[\h__\h] it. We're going to start
immediately. We only did one song. We
We're only doing one song. Uh we
typically do like wait like two or
three. But but this story is important,
right? The story is [\h__\h] important.
You guys know or at least all of you
that that are watching so far know that
I've been covering the story for quite a
while. I've been doing a lot of
research, a lot of digging. I've done a
lot of like cross analysis, right?
Making sure that all the details are
correct.
uh obviously has been long awaited. My
opinion, in my honest opinion, I don't
think that Saber Spark should have
responded, at least not optically
speaking because uh now people uh that
haven't heard about these allegations
are going to know and some people are
going to come with, you know, uh bad
faith conclusions because that's
typically how people on the internet uh
behave or react. But uh but a response
is always good regardless. A response is
always good regardless so that we can
get uh all of the information in one
place. So, I'm glad that he responded,
but at the same time, this might
actually we we'll see we'll see in the
in the following days just how this will
affect him, right? We'll we'll see how
how this will affect him in the
following days. Now, quick summary for
those of you who don't know. It was
about maybe like a week and a half ago
when Saber Spark was accused by an
anonymous user uh in a testimony of
apparently coerced rape. We've done a
lot of digging and analyzing to come to
a uh you know, somewhat of a
rationalization of what the events
actually were, what actually occurred,
and now we're here at a response
finally. So, we're just going to jump
right into it because I I just want to
get like right down into the details so
that I can then uh you know reconcile
all the information and come with a more
cohesive conclusion. We're we're just
going to start. We're just going to
start. Hello, I'm Steven Carver and I go
by the name of Saber Spark on YouTube.
For the sake of transparency, I will be
on camera for this video. I also have
some notes over here I will be
referencing for this response. Now, some
of you may have seen the recent two-hour
video by the YouTuber I Live Compossible
A lot. Putting aside what it was, which
we'll talk about here in a moment, this
video included her making some
significant and sweeping accusations
involving me. Most of the comments I saw
on the original upload indicated that
many people saw this video for what it
was, clout chasing, and it threw out
very severe allegations in a really
callous and reckless way. I app he's
he's right on the money. he's right on
the money. Whether he should be
approaching uh these allegation or no
not whether he should be approaching the
criticism of uh KP in that way is
probably a little bit uh is probably a
little bit too
abrasive, a little bit too um I want to
say he's coming at it a little bit too
hard himself, which I know is probably
going to turn a lot of people away, but
I understand why he's doing it. I mean,
he's just correct. Like the common like
the common opinion on KP's execution of
this stuff is that she made a lot of
like sweeping allegations with very
little to substantiate them. And the one
the one allegation that was the least
substantiated more specifically were the
ones against Sabersport. And she
admitted on a live stream in an
interview that she literally had no
evidence to even push these allegations
besides vibes.
appreciate that people out there are
willing to question such things and more
importantly share my sentiment that this
is not the way things should be done.
What was said was untrue and it's
disappointing to see people try to build
themselves up by tearing others down.
With that in mind, this is my response
to recent allegations against me from
the Twitter account Brony Fandon and the
YouTuber I live possible a lot. Before I
begin, I already know that this video is
going to get a significant amount of
views. This will probably be the kill
shot for like KP and hopefully maybe
even Brony Fan don't because I did a lot
of digging on Brony Fandone
independently outside of my coverage.
And I've come to I want to say a
reasonable conclusion that Brony Fand
don't in their own right is an absolute
[\h__\h] that shouldn't be taken seriously.
I want to give a content warning for the
following things on screen. Folks, this
is a very serious video, so please
continue watching it at your own
discretion. To be clear, the accusation
that I sexually assaulted someone is
completely false, and I feel disgusted
that I even have to say that. I've had
sexual partners before in the past, but
we have always abided by enthusiastic
and reciprocated consent.
Okay. So, already already immediately
dispelling the narrative, right, that it
could have been coercive or that implied
consent wasn't present. And it's
interesting that he's using like, you
know, the same words that were utilized
in Kim Possible's video, you know, using
the sort of uh enthusiastic and
reciprocated consent wordage. I mean, I
I I I understand why he's doing it, but
he should just say he should just like,
you know, put it bluntly and say that
the allegations don't hold water and
that this individual did consent in this
moment rather than like, you know, try
to try to play by their rules. But I
understand why he's doing
it. The actual reality of the situation
appears to be the result of what I
believe to be a hit piece. From what
I've seen, it seems that KP and a person
by the username of Brony Fandone were
working together to push this story. And
I have evidence to prove that. But more
than that, I was about to say I was
about to say too is like there there is
there is a lot of uh circumstantial
evidence as well as you know direct uh
testimony that suggests that this is a
hit piece, right? the way that they
hyped up the video, the way that they
hyped up the the testimony, the way that
they were not refuting or dispelling any
potential, you know, any potential that
these things may be coming from a
negative place or from a uh I want to
say I want to say a uh a mental place
where it's vindictive in a way, right?
