I didn't cover the Saber Spark drama
back when it was happening. I think the
Saber Spark drama happened before I uh
started uploading on this channel, but I
guess I'll give you guys like a TLDDR.
Um, Saber Spark had some serious
allegations of sexual assault levied
against him. He's in the I think he's in
the online art community. Um, he's kind
of like closely overlapped with a lot of
those spaces. I know the brony fandote
account, like we talked about it in the
uh Black Griffin coverage I did, which
by the way, I'll leave a link to my
Black Griffin video in the description
below if I remember it, but essentially
uh Sabers Spark got these allegations
and uh he made a response video that
pretty much debunked most of it. And I
it's kind of sad like the whole Saber
Spark situation is really sad because
even though the allegations are false
and he recovered most of his fans, I
would say he recovered most of his
audience. Um he still has his reputation
irreparably damaged. Like he like there
are still people that like don't watch
him or don't even know that the
allegations are false. And he's had
opportunities that have been completely
missed or squashed as a result of these
allegations coming out. And it just
really [\h__\h] sucks. And this person
named I love Kim Possible Lot was one of
the people involved in pushing these
allegations heavily. And uh Brony Fand
was another one. And once the those
allegations wound up being false, some
people were questioning the Black
Griffin allegations whether those had
authenticity. And I guess uh I love Kim
Possible a lot decided to come forward
with this. Someone sent this to me on
Discord, by the way. Um and I guess I'll
just uh we'll just take a look at it.
It's a 10-minute video. I highly doubt
that this is going to be any meaningful,
I guess, followup to the Saber Spark
situation, but we'll take a stab at it.
>> This video discusses sensitive topics,
including grooming, power dynamics, and
>> oh, power dynamics. That's a new one. I
don't think I've seen anyone put power
dynamics in the [\h__\h] trigger
warnings. And I'm just going to be real
with you. This point is absolutely not
going to matter. Like I like right off
the bat, I know we're only 5 seconds
into it, but this point completely
irrelevant. I'm letting you know now.
Every time someone talks about power
dynamics online, in a majority of cases,
I would say 99.99% of the time, it often
just boils down to them saying, "Oh,
well, they're a bigger content creator
and I'm not a bigger content creator,
and therefore there's a power dynamic."
And uh that's bad. And and I'm just
going to be clear, power dynamics exist
everywhere, okay? There's power dynamics
between siblings, right? an older
sibling and a younger sibling. You know,
there's power dynamics between someone
who is a dungeon master in a D and D
game versus the players. There is a
power dynamic there. Uh there's power
dynamics between you and your boss.
There's power dynamics between you and
your teacher. There are power dynamics
between uh people who make more money
than someone else. And and the point I'm
trying to make is power dynamics are
probably in every single relationship
you can come up with off the top of your
head. And they just exist. And the
existence of one doesn't inherently mean
that the power dynamic is being abused.
All right. Uh the only thing that would
make it problematic is if Sabers Spark
said, "Hey, I'm a bigger content creator
and if you don't have sex with me, I
will [\h__\h] cancel you in my community
and every opportunity you have in any
community adjacent to mine, then that is
really that's a form of sexual assault
that is predatory." Absolutely. Um, or
if he says, "Hey, if you do [\h__\h] me,
I'll give something to you as a content
creator. I'll like boost your platform
or something." That is also an abuse of
a power dynamic. So, unless we see any
of that, then this point does not
matter. So, I can already just tell by
the fact that they put this in the
trigger warnings just okay. We're not
really going to have any meaningful
discussion in this video just by seeing
that alone.
>> Online harassment. Viewer discretion is
advised.
>> All right. Content warning. Do not
harass anyone discussed in this video.
Hi everyone.
>> Damn.
>> Welcome to the video. For those who
don't know me, I'm the YouTuber. I love
Kim Possible a lot.
>> Wow. Guys, I think she loves Kim
Possible a lot. I I would never be able
to guess,
>> which is a very long name, but I'm known
as KP on online spaces. I mostly do
Disney and cartoon media analysis, but
we aren't here for that today. Today
we're here to talk about another video I
did recently that
>> Well, I don't even think you've uploaded
in a while. No. Yeah. Like, look at
this. Girly pop. You haven't uploaded in
months. And you're like, "Normally, I
talk about these things." Uh, girly.
Like, no one knows who the [\h__\h] you are.
Like, you have a 100,000 subscribers,
but like, you only seem to make it to
like 5k views on a good day. And I'm not
trying to be that guy. I'm not trying to
be an [\h__\h] and viewer shame, but it's
like, girly, like I don't know. It seems
like you weren't really doing well and
you if I didn't know any better, I'd say
that you probably saw an opportunity to
get a lot of views and a lot of clout
and you decided to jump on this uh Saber
Spark sexual assault uh cancel wave, but
uh all right,
>> that didn't go over so well. The video
was
>> Yeah, I wonder why. Maybe it was because
the allegations were false and you
didn't seem to care about the
uh severity of them. You just wanted to
gain clout out of it. It seems
>> intended to be a conversation about
problematic behaviors in online spaces,
community safety, especially
>> problematic behavior in online. Listen,
I'm not trying to be an [\h__\h] but if
you truly believe there was a sexual
Listen, if I truly believe there was a
sexual assault of somebody and I really
thought then believed it, I wouldn't
label it as problematic behavior in
online spaces. If you're implying that
sexual assault occurred, then why the
[\h__\h] why would you label it online
behavior? Because a sexual assault has
to occur in real life, right? I don't
know. Like this might seem like I'm
nitpicking a little bit, but like I I'm
not crazy for thinking that. No,
>> concerning children and my own
experiences regarding certain YouTubers
and content creators named in this
video. However, even the best of
intentions could go ary, and it's safe
to say that my internally did, causing
unintended harm and confusion in a
situation where clarity and resources
are paramount.
