All right, let's finally make it to the
end of this case. On the 1st of May
2025, I Love Composible Lot made a train
wreck of a video going after a former
employee of hers, Afficionado Chris, and
tying that story into two larger ones,
that of DA Games and Sabers Spark. The
video went over extremely poorly and was
removed within hours. But the thing it
was most known for was platforming
accusations by Emu Emmy against Sabers
Spark of very heinous things on two
occasions in 2012. Over the course of
May, my team, among other people,
investigated this story to figure out
what the hell was going on. And
throughout the month of May, many people
released their findings. I released my
investigation video on June the 2nd,
ending off by saying that that wouldn't
be the end of the story. Spoilers, it
wasn't the end of the story. Because I
know how attention spans work on the
internet in the modern era, I'm going to
come right out and say it and not bury
the lead. Saberspark is not guilty of
what he's accused of. Shortly after I
released my video, and by shortly I mean
the day of, Saber Spark was able to
acquire old text messages between him
and Emily. Throughout the month of May,
after his response video, he was looking
through old computers, old technology,
and old cell phones, and spending
hundreds of dollars at repair shops to
find any evidence that he could to
exonerate himself. So during the month
of May, my team asked Emily a lot of
questions. Beyond just the interview
that I published on June the 3rd, my
team had DM communications with Emily
via Discord. Through these, we asked
many questions about not just the
incidents in question, but contextual
information, Emily and Saber Spark's
relationship overall. Throughout it, I
tried to ascertain the wider picture. I
asked her questions about how they met
and what their relationship was like
before Canderlaw Gardens. I asked about
that time in October between the two
conventions, and I asked about the
relationship afterwards, among many
other details. When Saber Spark got his
text messages back, every investigator
was able to compare and contrast
answers, and they looked very, very bad
for the narrative that Emily had
constructed, to put it as simply as I
can. This information was released to
the wider public on 10:30 p.m. Eastern
in Beckett's video on the channel Copen
Se on the 20th of June. And if you're
interested in the full story of this
part of the investigation and want to
know about all of the minute details,
I'd advise you watch that. Saber Spark
goes on the record and talks about his
experiences. I'll hit you with the two
long didn't watch here. Here are the
things that are most damning straight
out of the gate. Emily told me and my
team that after Equestria LA 2012, she
tried to pull away from Sabers Spark.
The text that Saber Spark was able to
provide proved that they had
communications for months afterwards.
And these communications appeared very
amicable to the point where Emily had
even asked Sabers Spark for relationship
advice. Once again, after the alleged
incidents were said to have occurred in
2013, Saber Spark unfollows Emily on
Twitter, and she texts him at 1:45 a.m.
asking, "What did I do this time?" At
around 2:00 a.m., less than an hour
later, Emily tells three girls she's
staying with the story that we've all
been told. There's obviously more
details you can pinpoint and once again
you can watch Becket's video if you want
all of those details. Uh, but they take
over an hour and I think what I just
stated will paint the clearest of
pictures as to exactly what we're
dealing with. I have no idea why Emily
said that she pulled away from Saber
Spark immediately after the incidents
when evidence is clear that she didn't
do that. Because let me put it this way.
If Emily did say that she was still
talking to Saber Spark well into 2013,
months after the incidences, none of us
would have actually questioned her on
that. I know that for a fact because no
one asked why she was still talking to
Saber Spark during the second
convention, a month after the first.
Emily and Becket had an off thereord
talk that I'm not entirely privy to. And
as far as I can tell, her excuse is that
she genuinely does not remember the
months that occurred after talking to
Saber Spark for all of this. And I'm
going to be blunt. I find that very hard
to believe specifically because of the
set of circumstances that we got to this
point. I had Emily walk me through her
activities the entire days of both
conventions. So, let's talk about what
Emily did remember last month. During
the first incident, she did remember
immediately telling someone on Skype
about what happened. Sleeping in the
lobby, walking around the hotel outside,
and she even remembered which hotel it
was. She also remembered that there was
supposedly a domestic violence incident
in the room that she was supposed to be
staying at. She was also able to
remember many of the details of her own
controversies that spanned years and
goes all the way back to when she was a
teenager on Dr. Phil. When it comes to
the second convention, she originally
got the date wrong, stating that the
second incident happened in 2013. In
hindsight, it's kind of odd to leave
that hanging for an entire month if, in
your memory, no communication happened
with Saber Spark after November 2012.
She did not remember the name of the
hotel in hindsight. We had to look that
up ourselves. She remembered going to a
Target that day for snacks sometime
during the day and playing games in the
hotel room for much of the day. Saber
Spark's testimony also mentions that
there was a Target in the area and I
walked over to a Target across the
street. I got the pregnancy test, came
back and I'm like, "Please, can you take
this?" And she goes, "Okay." You know,
now let's talk about the layout of the
hotel. Sabers Spark mentions this. We
met up. There was like this air this
this not basement, but this lower level
at this nice Hilton hotel. Um, I'm
pretty sure it was a Hilton. It was a
nice hotel in the area. And we're asking
her, uh, we we start walking around the
hotel, by the way, just catching up. Um,
and we went down to like this gym floor.
