Disclaimer one, all parties are presumed
innocent until proven guilty in a court
of law. Do not contact or harass anyone
mentioned in this video. Disclaimer two,
this video talks about crimes and
activities of a violent and disturbing
nature. Viewer discretion is advised.
Disclaimer three, this video should only
be viewed by those 18 or older. We talk
about some pretty serious subject matter
and minors should not be present for
these discussions. But I like to think
of myself with the John Stewart of the
YouTube animation community. I call
things out when I feel like I can add
something to the conversation. This is
the YouTuber I love Kim Possible a lot.
Also known as KP, real name Rachel. If
you've been in the Brony fandom for a
while, you've probably at least heard of
her. She was a big deal back in the day.
However, as the fandom faded from
relevance, her channel largely fell into
obscurity. She tried jumping into
general animation reviews like most
people who survived that crash, but she
never quite could stick the landing. It
was a rare day that her videos climbed
past 10K views. If you're not a diehard
fan, the only time that you probably
heard of her this decade was last year.
Courtney Pete appeared on the internet.
She is the sister of the controversial
and debatably human Lily Orchard.
Courtney gave her personal account of
everything that her sister allegedly did
to her. It was a lot and it kickstarted
a new era of people looking into Lily
Orchard's many, many controversies.
Rachel made a video with Courtney
appearing in it, signal boosting the
Lily Orchard story. It was her most
viewed video in years and even became
sort of a reference point in the Lily
Orchard story. Fast forward to this
year. Rachel had been hyping up a new
video a lot tweets and community posts
galore. At first, the video seemed to be
about the YouTube channel DA Games, but
as the months went on, KP began saying
that she had career ruining allegations
towards Saber Spark. DA Games was one
thing. It's a community that has many
known and documented controversies, but
Sabers Spark is another story entirely.
If you're watching my channel, I know
that you have at least heard of Sabers
Spark. At present, he has 2 million
subscribers and was the first cartoon
channel to cross the 1 million
subscriber mark. Practically speaking,
he's the largest member of the cartoon
community. And even more surprising for
a channel of his size, with a few
exceptions, he didn't really have any
controversies to speak of. and most of
the ones that he did have could be
considered fairly minor things like
getting into a spat with the right-wing
channel Freedom Tunes. If you had news
about this man, career ruining
allegations, let's just say that all
eyes were on you. On May 1st of 2025,
the video was released complete with a
premiere and a watch party.
Unfortunately for KP, if this video
killed anyone's career, it was not Saber
Sparks. It was her own. Shadow the
Hedgehog is a [\h__\h] ass [\h__\h] He
pissed on my [\h__\h] wife. That's right.
He said his dick was this big and I
said, "That's disgusting." So, I'm
making a call out post on my
twitter.com. Shadow the Hedgehog. You
got a small [\h__\h] dick. It's the size
of this walnut, but way [\h__\h] smaller.
This is a real clip in the real video.
The entire thing is filled with
Nostalgia Critic type sketch comedy,
lingering jokes, bad pacing, and even
technical errors. Some of the censorship
in it is very poorly done. Like, you can
easily make out all of the details of a
dickpick that Rachel quote unquote
censored. I'm not showing it at all for
what I hope are obvious reasons, but the
video itself has been archived and
preserved and re-uploaded on many
channels. So, if you are really curious,
uh you can see it for yourself. just
know what you're getting into. What was
hyped up to be about Saber Spark barely
ended up being about him at all. In the
end, the video wasn't even really about
DA Games. The crux of the video was
about Rachel's conflict with a former
editor of hers named afficionados Chris,
who had worked for her a decade prior
and now works with Sabers Spark and DA
Games. And even though Saber Spark was
largely treated as an afterthought, one
moment of the Saber Spark segment in the
video is what got everyone talking about
it. Rachel has an anonymous testimony
accusing Saber Spark of sexual assault
on two separate occasions and it comes
out of nowhere in the context of the
video. Like it's in there with the
structural integrity of a Rick roll. So
what we have here is a video where the
largest member of the community is
accused of some of the worst crimes
possible after a slog of Seinfeld jokes.
And um this it looks like two balls and
a bong. He [\h__\h] my wife. Guess what?
I'm going to [\h__\h] the ass. That's right.
That's what you get. My super laser
piss. People were upset. People still
are upset. There were CSA survivors in
the premier chat who complained about
the video proper, but they ended up
getting berated by Courtney Pete, who
was featured extensively in the video.
The backlash was swift and immense and
to some extent still ongoing, even
almost a month later. The video was
unlisted and then privated within hours.
And while it was preserved, the video
itself had several assets in the
description. The Google document version
of the accuser statement against Sabers
Spark and the initial call with Chris
that started this whole thing. These
simply disappeared for a time because
cutting off the video was immediate
priority. People tried to preserve the
description, but the links to these
things were broken because they were so
long. I was able to find them, but they
had to be collected through roundabout
means. The video certainly made a splash
and everyone wanted to know what the
hell is going on here. When it comes to
Saber Spark, there are only two real
possibilities. Either it happened or it
didn't. And all Rachel provided for
evidence in the video at least was a
tweet longer that fun fact got one of
the dates wrong. The two incidents are
both alleged to have happened in 2012,
not 2013. If this did happen, Rachel
presented the worst case imaginable and
very few people were publicly believing
the alleged victim. And if it didn't
happen, I can't imagine a more effective
strategy to speedrunning becoming a
community pariah. As the saying goes, if
you take a shot at the king, you best
not miss. And this is why. One of the
most frustrating things about Saberspark
as a content creator is that he never
seems to address anything. talking about
even his remotest controversies seems to
be banned on all of his socials. And
anytime you comment about even something
small like his Twitter likes, it gets
quickly removed. It would have to be an
extreme controversy to get him to make a
response, which Sabers Spark did on the
12th of May, simply called response.
When I first watched Rachel's video, I
was very confused and then as it sat
with me, I got angry and then I decided
to get involved. I am mostly detached
from the situation. DA Games and their
community hurt one of my friends and
they were very upset with the video in
general. Rachel has also not been the
best to a couple of my other friends.
Lazy Bedhead was also in the video and
while she did have more context than
some of the others who were put in the
video, few people had the full context
to what was being released. But as far
as being involved in the original
situation, I'm not. I don't know KP. I
don't know Sabers Spark. Well, I know of
them. I don't know them personally. And
I don't have a horse in this race either
way. But someone has to do due
diligence. And considering some of the
background events that have happened
during the month of May, I'm kind of
worried about how this is progressing.
Either way, I want to get to the truth
of the matter here as best I can. As
usual, I have the help of a team. I will
be upfront this time, though. We're not
going to have all of the answers. I'm
not going to hand down a definitive
verdict. The crux of the situation
happened in 2012. There are always going
to be unknowns with a time gap of more
than a decade. This is not a Phoenix
Wright game where there's a smoking gun
that definitively points to a target.
This is real life where things are
alleged to have happened in a hotel room
with no cameras and no witnesses. And in
the real world, when people are
traumatized, sometimes the last thing
people think of is proving that it
happened at all. Here is what I will
promise you. I will give you everything
that you need to know to form a more
informed opinion on Saber Spark, I love
Kim Possible Lot, and the allegation in
question, trying best to remove it from
the context of this cluster [\h__\h]
Speaking of that, one of the more
immediate mistakes that KP made was
trying to cover both DA Games and Sabers
Spark in the same video. The only
through line between the two was their
mutual editor, Chris, but the situations
and scenarios are very different. I am
personally focused on Saber Spark in
this video. DA Games controversies are
much better documented. There is a
Google doc about them and a lot more
people are outwardly speaking out on
that issue, but they will not be my
focus for this video. And please pardon
the more minimal editing in this
investigation video. I'm I'm not doing
the whole Dang and Rama thing again.
That was hell in the editing bay.
Chapter one, the beginning of the end. I
believe that the best way to tackle this
case in particular is to start with the
fallout and work our way back to the
video proper. After all, the video in
question isn't where the story ended.
Honestly, it's somewhere in the middle.
By doing this, we may have a definitive
answer to how did this even happen.
Sabers Spark's response on the 12th was
a strange one. Mainly due to the fact
that it exists at all. The man does not
like speaking on controversies, small,
big, any of them. He makes the fans of
Freedom Tunes angry. He just quietly
removes that segment from the video and
never talks about it again. And while
sexual assault allegations are
definitely much more serious than a
YouTube feud, very few people seem to be
going to bat for these allegations.
There was KP obviously and the Brony
Fandon account who brought the
allegations to light. For reference,
Brony Fandon is a shared Twitter account
by two individuals, Bonk and Sophie. At
least it was shared at the time the
video came out. Sophie has since changed
the password for a reason that we will
get to. That account exists largely to
signal boost the allegations and
controversies towards someone called
Black Griffin. Because that story is
tangentially related to Saber Spark, the
accuser was sent to Brony Fan Don't by a
friend named Amy. Neither of the Brony
Fan Don't users were able to help
immediately, but they heard that KP was
making a video involving Sabers Spark.
So, the accuser was sent in that
direction. Even after the video and
after the backlash, the Brony Fandone
account stood by the accuser. They also
signal boosted other people who claim to
support the accuser story, Amy and
Jessa. Of course, none of these are very
public individuals. And the most public
of them all, KP, dealt with a much more
public backlash than Sabers Spark. A
good deal of the general public was very
skeptical of the allegations, which they
probably should be. KP provided no hard
evidence that this actually happened.
Others, however, crossed the line into
legitimate harassment of the accusers,
which you should not do. Even if you
believe that these are liars of the
vendetta, harassment does not benefit
anyone. The general consensus on the
internet at this point though is that
allegations with no evidence does not
have to be addressed at all. Because
could you imagine if we were stepping up
with everything that every rando says
about us? As you might imagine, crazy
people saying things about people is a
very real thing that happens a lot. More
than you might initially expect. A good
deal of the people commenting on this
seem to believe that Saber Spark had no
real reason to respond at all. Maybe I'm
painting things as more black and white
than they really were because a lot of
people did jump on the allegations and
many people did unsubscribe from Saber
Sparks channel as he pointed out in his
response video. Whatever the reason, it
exists. Let's take a look at it. It's
one of the very few times that he's been
live on camera on his channel. A camera
that he does not seem to know how to use
properly. I is is this like a a fisheye
lens, a a wide angle for a close-up
shot? The framing is very bad. Anyway,
this is largely standard for a YouTube
addressing controversy video. And keep
in mind when I say that, standard is
bad. At the very least, it's not a
ukulele video. I can assume that he
showed it to a lawyer before putting it
up. With the most major allegation,
Saber Spark simply says that it didn't
happen. To be clear, the accusation that
I sexually assaulted someone is
completely false, and I feel disgusted
that I even have to say that. I've had
sexual partners before in the past, but
we have always abided by enthusiastic
and reciprocated consent. Which fair
enough, KP and company didn't provide
any evidence themselves. But the video
goes on and on like it's KP and Brony
Fandon directly making this claim
entirely on their own. Like, if anyone
made up this claim, it was those two
making it up. Like, the accuser doesn't
exist as a person at all, which they
are. They are a real person who is not
KP or either of the users of the Brony
Fandom account. I want to be clear about
that immediately. In my own personal
opinion, the response video was focused
on one thing and one thing only. Slug
Entertainment's interview with her seems
to demonstrate her malicious intent. And
from the context of her video, it looks
like it was done with a desire to use
this drama to boost her channel's
popularity. In order to sue someone for
defamation when you're a public figure,
the defamatory statement must be false.
must have caused actual damages. And
here's the kicker, which makes it really
hard to sue someone for defamation when
you're a public individual. You have to
prove actual malice, or barring that, a
damaging level of negligence. Saber
Spark's response video seems to set up
that case, sometimes going as far as
just straddling the line like it's an
outright checklist. Of course, the video
does other minor things as well. They
seem to see themselves as judge, jury,
and executioner and launch vicious
harassment campaigns against multiple
online creators such as Billy Bustup,
Prince whatever, and Black Griffin. So,
the tweet that Saber Spark points to,
for example, a Brony Fandone harassing
Black Griffin is a link to a Google
document. Now, Bonk, one of the users of
the Brony Fandone account, does not
claim to have written the document. As
far as I could tell, the Brony Fandone
account is only a contributor. There
were multiple contributors. If you
believe them or not, that's up to you.
But if you've noticed Bonk's pattern of
writing or even Sophie's pattern of
writing on Twitter or other locations,
you could probably easily see the
difference in terms of writing. So, am I
harassing DA Games by putting the Google
document against them that was not
written by me in my description. I'm not
saying that Bonk does not harass Black
Griffin because he does have a
reputation of harassing people. I'm
saying that linking to a Google document
not written by him does not constitute
harassment. Bernie Fandone has on
multiple occasions use falsifiable
information to attack people with. Okay,
this might be a nitpick, but I think
that it's important to bring up because
both KP and Saber Spark have misused
this word and it is possible to misuse
this word to try and pull a fast one.