>> M I'm going to doubt that one, Kim. I'm
sorry. Like, I don't know. You want to
post a video levying a sexual assault
allegations against this YouTuber. And I
imagine, is Black Griffin coming up in
this? Uh, I don't think Black Griffin is
involved in this one. I do think that
the [\h__\h] um what was it? The Brony
Fandone account probably comes up later.
But still anyway, it was Brony Fandone
who was involved in Black Griffin. But
that's beside the point. It's like I'm
going to doubt that you had the best
intentions with this. It just seems like
you handled allegations poorly and you
levied sexual assault allegations and
you really didn't seem to you didn't
seem to care. I don't know. For all I
know, maybe you could have had best of
intentions, but it just seems like
you're really I I don't know. Like it
it's like saying that it didn't go well.
Like this is not really anything out of
honesty. Like how come if it really if
you really did have the best intentions,
why are you coming out with this months
after Sabers Spark released their
response?
That doesn't make a whole lot of sense
to me.
>> The video in question went live on my
channel in May earlier this year, being
removed within hours of upload since I
understood the message.
>> Okay. Uh, so the video that you that
went live. It was with Saber Spark.
Yeah. Okay. I've heard concerns about
the recent video and want to acknowledge
that parts of it didn't land the way I
intended. While it was reviewed by
several people, including CSA survivors,
who were comfortable with the tone, I
now understand that others experienced
it very differently, and that's valid.
Uh, this was my first time covering a
topic of this nature, and I'm still
learning how to handle serious topics of
a subject matter with the right level of
care. I've taken the video down
considering how to approach it if it's
revised. I don't know. Like this could
be true maybe, but I I just have a huge
level of skepticism,
especially from people who falsely
accuse others of sexual assault,
blatantly so. Like it just it seems like
your most charitable interpretation of
Kim Po I love Kim Posspel a lot is that
she handled this situation so [\h__\h]
badly and she clearly didn't have enough
evidence to go off of and it just like I
don't know the least charitable
interpretation is that she was malicious
about it. The most charitable is that
she was so [\h__\h] careless about this
situation and I really am curious to
know how the intent was never to
diminish anyone's story experience.
Thank you for those who provided
feedback. I appreciate the chance to
make changes necessary to give proper
respect to material discussed. All
right.
>> Not come off as what I intended. I
haven't yet spoken on the issue
publicly, choosing to take time and
space to be able to address legitimate
concerns of the video with a clear head
and level emotions. For those of you who
>> uh I mean, I guess that's reasonable. I
mean, the internet does tend to give
disproportionate feedback to people, but
I feel like when you levy a false sexual
assault allegation, which you haven't
really brought up that much in this
video, you didn't outwardly say it. You
just showed a screenshot of what you
said about it.
I don't know. Like, I feel like you have
to understand there's a level of push
back that is necessary to hear. So, I I
don't know.
>> You still have no idea what I'm talking
about. Earlier this year, I released a
video about the online actions of DA
Games associates Chris Deficados and
Will Ryan, another YouTuber named Steven
or Savior Spark and the association
between them that creates a dangerous
space for miners to occupy.
>> Oh my god.
Yeah. All right. Whatever. Like at most
Saber Spark is probably irresponsible a
little bit, but like you levied a
[\h__\h] sexual assault allegation
against him as well. So I I don't know.
Like, are we going to mention that?
>> Included in the video was my own
testimony of interactions with Steven as
well as third party testimony of
additional interactions with Steven.
>> Yeah, that's not enough evidence to say
whether he did or didn't do it. Like I I
like I'm sorry, but it's like you say my
intentions were well with this, but
obviously it didn't resonate with
people. Yeah, okay, but like you still
handled it badly. The third party
testimony includes accusations of essay
from a person named Emily, accusations I
platformed on a video that in hindsight
wasn't suited for testimony that heavy.
Some other notable issues.
>> Okay. I mean, I'm I guess I'm glad that
you're finally admitting that. But I
don't know, girl. You were super
irresponsible with your platform.
>> That were pointed out about my video was
the tone. The general consensus was that
the tone throughout the video was jokey
and that I came across as making light
of some serious accusations and
conversations.
>> I didn't watch the original video, but
like I watched the response that Saber
Spark had and a lot of the claims were
just so like just out there. Like it it
was just like out of the blue. and you
platform, like listen, if you're
platforming someone, listen, you're
going to platform some like a wall of
text that someone says about their
sexual assault story, then you have to
like really take everything into
account. You you can't just platform it
and be like, "Oh my god, this is true."
Like, if that's what you did, that's
very [\h__\h] irresponsible of you. And
you do have to suffer repercussions for
that to some capacity. Like, you do. I'm
I'm not trying to be an [\h__\h] but
it's like you platform very serious
allegations that wound up being false.
This is why we don't make false
allegations against people. I'm not
saying that you made them, but you
definitely had a role in pushing them
and it was super [\h__\h] stupid of you
to do.