Emily says that the basement had meeting
rooms that could be rented out. So,
whose memory do we trust? Uh, Saber
Sparks. Grace actually called the hotel.
Uh, and this is what she heard. I'm just
recording this because it's hard to type
and explain. I didn't ask specifically.
I asked specifically if they had a
basement. The front desk person was
really confused. And so I said, "Do you
have like do you have an accessible
lower floor area?" And they told me that
was the gym. So I don't know if they
actually have a basement or not. The
person on the phone was really confused
and I think they wanted me to hang up as
soon as possible. It completely matches
Sabers Spark's description of the hotel.
And uh no, no one outside the
investigation knew that we did this
because until Saber Spark himself
mentioned this, it would have been a
useless thing to mention, especially
because we thought the hotel could have
changed the purposes of its room in 12
years. This is a point to faulty memory
on Emily's side, but here's the thing. I
asked her about a lot of details, and
she did get quite vivid at times.
However, there is one thing that I think
is a silver bullet to the memory
argument. Emily stated that Saber Spark
texted her at the second convention. She
was absolutely sure of it. She was so
sure of it that she stuck with it even
when we told her that it was impossible
because we all thought that Saber
Spark's phone was dead at the time. It
was a solid detail in memory that she
could not be swayed from. For me to
believe that memory is an excuse, I'd
have to believe her that Emily didn't
remember months of interactions after
the convention while explicitly
remembering benign details when asked.
The couch seats in the hallways having
no backs doesn't mean anything, but
Emily was able to recall them. It
especially doesn't mean anything since
the hotel could have changed decor since
then and probably doesn't look the same
way a decade later. Knowing them or not
knowing them doesn't alter the
believability of the story. Meanwhile,
Saber Spark's text messages are very
impactful. They fundamentally change
everything. But let's give as much grace
as I possibly can at the end here. Let's
argue that there is a selective memory
involved. In that case, can we take
someone's word that the incidents
happened as remembered, the incidents
themselves? If memory alone is what
we're talking about, Saber Spark was
able to correctly remember details about
the hotel that Emily was not. That's the
argument that anyone who believes that
Saber Spark did what he was accused of
needs to overcome at this point. Saber
Spark has his old data and he shows him
scrolling through the messages on screen
in Beckett's video specifically to prove
that they're not fabrications. Whatever
you want to call Emily's testimony,
lying, misremembering, or anything in
between, what Emily told me specifically
does not line up with evidenced reality.
And to be honest, that's what's
important at the moment. Why she said
what she said or the intent behind it
aren't questions that I can personally
answer at the present. And that's the
long short of it. But I understand that
a lot of people have a lot of other
questions. And I want this to be the
final video that I make on this matter.
So, let's talk about everything that I
can't answer because at this point,
there's no reason to keep anything
secret. Let's go with the big question
that I know a lot of people have been
asking. Why did you listen to Emily at
all? Like, why did we even give her the
time of day with the interview and the
investigation in the video? Let's start
with a couple of reminders. One, at the
start of this, we didn't know Emily's
long, long backstory. And when we did
learn of it, it changed the dynamic of
everything. and two, the allegations
were originally leveled by KP, who is
not very competent. Whether the
allegations were true or not, KP's video
did a disservice to everyone involved.
Once again, you could call it karma that
her video ended up being the train wreck
that it was. But on the other hand, you
could have called it a potential
scapegoat. Let's take a look at a
universe where only KP decided to look
into things. People would be pointing to
her for every misstep and strange thing
in the story. whether or not KP was
actually to blame. Recall if you might,
KP and Courtney essentially tried to
coach Emily to remove bits and pieces
from her testimony. The bit about
implied consent. My team questioned
Emily. We confronted her on some details
and we asked her to expand in some
places. But you have my word. We didn't
coach her. Every detail that she gave
came from her. As far as we can tell, I
want to double emphasize as far as we
can tell. My promise is that my
investigation team didn't alter the
testimony ourselves. There is the
distinct possibility that Emily was
coached by other people who were not KP.
Emily was in a group chat with other
people against Saber Spark and Emily
also claimed that her unnamed best
friend needed to remind her of the year.
This unnamed friend may have also
provided other details that we are not
privy to. And KP has proved that Emily
was at least receptive to being coached.
On the flip side, anytime that Emily
would have been disbelieved, any of the
other people platforming Emily could
have just said that it was KP's fault
and her video and her actions made
things look bad. Real or false,
allegations appearing randomly in a mess
like that had lifealtering implications.
