say that you're fine with
commentary. Yet, you've taken down
videos from Falgis and Beckett's channel
that are entirely commentary. These
people stretch three screenshots in one
video into a 6-hour stream. How much
more commentary could there be? The only
thing I can possibly give you is
striking archives of your video, as
these constitute a straightup reuploads
of your original content. Though, being
for real, who cares? If it's not
archived in YouTube, it's archived
elsewhere, so why do you give a [\h__\h]
Let me end this off by saying all I can
say at the end of the day, YouTube may
be on your side, KP, but the internet
and the community is not. You cannot
come back from this. And the fact you
spend your time actively manipulating
what little audience still wants to be
on your side while collecting the docks
information of creators you deemed as
wrong in you is disappointing and
disgusting. You want to do the right
thing. If not for the people you hurt
for your audience, then [\h__\h] off. Take
care of your clearly messy mental state
and get the help you need.