>> As well as my social media postings
leading up to the release of the video.
My postings came across as bragging,
clout chasing, and once again that I was
making light of a serious situation.
>> You I don't blame people for coming to
that conclusion because there is a lot
of clout to gain off of saying that
someone did a bad thing online. And I'm
not that's not to say that everyone who
comes forward with a story online is
necessarily lying, you know? I'm not
saying that. But like you have to
remember all it takes is like two or
three false allegations for someone to
get completely [\h__\h] blackpilled and
then like be like, "Oh well now every
single allegation that's online is
false." That's all it takes for some
people. And like I don't know, I'm of
the opinion that like if you were
sexually assaulted, you need to go to
law enforcement. I get it. Law
enforcement's not perfect. The system we
have is far from perfect. They're not
the best when it comes to prosecuting
people. But that doesn't mean that the
next avenue you have is going to the
[\h__\h] internet about it. Like you
still have to go to the police. All
right? Cuz when you post something on
the internet, you are susceptible to
hearing so many different perspectives.
You know, if you get overvalidated or
undervalidated, that can be an
additional trauma on top of things,
right? You can be that can be like an
extra trauma to your story that you
wouldn't have otherwise had. And that's
why when you see a therapist, they're
very careful not to do either of those
things. They are trained to sit you
where you are. A good therapist will do
that anyways to make sure that they sit
you where you're at and they don't
[\h__\h] do either of these things. I
don't know. Like I feel like if you
don't understand the seriousness of
sexual assault, if you're trying to
quote unquote make light of someone
else's story, maybe you shouldn't be
speaking up about social issues to begin
with.
I'd like to firstly apologize for anyone
who was hurt by my tone both throughout
the video and on my socials. My joking
and memeing was contained to my own
experiences as I deal with my own trauma
that way. I make dark jokes and make
light of my own situations. Something I
didn't realize was not universal and
might come off as if the tone pertained
to anyone's experiences that weren't my
own. And I do want people to understand
that it was directed at my own
experiences. But I'm sorry.
>> So, you were projecting a little bit. I
mean, I wouldn't necessarily doubt that
if if Kim this person has like a
legitimate trauma. Maybe that's
possible. I mean, I'm not here to like I
mean, we're not here for your
allegations, though. We're here for
Saber Spark. So, like again, obviously,
it could just be like a bit of a lack a
self-awareness issue. It's possible, but
you have to remember that these are
serious allegations at the end of the
day. And the tone you have to come with
them, even if you make like a joke or
two, the overall tone still has to be
serious. And so I don't blame people for
thinking you came at this with the
intention of gaining clout. I mean, your
channel hasn't really been doing super
hot as we saw earlier in this video. So,
I feel like it just doesn't really I
don't think it's a far-fetched thing to
say that you probably came forward with
this to get some clout to some capacity
>> that it didn't translate properly.
Another thing I'd like to personally
address is Courtney Pete and her
treatment of another CSA survivor in the
live chat of the video premiere. I have
spoken to both Courtney and the affected
individual. Apologize on Courtney's
behalf. Video premiere.
>> Okay. I have to read this. Uh May 2nd.
Hi, I talked
with Courtney and she doesn't seem like
she wants to ap uh apologies. I'm sorry
about that. It is what it is. I
appreciate you trying. I wish I got a
better update, but she has a death
anniversary coming up and she's got a
lot on her pl Oh. Oh, death ann.
I've never heard someone do like a death
anniversary. I suppose it's not like
completely uncommon, I guess, for some
people. Maybe it's like a death of a
family member. I I I guess I don't know.
I feel like that's the [\h__\h] you'd kind
of want to forget though, right?
>> I've spoken to both Courtney and the
effective
>> I don't know if I'd word it like a death
anniversary. That seems a little bit out
there.
>> Individual apologize on Courtney's
behalf. And going forward, since she
doesn't want to apologize herself, I'm
cutting public ties with her. While I
can't control the actions of another
grown individual, I can control how and
if she is associated with my work and
channel. Now, I'd like to take some time
to go over my original intentions of the
video.
>> I You kind of already did. No, like
let's not. Why don't we talk about like
let's talk about like any evidence to
any of the claims that you provided, but
you didn't seem to provide any [\h__\h]
evidence. You just showed like one long
post that wasn't even verified and it
backfired on you. Maybe just get your
[\h__\h] together and just like move on.
Maybe like you apologize for it. Okay,
that's fine. You can apologize for it,
but like why don't we just move on, you
know? Like why rehash any of this to
begin with? Like the allegations are
false. you like you were part of
irreparably damaging Saber Spark's
reputation. Why don't we just move on?
You know, like why don't we just put the
fries in the bag?
>> The conversation I wanted to start in
the message that fell short. Steven or
Saber Spark employs an editor by the
name of Chris, who owns a Discord
server. Chris is also employed by Will,
who owns the DA Games Discord server.
There are a lot of names to keep track
of, I know. Will has a pass of posting
pornographic, racist, incestuous, and
anti-semitic content in both his and
Chris's servers.
>> Yeah, I'm gonna censor all of this, by
the way, because I absolutely can't show
this on YouTube. I don't know why, bro.
Why the [\h__\h] are you comfortable show
Dude, this isn't even censored enough.