Life destroying implications, no matter
what the truth was. My stated goal was
always to give Emily a fair shake in the
court of public opinion. I did state to
her that I would have to report all of
my findings whether or not they made her
look good or bad. And that's largely one
of the reasons that I did continue with
the investigation in the video. And in
the end, I think that I did succeed in
giving her a fair shake. People do have
problems with the video as always, but I
think that it holds up with the
information that we had at the time. Of
course, here's the thing. At the time,
Emily provided us with false
information. Once again, intentionally
or not, whether she was intentionally
lying or manipulated or just has a bad
memory, she told me personally things
that are objectively not true. And
people have been giving me a lot of
comments about this, thinking that I'm
stupid or that I have egg on my face or
whatever. Let me humbly ask you this
question. How do you expose a liar in a
way that won't affect or offend someone
who isn't a liar? The answer is actually
really simple. You just get them talking
a lot for hours. An innocent person
might be mistaken on details. It
happens. But they'll generally stick
with the truth. And even with small
missteps along the way, they'll
generally tell you something that makes
some form of sense. A liar will
inevitably trip up. They will either
contradict themselves or the evidence at
some point. Very few liars are good
enough to keep talking forever without
tripping up. You see, it wasn't just the
text messages that exonerate Saber
Spark. It was that they could be
compared directly with the testimony
that Emily gave to me and my team that
created stone cold, inarguable
contradictions. So, if you're wondering
about that, no, I don't regret giving
Emily the interview and talking to her
for weeks because those were essential
to uncovering the truth. No matter what
the reality ended up being, this helped
paint the proper picture of reality.
When something was only verified through
testimony, I stated on record that
things were alleged. I didn't speak to
things that I couldn't outwardly state
or prove. Despite talking with Emily for
all this time, I still said that the
story at the time was a he said, she
said, and it was until Saber Spark got
his text correspondence. On the other
hand, Emily wasn't able to provide
evidence. Sort of. She provided evidence
of her telling other people the story
that she's saying now, but not the
actual story. She provided evidence that
she was at the conventions, but none of
those things were ever in question.
Like, at no point did anyone with even
the most cursory of knowledge say that
Emily wasn't at these supposed
conventions. And obviously, Emily not
providing evidence can look fishy in
hindsight. A ton of things can look
fishy in hindsight. And for what it's
worth, we knew exactly what we were
dealing with. Alternatively, it was over
a decade ago, and the Skype chats that
these people had are gone. Saber Spark
was able to find his old phones, but as
far as I can tell, even he wasn't able
to get the Skype logs, but what he was
able to find was enough. I'll put it
like this. We gave Emily a lot of the
benefit of the doubt. Whether or not you
should give people the benefit of the
doubt is, well, your decision in the
end. Let me put it like this. At the
start, we gave KP the benefit of the
doubt and tried to keep her in the loop.
When we told her who Emily really was,
because KP didn't give her the benefit
of the doubt, she went out of her way
and threatened Emily and then gave her
DMs to Becket. Becket gave Sabers Spark
the benefit of the doubt and was able to
properly get to the bottom of things.
Becket gave Lacy Bedhead the benefit of
the doubt and they were able to talk and
Becket also gave me the benefit of the
doubt. Investigations like these always
involve giving at least some people the
benefit of the doubt. I will agree there
are some people that you absolutely
should never give the benefit of the
doubt to, but that's not most people.
And unfortunately, sometimes you win and
sometimes you don't. However, the public
only notices when you lose in the game
of Russian roulette. So, I will say we
did give plenty of people the benefit of
the doubt. Some of them we lost and some
of them we didn't. Now, let's talk more
in depth about this. So on Twitter and
in comments, a lot of people were mad at
me for working with Becket of Cop and
Seth. Bonk especially, who was really
really mad at me for mentioning him at
all in my investigation video. Uh, and
then who decided to confront me on call.
People even called me biased for
platforming Beckett and for linking to
Beckett's second video on Twitter and
here. I guess I'll tell you right now, I
am biased. I'm biased to the truth. And
the truth was my number one focus in all
of this. And to get to the truth, you
have to work with a wide variety of
people. Becket has been accused of
harassing people, specifically bonk on
Twitter and using ableless language like
the Rword. And and I believe that anyone
who knows me knows that I'm not exactly
a fan of that kind of language. I'm not
going to defend every little thing that
he does. And I don't think anyone else
would either. Here's the crux of the
matter. Beckett has very good
investigative skills. He fights for what
he believes in and he was able to help
Saber Spark prove his innocence. During
the investigation, he was able to get in
contact with people that my team either
didn't or couldn't, like Claire Klette
and Michelle Kraber. I still don't even
know how it was possible to get them on
the record. I said a billion times in my
first video that I disavow harassment of
any kind, and that hasn't changed. Even
if morality is off the table, it's just
impractical. The problem I'm having here
is that people coming after Beckett all
have their own biases, and it's hard to
take anything they say at face value.