False is not a synonym of falsifiable.
False means that something is not true.
Falsifiable means that it can be proven
false. Technically speaking, that
doesn't mean that it will be. Every
statement of fact by definition is
falsifiable. The sky is blue is a
falsifiable statement. If the sky is not
blue, the statement has been falsified.
False and falsifiable do not mean the
same thing. Saying falsifiable can mean
that the audience hears the word false
when the statement may not be false at
all. I want to be clear. I'm not saying
that Saber Spark or even KP was
intentionally doing this. It may have
been a legitimate mistake. According to
KP's post, Bernie Phantom was in her
Discord server. And according to this
person, they were allegedly friends.
According to Damen Wolf, Damian in the
dark, the smoking gun. Twitter rando
says they're besties. This is our
standard of evidence. Okay. I have been
on Twitter since 2012. But in early
2020, I noticed that the culture of the
website had begun to change. It was more
combative and antagonistic.
The Justine Sako controversy happened in
2013. And the website started to reward
that kind of engagement. Yeah. In like
2015. You were late to the party is what
I'm saying. By the way, Blue Sky will
will join that party before too long.
That kind of behavior is baked into the
format of short form blogging. It's
inevitable. These aren't individuals who
care about the well-being of victims,
but only engagement and exploitative
content. So, funny story. This is not
the first draft of this video. I wrote a
first draft where I was a whole lot
harsher and quite mean to KP especially.
It is very easy to assume that she made
her video based on a vendetta against
Saber Spark. I will even state that it's
probably the easiest conclusion that you
can come to and the things that she has
done after the release of the video,
which we will talk about, don't give her
the best look. But, we don't really know
her full intentions. We can make
speculations, but we probably shouldn't
do that. As for Brony Fan, don't Bonk
specifically, after the video got
immense backlash, he did throw KP under
the bus. However, at no point did he
ever state that the accuser was lying.
He didn't even shield his language with
allegedly, and he got into fights with
people who didn't outright believe the
accuser. On top of that, Bonk is clearly
mentally unwell. I don't really think we
can know his full intentions. In regards
to my channel, we have lost nearly tens
of thousands of subscribers since the
release of their video. According to
SocialBlade, Saver Spark started losing
subscribers on April 28th, days before
the actual video came out. Look at the
very screenshot that he shows. You see
those bumps before the first? Those are
all dips below zero. Sabers Spark was
losing subscribers before KP's video
came out. Not as many, but there was
still subscriber loss. It might be a
little bit harder than that for him to
prove damages in court. I'm not a
lawyer. I'm I'm just saying, especially
since loss of subscribers isn't the same
thing as financial harm with how YouTube
itself keeps deemphasizing subscribers
as an important metric. And let's not
forget something very important.
Saberspark himself put retirement on the
horizon in the month of April. That is
going to lead to subscriber loss by
default. You would also have to detach
that subscriber loss from other factors,
which may be a little bit harder to do
than Saber Spark expects. Like I said,
this whole thing reads as the first step
in a lawsuit. And it is my personal
belief that Saber Spark will at least
attempt to sue Brony Vand and KP. The
obvious question is, can he? Well, I
mean, in the United States, you can
generally sue anyone for anything. You
could take your grandmother to small
claims court because she got you the
wrong McDonald's order. The better
question is, can he win? Once again, I'm
not a lawyer, but I believe that it'd be
hard to argue damages due to Saber
Spark's other controversies and the fact
that KP's video is almost universally
reviled. Brony Fan don't and Rachel
don't exactly have a good reputation at
the moment. And I believe that anyone
primed to believe the worst in Saber
Spark because of such a spectacle
probably would have came to that
conclusion via other means. And if we're
talking reputation, it would probably be
a bad idea to go after Bonk
specifically. I I don't know how to put
this delicately, but the man has
problems. After a bunch of background
stuff and harassment, Bonk appeared to
stream an attempt on his own life. First
on Twitch, but when the Twitch account
got banned, he tried doing it again on
Twitter. He did not succeed. He was
found beforehand, and according to
Sophie, he was checked into a hospital
afterwards. A lot of people suspect that
this was a stunt, that it was, you know,
faked. In my own personal opinion, the
distinction is irrelevant because
whether you're seriously doing it or
you're only pretending to do it, neither
of which showcases a very healthy
mindset. As for KP, I will say that if a
lawsuit is on the table, she is making
some of the worst possible decisions in
the aftermath of the video. I can see
the temptation to go on interviews and
get your side of the story out there,
but I cannot possibly fathom any reason
why Rachel would go on an interview with
Slug Entertainment, also known as Angry
Slug. For those who don't know who that
is, that's the former editor of Mama
Max. Yes, Predator Hunter Mama Max, the
one who was canled last year for turning
real world cases into a Hotline Miami
ARG, among other things. He has about
7,000 subscribers. Why would you even do
this? What's your angle? Going on an
interview at all when defamation is on
the table is a bad idea, as Carl Jops
learned the hard way with his case
against Billy Mitchell. Also, outright
threatening the accuser is not a good
look either. Okay. Emmy, I'll be honest.
From my understanding, you shared a
Dropbox file with Lazy and Lazy and your
[\h__\h] name was on it. I don't know if
you're aware of that, but that's direct
confirmation. So, I'm at the point where
my reputation is on the line because of
you. And I feel like an idiot because of
you. and you can help me clean up this
mess and get in a call and tell your
side of the story or this is going to
blow up in your face because people have
already figured out it's you based on
that
mistake. And I'm [\h__\h] I'm [\h__\h]
tired because the things that have been
pointed out to me is that you have your
own platform. You know, people you knew
going in that people were going to
figure it out. Maybe not this quickly,
maybe not by your own mistake, but they
did. And you can be an adult and help me
clean up this
mess. Or you can be a
coward. I'm not yelling at you. I'm not
telling you what to
do, but you have put me, you've put
people that are in the video in a very
difficult and dangerous p
um position.
And I don't think you really understand
that. And so I'm at the I'm at the point
where I talk to this guy,
Becket, and he says that you can you
have the chance right now to tell your
side of the
story in a call with me or with Lazy or
with him or with someone or people are
going to villainize
you. And that's where we're
at.
And none of like the things that that
have been pointed out to me doesn't
doesn't make any
sense. The timeline is
questionable. The only people that
vouched for you were Brony and Amy and
Sophie. And Amy won't even [\h__\h] talk
to
me. So, I'm not telling you what to do,
but I'm being real with you. It's a it's
it's it's
it's [\h__\h] You're you're [\h__\h] one
way or the
other. So, make a decision soon or I
will publicly confirm it was you. You
have 24 hours. If I had to guess, and
this is only a guess, if Saber Spark
tries to sue anyone, I'd imagine the
strategy would be to get them to settle
out of court because KP does have one
major defense. KP's major claim is that
Saber Spark didn't fire afficionados
Chris despite having every reason to.
And as far as I'm aware, Chris is still
on Saber Spark's team. There is the
sexual assault allegation that is the
most damaging of all the statements. But
that allegation did not originate from
either KP or Bon or Sophie when the
allegation does come from an actual
person that actually exists. Let's talk
about them. Chapter 2. Old friends, new
enemies. Saberspark was not the first
person from his camp to make a comment
about the situation. This is Casey. She
is Saberspark's editor's wife and she
posted a twit longer on the 7th of May.
Whatever was going on behind the scenes,
these two seem to be operating at
entirely different frequencies because
it's a completely different attitude
than Saber Sparks response. Keep in mind
that this is to I Love Composible a lot
and not to or about the accuser
directly. A lot of this does read as
pointless drama and insider information.
I will say that the phrase cool kids
club comes up a lot in other places, not
good places, like places where the C's
are replaced to K because that's a quote
unquote joke. It's a phrase that you
shouldn't use. Speaking of phrasing, she
was also asked about Black Griffin. To
which she wrote this, the phrase my
truth is also something that you should
never ever say. At best, it makes you
sound willfully delusional. There is no
quote unquote my truth. There is only
the truth. Now, this statement here, at
the time that this was written, KP may
have removed the video, but she did not
publicly recant the allegation. Her
tweet the following day called Sabers
Sparks accuser a victim without
shielding the language with allegedly.
The only thing that I found that could
be considered close to a recantation was
KP's voice message to the accuser, which
was said in private and made afterwards.
But beyond that, Casey says some fairly
egregious things about the accuser. She
states that the accuser has victims,
that the accuser committed a crime in
her own guest room, and a simple Google
search of quote unquote her name drama
could have told you everything that she
has done that is of public knowledge. Of
course, Casey never reveals what that
name is. And that's one of the biggest
mysteries of the whole ordeal. Like, if
you really think that this person did X,
Y, and Z, and you're clearly not caring
about the consequences here, since I I
doubt Saber Spark wanted a statement
like this public, why not just out the
person? The most logical answer is that
this is all made up and Casey is talking
out of her ass. But like, no. The
accuser also claims that she used to
know Casey, know her enough to go to
Disney together in 2014. And for the
record, no one I've spoken to seems to
know the context of the alleged crime in
the guest room either. I could speculate
as to why Casey didn't just out the
accuser outright, but we're probably
never going to know the real reason.
What I do know is that this seemed to be
the impetus of people looking further
into the accuser who wanted to stay
anonymous. Brony fan don't signal
boosted every single person who publicly
said that they knew the accuser and
defended their story. Redditors used
this to see who they were all mutually
following. Then they went into the past
looking at tweets of not just Saber
Spark, but who they thought was the dead
ringer. And then they created a Google
document and released it publicly. I
want to be clear, no one on my
investigation team had anything to do
with this, at least unless someone went
behind my back. And I trust all of these
guys with my life. So, I'm saying that
they didn't do it. I also do not think
that it was KP or anyone assisting her
because KP knew at least the name of
this person from the very beginning. My
team and I were speaking to the
accusers's alt first through Twitter and
then through Discord. And the first
question that I ever asked them was what
questions shouldn't I ask? And the only
thing I wasn't allowed to ask was about
their identity and so I didn't. Of
course, being anonymous is more than
just not saying your name. It's actually
a lot more difficult than you might
think. The kisser gave us her first
name, Emily, and a bunch of other small
pieces of information that couldn't be
used to directly identify them out of
context. However, there was a vlog clip
that was too big to send via Discord.
So, they used a Dropbox, and that
Dropbox had their last name on it. Now,
this person has a common first and last
name, so it could have just been a
coincidence, but we had her speculation,
and the other seemingly irrelevant
details all proved accurate to who this
person was speculated to be. I will
state up front, I was given express
permission to reveal who this person
was. And I was given this permission
after KP threatened them, after Blanc's
apparent breakdown, as well as me having
questions with their overall testimony.
So, we'll talk about them so we're all
on the same page. So, as many people
speculated, the person in question is
Emily Jones, also known as Emu Emmy. If
that name sounds familiar, it's because
she's been on the platform longer than I
have. She's an influencer with over
100,000 subscribers, prominent in the My
Little Pony community, obviously, and
later the Sonic community. She's mostly
known for singing, voice acting, and
Sonic and Tales R. It was a bit of a
revelation to me that I was actually
familiar with some of her work. When we
found out who she was, we decided to do
a background check and Lazy Bedhead
spent like two days looking up who she
was. There is plenty of information
about Emu Emmy online. And one thing
that both Lacy and KP found was a video
documentary here that talked about a
whole wide array of things. There was
also, ironically enough, a Google
Dropbox with more information. The
information does paint her as crazy,
like over-the-top crazy. from small
things like working with animated James
or Mondo Pony before their consolations
to much more out there events like
having an affair with Ryan Drummond,
voice of Sonic in several games, not
paying Mike Pollock, voice of Eggman,
for voice acting work, and a
long-standing feud with a brain cancer
survivor named Lizzy. It was roughly at
this time KP also seemed to be doing
research into who this person actually
was. This was in spite of her not
talking to an alt the entire time and
actually talking with the emu Discord
account from the very beginning. To make
sure the KP was on the same page with
us, we did have several calls with her.
We tried to keep her in the loop. The
threat that leaked out probably proves
that that wasn't the smartest decision
on our end. By the way, if Emily is to
be believed, Bonk released that without
even her permission. As you probably
already noticed, a big issue behind the
scenes was that everyone seemed to be
acting incredibly irrationally, acting
on impulse, or not really thinking
through their actions. It was enough
trying to get to the bottom of things
without someone doing something
incredibly inadvisable every other day.
My team and I had three separate talks
with Emily directly about her own
controversies. The first was with Lacy
Bedhead alone. The second was with her,
myself, and Phineas. We wanted to get
her side of the story on her
controversies, just us figuring out what
the hell was going on. And as the
discussion went on, she provided plenty
of receipts. It would take an atless
effort to verify each and every single
one of them, but some of them did hold
up to immediate scrutiny. Mike Pollock,
for instance, wrote a full-on message
about his part in this story. The third
conversation was a full-on interview for
all of your viewing pleasure, which I
will link in the description. If you
want to hear Emily side of the story
directly on any and all of her
controversies that we know of, go ahead.