Why are you showing this? This is a
[\h__\h] lolly model, too, and you didn't
even censor it enough. Why are you
showing this? Oh my god. I have to
[\h__\h] censor. I'm cutting this out of
the like I'm cutting that out
completely. Oh, that's so What the [\h__\h]
Oh my god. Okay. I mean, like, listen,
none of this is [\h__\h] good. Okay. But
like is the in was the insinuation in
your original allegations just like
[\h__\h]
the insinuation was that you were trying
to say that [\h__\h] Saber Spark was
involved somehow because there's overlap
between the [\h__\h] editor that they
hired or the person that they hired or
whatever. Like obviously if that was the
case then I guess every single person
would be a predator including the people
that Dr. Disrespect associated with. I
don't know
>> his own server, the DA game server,
having children as young as 11, maybe
younger, with access to these posts. Not
only do children as young as 11 have
access to this content, but there are
also children as young as 12 given mod
status. The same server also has a man
accused of and arrested of child
grooming.
>> Uh, well, hold on.
>> The same server also has a man accused
of an arrest.
>> Um, okay. I now have to [\h__\h] verify
this information. All right. So, I just
looked up who this person was.
Apparently, they were arrested for child
porn. Actually, you said they were
arrested for child grooming. Uh, but
they were arrested for CP and stuff.
Like, I don't know. Like, I didn't The
way she worded it, she said they got
arrested for child grooming, but like I
don't I know I'm going to sound [\h__\h]
up for a moment, but I don't think child
grooming is a crime. Like, I don't think
setting up as [\h__\h] up as that sounds.
I know, but like I don't think that's a
crime. I think if anything sexual
actually occurs with the child is when
it happens. I know this because there's
a lot of [\h__\h] weird people that have
done a lot of all sorts of horrible [\h__\h]
but don't get convicted for these things
unless something actually happens with
the child or something act like actually
sexual happens. And I thought there's
got to be more to the story. And I'm
sorry just like it's one of those things
where it's like even when you get small
details like that. I know I'm nitpicking
this person a lot, but like even when
you get small details like this wrong,
this just proves to show that you
shouldn't be talking about sexual
assault. You you clearly are not mature
enough to be talking about these serious
issues whatsoever. And that's especially
disappointing considering you claim to
have your own trauma. I don't even know
if I believe it's on the same level as
sexual assault to be honest with you.
Like I don't know how much I believe
that cuz like if you knew how
traumatizing that was then you wouldn't
really be treating it with the conveying
it the way that you've been conveying
it. So I don't know but okay I we got to
be like we have to like get our
information correct here if we're going
to like try to like post it at all of
child grooming. This is Will's own views
on how children should be interacted
with online with some 12-year-old
>> Hold on. I got to read this.
>> Okay. So, it's been brought to my
attention that there are three names,
not going to name them, who have been
abusing our mod. Again, no name. I'm
pretty sure you know you guys are
calling out that because of the age,
they shouldn't be allowed. Time and time
again, I can't believe I have to keep
mentioning this, but mods are placed not
on age, but maturity. Okay, that's
obviously a very it's a huge red flag on
this guy, obviously. Uh, imagine if we
took a 41year-old who acted five and a
12-year-old who acts 26. Well, let me
tell you that has happened and will
happen periodically. Not in this server,
but life itself. No, it won't. Uh,
doesn't matter. Uh, I don't care if the
12-year-old's like, "Oh, I'm mature for
their age." Like, a 12-year-old or a
14-year-old thinks that they're mature
for their age. They're not. They're
[\h__\h] stupid. Uh, they don't know what
they're talking about at all. They're
way too young to even like think about
these things uh periodically. So,
I just obviously like this is a very
stupid thing to say. Like, no, you got
to have like a hard stance against this.
This is obviously not a good thing to
say. It is not about the age. It is
indeed about the level maturity. Now, to
the abusers who call out the fact that
this mod is 12 and you uh call the mod
out to be uh have you [\h__\h] seen who I
am? I'm 24 and still act young enough to
be in school. Whatever. Okay. Brain
broke trying to even say this out loud.
Okay, whatever. Fine.
>> More mature that some 40-year-olds. I'd
like to point out that this is groomer
mentality. This is the same sort of
language used to make a child feel
special and grown up when receiving
inappropriate attention from grown
people on
>> I mean we don't necessarily know if he
groomed himself but I I I wouldn't doubt
it. I mean it's certainly a red flag but
you like have to actually do we have
like any evidence that he did it cuz
like I don't know if he was involved in
that at all. Like I mean like he sent a
lot of weird [\h__\h] [\h__\h] and he seems
to have not good boundaries with minors.
So certainly a red flag. I I'm not going
to dispute that he didn't groom anybody.
He might have for all I know, but
>> minor off. Not to mention that Discord's
own terms of service state that the
users must be 13 to even be on the
platform. Terms will and Chris seem to
be happy to help children break. How and
why does this pertain to Steve?
>> I really wish you would [\h__\h] stop
showing proof for like a split second so
I can actually pause and read what
you're [\h__\h] showing me.
>> Terms will and Chris seem to be happy to
help.
>> By the way, I'm 11. You're fine though.