Bonk literally told me that he believes
that Beckett is right-wing because cope
and see is a phrase that is said by
right-wing people on places like Reddit
and 4chan. That's that's not even a
joke. That is here. Here here's the
here's the DM. And calling Beckett
right-wing is something that comes up by
Bonk over and over and over and over
again. Becket is not right-wing. Here's
a community post about Pride Month
stickers. He's not right-wing. If you
need another example, last year he made
a video on Just a Robot, who beyond the
controversy that got him in hot water,
who was essentially an anti-woke media
critic accused of being racist. And in
doing a video on him, Becket talked to
and platformed a bunch of people who are
distinctly not right-wing. Ju just look
at this here. However, I believe it is
blatant when you look at any of their
posting that they are an account that
prides themselves in harassing leftwing
folk and defending those on the right.
Hey, you know that Saber Spark is
leftwing, right? like openly to the
point where a lot of his content is
critiquing right-wing stuff, right?
Becket reached out to Saber Spark first,
not the other way around as Bonk seems
to be implying. Also, I have to state
this. Bonk thought that I might have
been right-wing because I placed a clip
of Rebecca talking about eating her
boogers in my video. Uh, so take that
where you want to take it. It's also
worth noting that Bunk's quest against
Black Griffin wasn't originally about
Black Griffin's alleged grooming, but
because of his quote unquote racist
posts back in 2020 when everyone was
crazy during the pandemic. Bonk only
learned of the allegations later on. But
even beyond political stripes, Bonk
keeps claiming that Beckett was making
fun of his financial situation. So,
here's the truth of the matter. Bonk had
a GoFundMe and Becket offered $100 if he
would go on interview with him. And
people like Oplock also offered to chip
in. I have no reason to believe that
that offer wasn't genuine. Becket does
get very mean on Twitter. I'm not going
to argue against that or defend it for
that matter. If you want it in plain
English, I don't think that he should do
that. Also, in plain English, nothing
you and I can say will get him to stop
doing it because he finds it funny.
Also, in plain English, no one's
perfect. So, I'll say this. Nothing that
I've seen about Becket suggests that
he's a liar or he doesn't care about the
truth of the matter or that he just
doesn't care in general. The people who
are coming after him try to paint him as
this far-right sociopath. But with
virtually everything they've shown me,
literally the worst thing that I can
call Beckett is an [\h__\h] on Twitter.
He does antagonize Bonk a lot. However,
Bonk will ignore virtually all evidence
that doesn't substantiate any weward
allegations he wants to present against
anyone, which is actually dangerous
behavior and leads to actual realworld
damage. Bonk claims that Clare said she
was forced to pet Sophie's snail in
Becca's original video. Uh, this is not
what Clare said at any point in time.
Bonk also thought that Lazy Bedhead was
making the investigation video when no
one ever even alluded to that. She was a
part of the investigation team, but she
didn't make the video. I did, and I was
always the one making it, and it was
like literally the first thing that I
told Emily. So, when Bonk is making
other accusations, it is incredibly hard
for me to believe him because this is
something that I keep noticing with him.
He has 80% of the picture and he talks
like he has 200% of it. Either he's not
paying full attention, he's running on
what he wants to hear to make himself as
pissed off as possible, or wires are
getting crossed somewhere. Random
details just get lost, rewritten, and
cannon. And one time he did it, it
actually managed to piss me off. The day
after Becca's video comes out, I
streamed to talk about the immediate
findings. And Bonk writes this, ending
by saying that I'm going to hell.
That'll be fun. The VOD of that stream
is still up there if you're interested.
Maybe I'm misremembering. So, you can
see the reality of the situation. Bonk
says that I started off the stream by
joking about a suicide attempt. So,
apparently, allegedly, I started the
stream by doing that. So, the proof
should be in what, first 10 minutes. Let
me spoil if you missed that stream. I
didn't do that at all. I even went back
and rewatched the VOD myself to make
sure that I didn't say anything that
could even be misconstrued as joking
about Bonk suicide attempts, even by a
bad faith actor. The closest thing I
could find was someone commenting,
"Bruh, this feels like throwing someone
under a bridge 101." And I responded
that that was bad phrasing. Because
considering what happened, it was bad
phrasing. And while I was lighthearted
in talking to the commenter saying that
it was bad phrasing, I wouldn't consider
that joking about the attempt. And I
think that most other people wouldn't
consider it a joke either. But
apparently Bonk is not most people. Bonk
is a person who takes the worst possible
interpretation of everything that anyone
says and just rolls with it, stating it
as plain fact for reasons that I
literally cannot comprehend. And that is
the sole reason that I will never talk
to him again. There was a point in the
stream that I did laugh. I laugh because
someone asked me if Becket and KP were
the same person and that just painted
the most ridiculous picture in my head
and I found that funny. But I take
personal offense to Bonk claiming that I
joked about him attempting suicide. You
want to know the reality of the
situation? When I learned of what Bonk
was attempting to do, I was freaked out
for a good majority of the day. The only
direct contact I had to him was on
Discord to which I tried to message him
and I tried giving information that I
knew to others who may have been able to
get in contact with him. I was shocked
and I was worried and I personally was
helpless and ever since then I have been
very careful about what I have said
about him. Bonk himself even stated on
call that he expected me to be a lot
more critical towards him in my video. I
only said what I had to against Bonk
because I have my sympathies. And after
the video, he confronts me on call where
what started about him talking about his
problems in my video turned into him
talking about his ideation. It was not a
pleasant conversation. And I will leave
it at that. It's not like I recorded it
myself. So there's not much I can say
regardless. There is only one thing in
this message here that Bon says that
it's true. You see, I was lied to
repeatedly during all this. Was turned
into an anxious wreck during some of the
turns of events. All while I had to
console other people and had to deal
with a bunch of other [\h__\h] in the
meantime. And after the video comes out,
it ends with new evidence that
counteracted what I personally was told.