I do think that it's important for you
to see that. But that discussion is
three and a half hours long on something
that's technically only tangentially
related to the matters at hand. To be as
forward as I can, most of the interview
is directly about the things that Emily
Jones herself has been accused of from
various, I'll be quite frank, unsaavory
places. That's the first two and a half
hours of the interview. Uh it's
timestamped. So if you have a specific
question or issue, you can go to a
specific timestamp. The last hour of
that interview is about some of the more
basic questions that everyone was asking
Emily. Why now of all times? Why go to
KP specifically? What's your thoughts on
Saber Sparks response video? So on and
hearing Emily talk about those in her
own words. Now, I want to be as fair as
I possibly can. I'll put everything on
the table. The goal during these
interviews wasn't to question or push
back on Emily's statements. And so, we
didn't. We did that in text and behind
the scenes, but not while on the record.
We did have a sit down discussion with
her about her own controversies. And I
mean to be fair, speaking about pushing
back on Emily's statements in this
interview, it's like what am I supposed
to say? Emily was talking about her
personal experiences. Like I could say
that it's trying to bait sympathy, but
I'm not interested in doing that. That's
up to your own interpretation. Saber
Spark's response was very
factoriented, and facts can be very
easily critiqued. And it's not like I'm
letting Emily's statements go through
unfiltered and unfocused because I am
going to have plenty of things to say
about the written testimony, the initial
allegation. But I will state up front, I
am interested in being as fair as
possible to all parties involved. And I
will state that I did pick apart Saber
Sparks response video on the matter.
You've already seen that. And during
this interview, I don't critique or
interject or anything like that. So, I
would keep that in mind. And I would
recommend watching Emily's statements
with just as much a grain of salt as I
had watching Saber Sparks. If something
sounds strange or odd, remember that
it's fair to feel that way. Do your own
research in the end. If something does
feel strange or odd, remember, even
though I have a team, our collective
knowledge can be surprisingly limited at
times. We have at least two members
whose entire life is Sonic. And yet, at
the same time, they had never even heard
of Emily Jones, who is allegedly
infamous within the Sonic community. The
goal here is to give all parties a fair
shake. Emily, Sabers Spark, everyone.
And I expect all of you to want to do
the same. For the sake of argument,
let's pretend that she was bullshitting
all of us for seven hours and that
everything and every dubious documentary
is gold standard truth. Terrible things
can happen to terrible people. Crazy
[\h__\h] can happen to crazy people. Of
course, when terrible or crazy people
tell us stories, we should take them
with mountains of salt. But
controversies alone do not mean that the
allegation couldn't have happened.
However, it would be irresponsible of me
to not mention that many of the
controversies, true or not, are sex
scandals. Maybe I'm naive, but in the
direct discussions that I've had with
Emily on voice call, she sounded
genuine. And for what it's worth, this
is not the first time that she's told
the story about Saberspark. She was able
to dig up some messages from years and
years ago. Unfortunately, much of the
digital data of conversations between
Saberspark and Emily, real or not, have
been lost to the turn of time. Cell
phone and computers were upgraded
several times and most of the
discussions allegedly happened on Skype.
Skype officially died on May 5th of this
year, 4 days after KP's video initially
aired. Some people speculate that this
timing is meaningful. It's not. The
truth of the matter is that Emily came
to KP in late March, a month before
Skype was fully deleted. Not that that
matters either, since Skype didn't save
user side data prior to 2018. If you
didn't have access to the computer where
all those messages originated from, you
didn't have access to those messages at
all. Of course, with what we know now,
there are a couple of legitimate
questions that do arrive. Why now? And
if you have a platform, why not do this
on your own? After all, Emily's platform
is much bigger than KP's due the fact
that she's worked directly with Sega and
actual established voice actors, you
could argue that on some level, she's
actually more successful than Sabers
Spark. I can't really answer that
question. As for why be anonymous, the
reason claimed is that Emily was afraid
of Sabers Spark's fans and would be
afraid of them attacking her. I will say
upfront, Saber Spark has a reputation
for a few things, but sending his fans
to attack people is not one of them. The
only thing that comes close is when
Saber Spark made a harsh, and to be
honest, bad critique of Freedom Tunes,
but that backfired horrendously on him.
The example that Emily gave when
directly asked was this Twitter exchange
between Saber Spark and KP. the one that
KP put in her own video. This is a bad
example. Here is how Twitter works. If
you don't know, even if you're following
someone, you are not sent Twitter
replies. You have to go out of your way
and specifically seek them out. And if
you're not following them at all, as
Emily wasn't, the chances of coming
across this is slim. It should be noted
that one of the things that Emily is
accused of is sending her fan base to
harass people. Even if that's false, any
big YouTuber probably knows that their
fan base has a propensity to harass
people. I know that my fan base has done
this in the past. You can probably get
away with calling this projection. Or
you could also get away with calling
this a fear based on experience. Even
through an anonymous account, Emily did
get harassment. And let's not forget
that in some circles, Emily's reputation
does precede her. Even though I don't
have a horse in this race, do you think
that I'm not personally worried that
this whole excursion could go very, very
wrong? I'm talking about serious
allegations against the biggest guy in
the community coming from another
established personality who is arguably
even more successful. And both of them
are at least accused of having very
rabid fan bases. This isn't how you
network is what I'm saying. But now
they're all on the same page. Let's
actually analyze the allegations in
question. Chapter 3, the first incident.
Cantalog Gardens, late September 2012.
In terms of transparency, I am going to
pull the allegations directly from the
original KB video. Then afterwards, I'll
throw in some updated and more specific
information that the accuser later
added. It is also worth noting that
there are a couple of different versions
of this immediately. The one in the
video is not identical that was released
on the Brony Fandon Twitter and Blue
Sky. But that being said, let's give all
the parties the benefit of the doubt
while we can. I will be calling the
separate alleged crimes incidents one
and two for simplicity's sake. Incident
one is said to have taken place in late
September during Canterlaw Gardens in
Strongville, Ohio. Incident two was
first said to have taken place in 2013,
but was later corrected to EQLA 2012 in
Anaheim, California. I get the changing
information at all can be taken as a
sign that something is a miss. But once
again, let's give the benefit of the
doubt while we can, keeping in mind that
all of this allegedly took place over 10
years ago. Speaking of which, I must all
remind you that these are allegations
and all parties should be presumed
innocent until proven guilty in a court
of law. I became a fan of Saber Spark
when I was in high school when I found
his essay titled Ballot of the Brony in
2011. After graduating and turning 18, I
added him on Skype to tell him I was a
big fan of his. He added me back almost
instantly and we had a conversation
ending with him giving me his phone
number which was a really big deal to me
at the time since this was the first
time interacting with any sort of
celebrity. I had developed a parasocial
crush on him due to being starruck which
was something he was aware of. We would
talk on Skype and text each other
semi-frequently leading up to the first
time meeting him. In 2012, I went to my
first pony convention. This was my first
time ever traveling by myself and was
soon after the two of us became friends.
When I met up with him in person, he
invited me to his hotel room, and he
showed me the video he was editing on
his laptop, causing me to internally
geek out. I was really nervous being
alone in a hotel with someone I was a
huge fan of and had a crush on, but I
tried to play it cool. He was four to 5
years older than me, making me feel more
nervous and out of place. He would bring
up the prospects of the two of us dating
and how it didn't feel right for us to
do so. After that, he almost immediately
initiated making out with me and guided
me to his bed. In this moment, he did
not directly ask me for consent. I was
thrown onto his bed and he would insert
himself into me. Saber Spark was also
significantly larger than me as I was an
80s something pound 18-year-old girl.
So, I physically could not stop him. I
felt extremely nervous and uncomfortable
because I had never experienced having
any sort of sexual intimacy with someone
I was not dating before, much less
someone I just met. I was very new to
meeting people online in general. At
that moment, I laid there dissociating
as I felt very wrong while trying to
rationalize it. In my head to convince
myself it was a safe and normal
encounter. He rushed off the clean and
finished himself and came back to the
bed and offered me a handshake, saying,
"Bfriends." This would cause me for the
rest of the event to feel that I was
taken advantage of and ashamed of myself
for not trying to stop the interaction.
Though I tried pretending I was fine to
everyone around me, I was and still am
demisexual, and being put in that
position was not something I wanted.
This concludes the accuser statement of
incident one. Before we continue, we
need to discuss how these allegations
were made. They were put together and
constructed on Discord before they made
it into the video, Twitter, and the
Google document. KP and Courtney Pete
gave direct feedback to the accuser. A
lot of this is innocuous, asking for
clarifying details, editing for flow,
but there was a segment that they
thought should have been removed
entirely. The issue of implied consent
and even giving Sabers Spark the benefit
of the doubt that there was a
possibility Sabers Spark felt that
consent was implied. Courtney and Rachel
recommended that part be removed
considering that Rachel thinks the idea
of implied consent is quote unquote kind
of BS. As you might remember, the entire
video has a whole segment on implied
consent. More on this later. I'll be
blunt. We won't be talking about
incident one very much. It was a smaller
convention in general and doesn't seem
to have been well documented. The only
footage that we can find was of panels
and interviews, things that would have
gone around in fandom circuits at the
time. Here's what we can prove. Both
Sabers Spark and Emily were at this
convention at least on the 27th.
Saberspark shared a hotel room with at
least Paleo Steno, a frequent
collaborator. Saberspark was also doing
coverage at times. Emily and Saberspark
have a Twitter interaction late in the
morning. At some point, he hosts a panel
with Everfree Radio and tweets about it
later that night. The sexual assault is
alleged to have happened on this day,
and there is a ton of time that's not
accounted for, but that just means that
it's technically possible to have
happened. Just because time is
unaccounted for doesn't mean that it did
happen. On day three of this convention,
Saberspark tweeted about dining with the
Creers, Mondo Pony, and the Everfree
Radio staff. After the incident, the
accuser alleges trying to go to the room
they were supposed to be staying at.
However, they were staying with a
couple, but there was allegedly a
domestic violence incident, so they felt
the need to leave. This incident doesn't
seem to have been reported to the
police. At the very least, it doesn't
seem to have been in fandom news or
local news of the area. It is also worth
noting that no police were ever
contacted in regards to any of the
alleged crimes at any point. That being
said, it is worth noting that Brony fan
conventions had notoriously bad
security. Tim Critic, an infamous former
analyst who had been accused of engaging
in erotic roleplay with a minor for over
a year, among other crimes, was
allegedly able to get away with a lot of
his shady behavior in plain sight at
many of these conventions. As late as
2019, when people should have been on
much higher alert, a security staff at a
brony convention was even outed as a
predator. Emily attests to having
circled around the outside of the hotel
on a Skype call with their best friend
and wanting to come home. They didn't
because they alleged to having very
strict parents and didn't want to be
banned from cons forever. After this,
according to them, they remained in the
lobby for the rest of the night,
remembering even sleeping there. Emily
did post a picture of the convention the
next day. It should be noted that Emily
posted to social media at both events
after the incidents were said to have
happened, but that's really what we have
for hard data here and full-on
testimony. Let's go over some of the
more inference-based things in the
testimony. Quote unquote, the first time
interacting with any sort of celebrity
is technically inaccurate. Emily has
been on Dr. Phil in an episode that was
aired in 2011. Now, I can easily see why
Dr. Phil would not be immediately
thought of as a celebrity. And if you
ask many people, especially young people
who have been on Dr. Phil, they describe
it as particularly traumatic. The Dr.
Phil experience is a whole wormhole of
controversies in and of itself that we
don't have time to get into. He is a man
accused of not having a therapy license
and yet acting like one on TV, focusing
more on entertainment than the health of
the people he interacts with. But he is
by definition a celebrity. The other odd
thing here is being starruck. Emily also
repeatedly claimed that Saber Spark kept
saying that the two of them even dating
would be wrong. So, let's talk about
where Saber Spark stood in 2012. He was
not the super mega ultra YouTuber that
he is now. He didn't have 2 million
subscribers at least. Even in the Brony
analyst circuit, he was not at the top
of the hill. I would have thought about
Digi Brony, Josh Scorcher, honestly,
even his longtime friend Pelio Steno
before I thought of Sabers Spark. That
being said, Sabers Spark was not a no
one at the time either. I mentioned
Everfree Radio a couple of times
already. Paleo Stano and Sabers Spark
were a part of this collective and had
associations with Dusty Catat and AC
Racefest. AC created Brony's React,
which was incredibly successful in its
heyday. So, Saber Spark wasn't a no one.