I'm two years older. L. But see, I
called your age out higher. You'd think
that kind of stands out as older than
your age, right? Yeah, because you are
more mature. You're another great Okay,
this guy's weird. This [\h__\h] Will Guy
is very weird. Okay, you know what? At
this point, maybe he is a groomer. I
don't [\h__\h] know. It's possible. I'm
not going to dispute that. Like, this
guy is [\h__\h] weird as [\h__\h]
>> Children break. How and why does this
pertain to Steven? Well, frankly, I see
an issue with the content creator
employing someone who directly
contributes to inappropriate
interactions with children online by
>> Oh my god. Okay, I'm going to have to
[\h__\h] read this. Uh, you did. Okay, so
this was in 2023. You did payment should
be inbound here, Sue, but I just want to
run a question to you. I had someone
approach me here on a Discord that
allegedly involved you and KP and some
deviant behavior that you bragged about.
I don't take these things lightly in the
people that I work with, but I also
don't want to automatically believe a
potential rumor. Is there any validity
to these claims? There's something I
need to know with the people I employ.
Uh, I hope you see where I'm coming from
with this question. KP and I resolved
that issue a few days ago actually. So
everything is okay then? You don't mind
me asking? Not that it's my business to
know the details, but just making sure
all is good and on the level with the
people that you were worked. Yeah, it
seems like Saber Okay, so just to be
clear, Saber Spark was obviously a big
content creator. He still is, but
obviously he's just trying to make sure
that everything is all good with this
[\h__\h] uh Chris person.
Um, no, Will. Will is another character.
Okay. I I I there's a lot of names to
remember. Sorry. It seems like Saber
Spark is doing like everything well.
Like I don't think I could have worded
this better. Like he worded this in a
way that makes sense and that like hey,
you know, like I don't want to believe
the allegation immediately, but I also
want to know is there any validity to
these claims? I feel like this is
something I should know. Like Saber
Spark is doing everything right here.
Everything's fine now. Yes, it was
resolved amicable. She wouldn't even
want me to divulge anything if that's
all right. Her privacy is important.
Understood. Just doing my part to be
vigilant with my own people. Glad you
are all resolved. Leaving it at that.
Much appreciated. Cool. All right. Fine.
of children online by providing a space
where it's normalized, welcome, and
defended.
>> Okay. I don't know. You can't show us a
screenshot of Saber Spark doing the
correct thing to make sure an allegation
is true or isn't true and sets the
proper boundary for it and then [\h__\h]
claim that Saber Spark enables child
grooming in his spaces. You can't do
that [\h__\h] Especially, girl, you said
your intention was well, but you're
already [\h__\h] handling this so badly.
You're handling this so badly already.
You This woman should not be speaking up
about social issues. She clearly is not
mature enough to do so at all. She She
clearly does not have any maturity or
intelligence to do it.
>> I see an even bigger issue when that
content creator has a history of
posturing himself against child
predators as being the voice that calls
them out, but is fine to employ people
who do this very thing he himself has
condemned in the past.
>> Yeah. But like he he didn't know and he
tried to make sure that he knew like
that. You showed it you showed us a DM
of him trying to verify if the
allegations are true and it turns out
they weren't. And you're trying to sit
here and say that there's validity to
those allegations even though you
apologized for it earlier. Oh my god. I
already hate this. I already hate this
so [\h__\h] much.
>> And it isn't as if Steven has no idea
that this was going on under his nose. I
myself had reached out to him directly.
I sent you an email on Monday, by the
way.
Uh, okay. Wait, no, this was in January
of this year. All right, whatever. I
Okay, wait, what? I'm so confused.
>> Steven has no idea that this was going
on under his nose. I myself had reached
out to him directly and threw at least
>> I sent you an email on Monday, by the
way, and then Why are you showing us a
DM from like two like that? That's like
two like a year and a half apart.
Whatever. Okay, to be frank, let me know
if Steven will take this seriously at
all and we can go from there. I already
let him know where it's coming from down
the pipe. He's talked to Blank about
this. He's currently working on a video
with Chris, but that's all I know right
now. Okay. Yeah, but we you showed us a
DM where he like tried to make sure it
was all good. And also, this was Okay,
if you look at the date of these DMs,
this is 4 days after this DM that you
showed us right here in this in these
Discord DMs. You showed us Steven trying
to verify if it's real and he cleared it
up and he seemed to have been okay with
it at the time. So why the [\h__\h] are you
faulting Steven for this still? He did
everything in his power that was
correct.
>> Despite my repeated efforts to bring
this issue to his attention.
>> Okay. What? Okay. I contacted Saber
through some friends in common. Never
heard about an official firing though. I
was never contacted by any friend of
yours, nor did you ever make any attempt
to reach out to me on your behalf via
Twitter, email, or anything else. You
are omitting so much information right
now, but I'll provide some here in a sec
under your original post, dude. We could
talk privately. I have screenshots and I
have content both blank, blank, and
blank, girl. Oh my god.
>> Stephen never spoke to me or commented
on the issue. Meanwhile, he was supposed
>> He wanted to though,
bro. He wanted to, right, in these DMs?
No. Okay, I guess he didn't want to, but
I I don't know. He never explicitly
mentions it here, but like I I don't
know. He literally did everything in his
power that was like good. Is there
something specific that Saber isn't
getting at? Okay, whatever.
>> In my repeated efforts to bring this
issue to his attention. Steven never
spoke to me or commented on the issue.
Meanwhile, he was supposedly talking.
>> I mean, he did earlier, right? Like he
handled it privately like he needed to.
What? What do you want him to do? Make
like a [\h__\h] public statement? Make a
song and dance about it? No. Like, he's
going to try to deal with it as
privately as he can. He has a big
platform
>> to someone else about the same issue
with third party. Not to mention the
fact that Chris himself has admitted to
and bragged about a little sex crime
that Steven brushed off as a sex joke.