In spite of all of this, all of it. In
spite of people acting completely
bizarre behind the scenes, there is only
one thing that like genuinely pissed me
off to my core. Genuinely pissed me off.
And that was that Sophie gave Bonk back
access to the Brony Fandon Twitter
account. This shocked everyone on my
team and everyone in the stream. And to
this day, no one knows why the [\h__\h] she
did this. And now I am about to be very
angry. Let me recap on what happened
last month. Bonk used said Twitter
account to try streaming himself jumping
off a bridge. This was after a mixture
of fights and direct harassment, as that
was the prior time that the accusations
towards Saberspark seemed to be the most
stark. Saberspark gave his response
video, KP gave her threat, and at the
time it looked like even my own team was
against Emily due to the cell phone
discrepancy. So, several people try to
get Bonk help. It gets brought to a
mental hospital and Sophie changes the
password to that account. Let me ask
you, would any of you, anyone in this
audience, give someone back access to
that account after all of that? Anyone?
If the answer is yes, I'd say that you
don't belong in this audience. And I am
beyond doozledorfed that some people are
actually taking this side on Twitter.
I'll say it as plainly as I can. While
Bonk's attempt was trying to throw
himself off a bridge, he used his
platform as a tool in attempting
suicide. I'll tell you exactly what
Sophie did. I will be as blanket as I
can. What Sophie did was give the keys
to the liquor cabinet back to an
alcoholic as soon as they got home from
having their stomach pumped. And yes,
you could argue that Bonk owns the
account. I will state that he has as
much a right to that account at this
point as a drunk driver has the right to
their car keys. Becket had been going
off on a met Twitter. And I will
reiterate, I do not stand by that for
what should be obvious reasons at this
point. But this scenario setup should
not exist in the first place. Giving
Bonk back access to the Brony Fandone
Twitter account, I can't see that as
anything but morally reprehensible.
There are there are so many mysteries to
all of this still, but like one of them,
one of the biggest ones was why the hell
did the two of these share a Twitter
account at all? Let's look at this from
an outsers's perspective. Bonk released
KP's threat to the public without
anyone's permission. Not KP's, not
Emily's, and not Sophie's. That
immediately made it seem like Emily was
lying, and it revealed who she was to
those partially in the know. To be
blunt, if you're trying to take a guy
down, none of these actions are helpful,
and Bonk continually does things like
this. So, I got a theory. On the 5th of
May, Brony Fan Don't goes into this
Twitter thread talking about their
involvement with KP. basically throwing
KP under the bus. Sophie is mentioned a
couple of times. One stating that the
subject was triggering for her and
letting the audience know that Sophie
was not involved at all. First of all,
Sophie was involved. Uh here's a
screenshot of Amy, Emily, Bonk, and
Sophie all in a chat room together. The
real Emily, the real emu Emmy. Uh so
Sophie was involved by definition. If
you're not familiar with the brony
fandom lore, this mention of Sophie
comes out of nowhere. My first reaction
at the time was that Bonk just doxed the
anonymous and Sophie was actually
Emily's secret identity because that
just fits in as well. So, let's ask an
obvious question here. Who wrote this
thread? Remember, at the time there were
two people who had access to it. Is it
Bonk or Sophie that is writing Sophie
had no involvement? I'll give you a
spoiler. There's no way that we can tell
for sure. And my theory is that that's
by intent. Through this thread, we do
see Bonk's DMs with KP, which does
allude to the fact that it's Bonk
posting them, or it would, except for
the fact that I also have those DMs.
Becket also has those DMs. Those DMs
have been leaked. Alternatively, on May
the 13th, Sophie writes to Emily that
she logged out of the Brony Fandon
account, Twitter, specifically after
disavowing the KP video. Now, these are
the tweets that Sophie did sign off on.