I mean, he was a part of this whole
panel in Canterlot Gardens. It is also
worth mentioning that brony fame or
horse fame as it was called worked a
little bit differently than general
internet whatevers. People did flock to
even smaller individuals and it didn't
take a lot to get wildly successful
within the community. I myself
practically did Wikipedia style recaps
of episodes and even I got a degree of
horse fame. On the other hand, we have
to consider the time period. This
allegedly took place in 2012 and in the
previous 13 years, our cultural
attitudes have changed a lot. These
days, there's a ton of argument and
debate about when it's okay for any kind
of celebrity or even a YouTuber to do
things with their fans. date them,
engage in sexual behavior, so on. Back
in 2012, it would have been at least
strange for Saber Spark to be concerned
about power dynamics. This discussion
really became mainstream in the wake of
Me Too later in the decade. In 2012,
with very few exceptions, being a
YouTuber wasn't even a real job to the
wider public. To be fair, Emily says
that it wasn't her saying it would have
been wrong for the two of them to date.
It was allegedly Sabers Spark saying
this. So, I did ask for alternative
theories. We considered the fact that
maybe it was an affair, but it didn't
seem like Saber Spark was dating anyone
at the time. At the very least, we
couldn't find any information that he
was. Emily herself suggested that maybe
it was because of the age gap, but at no
point was she ever accusing that Saber
Spark thought that she was under the age
of 18 or anything like that. Saber Spark
was 24 at the time and she was 18 and
that is a significant age gap. But once
again, considering the time period, I
don't know how taboo anyone would have
felt dating an 18-year-old just in
general. I am also aware that a lot of
people speculate that Emily might be
bitter that a previous relationship
didn't work out and that might be why
she's doing this. The testimonies
themselves do delve into a lot of a
parasocial crush and the possibility
that she wishes things turned out
differently than they did. By her own
admission, she believes that consent may
have been implied because of said crush.
Now, people can be sexually assaulted by
someone that they have a crush on. They
can be taken to a place that they are
not comfortable with. And I will also
state this because I think this is
relevant to this argument. Emily
currently has a partner that she does
seem very comfortable with. That doesn't
make this point of view impossible. I
just personally think it makes it less
likely. No matter which way you slice
incident one, it's going to be a he said
she said story. It allegedly took place
in a hotel room with no witnesses. And
while there are certainly things that
you can question, certain statements
that sound odd, there are no outward
contradictions. And one of those
questions that we should probably nip in
the bud immediately is why don't you
just go to the police after 2020? I
think that some people do understand the
view of being hesitant to go to the
police a little bit more. But to start
with, some people are just very
uncomfortable with police officers in
general and in many cases justifiably
so. But the best way I can describe it
is like this. After something traumatic
happens, the last thing on many people's
minds is trying to prove it. And
sometimes, even in the instant, you
can't prove it. If someone runs over
your dog, would your first inclination
be to try and write down the license
plate number of the car that hit it?
That being said, going to the police
after something terrible happens is,
generally speaking, the correct course
of action. To be forward with you, if
this is where the story ended, I
probably wouldn't be making this video
at all. There's not much a YouTuber can
do with a he said, she said story that's
not their own. At the very least, it's a
very big risk to handle at all. But the
big issue is that people are going to
have their own immediate biases and you
can't really shake them away. You know,
you've got the believe all victims crowd
versus the I want to see the goddamn
footage before I believe you crowd. But
we do have one more incident to look
over and luckily for us, there's
actually more stuff to look over with
that one. Chapter 4, the second
incident, early November EQLA 2012. Once
again, I'm going to be pulling the
allegation directly from the KP video. I
will state ahead of time once again the
date in the original allegation is
wrong. Emily later updated this to have
occurred at the very start of November
in 2012. I will also state again that
these are allegations and all parties
are to be presumed innocent until proven
guilty in a court of law. I maintained
the friendship until a second occurrence
happening at a completely different
Ponycon in 2013. This time we met in a
public space but had no one around and
talked for a while. He kept bringing up
the prospects of us starting a
relationship, but how it felt wrong. He
would grab my hand, saying how it felt
so right, only to push my hand away,
saying, "But so wrong." I had decided
that my crush on him was something I
needed to get over because I felt that
my emotions were being toyed with. He
then suggested going to a more public
space around others, and we went into
the elevator to go up to the lobby of
the Ponycon Hotel. As soon as the door
closed, Saber Spark forcefully shoved me
against the wall and shoved his tongue
down my throat. It scared me and
actually hurt, triggering another attack
of dissociation. Once again, he did not
ask for consent when throwing me into
this situation. Once the doors opened
and people were present, this led me to
feel very embarrassed.
He got off me and took my hand and
guided me towards the stairs to go back
down to where we just were and into a
men's restroom where he pulled his pants
down and guided my hands and head to
perform oral sex on him. I was afraid of
denying him because of past experiences
with sexual assault. So, I did it to get
it over with without wanting to cause a
problem where he would ejaculate on my
face, apologize profusely, and then
offer the same handshake as he did at
the con I initially met him, saying,
"Friends." Despite pretending I was
fine, I had slowly begun pulling away
from Saber Spark. I cried that night
while staying with a friend, but waited
for that friend to fall asleep so no one
could hear me, and I would cry for
months, feeling ashamed of myself for
putting myself in a compromising
situation with someone I hardly knew. I
had always felt taken advantage of by
him and tried being friendly and
pretending nothing was wrong because it
was all I knew how to do. I would blame
myself for the interactions for years,
only opening up to a few close people,
questioning if consent was implied
because of my crush and unwillingness
and fear to outright stop the advances
because of how uncomfortable I felt. I
understand that there is a possibility
that he felt consent was implied because
he knew I had a crush on him. However,
he did not once ask for consent directly
and was instead thrown into these sexual
encounters, usually very suddenly. There
were no discussions about the power
dynamic between us as a popular content
creator and a fan at any time, and my
parasocial connection to him and not
wanting someone I was a fan of to hate
me if I rejected him, leaving me afraid
to stop his advances. Over time, I grew
increasingly distant and would
eventually end contact completely. I
don't feel safe enough to fully come
forward because I don't want his fans
and friends or even him to harass or
contact me publicly. I wish to stay
anonymous so I can avoid the anxiety and
stress of being targeted by either him,
his friends, and especially his fans as
Saber Spark has over 2 million
subscribers. And even sharing my story
at all has me feeling really afraid. I
have seen other instances of Saber Spark
using his enormous platform to confront
people online. he has had conflict with.
I have also witnessed several instances
of his friends attempting to justify him
and others actions. I was not made aware
of his jokes about consent and his
recent behavior involving Chris until
only recently and had left my stomach
and knots. I please ask above all else
for my privacy to be respected. I don't
wish to publicly defend my personal
experience and just wish to share my
experience. This concludes the accuser's
initial statement on incident 2. This
was the focal point of most of our
investigation because we actually had
something to look at.
Start running now, ladies and gentlemen,
because Equestria LA AC Race Fest. I'm
going to vlog it. I am going to
video
log it. This is AC Racebest, host and
creator of Bronius React and notable
friend of Saberspark at the time at
least. He went to EQ LA that year in
Anaheim, California, and vlogged the
whole thing. The vlogs are actually
still up on his channel, but they've
also been combined and re-uploaded in a
corrected aspect ratio by deleted Brony
Video Archives. It's shitty 2012, like
140p hand quality. A little tidbit, I'm
about to get a new video camera, so the
formatting on this one's a little bit
off as you're noticing. You see these
black balls all over, but there is film
evidence that we can look at for this
one. And yes, we did archive it. Also
relevant, this is the calendar of
November 2012. The convention was meant
to happen over the weekend, the 3rd and
4th, Saturday and Sunday. Technically
speaking, technically speaking, AC
starts recording on the night of the
1st. Now, you ask yourselves, why is he
putting this up today? This is this is a
well, whenever I get this up, but I'm,
you know, this I'm I'm filming this on a
Thursday. Halloween was yesterday. Saber
Spark is also talked about in this
footage. am going to see if I can sneak
up on Everree radios Final Draft, Dusty
Cat, and Saber Spark. We found Saber
Spark, Dusty, and Final Draft on my
phone, and they were already gone. And
back at their
hotel, AC also talks about attending the
premiere of Wreck-It Ralph, likely
referring to a midnight screening where
it first aired in most locations on
November 2nd, 2012. Let's walk, folks. I
just came out of seeing the movie Wreck
and Ralph. I know this isn't pony
related in any way. What time is it?
2:20. 2:20 in the morning. He doesn't
manage to find Sabers Spark here, but
it's quite clear that Saber Spark and
the others have at least arrived in the
area. Now, one thing that a lot of
people have noticed is that Emily has
said that the second attack allegedly
happened on the second, the day before
the convention proper. However, both
parties did arrive early. So, let's talk
about the second. We will go through
this day beat by beat with what
information we have. The hotel was
apparently the Anaheim Hilton which
provided discounts to the coners. It was
also basically across the street from
the local Disney park and that's where
Sabers Sparking Company spent most of
their day. On the list of bad ideas.
Here comes the first one. Setting up my
camera. This camera is not going to
stay. It's not going to stay. Ladies and
gentlemen, it is Friday. The Friday
before Equestria LA. One day less than
24 hours before the convention begins.
AC Race Best drives the place alone and
meets Saber Spark there. This is
sometime after 4:45 p.m.
Traffic. Well, not too bad. It's
4:46 and things have actually been
moving pretty good on this freeway so
far. So, now at a point, Saber Spark
mentions that his cell phone dies.
Saber, your phone died. Why would it do
that? Plug it in last night. Oh, it only
charged for like 30. He tweets again
later that night. Now, this kind of
breaks the timeline a bit, but I do
think that we need to skip forward a
little and establish something
immediately because this thing threw
everyone off. Saber Spark's tweet here
looks like it was made at November 3rd
at almost 1:00 in the morning. Now,
Emily alleged that the incident happened
after 10 p.m., like shortly after 10
p.m., and she alleged that Saber Spark
texted her to get her to go down into
the hotel's basement. Now, that is a
wild time discrepancy of 3 hours where
Saber Spark's cell phone was apparently
dead. This is what KP is referring to
when she says this. By the way, none of
like the things that that have been
pointed out to me doesn't make any
sense.
The timeline is questionable,
and I'll admit that at this time, we had
at least heard some version of Emily's
controversies. And with this apparent
discrepancy, it was not looking good for
her. However, Phineas let us all in on
something that we all should have
figured out a lot sooner. Time zones,
you idiots. The time that a tweet is
posted shows your local time, not the
local time of the sender. So, I went
into my computer settings, changed it to
Anaheim's local time, Pacific United
States, and look at that. Sabers Spark
sent this tweet out at 9:59 p.m. his
time, November 2nd. This doesn't
automatically mean that Emily's
allegation is true. The only thing that
it means is that there is no obvious
contradiction when Emily says that Saber
Spark texted her because at 10 p.m. his
phone was charged and he was tweeting. I
also must let it be known that Emily did
not change her story when confronted on
this mistaken discrepancy. She did not
change her story even when we were
telling her that the story was likely
impossible. Everything else that happens
at Disney isn't important at the moment.
Saber Spark and AC carp pull together as
they drive away. And luckily for us, the
camera does occasionally hit the car's
clock. The problem is that it's shitty
2012 hand cam by someone just casually
recording at night. Here's the best
quality images that we were able to get.
We believe that this is roughly 920 and
we asked a dozen of people. However, if
you don't agree with us, I don't blame
you. If that's not enough, after driving
for a brief time, AC Racebest is walking
with a camera when it hits the moon.
It's fairly low in the sky. And moonrise
in Anaheim, California on November 2nd,
2012 was roughly around 900 p.m. Passing
the meridian around 3:00 a.m. And this
is very clearly not moonset, which would
have been the next morning. Emily
alleges the attack happened at sometime
around after 10:00 p.m. So, what appears
to be roughly after 9, the group gets
food somewhere, and Saber Spark is seen
and heard on camera walking with them.
Really fat Tyrannosaurus didn't stop
eating. What if they were smart and they
try to stop the comet, but they fail?
There's like a dinosaur version of Bruce
Willis. So, so what are we doing right
now, Saber? We're going to go meet up
with I think food. We can't tell the
exact location because this camera came
from the depths of hell, but they passed
by a logo that looks like this. And the
interior of the place they're at looks
like this. Now, Dusty Cat was tweeting
at this location, so it clearly did have
some form of Wi-Fi. And the woman that
he's filmed with does appear in the
photo on his Twitter to this day. This
tweet was posted shortly after midnight.
Time zones accounted for. However, one
thing that has to be noted, Saber Spark
is not filmed at this location at all.