>> What the [\h__\h] are you showing us?
>> Has admitted to
>> Oh my god. Okay. Uh, my response to
recent events. So, Saber Sparks editor
roommed with a code group of friends at
a con, saw one girl had left the laundry
on the bathroom floor, bragged to all
their peers that he masturbated onto her
used panties, and Saber's summary was
that he
just told a sex joke and that was the
real victim. This is a random [\h__\h]
Twitter post. Like, what do you what do
you want us to do with this? This is
just random [\h__\h] testimony from other
people. Like, are you saying that this
is evidence that this definitively
happened? Cuz if you're going to use
that argument, KP, you're going to have
to do better than that.
>> Bragged about a little sex crime that
Steven brushed.
>> Oh my god. I have to read more [\h__\h]
text on screen cuz you're showing it for
like half a second. I was not going to
acknowledge this, but since people I
care about are being dragged as, I want
to make a statement. First of all, I
want to apologize for what I said in
comments in the past. The joke I told
was immature, appalling. Oh, yeah. Oh,
wait, wait, wait. I think I already read
all this from the [\h__\h] um original. I
think like I think Saber Spark did a
Google doc response and then he did like
a YouTube response. Okay, whatever
>> joke. It should all
>> I mean maybe it was it was years ago,
right? Like humor was different back in
the day and I'm not saying that makes it
okay, but like maybe it was just like he
thought it was like a weird edgy joke
and people didn't understand boundaries
as much back then than he did now. I'm
not saying that makes it okay, but if he
apologized for it then like what do you
expect? Do you want it to follow him for
the rest of his life? By that logic, you
making weird, edgy jokes about this
sexual assault that happened, making you
making jokes about it to cope with it,
you should be held over that for the
rest of your life, KP, by your own
logic.
>> Also be noted that in all of Steven's
responses to the allegations, he has
still not spoken on, condemned, or cut
ties with Chris, Will, or DA Games.
>> I What do you expect him to do? He
doesn't have anything to prove that they
definitively did it or not. You like,
what do you expect him to do? like he
already tried handling it behind the
scenes as best as he could.
>> And once again, for someone who not very
long ago had plenty to say on whether
Gabriel Brown was or wasn't a groomer.
>> Oh, Gabriel. Oh, you mean Black Griffin?
Yeah. For the most part, I think there
are some suspicious things with Black
Griff. I mean, my take on it is there
are some suspicious things like some
people alleged that he got with his
girlfriend while he was 16 or while she
was 16 and he was 25, which is obviously
[\h__\h] up. If that was true, that is
like worthy of calling out. Absolutely.
That is [\h__\h] up. But so far, there
isn't like any legitimate evidence to
support. I mean, there was some things
that like kind of looked very sus, but
there wasn't enough to definitively say
Black Griffin groomed this girl or did
anything bad to her. And also, his
girlfriend said that like she's not a
grooming victim. And I'm not going to
victimize someone if they insist on not
being a victim. they insist on not being
a grooming victim, I'm not going to sit
here and try to victimize someone and
assign victimhood to somebody. Like, I I
don't know. Like, there's just not
enough evidence to definitively say he
is or he isn't a groomer. If if more
comes out, I'll definitely make a video
on Black Griffin. If more evidence comes
out that like uh implicates him into it,
yeah, absolutely. Then we'll be there.
But like that [\h__\h] brony fan don't
person is such a weird [\h__\h] freak
[\h__\h] that seems okay with Lollcon as
well. and also pushed false allegations
for some reason just as like a virtue
signal on Twitter. So, I don't know.
Like I just there's not a lot to go off
of here. KP
>> that child predation online is terrible
and he himself has been abused as a
child. It seems odd that he has nothing
to say about his own employees child
predation even to condemn it.
>> Where's the evidence? You haven't shown
us any like legitimate evidence for it.
There's no evidence.
>> Let alone him excusing masturbation onto
a stranger's clothes. A biohazard.
>> Where's the evidence? Can you show us
any of this? Like you showed us like
screenshots of testimony from people,
but is there like any actual legitimate
damning things to say about it? Like
where? All you have is just testimony
from random [\h__\h] people and you're
saying up this definitely happened.
You're you're doing exactly what you
apologized for earlier in this video and
you're still pushing false allegations.
Oh my god, you're so weird. You're such
a weird person
>> and sexual harassment as a joke. And now
on to Emily. In regards to Emily's
testimony in academ,
>> let's not let's log off the internet.
Let's not go on to Emily
>> against Steven, she has released her own
video that will be linked in the
comments and I encourage people to go
watch and hear her story from her own
mouth. While I don't regret believing
someone, I do understand that I wasn't
the best equipped to be the person
breaking a story like that.
>> Yeah, no [\h__\h] Why did you [\h__\h] make
a video on it then? Um, maybe it's cuz
there's clout to gain from it. I don't
know. Because there's a lot of clout in
talking about allegations online. Don't
get me wrong, I cover allegations, too.
But I'm not going to sit here and say
that they're real or aren't real. I'm
going to look at all the evidence in
front of me and then give a good faith
interpretation based on what's
available. Like I you're just so [\h__\h]
irresponsible when handling this
information
>> public for the first time. When it came
to other people's coverage of the
situation, whether or not they had
spoken to me in person, a lot of my
intent with the video and what I chose
to platform in it was assumed.