The second one she did, anyway. The
first one she didn't. I just have to
assume that she wrote the first one. And
you'll notice that many of the tweets on
the account weren't signed off on. Like
it's not relevant information, but it
clearly is relevant information. I have
a hard time believing that these are the
only tweets that Sophie wrote before she
took the account from Bonk. Also, for
someone who was less involved in Bonk,
it appears that they had equal amount of
knowledge at the time. Both getting
blindsided by the actual video, but both
seeming to have some sort of knowledge
and understanding of Emily. Doie had
access to the Brony Fandone account and
it gave her the perfect rounds to say
whatever [\h__\h] she wanted about Sabers
Spark, Black Griffin, anyone. And unless
she explicitly gave her signature,
everyone would have thought that it was
Bonk. I'm not saying that any specific
post is hers because I don't really
know. I can't know. As far as I can
understand it right now, she's not just
given Bonk back the account, but
completely absolved herself of the Brony
Fandom project. Now, that timing is very
interesting. when the account's
reputation is completely shattered
beyond repair due to flying too close to
the sun. Someone packs up and runs. And
you know, that's one thing that I'm not
letting happen again. So, let's get a
little bit in depth here. During the
production of my video, Bonk was
released from the hospital and has been
doing a lot of the old stuff on Twitter.
He came at me wanting me to disavow
Becket, keep saying X, Y, and Z about
Saber Spark, and has been getting into a
lot of fights. I use the word fight
specifically. Harassment is one way, a
fight is two ways. So, he's putting out
a lot of insults, a lot of deranged
statements and clear misinformation. And
I could go on disavowing this or that,
talking about who did what and trying to
get to the bottom of the murky depths.
But in an internet slap fight, it's
irrelevant. In a fight, everything gets
very nasty and no one looks good. And if
I were to critique every little thing
that every party did, we'd be here all
day. That's not the point of what I'm
trying to get at. I want everyone to
think of everything that Bonk has been
doing since getting out of the hospital
and getting the account back. And you
know what? Everything that's been
happening to him. I want everyone here
to remember Sophie had the power to stop
this. She was the only person who had
the actual power to stop this. Other
people could report the account, but she
had the password and she temporarily
removed access from Bonk. I will say
Bonk also had access to the blue sky
which did and does have a smaller
audience. But even with that in mind,
Sophie could have used the brony fandom
Twitter account to distance itself from
Bonk's actions and disavow them. She did
not. She took the option of giving the
account back to Bonk. The Twitter
account, whose generalized community is
much more toxic than Blue Skies once
again after he used that account to
stream himself attempting to jump off a
bridge. You know what? Let's talk
charity. I'm willing to hear a reason
that doesn't make Sophie's actions look
demented. However, if there is any
reason you can think of, I want that
reason stated publicly on your own
Twitter profile. I want everyone to hear
it. Cuz like here's here's the ironic
thing. Despite everything that Bonk has
said and done and blah blah blah, I
don't want bad things to befall him. But
here's the fact of the matter. As long
as he is in that Twitter account, bad
things will befall him because he has
proven that he cannot handle it.
Especially now that the Saber Spark
allegations have fallen apart and the
ones that platforming them were
conspirators against Black Griffin.
Allegations that Bonk has been trying to
do something with for over half a decade
now and has been a major part of his
life. And yes, conspiracy. I don't use
the word conspiracy lightly because it's
a word that's hard to take seriously,
but there was a legitimate conspiracy
against Saber Spark. Emily's screenshot
of them all together proves it. Sophie,
Amy, Emily, and Bonk were all talking
behind the scenes. This is despite Amy
claiming that she has very little
involvement. Despite brony fan claiming
that Sophie couldn't get involved
because the story triggered her. And you
know what? Speaking of conspiracies,
there's one thing that I've got to
mention here towards the end. I do not
believe that people are going after
Becket because he's quote unquote
right-wing or edgy or whatever. I think
it's because he platformed Clare and
Michelle and played that clip of Ian
yelling allegedly in a therapist office.
That is what pretty much everyone
involved in this conspiracy keeps
saying, that this was recorded without
Ian's consent or that it's a HIPPA
violation or whatever. And when asked,
Bonk wouldn't provide evidence of this
fact because he doesn't trust me. No one
has provided evidence of this. The
question is, if this is true, how would
anyone know this? It couldn't be Clara
saying this because she's the one who
provided the audio. So, it's either the
therapist or Ian himself. Bonk
specifically alleges the recording was
cut up and edited into conversations
that didn't really happen. So, let's
talk about the editing angle. I took a
look at the audio of the thing and
analyzed its waveform and I even ran it
through a spectrogram, which you can use
to catch audio cuts. So, there are cuts
in the audio. The first one happens
after almost 2 minutes of a 3minute
recording. Now, to say it was
intentionally cut up is a little bit
far. It could be a technical failure of
the recording or it could be stitching
several conversations together. Here's
the thing. The argument that's being
made is that they're out of context. And
let's just get this out of the way.