If he was there, he's simply not on
camera. We don't see him. We don't hear
him. When the camera cuts forward again
to after 2:00 in the morning, AC is
driving in his car alone, which means
that Saber Spark needed to find another
way back to the hotel. He may have
gotten a ride with someone else. It may
have been close enough for him to walk
to the hotel. We don't know. It should
also be noted that places with Wi-Fi,
such as McDonald's or outside bars, they
don't often give customers the ability
to charge their electronics because
people would be there all day and the
business owners don't want that and it
would drive the electric bill up. So,
Saber Spark would have needed to find
some way to charge this phone before 10
p.m. Now, some places like theme parks
do sell portable chargers. However,
Saber Spark specifically tweeted at 10
p.m. that his phone had come back alive
at that specific time. And while we see
many people using their electronics, we
see no one charging their electronics,
especially since this whole place
appears to be outside. Another thing of
note, we don't exactly see people eating
here, which means that this was likely a
very confusing cut where AC race best
jumped forward in time with a lot of
missing context. So, where does all of
this leave us? It means that as far as I
can tell, Saber Spark was filmed up to
about 10 p.m. But if he was filmed after
that, AC Racefest didn't put it in the
vlog, which I got to say is quite
frustrating. But what does it mean for
real? It means at the very least with
what we have publicly available, it is
not impossible for things to have
occurred the way that Emily does
describe them. Now, that doesn't
automatically mean that it happened,
just that with what we know, it's not
impossible. Remember, the incident
allegedly happened at the hotel. It
allegedly started in the elevator and
allegedly ended in a men's public
restroom in the basement. Once again,
areas that don't really have cameras.
The logical question is to ask if
there's any missing footage here at all,
but this is a vlog from 13 years ago.
And considering its quality, I don't
exactly know how usable it would be. I'm
sure that some people are going to find
the fact that Saber Spark isn't filmed
after 10 p.m. suspicious. And I'm sure
that other people will find Saber Spark
being out and about at 9:00 p.m.
suspicious in the other direction. I'll
recap what we can actually see and what
we do know. Saber Spark's phone was
charged at 10 p.m. and he was able to
get Wi-Fi at that time. He was able to
tweet on camera sometime after 900 p.m.
He says that the group is going to meet
up with food. Wherever they went to get
food likely wasn't the place the camera
cut forward to. It could have been
another restaurant or it could have been
the hotel itself. I can call the
timeline tight and I definitely will
call the gaps in the timeline
frustrating at no fault of either Saber
Spark or Emily or even AC race best
because I doubt he was expecting this to
be used as evidence a decade later. But
unlike KP, I can't call the timeline
quote unquote questionable with the
facts that are on the table. And
speaking of that, I do want to give my
final thoughts on this threat. And it is
a threat.
So, make a decision soon or I will
publicly confirm it was you. You have 24
hours. Even when we believed that
Saber's phone was dead until 1:00 in the
morning, hours after Emily said that she
was texted, and at the same time we
believed her to be not of sound mind, do
you know what my team didn't do? We
didn't threaten her. We did confront
her, but we didn't do any of this cloak
and dagger [\h__\h] There is no excuse for
this. I'll state on the record that very
few of my team believed Emily the entire
time. And when all is said and done,
some of them still don't. Some of them
do believe her, as you can tell in the
interview, but some of them do not. Here
is the crux of the matter. Could Emily
Jones have specifically scoured through
all of this footage and come up with the
absolute perfect timeline to create
something impossible to tell the
objective truth of the matter? Yes, that
is a possibility. All of the information
we had was public in some shape or form.
Can I objectively state that Emily Jones
was lying? No, I can't. The reality is
that there are only two people on Earth
who truly know if this happened or it
didn't, at least with all of the
evidence that is currently available. It
sucks, but that's unfortunately the
reality of most alleged crimes. And
lying isn't even the only possibility.
Emily may have been manipulated by bad
actors into thinking a certain way about
certain events. And she also may have
given herself a new perspective on old
events in hindsight. Can I say that
she's doing that objectively? No, I
can't. And I know that's going to be
disappointing for a lot of people who
are looking into this and want an
objective answer. But for this one
specifically, you're going to have to
use your own discretion to truly
determine what you believe. My goal here
was not to prove something one way or
another because from the start, we knew
that it was likely impossible. Our goal
was to detach serious matters from
someone who wasn't treating it as
seriously as she should have been. Here
is what I'll say as a verdict on this.
With the publicly available evidence,
it's not impossible. That doesn't mean
that it happened. It just means that it
could have possibly happened. And I keep
saying the publicly available answer
because there is always the possibility
that either the parties are withholding
things. I can also say that Emily Jones
is a real person who at the very least
does have something to lose if she was a
proven liar. Regardless of the initial
anonymity, she's out in the open now.
She's not the figment of the
imaginations of Brony Fandote and KP.
Remember, Saber Spark spent much of his
own response video talking about Brony
Fandote and KP. Like, he didn't bring up
any of this timeline stuff. And on one
level, I can see why he did it. It makes
his argument less convincing, but at the
same time, I can see why it would be a
bad idea to establish that he was at
these locations at all. But there was
something else that crossed my mind when
I actually watched through the footage
because a lot of these vlogs make Saber
Sparks response video strange in a new
way. And we're going to go over that
next. Chapter five. It's called Creeper
Fever. One thing that confused me about
Saber Spark's response video is that he
didn't seem to bring up any evidence
about the assault allegations
specifically. Granted, he didn't have to
because there was no evidence directly
against him. However, the Disney vlogs
do exist and they're very compelling to
this whole case. The videos are still up
on AC Racebest's channel. It begs the
question, why wasn't this mentioned at
all? Even if it's not a perfect alibi,
he could just say, "I was at Disney the
whole day." It'd give a wide swath of
the audience enough of a reason to doubt
the accusations on merit alone. On top
of that, for much of the day, Saber
Spark was with people, one of which was
recording. There may still exist footage
that was not used in the vlogs. I doubt
it, but it is possible. Like, it's not a
perfect alibi, but there is clearly ammo
here that he left on the table. I can't
say why Saber Spark didn't use any of
this, but I might have a guess. True.
She's a boring. Oh my gosh. So, tell us
more about your hair, Michelle.
My hair sounds a This is Michelle
Craber. If that name sounds familiar,
she was the voice actress for Apple
Bloom in Friendship is Magic. She was
born September 7th, 1999. So, on
November 2nd, 2012, she had recently
turned 13 years old. Michelle Cber's
parents are mentioned in the vlogs.
Know as well that Mando Pony and the
Creepers were also hanging out there
yesterday. So, we might, who knows, we
might see some uh cameos by some people,
but they don't seem to appear much on
camera. However, someone else does. This
man here, he walks in and it literally
looks like he's about to give Michelle a
hug. And then they walk in tandem. This
is not Saber Spark. The shirt's
different and he's wearing a hat, but
it's not Michael, Michelle's father. And
he's not in the group photo that Saber
Spark took of the event, but he is in
the vlogs spending much of the day with
Saber Spark and the Everfree Radio cast
as well as Michelle Kber, this
13-year-old girl that he is not related
to. So, who is this man?
Saberia, you're watching Every Free
Network. You're watching Every Free
Network.
This is Pony and you are watching
Everree Network.
[Music]
[Applause]
This is Mando Pony making very gross
comments that you shouldn't be making
about any 13-year-old. Do you now have
the creeper fever? Oh, I've had the
creeper fever. I've had the creeper
fever. It's just now I'm contaminated.
Creeper. Michelle infects everyone. make
you feel good, sir. And so does Monique.
And so does Michael. Monique and Michael
are the names of Michelle's parents. So
tell us more about your hair, Michelle.
This is all very, very creepy. Some
people might argue that these comments
aren't a big deal. Like, we're seeing
more than is actually there. But I have
to ask you this question if you think
that way. What the hell do a bunch of
guys in their early to mid20s have in
common with a 13-year-old girl that
they're not even related to? Yes, she
was an actress, a celebrity, and yes,
they're probably all fans of hers, but
like there's a difference between
meeting a person like that at a
convention, and well, just hanging out
with them for the day. And it looks like
the whole Everree radio cast is just
spending time taking it all in
nonchalantly. It should also be noted
that while I was looking for the video
where they're on the River Rapids ride
and Mondo Pony actually announces who he
was, I learned that it seemed like both
Michelle and Mondo Pony had had
appearances on the Everfree Radio
channel.
Um, and yeah, I I think it's it's
awesome. I've actually this is my first
encounter truly with the Creepers. I got
a hug from all of them. Even Dad. Even
the dad. They're like the sweetest, most
I can tell. Dude, she was a 13-year-old
girl, not a Disney mascot. Yes, she was
a celebrity. I can't imagine any time
where this would have been appropriate.
Like, people made [\h__\h] up jokes about
children back in the early 2010s on the
internet, but as you can clearly see
from the footage, this is not the
internet. This is out in public. And the
whole Everree radio group at the very
least doesn't seem to be off-put by any
of this. Now, Mando Pony, if you don't
know, in 2020 was accused of having
inappropriate conversations with minors,
cheating on his wife, among other
things, because once you hear the
important stuff, it's pretty easy to see
that this is basically undeniable
evidence that Andy both sent and
solicited nude photos from this girl.
The first one contains a straightup
admission that Andy wanted to uh do
Kaye, followed by a completely
unsolicited photo of his bare ass.
Another screenshot, one of the most
damning, contains a snippet of a
conversation in which Andy straight up
asks her for a nude photo, followed by
him immediately telling her to keep it
secret and that Andy doesn't want anyone
finding out about him sending her
inappropriate photos. And even worse, in
the next screenshot after that, he says,
"It's probably wrong of me to be
attracted to you, but I can't help it.
As long as it's kept quiet and as long
as you're comfortable, is that okay? And
it won't progress beyond just
flirts/lude moments." XD had been having
marital issues and that while he
apparently still loved her, he hadn't
been intimate with her in over a year
and felt as though their connection was
growing weaker, which of course is a
completely reasonable justification for
cheating on your wife with a high
schooler. While there was apparently an
investigation that didn't lead to any
sort of conviction, pretty much all of
his associations distanced themselves
from him, and his fan base this day and
age is largely non-existent. I probably
would have created some distance, too,
if someone I knew was making jokes about
a 13-year-old girl infecting people.
Mondo Pony would have been around 24 at
the time of this footage, if you're
wondering. So, this is weird. I think
that most people would consider it
weird, but I will state there is no real
evidence to how much Sabers Spark or any
of the Everfree Radio people had to any
of this. We don't know what anyone in
the group was thinking, Saber Spark
included. All I can say is that I
personally wouldn't be caught dead
around whatever the [\h__\h] is going on
around here. At the very least, this is
all incredibly weird. However, it does
seem to be part and parcel of the
bizarre environment the Michelle
specifically and many other child stars
have grown up in. You probably been
expecting me to talk about the Black
Riven stuff for this whole video. I have
mentioned him a couple of times as it is
the one controversy that seems to have
stuck to Satar's reputation. The thing
that people seem to be aware of this day
and age is that Gabriel C. Brown, stage
named Black Griffin, has been accused of
meeting his now wife, Claire, when she
was 14 years old. They got married when
she was an adult, and ever since then,
this has been the target of suspicion
and rumors, namely that people are
alleging that Gabe groomed his wife.
Saber Spark himself stepped in and said
that the relationship was weird but
above board basically and it's known
that he was at the wedding of Clare and
Gabe. Now I need to pick and choose my
words very carefully here. Claire claims
that she is not groomed. Michelle also
vouches that nothing weird happened and
that everything was essentially above
board. If you've been paying attention
to the KP story at all, Becket from the
channel Cop and Se actually got both of
them on interview for them to give their
side of the story of this whole thing. I
do think that if you're concerned at all
with the Black Iran story, it is worth
at least hearing them out. Also, so
there's absolutely no confusion on the
context of this, uh, this is not a
collaboration project. Beckett and my
team did talk with each other and we
exchanged evidence, but each of us
independently had our own investigation.
We reached out to separate people, had
different approaches, that kind of
thing. But I do see the videos as
companion pieces, which is why I keep
bringing up his video. Also, small
detail, Claire is not Michelle. And the
most weird [\h__\h] I hear about seems to
occur around Michelle and not Claire.
And it's Michelle getting these weird
interactions with Mond Pony. Now, I do
know the counterpoints here. These girls
grew up in a bizarre environment.