>> Listen, I'm all for like intentions
always mattering. I I've heard some
people say like impact is more is
greater than intent. There's a level of
truth to that, but also when you say
arguments like that, you imply that
intent doesn't matter. This is one of
the few times where this is an impact
over intent moment. Like you [\h__\h] up a
guy's career so badly to the point where
he lost a lot of support. You know,
there are probably still people out
there that believe Sabers Spark is this
horrific sexual abuser.
There were probably still people that
believe that Saber Spark is a horrible
person and now like bec and there were
also opportunities that he had lined up
with other content creators, events,
whatever the case is that he no longer
can align now because of these
allegations that you levied against him.
And that's just kind of something you
have to carry KP. Like you [\h__\h] up
someone's career and you really like
this is your [\h__\h] KP and you're still
trying to push that Saber Spark is
guilty to some extent and you're being
such a total scumbag about this.
>> Concerns to me that are so much
legitimate were and continue to be
brushed off as cloud chasing or jealous
women scorn mentality.
>> They might be, but we need and like we
need to [\h__\h] get like more evidence
of things. People who have never spoken
to me or heard my sight of anything
spoke with absolute authority on my
intentions and desires.
>> Why would they need to speak to you? Who
the [\h__\h] Like, why would they give a
[\h__\h] to talk to you about anything? You
clearly have everything. You wanted
people to believe things publicly. I'm
sure if these were videos mentioning you
and then condemning Saber Spark, you
wouldn't have anything to [\h__\h] say
about it. Like, why would they ever want
to [\h__\h] talk to you? and people who
did speak to me in person painted our
conversations in a different light when
presenting them to her own respective
audiences. This led to a good number of
people speaking down to me, harassing
me, and sending me death threats largely
based on the assumption that I was a
bitter, jealous, stupid woman targeting
an innocent, successful, intelligent man
for the sin of not dating me. To which
I'd like to
>> maybe I don't [\h__\h] know. Who knows,
man? Like women do be crazy. No, I'm
just kidding. I'm not trying to dog
whistle that uh I'm redpilled.
>> Respond by saying, "Stephen, I'm just
not that into you." the same brush with.
>> Okay. Wow. You got him. I I guess. Wow.
I don't think this is uh I don't think
this is the time to be saying that
you're into or not into somebody when
you're talking about responding to how
you made a [\h__\h] false sexual assault
allegation. Uh when you say it in that
tone, especially considering earlier in
this video, hey, I probably shouldn't be
joking that much, and then proceed to
make a light-hearted jab saying, I'm not
that into you. Uh, I don't know. Kind of
takes away from the tone of your video a
little bit, wouldn't you say?
>> She used to paint over Emily's
accusations and intentions with even
less people speaking to Emily herself.
More can be learned about her
experiences in the video linked below.
Steven Hower was given grace, room to
respond, and direct.
>> What the [\h__\h] happened? Did girl just
like [\h__\h] like,
oh my god, she raised her mic volume by
like [\h__\h] million. personal support
from the
>> she turned German for a second.
>> The same people claiming to be an
objective voice of reason throughout the
situation when given his own testimony
on the accusations leveled against him.
His own lapses of memory are not painted
as proof of malicious lie. His own
incorrect recollection of events as
proved by the screenshots he himself
provided are not painted as proof of a
malicious lie.
>> Okay. Wow. That's crazy. I girl, how do
we know that it's like an incorrect
[\h__\h] interpretation of something when
you haven't even shown us like hard
evidence that he definitively sexually
assaulted somebody? You know, I would
say pretty good evidence of it is
someone going to the police about it.
You know what I mean? If you file a
police report, at the very least that's
something that shows some validity to it
because you believe that there was like
a legitimate assault that occurred. It
doesn't necessarily say they did or
didn't assault you, but it's better than
coming forward online about it.
>> You say you pulled away from her for the
next two months, but I mean because I
because I've seen your DMs with her.
>> Um, so you p if you pulled away from
her, I mean, it wouldn't be for months.
Saber,
>> not months, I would say. I mean, it's
I'd say November. No, I'm sorry. You're
right. I'm I'm getting my uh the
increments wrong, but it was I would say
for the rest of November. his own
admission of trying to force a woman to
take a pregnancy test against her will
is not seen.
>> What? Hold on. The clip that you just
showed us was him like [\h__\h]
misspeaking a bit. But you're going to
say that his recollection of something
is What the [\h__\h] is this? You're saying
that like he had his recollection wrong
and then you showed us a clip of him
correcting his own recollection of it
and you're saying that's evidence of the
fact that he [\h__\h] uh that he is lying
or something? Is that your [\h__\h]
evidence? Get the [\h__\h] out of here. Who
believes this?
>> November.
>> His own admission of trying to force a
woman to take a pregnancy test against
her will is not seen as a violation of
consent, privacy, and bodily autonomy,
but instead as a horrible event he was
made a victim of by the girl he had
targeted
>> into the convention on a Sunday. I
remember going over to her hotel being
like I'm like, "We have to get this
test. Like, I I I need to know the
answer before I head home just so I can
know what's going on." I got the
pregnancy test, came back And I'm like,
"Please, can you take this?" And she
goes, "Okay." You know, because it was
time time's up. And she she's said,
"Okay, I'll do it." And she took it and
it was negative. And I remember after
her after afterwards, I was like almost
dumbruck with relief. At that point, I
started forming this opinion in my head
where I'm like, "Did she just babysare
me to keep me in her life?"
