It appears that the Saber Spark
situation has reached a very critical
boiling point. And while I typically
don't double dip on topics, this one is
somewhat important to update on to try
to clear up as much information as
possible. So, in this video, I'll try to
deliver a concise and quick update on
all recent developments, starting with
the allegations and the motivations
behind these allegations. On May 1st, an
anonymous individual came forward with
her testimony against Saberspark. These
allegations recounted two separate
incidents in which Saberspark essayed
them in between two years, claiming that
they had been starruck and went through
with these interactions over a quote
unquote power dynamic. Since then,
details of the situation have changed
and we may possibly know the identity of
the individual as well. As it turns out,
both of these incidents happened within
the same year. We also know where these
incidents allegedly took place, and we
also know what motivated these
allegations to be published, at least
somewhat. If you want a full in-depth
breakdown, check the link in the
description for a deep dive. In an
interview posted on March 5 featuring
Kim Possible by Slug, we learned some
very concerning information behind these
allegations that cast a lot of doubt on
the credibility of these claims. In this
interview, KP, the individual who was
responsible for making these allegations
public, went on to explain that they had
no evidence for their allegations, at
least besides knowing that the victim
was present at these events. They also
claim that the reason they went through
with publishing these allegations in the
first place, is because it sounded like
something he'd do. I am not joking. And
also when asked if she knew these
allegations wouldn't hold up under
extreme scrutiny, she said it's fair
because she herself knew that these
allegations don't have enough
information to back them. Here are a few
clips. As far as characterization,
everything seemed to fit. Um, but
literally literally their evidence
characterization that this individual
has because this person feels like they
would somebody. They story must be true.
It's their only evidence. The reason why
these idiots push this story, it's
because they felt like he would be the
type to do this. Basically, the evidence
that you were given was more personal
circumstance and hearsay rather than
like objective evidence. So, they had
nothing. They had no reason to push
these
allegations. They literally had no
reason to push these allegations
besides, yeah, I feel like he'd do it.
If you were to say that this is
something that needs to be taken with
the utmost seriousness despite no
evidence, um, would you believe that it
would be fair for people to disregard it
entirely due to the lack of actual
evidence? Yeah, I think that's fair.
Okay. So, even by her own standards,
even by her own standards, she's pushing
allegations that she believes is
entirely fair play to not take seriously
at all. If you understand that it's
completely fair for people to not take
your allegations seriously at all, then
why bring forward the allegations in the
first place? Have you received any other
evidence such as like even a screenshot
or a call log or something of that sort
aside from the conversation or the or
the um testimonial? If she says that
she's received no more evidence, I'm
going to lose it. No, but um I do feel
that something may be happening, but I
didn't really have enough information to
really Oh my god. If you don't feel too
confident about these allegations, if
you're very skeptical, I don't blame
you. These allegations were brought
forward in the most irresponsible way
possible, which only serves to detract
from the serious allegations in the
future. Is this a straight debunk of the
allegations? No. There's no way to prove
or deny that something did or didn't
happen. I have to make that very clear.
This is more so to help people not
immediately cast guilt and see things
from a more rational point of view. So,
not only were these allegations handled
in a very immature and irresponsible
way, they tacked it on at the end of an
expose against DA Games as a sort of
gotcha against Sabers Spark for their
association with Black Griffin. Despite
Black Griffin having some serious
allegations in his own right, simply
associating with or defending a bad
individual, doesn't mean that you are
more or less likely to be responsible
for something terrible yourself. So,
when you take all of these factors into
consideration, including these two
excerpts right here, it's very easy to
wonder where did the motivation to bring
these allegations come from exactly. Was
it done as a takedown for someone who
you feel is a terrible person,
vindictively speaking, or was it because
this person was genuinely responsible
for a crime? Let's take a look at this
tweet by the victim's anonymous account
specifically. In this tweet, they say,
"I have always remained quiet and felt I
should never cause a problem by saying
something, but when venting privately, I
was encouraged to come forward." Now, I
am speculating to be very clear, but
there are many factors that could be at
play here. Depending on who they
converse with, how the conversation
went, and what ideas were thrown around
between these individuals, it's entirely
possible that this person was encouraged
to come forward with a motivation to
take down Sabers Spark for shady
associations or other similar reasons. I
am not saying this is the case, but it
is a possibility to consider before
anyone can begin to start assigning
guilt. On May 7, an individual known as
Casey came out against KP and heatedly
criticized KP for their lack of due
diligence, her incapability to vet her
sources, and even dropped a lot of shade
on the anonymous victim. This call out
letter on its own seems to come from a
pretty negative place as well, so take
it as you will. Since then, someone has
gone through the effort to compile an
information document in an attempt to
prove that there is a real person behind
these allegations and that these
allegations aren't just a fabricated
fanfiction. This portion of the video is
also based on a lot of circumstantial
information and speculation, by the way.
So, be very careful of how you take this
information and how you come to your
conclusions. Without being too blunt,
this document goes on to show
information that heavily suggests that
the anonymous victim in this case is an
individual known as Emu Emmy, which so
happens to have a negative history as
well in their own right. To be clear,
that is not a claim that I am making.
That's what this document suggests. The
circumstantial evidence shown here are
screenshots of Emmy posting tweets
around the same dates mentioned by the
accuser interacting with Saber Spark
around the same time and even attending
the same events. In this video, I will
not be commenting on the character of
either Saber Spark or Emu Emmy based on
their histories or the people they've
interacted with to avoid any conflict.
But what I do want to make is this
argument. If it is true that the victim
is Emu Emmy, which is completely
circumstantial right now, by the way, I
have to make that really clear, then the
argument of a power dynamic is
incredibly unfair because both of these
individuals were somewhat prolific back
then in their own right. Take that with
a grain of salt, though. Obviously, come
to your own conclusions. Take everything
that I said in this video with a grain
of salt. Make up your own minds. This is
simply an update to the story to let
everyone know that what the information
at hand is now. Take all of this
information as you will, but I implore
everyone to be charitable to both
Saberspark and Mo if it just so happens
that they are a victim based on the
information at hand. If you want my full
unfiltered opinion, check out the video
linked in the description. That's all I
got for today. If anything more comes
up, I will make a full comprehensive
video on the topic. Thanks for watching.
Later.