There's clear footage of that here. It
looks like Michelle is going in to greet
this man who is not related to her with
what appears to be a hug. This woman
here like might be Mon'nique Cber, but
like this is the closest time to seeing
either of Michelle's parents anywhere in
this footage. I've come through it and
besides this one cameo, I can't seem to
find them. As Mondo Pony takes Michelle
around Disney, a man who years later was
accused of using secret social media
accounts to groom young girls. They
clearly did not have a normal childhood
and things were normalized, they clearly
should not have been. There's also the
argument that when grooming is
successful, the alleged victim will
claim to not be a victim. That is the
goal of the activity, to make victims
not feel like victims. There are plenty
of stories where people who will defend
those who have victimized them, not just
in cases of grooming, but in examples
of, say, abusive relationships. We've
all at least heard of the story of
someone who has stayed with a violent
partner because of any number of
excuses. Here is the reality. Even if
the worst of the worst happened, Claire
and Michelle are adults now. Even if the
worst of the worst has happened, they
have the final call and decision about
what happened to them, especially
without super concrete proof. And I use
the word proof intentionally. There is
evidence that things are weird, but we
still don't have a smoking gun, as it
were. And I will be honest, most of the
evidence in regards to Gabe and Clare is
circumstantial. And for the sake of
argument, even if the worst of the worst
happened, harassing Clare, especially to
quote unquote get her out of her
brainwashing, is not going to solve
Jack's [\h__\h] It's really not. And some
weird internet rando is not going to
change her mind after a long series of
decisions supported by her environment
and her circle of peers, especially when
the standard bearer of the accusations
comes from people like Brony Fand. Now,
back to the matter at hand. Saber Spark
was within his right to defend Black
Griffin. That is his right. Am I saying
that he is right to do so, though? In my
opinion, no. I want to get the order of
events as right as possible. The
relationship between Gabe and Claire
starts publicly and then people get
speculative. Saber Spark steps in and he
defends them. After this, there are a
bunch of other allegations against Black
Griffin. The Google doc is written and
videos are made on Black Rifen. And if
Saber Spark stayed entirely quiet, to
some extent, I would understand that. We
probably wouldn't be talking about this
at all. However, in his response video,
he does muster up at least the barest
level of defense for both Black Griffin
and Billy Bustup and launch vicious
harassment campaigns against multiple
online creators such as Billy Bustup,
Prince Whatever, and Black Griffin.
Billy Bustup is an indevelopment indie
game that is being targeted because they
have refused to fire Black Griffin. Now,
my team and I actually went through the
Black Griffin Google document as
thoroughly as we could, and I will say
immediately, the most damning
allegations are, well, without evidence.
Destiny even states that she doesn't
have evidence. Now, whether or not you
or I believe the allegations, look at
where we are currently. There is
certainly a lot of allegations, but
quantity of allegations does not improve
quality of allegations. I'll be as blunt
as I can. The Google document comes
across as a gish gallop, a rhetorical
technique where you try to overwhelm
your opponent with a bunch of arguments,
where the focus is not to win the
argument, but make the arguments
impossible to respond to. Now, let me be
as clear as I can. Defending Black
Griffin still affects my opinion of
Saber Spark's character in the present
day. And I'll tell you why. The most
damning stuff is accusations that are
technically without evidence. However,
there are things that do stand that are
clear-cut, like the Deviant Art comments
where Black Griffin was flirtatious with
a minor who had their age in the
profile. And in many of the videos and
many of the tweets, he is saying creepy
[\h__\h] with minors present. And then
there's this video where he's um doing
things with Michelle Cber. Once again,
this underageed girl that he's not
related to. the concert. Part two is the
reception where we get to say hi to
performance and get signed and
photograph. Oh my gosh. All of us for a
marvelous turkey dinner. Y'all better be
buying the tickets cuz I need to get
myself a new prop.
If you want to expand your day, you can
opt into other events such as a comedy
worship with Saber and Race and us. I
can't judge the intention or the effect
on those around him and I can't say that
he's a criminal, but I can say that he
is creepy. Very creepy. Where's me in
all of this? Huh? You're not powerful.
I have a horn. So do I. But I can't do
anything with it. Keep it in your hand.
And I could say that making any comments
like that. And I could say that watching
any of this footage just makes me
really, really concerned. I personally
would not be defending this man. Even if
all of those other allegations are
false, Sabers Spark has every right to
defend this man. He may even personally
believe that Gabriel did not groom
Clare. He may even be right. We really
don't know. I can't even say that he
knew or believed of the additional stuff
like the weird as hell comments in the
Deviant Art messages. But in that case,
it would be a level of negligence to not
know that while defending someone. Even
if you have a problem with the source,
you should at least know what all the
claims are. To be as fair as I can, what
Saber Spark literally does in his
response video is just say that Black
Griffin is a content creator being
harassed by Brony Fanote. but he does
not state what that reason might be.
Essentially downplaying the level of the
scenario. It's fine if you believe that
Black Griffin doesn't deserve to be
harassed. And I reiterate, don't harass
anyone. It's not going to solve
anything. But I also believe that it's
important to know why he's being
harassed. And all of these comments that
he's made are attached to that and
whether or not Saber Spark actually knew
about any of these comments. Any defense
of Black Griffin, especially now, are
attached to these comments. even the
most minor of defenses. And it's not
like Sabers Spark or his team is above
looking into dark stories, as much of
his content is about hard-hitting pieces
on dark subject matter and dark
characters. I'd also be remissed if I
didn't mention that I find the timing of
Saber Sparks retirey message convenient.
This is my own personal opinion, and it
does not mean anything objectively, but
throughout the spring of this year, the
Black Rifen fires got a lot higher. The
Google document is released and two
videos on the man are released that get
some level of mainstream attention.
Regardless of their quality and the
standard bearers, the story is getting
mainstream attention and many people are
publicly distancing themselves from
Gabe. In the midst of all of this,
Saberspark in the month of April lets it
out that he's only got like 2 years of
video making in him left and is planning
on retiring to start an animation
studio. In my personal opinion, I find
the timing interesting, especially
because Sabers Spark, outside of his
ever free radio friends, doesn't seem to
have shown much goodwill with the
cartoon community. Even ignoring KP, you
might not believe this, but a lot of
people in this niche who do what I do,
do not like Saber Spark as a content
creator. I won't name names because no
one wants to be in any part of this
drama, but a wide swath of content
creators find Sabers Spark to be a
negative influence in our niche.
Speaking of the Black Griffin thing,
there is the thing making content about
predators in the animation industry
while defending someone who is allegedly
a groomer or in some cases just not
being open about everything you do know.
That can be considered a level of
hypocrisy. But even that even that is
not what I'm talking about as to why
many cartoon reviewers do not like Saber
Spark. I'll tell you what the big
problem is. One day this guy will be
talking about My Little Pony. He
spearheaded Sleepy Time Reanimated, a
project revolving around Blueie, a show
for preschoolers. Adults watch both of
them, but their show is aimed at very
young children. Then on another day,
Saber Spark will be reviewing literal
animated porn. Like, not just adult
cartoons, but literal X-rated films. He
finds out that no matter how hard you
censor porn, you can't put it on
YouTube. And so, he literally uploads it
to Pornhub. It'll be on Patreon,
Newgrounds, and Pornhub because
Why the hell not?
Then he tries to link it in the
description of a YouTube video, but he
learns that that's also toos. You can't
link to porn either in YouTube. Doing
stuff like this is how you alienate
yourself from a community. His
thumbnails can be so risque that they
look like they come from 2008 where
people just put boobs on screen and call
it a day. And the man finds sex so funny
or fascinating or I don't even know that
all he can think about when looking at
the stupid innocent McDonald's ad. He's
going on about breeding. For me, for
some reason, I can really go for a
cheeseburger right about now with a side
of breeding, too. I get that the joke of
much of his content is quote unquote
porn. It's not a funny joke, especially
in this medium. Yes, adults watch
animated content and they watch videos
about animated content, but we also have
to realize that 13-year-olds also watch
animated content and they watch content
about animation. Sabrespark goes on to
complain that YouTube is putting
pornographic ads on his content. Jeez, I
wonder why. Here, here's a little tip
for you. You can manually turn that off.
Like YouTube gives us options of ad
categories that we want to refuse. For
instance, I do not allow alcohol and
gambling on my channel because addiction
is a sore spot for me. But if the porn
ads are such a problem, go to channel
monetization, watch page ads, ad
categories, and here are the ones you
want to turn off. You're set. I have
problems with Saber Spark's character.
Does that automatically mean that he's
guilty of sexual assault? No. But I
think this is relevant. And let me put
it this way. Saber Spark used a video
about his own allegations to say that
there was a harassment campaign against
Billy Bustup and Black Griffin. And he
was so determined to do so that he
didn't realize that Billy Bustup is not
an online creator. Billy Bustup is a
video game that is developed by Giddy
Goat Games, which I guess you can call
the Billy Bustup team, but Billy Bustup
itself is not a content creator. It's
like calling Minecraft itself a content
creator. And once again, Saber Spark
himself used the tweet of Brony Fandon
linking to a Google document that he did
not write as an example of his
harassment of Black Riven. I am fully
willing to believe that Brony Fandon has
harassed Black Griffin. The Brony
Fandone account is known to harass
people that they believe to be a
criminal or believe to be defending
criminals. Bonk will likely harass me
when he gets out of the hospital. Once
again, linking to a Google document is
not an example of harassment, especially
in a scenario where actual examples were
likely easy to find. I do see this
portion of the video as an attempt to
try and defend Gabriel. Saber Spark's
own words. I think taking this time
especially to do this speaks to a larger
problem. Honestly, it's not even a moral
thing. Like, it's a sense of pragmatism.
For the sake of argument, let's say that
everything levied at Black Griffin is
false. All 100% of it. And let's argue
that he's the most innocent, perfect man
on earth at the brunt of a bizarre,
deranged harassment campaign because
people want to marry Sweetie Bell
online. A good chunk of the public
believes that Black Griffin is a
groomer, especially before Beckett's
video came out, when Saber's response
video came out. These people cannot seem
to be convinced otherwise. They don't
believe the alleged victims, Michelle
and Claire, when they say that nothing
happened. This campaign has gotten to
the point where people are
disassociating with Black Griffin
publicly and the people who aren't are
getting harassment campaigns of their
own. True or false, people believe the
worst in Black Rifen. So, when you're
the one in the hot seat, defending
yourself from sexual assault
allegations, even invoking the man's
name at all, it's just [\h__\h] mental.
Let me put it this way in a way that I
think everyone can understand. Chris
Hansen is a man with a ton of
controversies and has lost pretty much
all respect in all regards. He's a clown
and he will be for the rest of his life.
And you could find this through easily
accessible dirt. However, with that
being said, if I were trying to defend
myself from predator allegations, the
last thing on earth I would want to say
is that Chris Hansen has been targeting
me for a while now. and just detached
from all of this. It's weird for Saber
Spark to still be defending Black
Griffin here in all places. This could
have possibly been his very last stand.
Like, it had to have crossed his mind at
some point that this response video had
a possibility of not working, a
possibility of not turning the tides.
With your dying breath, do you really
want it to be a defense of Black
Griffin? Do you feel that strongly about
this man? Especially because like
detached from morality, even detached
from the truth. Defending Black Rifen
here is a boneheaded move. It reminds
people of your biggest controversy prior
to this. You can't logic anyone into
believing your side on the Black Griffin
controversy. And there are so many other
points you could have gone to if you
wanted to go after Brony Fanunt, such as
his associations with Wootmaster. Watch
Becca's video for that. And honestly,
defending Black Griffin here, it's not
even a good defense for Gabriel. Like,
what am I supposed to get out of this?
Yeah, this guy who thinks Gabe is a
groomer is coming after me. But I'm
innocent, so that means Gabriel is
innocent, too.
Like, why? Why any of this? I do think
it's important to state the difficult
situation that Saber Spark is in in his
response video. He had the task of
trying to prove a negative, which you
can't do. Like, even with the timeline
and everything that we found, he'd still
recall things from over a decade ago.
And even if he could do that correctly
without the gaps in the footage, it'd
still just be his own word. And even if
he did find the footage, people could
say that it was altered or blah blah
blah. You can't prove a negative. So, I
can get why he's kind of reaching for
arguments in his response video because
even if he was totally 100% innocent,
you can't exactly prove that you didn't
do something. At least in a situation
like this where it really is he said
versus she said. However, I have to say
the arguments these reaching for are
weird. Technically speaking, Black
Griffin getting harassed by Brony
Fandone doesn't have anything to do with
Saber Spark. It's a what aboutism
argument. Like think about it. Even if
everything against Gabe is false and
everything that Saber Spark says about
Brony Fanon is true in regards to Gabe,
that doesn't automatically mean that
Saber Spark is innocent. You know what
I'm saying? Chapter 6. Proving KP rep.
There's one thing that's of a fairly
universal opinion. This is where Bonk,
Emily, and KP all agree. We should be
focusing on the actual allegations and
not the video. That was for all intents
and purposes a complete and utter train
wreck. I hope that spending 23 pages of
script on them is enough because I do
think this video would be incomplete if
we didn't at least talk about the video
in question. So, here's the events that
transpired behind the scenes. In 2015,
afficionado Chris is in a co-ed room
with KP at a convention. At some point
later, he gets fired and comes up with
this joke or story. Most people are
telling me that it's a joke, but
honestly, I really can't tell, and I'm
not taking anyone's word on it. He tells
a story where he did something very
inappropriate to KP's clothing and
shares the story with other former KP
staff. It's worth noting that KP does
have a lot of disgruntled former
workers. This video was mostly about
Saver Spark and I think I made that
clear like publicly, but when I opened
up my DMs, people just kept telling me
stuff about KP, like a lot of stuff
about bad experiences and apparent weird
[\h__\h] she's done. Stuff that's not
entirely relevant to the matter at hand.