>> Uh, give me one second. By the way, hold
on. I have to go back. All right. Sorry
about that. I had to uh take a phone
call that I uh needed to do. So, we're
just going to edit up to this point.
>> Victim of by the girl he had targeted
>> into the convention on a Sunday. I
remember going over to her hotel being
like I'm like we have to get this test.
Like I I I need to know the answer
before I head home just so I can know
what's going on. I got the pregnancy
test, came back and I'm like please can
you take this? And she goes, "Okay." You
know, because it was time time's up and
she she's said, "Okay, I'll do it."
>> Sounds like a reasonable thing to do.
Yeah. She took it and it was negative.
And I remember after her after
afterwards I was like almost dumbruck
with relief at that point I started
forming this opinion in my head where
I'm like did she just baby scare me to
keep me in her life. That was the
emotion surging through my head along
with relief.
>> Admissions of being
>> I mean I don't know maybe it's it might
be a bit of a far-fetched reach but
maybe
>> where he was accused of being and when
are not painted as plausibility that
what he is accused of is true. instead
is painted as proof that he's telling
the truth and the accused victim is
lying for clout.
>> Oh my god. Okay, so this is you dog
whistling that Saber Spark did commit
the sexual assault. Got it. Cool. So,
you're not actually sorry that you
handled this the way that you did.
You're not actually sorry about it.
Cool. Got it. Nice. For objective
coverage of what was supposed to be a
serious situation, there seems to be a
lot of sweeping for Steven. Standards
that myself
>> Oh my god. Yeah. If you say so.
>> And Emily were and continue to be held
to are not standards that he needs to
meet. Yeah, says the one who literally
[\h__\h] hardly had any [\h__\h] evidence
that he committed any sexual assault
possible.
>> So, moving forward, how can we as the
online community do better? What?
>> I don't want to hear it from you, the
person who literally pushed false sexual
assault allegations and seems to be
doubling down on it in this video.
>> Changes can we make to improve child
safety or our fandom spaces? What kind
of conversations should we be having?
How about power dynamics in fandom
spaces and the people that abuse them?
creatives turning their fan bases into
dating pools. Oh,
>> great. Power dynamics. You mean the
[\h__\h] same point that everyone hurt
her about even though there's no abuse
of power in the situation whatsoever?
Yeah. Wow. Can't wait to hear this one.
>> Grooming behaviors passed off as normal
internet interactions.
>> Yeah, Saber Spark didn't do that.
>> These were the kinds of conversations I
was intending to spark with my last
video. This was mine.
>> Okay. No, you wanted to push a false
sexual assault allegation and it
backfired. Shut the [\h__\h] up. I'm tired
of this virtue signal. It's like just so
annoying.
>> And with the end of the video, I'd like
to close off with a note about
accountability. Throughout the whole
ordeal, I have seen a lot of people
attributing my lack of response to mean
a lack of accountability. That I was
avoiding the controversy and that I was
trying to erase or ignore it. Something
I invite the audience to think about is
what accountability is, what it looks
like, and what it isn't. Someone jumping
to respond as soon as possible or
through as many avenues as possible is
not indicative of taking accountability.
Especially
>> I mean I agree with that, but you're
doubling down on false sexual assault
allegations and you throughout this like
whole video even though you tried to
apologize for it earlier. You see in the
beginning of this video I was actually
like I still thought you were a piece of
[\h__\h] But like I in the beginning I was
actually at least willing to hear you
out because you were you seemed like you
were apologizing and taking
accountability. But all of that goes out
the window once you started to like
[\h__\h] double down on the allegations
against Sabers Spart. So, I just don't
really have any sympathy towards you
whatsoever.
>> If that response is to victimize
>> cuz I don't sympathize with people who
parrot and platform false allegations in
any capacity
>> slashm yourself in the face of
accusations and criticism. True
accountability is stating whether or not
you did something on its face regardless
of any intentions or effect and without
excusing yourself or attacking the
accuser. Example, I made the
>> That's very ironic given what's in this
video.
>> Original video. It was bad. And I
understand that. Jumping to dismiss
someone as cloud chasing and trying to
justify why what happened isn't the word
they are using is not accountability.
It's obuscation and defense. And you
didn't need to defend something that
didn't happen. Anyway, this was heavy.
I'd like to thank everyone who stuck it
out this far, as well as a special
thanks to my fans who allowed me the
space to respond before forming an
opinion about my intent.
>> You're not welcome.
>> In the meantime, I've tried to be
positive and I'm working on something
that is not YouTube adjacent. And maybe
I can share it with you someday. Maybe
not. We'll see. Anyway, this is my dog,
Toby. He's a little man. He likes to
wear outfits. Decompress with him. And
thanks for sticking around.
>> Wow. very appropriate to show a [\h__\h]
pet dog in a video doubling down against
fake sexual assault allegations against
a content creator that vehematly
disproved it in uh like pretty much
every way possible.
Wow. Very appropriate of you, by the
way. I'm sorry for making jokes about
serious topics and then proceeds to
continue to act inappropriately about uh
these allegations. Cool. You're really
showing that you're trying to change and
do better as a person. KP,
just put the [\h__\h] fries in the bag
and just like get off the internet.