There is no context, which makes Ian
sound anything but an [\h__\h] Unless I
guess they were recording a show
together, which is not the allegation.
Assuming that the audio cuts aren't just
technical failures from a bad
microphone, the worst thing that I can
call this is a compilation. Because as
far as I can tell, in between the cuts,
it's not edited. Even beyond that,
investigation says the first twothirds
of this, which alone makes Ian look like
an [\h__\h] hasn't been altered in any
way whatsoever. Bonk was pretty much mad
at everyone for using the quote unquote
therapy recording. But here's the thing,
Beckett didn't hide that there was an
audio cutout. He subtitled it as
trailing off. And you want to know
something really damn ironic? So, one
thing came up in my call with Bonk. I
didn't record the call, so I can't
objectively prove it. But I wasn't in
that call alone, so I actually have a
witness. Benius was with me in that call
for everything, and he can verify it.
One of the criticisms that Bonk had for
me specifically was that I criticized KP
for recording people without their
consent because Bonk says that he found
it necessary to do that sometimes.
So, he thinks that his word is better
than Claire on whether or not she was
groomed. He's okay with recording people
without their consent unless it's Clare
doing it, the person he believes he is
trying to save. And I bet he's probably
wondering why I won't talk to him
anymore. Bon can accuse me of lying of
that, but once again, I had a witness in
that call. And if we're playing the
defamation game, he accused me of making
jokes about his suicide, which I
blatantly did not do and can prove
because the VOD is still on my channel,
will be on my channel, isn't unedited.
Definitionally, that's liable. I'm not
going to do anything about it. I'm just
stating a fact of the matter. And if he
keeps going on the same path, he's going
to rub against someone who is far less
charitable. I would not joke about his
attempt. I've got nightmares about what
he tried to do. And I'm not even joking.
It'd be best for everyone involved if he
should just forget that I exist, but I
don't think he can. He doesn't let
things go. Bonk wanted to do a reaction
to my video at some point, but someone
told him not to do it, and so he didn't
until Beckett's second video came out,
and now he's ranting about everything
and everyone. So, I'm sure that they'll
be saying many, many wonderful things
about me in the future from here to
perpetuity. And you know what? I
honestly don't give a [\h__\h] anymore. I I
just don't. I've had enough. I'm tired.
I stated ahead of time that Brony Fan
don't the account should be disavowed.
And I think that's the only way to react
to all this is just ignore the account
completely. Don't respond to it. Don't
retweet it. Don't look at it. Seriously,
it's bad for any side of anything, no
matter what you're trying to fight for,
to give it any sort of attention at this
point. So, where does that leave
everyone else? Sabers Spark did put up a
community post. It states that he's
looking into legal action, but it's not
clear towards who, and he is probably
looking forward into getting back into a
more regular schedule. Uh, if you're
curious, Saber Spark and I did talk
behind the scenes after my video, and we
came to amicable terms. Uh, there is no
bad blood between us anywhere. As for
the people directly involved in the
allegations against him, I'm guessing
that they're going to try and move on,
try and pretend that they didn't have as
much involvement as they did. But in the
end, the only real question is who is
the most culpable of everything that
happened. But that's not a decision for
me. That is a decision for the courts at
this point. Legal and court of public
opinion, I guess. Yeah, that that's the
funny thing that no one tells you about
going to the court of public opinion
instead of an actual trial. The court of
public opinion uh doesn't have rules of
double jeopardy. Actual legal only has
one shot, so they need to put all the
evidence at the table. Meanwhile, out
here, we could be relitigating things
every time someone sneezes. Weird. A lot
of people have their own opinions about
amateurs doing stuff like this. Like
pretty much everyone involved isn't an
actual professional. Most of us have a
degree of professionalism, but like no
one has a degree in investigations. And
when amateurs get involved, [\h__\h] does
tend to happen. A lot of bad [\h__\h] And
not even because people have the worst
intentions. Sometimes people are just
really that incompetent. I understand
those opinions. In an ideal world,
professionals would tackle every single
situation. We don't live in an ideal
world. And sometimes what you get is
what you have. And sometimes all you get
is just random people trying the best
they can with what they have. And
sometimes you don't even have those. You
got the ambulance chasers, the people
only looking to make a profit. As Creepy
Reading put in my live stream, there's a
bunch of sub 20 subscriber drama
gremlins out there. People who are in it
for nothing but the ad revenue and well
clout. Or even worse, the people in it
with some kind of vengeance. I can't say
I'm happy with the way that everything
happened in the background, but as far
as I can tell, the truth is out and that
is the most important thing. In my
personal perview, Saber Spark's text
communications with Emily when compared
to the testimony that she gave us
exonerates Saber Spark. Not guilty as my
verdict. And I think everyone involved
in the investigations more than anything
wants to move on to some kind of
normaly. I know that I do. Uh but as an
epilogue, it brings us back to where we
all started. the one person who is
probably not going to get normaly. What
about I love Kim Possible a lot? Well,
as I write this, exactly a month ago,
she made a tweet saying that she was
waiting for third party information to
drop before she gave a response. Uh that
was before Becc's first video. So, as of
now, the dust has largely settled. So,
if she's still on stating her case, uh
that'll be the next chapter in the
story. Uh, if any of you want to keep
going on past its end. And to be as
honest as I can, I'm curious to see what
she's going to say at this point. If
you're wondering, no one behind the
scenes told KP about Saber Spark's
texts. It was mean and it was sucky, but
it had to be done that way. After we
told KP about Saber Spark's phone being
dead a month ago, KP went straight to
Emily with her threat. Whether or not
Blanc leaked it, it made the statement
to the investigation that anything KP
was told was public. So, she learned of
the full truth when the public did, I
presume. For security reasons, we
couldn't tell KP what we had learned as
we learned it. Emily couldn't be alerted
until someone we could trust talked to
her directly about the texts. And by
that point, the video was almost done.