And I I'm sure that other people will be
telling their stories at some point in
the future, but I want to stay focused.
In the 2020s, the story finally gets
back to Rachel. She confronts him in a
call with someone called Riddle of
Lightning. This call is allegedly
recorded without Chris's knowledge and
consent. I will also note that there is
a third party here, Riddle of Lightning.
He doesn't say anything, so I'm fairly
sure his purpose here was just to
record. Considering the Star Giant
video, you might be expecting me to say
a certain thing. I'm not going to say
that this is illegal because I I don't
know the exact scenario. I'm not even
going to say that Chris didn't deserve
it. I'm just stating a fact of the
matter. Chris was allegedly recorded
without his knowledge and consent. KP
sends this to Chris's bosses and seems
to be very, very surprised when they
don't do anything with this information.
Both of the bosses make it somewhat
clear that a big problem here is that
the recording was taken without Chris's
consent. And so KP goes on to make this
huge video starting roughly in late
2024. A lot of the video is about her
own beef with Chris, but she gets in
contact with some of the alleged victims
of DA Games. And towards the end of
March, Emily steps forward to are
encouraged by both Brony Fandon and Amy.
Both users of the Brony Fandone account
had direct access to the Emu Emmy
Discord account. And KP was talking with
it since the very beginning, and neither
of them did a background check on her or
until after the video exploded. KP was
told not to put in Emily's allegations.
She was told this by Lio Convoy. Then
that needs to be handled by the cops.
Like
period, like 100% period, that that
needs a police report filed today.
Here's the problem though, uh, with that
inherently. If that did happen, and
Saber did do that, he will by nature
know who it is.
So, if it gets out in any way, shape, or
form and a police report hasn't been
filed, she's going to be at risk. Like,
that's just the truth of the matter in
this. And it's unpleasant. It's ugly,
but that's the truth. KP, of course,
didn't seem to listen, as we all know
how that story ended. The video was
enlisted and then privated soon after,
but by that point, it was too late. The
damage was done. She seemed to really
want to get this video to the public as
is. For the entire month of March, they
didn't even bother to ask, "Are you sure
the dates are correct?" Now, it's known
that KP basically asked for a bunch of
assets and voice acting from various
places. And the common story is that no
one had any information about what the
video was about at all. From what I
could tell, each of the individuals
involved had a varying set of knowledge.
Like, the guy who voiced the Eggman meme
thing, he didn't even know that he was
being put in this, which is weird on the
face of it because that that's not even
the original meme. It's a cosplayer
doing a readover. No one really knows
why KP put that version in the video. I
actually had a hard time finding it. I
guess maybe because the voice sounds
more like Saber Spark than the original.
I really don't know. Some people only
apparently got context of their specific
little piece of the video. Like the
disclaimer, for example, probably only
got the disclaimer at the start. If you
want special insight, though, Lacy
Bedhead was featured in the video
reading an email. She did seem to get
more context than most seem to have
gotten, but it was still just random
chunks of information. Nobody truly knew
how bad the video would have become.
Meanwhile, Courtney Pete had more
extensive knowledge of the video that
seemingly anyone else had, but claims to
have not seen the video before it aired,
despite featuring in it heavily and
berating people in the premiere who did
not like it. Very few people had the
full context, and I believe people when
they say they didn't know X, Y, and Z.
But if I have to be absolutely frank, it
doesn't exactly absolve everyone of
everything. Jun the King's part of this
video especially sticks out to me
because that part specifically does not
need context to be bad. Here's what he
literally says. And just those lines
alone shows you the problem where it's
full of probably conflicting and soft
language, speculation, and the last
thing you'd expect in a June the King
video or any video about serious
allegations. It is not something that he
should have read on its own merit. Never
mind the construction of the rest of the
video. This is opposed to the email that
Lazy read or the disclaimers at the
start. Those were largely innocuous.
Which reminds me, in the June part,
there's this line here. Chris also tries
to steer the conversation to not include
too much explicitly, stating that quote,
"There is a baby in the other room."
This gives the impression that Chris in
the video is being quoted literally. He
is not. Chris literally says this,
right? And pardon my PD version, I have
a six-year-old in the other room. So So
what what's the deal here? Chris is
using this as an excuse to soften his
language and not quote the story
literally with all of its grotesque,
revoling details. And I want to be clear
and upfront, the story is gross and it's
a shameful thing that no one should ever
really be talking about. Why is this
slight of hand a big deal? because a
six-year-old and a baby are not the same
thing. Now, I will be frank. You should
not be talking about this kind of stuff
around a baby. But if you do, they're
probably not going to remember it.
Meanwhile, a six-year-old is going to be
repeating the story to all of their
friends the next day at school.
Intentionally or not, it changes the
dynamic of the excuse. This call was
recorded without Chris's knowledge or
consent. This is not the first time that
KP had done this. The Lily Orchard
video, she made that very clear. Now,
[\h__\h] Lily Orchard. But a lot of other
people have also speculated that she has
recorded other conversations without
consent. I have no proof of this, but
considering KP has done it twice now,
the speculation is extremely common.
Even in cases where this is not illegal,
it is bad form. And I'll tell you why.
When you record people without consent,
simply put, people become hesitant to
talk to you at all. even if you record
quote unquote bad people only because
then it's your perception of them that
they have to worry about and no one
wants that kind of headache because they
can't read your mind. It's bad ethics to
record even bad people without their
consent. In the video, KP states that
Chris should have known that the call
was being recorded because it was quote
unquote about safety. This is the very
same video that has a long segment by
Courtney Pete going on and on about how
implied consent is not a thing. KP also
went on later to state in the DMs with
Emily that implied consent is quote
unquote kind of BS. If I need to spell
it out for you, KP thought consent to be
recorded was implied in this
conversation. Consent is more than just
about sex. I hope you realize the entire
call itself is about Chris being
regretful and remorseful. At no point
does he ever say, "I didn't do it. You
deserved it. You bitch." He's saying all
the things that an offended party would
want to hear. I'm sorry. I shouldn't
have done that. It was wrong. It's
disgusting. and I'm sorry. He doesn't
even bring up that this happened years
ago. The only thing that he says in his
defense is that he's doing things to get
better, like going to therapy. Does
Chris deserve to be forgiven? I don't
know. That's not my call to make. Does
he deserve to be hunted down a decade
later by his ex- boss after doing this
grotesque, egregious thing and fired
from all of his jobs that he currently
has? That's not my call either. The only
comment I really have on this matter is
that the mercy you give to others tends
to be the mercy that you get from
others. The call itself makes some
really confusing points that makes it
hard to know where Rachel is coming from
exactly. KP appears to believe that
Chris is using the story to like fluff
himself up with other men. She directly
compares it to the Trump Billy Bush
thing almost as if Saber Spark or Will
from DA Games were supposed to be I
don't know impressed by it. Um as
analogy is kind of the the Trump locker
room talk and excuse my French but I
feel like that's kind of what what it
feels like. you kind of boast yourself
up around another guy and you know you
kind No, that's 100% accurate. That's a
very good analogy actually. The most I
ever see him is at conventions if he
happens to be at the same one. Okay. So,
you know, you're not in an environment
where this would have come up anyway.
Never. So, he would probably be unaware.
He's 100% unaware. Like again, I I can't
uh stress enough is that in the times I
ever told the story, it was, as you
described it, locker room talk with a
very small amount of people in a private
call. I never told it publicly, and I
never ever told it to anyone like Saber
Spark. As a man myself, if you're
telling me a story like that in hopes of
getting a job, I'm going to tell you to
get bent. I don't know how this was even
a speculation in Rachel's mind. She may
have had a point in like 2015 when edge
lords dominated the platform, but we're
in the 2020s. Influencers tend to be
very progressive, at least publicly
facing. Even if they're faking their
values, anyone telling sexist or racist
or transphobic or stories like this, is
a liability. And nobody wants that. And
honestly, KP's video might be a good
example as to why. The fact of the
matter is that if Rachel's video didn't
accuse Sabers Spark of sexual assault, a
lot of people probably would have taken
her side against Chris, in spite of the
video's tone and construction. After
Sabers Spark's response video came out,
some people still did. This conversation
was the impetus of a year-long campaign
to get Chris fired. And when that didn't
happen, KP made a video on the people
who wouldn't fire them over the course
of 6 months. And she hypes this up to
hell and back. And by March, she's
claiming that she has career ruling
allegations against Saber Spark. She
won't tell anyone exactly what those are
because apparently she wanted to
blindside the man. In the video proper,
the Black Griffin stuff is like only a
footnote, by the way. Courtney gives a
brief rundown and basically says, "Go
watch my video on it." Meanwhile, the
Black Griffin stuff is the only thing
against Saber Spark that seems to have
publicly stuck. On March 25th of this
year, Emily goes forward to Amy telling
her a story about Sabers Spark. Within
24 hours, Amy has contacted Brony Fan
and Emily is telling her story directly
to KP. From the beginning, both of these
had access to who Emily Jones was and
the ability to look up the controversies
revolving around her. KP decided to
believe Emily based on testimony
matching experiences and quote unquote
seeming to be in character with him.
This is not a good standard of evidence.
Anyone who knows someone well enough can
make up a story about them doing some
deranged [\h__\h] thing that quote unquote
fits with their character. I'll even
state for the record, if the allegations
weren't out in the open already, I would
not be platforming them. Even if you
believe them wholeheartedly, it's a risk
in every sense of the word. Reputation
risk, lawsuit risk, and the risk that
you may have been lied to or taken
advantage of. It is all right to believe
a story. But if you want to platform
something, you need evidence, and you
need hard evidence, especially when the
person you're talking to has an audience
of their own, which KP should have
known. But let's say that you're just
desperate to quote unquote do something
right. Maybe stop a time or two and
listen to the advice of those around
you. With the exception of the editor of
the video, who is uncredited and I'm not
interested in unmasking, it's hard to
know who saw the video in its entirety
beforehand. Besides Emily, I only got
two objective names of people who were
at least shown some version of the video
before it was uploaded. Lio Convoy and
Courtney Pete. Lio Convoy was too busy
with real life business and the version
he was shown anyway was an earlier draft
before the Saber Spark allegation was
put into it. And I reiterate when he
figured out what KP was going to do, he
specifically told her not to put it in
the video. Meanwhile, Courtney P claims
that she didn't see the video at all
despite being in it extensively multiple
times, despite working with Emily and
giving feedback to her testimony and
having direct sway over it. despite
berating people in the comments during
the video's premiere. I'm not saying
that Courtney Pete is lying. I'm saying
two separate things. One, I wouldn't
blame anyone who comes to that
conclusion of their own accord. And two,
if she is telling the truth, her not
watching the video does not absolve her
of the blame of the video's quality.
Courtney had segments where she took the
lead. She was giving behindthe-scenes
feedback to Emily. There is one other
name of someone who apparently gave KP
feedback. Casey. If Casey is to be
believed, she knew the video was in
production and also told KP to not
[\h__\h] do this. After the video was
unlisted and then privated, KP claimed
the tone was broken because she had
never made a video like this before.
This is a lie. This is objectively a
lie. Last year, she had made a video on
Lily Orchard with the help of Courtney
Pete. I have my issues with that video,
too. Once again, recording someone
without consent. And she also starts
with the least compelling argument
against Lily Orchard, pretendianism.
That can be considered burying the lead.
But other than that, the video itself
was largely fine. Of course, according
to Random Anons, that video was meant to
be similar to the Saber Spark in DA
Games video in tone, but she had to
begged out of it. I'm not sure if I can
believe that since she clearly didn't
take any advice for this video. I doubt
that advice would have influenced it in
the previous case, but this is what
people have told me. My only real
problem with the Lily Orchard video is
when it came out, 2024. That is very,
very late in the Lily Orchard timeline.
Rachel claims that she was only kicking
Lily Orchard to the curb then because of
her own triggers. Counterpoint one, she
made a video in part about DA games,
which is tied to a grooming scandal.
Counterpoint two, Lily Orchard's
internet story is filled with scandals
of a wide variety. Even if Stockholm,
Terra Cali, Courtney Pete were all too
much, the Josh Scorcher fallout is
something that everyone heard about,
especially in the brony community, her
community. Between not vetting Emily
Jones backstory at all until after the
video is made and doing an interview
with Angry Slug, who who doesn't even
really have an audience, something is
fundamentally wrong here. It's one thing
to look past the flaws of your friends
and acquaintances. Literally, every
single person I interact with knows the
June the King video on me front to back.
Some of them have even been there with
me through those controversies. So, it's
not like the people I interact with are
not aware of my flaws. I haven't talked
too much about the tone of the video and
its actual construction because honestly
it's not even secondary. It's it's
beyond tertiary. There are people saying
that you shouldn't have any jokes or
humor or anything in a video like this
when I don't think that's quite true.
Lacy Bedhead herself has some skits in
her videos and sometimes people do
something so objectively stupid and out
of left field that there's always going
to be humor in it. Like Mama Max
thinking that the best way to hunt
predators is not contacting the police
and instead sending them photographs of
his ass. Let me put it this way. I love
Kim Possible a lot has been having the
PFP of Shego from Kim Possible this
entire time as she goes through her
villain arc. I wouldn't blame anyone for
finding that objectively funny. Anyone
who comments on this whole ordeal is
going to comment on this line here. For
some reason, people think I'm
unqualified to do this. You know, I
think they might have been on to
something. Hello SL. which has for all
intents and purposes become mimedic. In
a discussion about difficult
allegations, you can't be blamed for
finding that humorous. That's without
even bringing up the fact that the video
she uses to quote unquote disprove her
rap is a video that's on her own
channel. Putting humor in a video like
this is all about the craft and
constructing the video well enough to
support the humor within it. Keeping in
mind tone, and here's what everyone else
seems to be missing, flow. There is a
prolonged Seinfeld joke, for instance.
So, this video claims to be about DA
Games and Saber Spark. It's actually
about a fish's Chris in the end. You
know how none of those names are
actually Jerry Seinfeld. So, Jerry
Seinfeld dating a 17-year-old. It's
gross. It's not something that he should
have done. And I can go on and on about
that. Why are we wasting all of this
time on Jerry Seinfeld of all people?
Why not Jared from Subway? Why not P
Diddy? Why not comment on the Drake
controversy? There's 20 million famous
alleged sickos in the world. Are any of
them relevant at all to the discussion
of DA Games, Sabers Spark, or Affician's
Chris? No. Jerry Seinfeld is irrelevant.
You should not be doing a prolong
Seinfeld bit in a video about them. This
gag would probably actually work if you
want to do like a documentary about
Jerry Seinfeld and his controversies,
then it would actually fit. It doesn't
fit here. With so many digressions, it
becomes so easy to just get lost in the
video. I did at one point want to
deconstruct this bit by bit, but you
really can't because when we spend 2
minutes with Eggman pissing on the moon,
we literally learn no new information.
It just literally reiterates what Rachel
just said. The video goes back and forth
and back and forth with these random
tangents that have nothing to do with
anything. It is one of the biggest slogs
of a video that I've ever had to see.
And I had to watch this. My brother
would like to punch me whenever I step
out of line. Most know for me eating my
boogers because he believed that he was
doing something right and making the
world a better place or you making my
life a better place. So he's basically a
social justice warrior at the age of
five. He did this because some kid in
his class got made fun of for picking
his nose and that gave my brother the
logic of him wanted to make sure that I
didn't do that same mistake. You can
blame my brother for why I don't like
the right in politics. That is I am left
lean for the record liberal. And even
after that, I I could not comprehend
what Rachel was saying. But I actually
do want to talk more about Eggman
pissing on the moon specifically because
this joke here actually happens to be
relevant and speaks to a larger problem.
I've come to make an announcement.
Shadow the Hedgehog is a [\h__\h] ass
[\h__\h] He pissed on my [\h__\h]
wife. That's right. He said his dick was
this big and I said, "That's
disgusting." So, this is a fan dub of a
fan. The original clip comes from Sonic
Adventure. Then this guy here made a
meme of it. So, I'm making a call out
post on my twitter.com. Shadow the
Hedgehog, you got a small dick. It's the
size of this walnut except way smaller.
And guess what? Here's what my dong
looks like.
A cosplayer did a rendition of that.
That's right, baby. All points, no
quills, no pillows. Look at that. It
looks like two balls and a bong. And KP
took it and put it in her video without
crediting the guy or contacting him at
all. That alone is bad enough, but if
you are remotely familiar with the Emily
Jones lore, this meme becomes something
else entirely. Emily Jones was accused
of not paying the voice actor of Eggman,
Mike Pollock. And Emily Jones has a
documented history of being harassed by
disgruntled Sonic fans, like
specifically for this. And you use an
Eggman meme as the voice of the man who
your video claims committed sexual
assault against Emily Jones. If you
believe Emily Jones story, that is seven
levels of [\h__\h] up. And if you don't
believe Emily Jones, this whole thing is
like 20 levels of [\h__\h] up. Looking
into someone is more than just trying to
prove them a liar. You know, it's trying
to give their story the best chance it
has at being objectively vetted and, you
know, not accidentally doing something
horrendously insensitive. Chapter 7,
final thoughts. Trust but verify. That
is the slogan that's been used quite a
while now. Back in the mid2010s, there
was a ground swell of people going
straight in and believing all victims
and taking all of their stories at face
value. Unfortunately, since then, we've
had so many stories where the reality
was initially a lot more complicated
than once thought. Pro-Jared and quite
are the names that come up a lot when we
talk about things like this. And on some
level, and in some communities, we seem
to be at the other end of the spectrum
where if there's no diehard evidence,
the accuser must absolutely be lying to
the point where someone stepping up
without an airtight case will get bashed
and harassed to the nth degree. The
problem is that so many cases, most of
them are in the gray area, especially in
cases of sexual assault where perception
is a large component of what constitutes
the crime. It's hard to prove or
disprove what someone was thinking, but
what someone was thinking of is a core
tenant of when something goes too far.
It must be stated once again that
innocent until proven guilty is for both
the accuser and the accused. The only
thing that I could really do in this
video is lay all of the findings on the
table. If you believe Emily Jones, if
you believe Saver Spark, or if you don't
believe anyone, that's your prerogative.
Just remember that you can't legally
state what you can't prove, or you may
be in just as much trouble as I believe
KP will be in. And I'll state, I believe
that she is in serious trouble for what
she did, no matter what the truth of the
matter is. Either the allegations are
true and she botched investigation
beyond all belief or they're false and
she elevated a horrendous controversy
against for all intents and purposes an
innocent man. I personally believe that
she will get sued for defamation by
Saber Spark. It really is only a
question of how merciful that he wants
to be at this point. Whatever you
believe, even if you believe the worst
of the worst of someone, I personally
believe that it's no reason to harass
anyone. Even if whoever you're doing to
is the worst person imaginable. When you
harass something, there are three
general scenarios. Number one, you might
be harassing someone who doesn't deserve
it at all. Number two, you may be
goating someone unstable into doing
something unstable. Or three, you may
actively be putting yourself in danger
by pissing someone off who is
legitimately dangerous. And while you're
doing this, you're blurring the lines of
the truth and making it harder to get to
its source. Let me put it this way. One
of the things that Saber Spark is
accused of is going out of his way to
harass Cla's father online. I'm willing
to believe that Ian Corlet is the worst
person in this entire story. I've heard
the recordings and they're not pretty. I
will state for the record that Anne
Corlet is a douchebag. I can believe
that he is a person with a character who
is worth harassing. That being said, who
did Sabers Spark allegedly harassing him
benefit? It didn't sway anyone's opinion
on the cleric corlette black riffin
matter. It didn't stop an from doing
anything that he was doing. The only
effect it actually had in the real world
was making Saber Spark look even more
biased in the Black Griffin scandal.
There is no legitimate reason to harass
anyone. So, what's the lesson here? Uh,
the lesson is to go to the police. I
know that we live in an AAB time and a
lot of people aren't too fond of the
cops, especially here in the United
States. Go to the police as your first
option. Seriously, the sooner the
better. The police will be harsh. They
will criticize your story. And yes, they
will even try to catch you in their
lies. They may even actively disbelieve
you. But for better or worse, the police
system is the only ones with proper
authority to get you justice. Because
all of this, all of that I walked you
through, all of the videos and all of
the background on this, all of this
[\h__\h] true or not, it's not justice. No
matter what the [\h__\h] happened, this all
of this, this is a cluster [\h__\h] If you
have 10 hours or hell, 10 days, I could
go over all of the controversies that
YouTuber vigilantes have created over
the years. Look really hard into Mama
Max. EDP tried to meet up with a
14-year-old girl for a quote unquote
cupcake, and he got away with one of the
most clear-cut cases imaginable because
the people who tried to sting him were
focused on content instead of justice.
Honestly, it it's not even just tied to
YouTube in general. It's To Catch a
Predator, Chris Hansen show ended up
getting a guy killed. And I'm not
exaggerating when I say that if you're
trying to do the hero thing, getting
someone killed is a very real
possibility. Assuming that Brony Fan
don't wasn't faking, look what almost
happened here. The last person that you
should ever go to looking for justice is
a YouTuber. Says the YouTuber. Look, if
you like this video and the previous
investigations, great. If you think that
literally everything I've said in both
those videos is airtight, perfect in
them, you're naive. I am not a doctor,
policeman, lawyer, magician, superhero.
I'm not even a journalist. I'm a random
guy on the internet who talks about
cartoons. And plenty of people don't
even think that I'm good at that. Rachel
was a random woman on the internet who
talks about cartoons. And she wanted to
bring very serious allegations to light.
If it sounds ridiculous, it's because
it's ridiculous. And I will state, it's
not like I'm not aware with the various
problems with our justice system. It's
harsh. It can be unfair and biased. And
in some ways, going through it can be
traumatic. If Emily did go to the court
system, you'd better believe that Saber
Spark's attorney would be bringing up
all of her dirty laundry. And even
beyond that, sometimes justice still
isn't served. A lot of people still
believe all kinds of things about
Mandabon, even though, as far as I can
tell, nothing came of the criminal
investigation against him. And you hear
plenty of people saying that there's
really compelling evidence against him.
On the other end of the spectrum, the
Innocence Project finds new people who
are falsely convicted year after year.
This does not mean that our justice
system is pointless or it should be
avoided. It means that it's a part of
our imperfect reality. Sometimes,
unfortunately, you get the short straw.
But you have to remember, sometimes you
don't. And since we survived so long as
a country, there must be something to
our institutions. If the police are too
intimidating, there are plenty of
separate organizations depending on your
particular issue. Rain is the
recommended resource in terms of cases
of sexual assault, but you'll have to do
your own research based on your own
specific dilemma. But I can promise you
for pretty much any issue, there are
resources out there. I can get the
temptation to go to YouTubers. On the
face of it, they appear friendlier. They
appear more understanding. And we have
the appearance of having our [\h__\h]
together. We don't have our [\h__\h]
together. We do not have our [\h__\h]
together. I'm not saying that we're bad
people. I mean, some YouTubers are bad
people, but in general, we're not bad
people. We can be very understanding. We
can even want to help. But we can't
help. And I mean this in a literal
sense. Let's say that I could prove this
case 100% without a doubt either way.
Does that get someone arrested? No. Only
the accuser going to the police can do
that. I don't have the power to put
someone behind bars. And YouTubers can't
even really keep you safe. We can't
protect your reputation. and some of us
can't even properly keep you anonymous.
I can't begin to tell you how much of
this whole endeavor was simply me
staving off a mental breakdown of my
own. Things suck and that's really the
only thing that I can objectively state.
Things suck right now and police reform
is a very real issue. As for this issue,
when it comes to Saber Spark or Black
Griffin or afficionado Chris even, we
may never really get to the heart of the
truth. And I will state it again, make
sure it gets beaten into everyone's
head. All parties are to be presumed
innocent until proven guilty in a court
of law. All parties. And I'm not just
saying that so I don't get sued. Like,
here's a big surprise that some
YouTubers learned their hard way.
Shielding your language in allegedly
isn't the foolproof defense that some
people seem to think it is. You can
still get sued if you say allegedly
after every single word, especially if
you're negligent. I keep saying innocent
until proven guilty in a court of law
because that is my standard of justice.
I have my own personal opinions on
everyone in this cluster [\h__\h] and I will
say that very few of them are positive.
I am not going to objectively state what
I believe about Emily Jones or Saber
Spark or whatever on the record because
it is not my place. It's not even really
my place to say what I believe about KP
and her motivations on this whole thing.
I can say that it looks really, really
bad for her and I can go over everything
she's done. I can say that I doubt that
she'll ever have any kind of career on
the platform again. But can I say that
she did all of this out of a vendetta or
malice as some people seem to think? I
can't say that objectively. If nothing
else, this should be used as an example.
This is an example of every possible
thing that could go wrong when justice
is not practiced correctly. I could
repeat myself on every single misstep.
all the way back in 2012 when a police
report was not filed when the crime
allegedly happened. All the way up to
2025 May when KP literally sent a threat
to the person that she platformed about
said alleged crime. But I think I've
made the issues clear from start to
finish. Like the only thing that I
really can say after 30 pages of script
is I'm sorry. None of this should have
gone the way that it did and it went
down in a way where literally no one is
happy with it. And unfortunately, I also
feel that this isn't the end of the
story either. Uh so, uh see you next
time. Uh I'll probably be taking a
little bit of time to uh decompress. Uh
but regular content will resume shortly.
I have no idea what regular content even
is anymore.