Anyway, I could say plenty of things
about my own thoughts with like everyone
involved, but I think that what's on the
table speaks for itself really. And I
think that's the end. I never claimed to
be perfect. I want to I want to make
that clear here. I'm just trying my
best. And I hope that you agree that we
did the best we could with what we had.
And when we couldn't uncover the full
truth ourselves, we worked
wholeheartedly with people who could and
did. After I did Signal Boost Beckett's
video, people once again call me biased.
And I will say it again. I am biased. I
am biased to the truth. The truth is
what was important here. It's the most
important thing. And the truth is I am
more tired than I have ever been in my
entire life. Is there anything else that
I'm forgetting? Oh yes, the the the
Chuga Conroy thing. Okay, this is very
very tangential. Uh but this is brought
up in the interview with Emily. The
Queen Falls documentary accused Emily of
defending Chuga Conroy. So we brought it
up in the interview. Of course, I
believe the allegation in the original
video was wrong of what Cho was even
accused of. Uh, so I did at least
correct that because I'm familiar with
the story and the stuff that I said that
Cho was accused of was what he was
accused of. That is what people accused
of him. But because it was a smaller
point in a larger video, there was
already a smaller point in a larger
video. I didn't elaborate on how that
story ended. I just linked to his
response, but apparently that wasn't
enough. Chucka Conroy released a full
14-page document talking about a bunch
of wider information that cast a lot of
light on that situation that made it
more complicated than the people who
were accusing him made it seem. For
example, people pointed out a lot of the
innuendos Chuga had with someone on
videos that made him seem creepy. What
wasn't revealed to the public until
Chuga himself made it public was that
the two were actually engaged and had
been dating for 10 years. At present,
these two people have made up, so please
do not target or go off on anyone. I'm
sure that you can find a full
documentary on that story on your own. I
never meant to revitalize old
allegations. That was never the
intention. And at some point, I'm sure
someone will go deeper into all of the
other things that were brought up in
that interview to verify this or that. I
will reiterate, I am very tired. This
this isn't my day job. This is just me
trying to do right by people. I'll also
reiterate that I do think the team and I
did a good job here. I know some people
have criticisms for some of the people
who worked with me or that did certain
things along the way. Without the help
from others, all of the people credited
and beyond, this whole thing would have
been a train wreck of its own. I won't
go into specific details, honestly, to
save myself from the embarrassment, but
you could probably personally imagine
how I reacted when we learned the
backstory of Emily Jones and thought
Saber Spark's phone was dead when she
said that she was texted. Of course,
roundabout way, we're back to
essentially the same truth. But I don't
think I need to state why it's wrong to
be right for the wrong reasons, or at
least I should hope that I don't have
to. A lot of people worked very hard and
are still working very hard and they
come from a wide variety of walks of
life. And I will also already state it
goes beyond who's credited by the way.
Like I credited a certain amount of
people uh but that's not everyone who
worked on the video. During projects
like this I actively ask if people do or
don't want to be credited. And if they
don't specifically state they want to be
credited. I don't credit them unless
they're like obviously in the video and
their connections are undeniable. And I
don't think I should have to explain why
I do this. Anyway, too long didn't
watch. Sabers Spark was accused of stuff
by Emily Jones and platform by I Love
Kim Possible a lot. During the
investigation that took a month and a
half, Saber Spark found old text data
that went completely against Emily Jones
testimony and painted a very different
picture of reality. Enough to where I
can say that Saber Spark is not guilty
of what he is accused of. And that's the
final findings. You know, in in 2013
when I decided to review cartoons, I I
don't know if I would have ever have
expected my life to turn out the way it
has. Butterfly effects are fascinating.