There's just a lot of like information
to suggest that these individuals were
obviously were not obviously but were
colluding to tie in all of these
negative allegations between all of
these people together to to make them
all as like impactful as possible to
undermine these people's careers or to
like take a shot at their reputation to
undermine their their characters,
right? So, I I think he's right to say
that. And if he has like additional
evidence, I'm going to love seeing it.
What KP's video actually does is
extremely dangerous. It hurts those who
are truly What did this guy do? Uh, we
don't know so far. If anything, if
anything, what we know is that he's been
alleged he's been accused of of, you
know, coerced rape, right? But even
going by the testimony, it's very hard
to say that this guy coerced, raped
anybody because something that is argued
as well in the allegations is like the
presence of a power dynamic. But when
you actually
compare this person's notoriety back
then and compare like how uh how known
the alleged victim was back then, how
well known they were within their own
communities, a power dynamic is a very
silly thing to argue. like like even in
general for the most part a power
dynamic is a silly thing to argue in in
a lot of uh of you know cases like these
as we've seen or at least a lot in a lot
in like flimsy allegation cases uh
because what ends up being the case is
that they they say oh I was starruck or
I I didn't want to disappoint somebody
who was famous but typically how a power
dynamic actually works is that an
individual is using their status right
their fame their power to say, "Hey, if
uh if you don't have sex with me or if
you do this for me, I'll I'll like pay
you a certain amount of money or I'll
make you more popular or I'll give you a
certain position in my company and
whatnot." So to claim that, you know,
there were any power dynamics going on
between like a brony community where
hardly anybody had any actual power,
right, is complete [\h__\h] to say the
least. Victims out there and this is not
how you do things when it comes to
people's lives. The following section
will be about Isle of Kim Possible a
lot, my history with her and what
appears to be her attempt. I mean, I've
gotten I've gotten reports I've gotten
confirmation from uh from a handful of
people that uh the victim actually was
Emu Emmy. Uh I did a little cross
analysis myself, but I got I got a more
uh I got more of a verdict by Beckett.
So, we kind of do know who the victim
is, right? I'm still going to say
alleged, but all all signs are pretty
much pointing to the fact that the
alleged victim is Emu Emmy. Is Kim
Possible cooked? Yeah, absolutely. Yeah.
Her reputation is going to be destroyed
after this. Absolutely. To falsely
accuse me for her own gain. To make it
easy, I will be referring to her as KP
for the remainder of this video. I met
KP in 2014. We lived in the same state
and eventually became friends. This was
mainly because we shared common interest
as we were both part of the Bernie
fandom and were both YouTubers as well.
She came to me asking for advice on her
videos and connections to go to
conventions. At the end of 2014, I
started a new job and entered a new
relationship with someone. For the next
5 months, I was extremely busy. KP would
occasionally reach out to me, but did
not have time to hang with her. It was
nothing personal and we naturally
drifted apart. 8 years passed and in
August of 2023, a friend of mine
messaged me on KP's behalf. He told me
that according to KP, one of the
editors, just a heads up, and I don't
have much of the details here, but I
figure I'd pass it on since you'll
probably hear about it soon. KP hit me
up saying that like a Chris like did
some stupid [\h__\h] or something about like
flexing, telling stories about how he
jerked off with her panties at a con a
few years back or something. I don't
know all the details and frankly I don't
want to. But she's going to reach out to
everyone that he works for and give them
a few days to distance themselves before
putting him on blast. Just so you're
aware that it's on its way. No idea
what'll actually go down. But there you
go. Well, I guess that explains all of
these people that you know all of all of
these people that they have in common
that has been like heavily suggested and
hinted at and you know and in like this
sphere of people in this friend group or
group of people on my team allegedly did
something inapprop. She's a scorned
lover and not from what we know yet. To
her back in 2015, I immediately
addressed this with my editor and he
told me that the matter was settled
between I
see. Yeah. So, so this all ties to to
this individual known known as Chris.
You did payment should be inbound here
soon, but I wanted to run a question
about you. I had someone approach me
here on a Discord with a matter that
allegedly involved you and KP and some
deviant behavior that apparently you
bragged about. I don't think these
things lightly with people I work with,
but I don't take these things lightly
with people I work with, but I also
don't want to automatically believe a
potential rumor. Is there any valid Is
there any validity to these claims?
That's something I need to know about
with the people I employ. I hope you see
where I'm coming from with this
question. You know, it's interesting.
It's interesting, too, because a lot of
people recently have been saying, "Oh,
Saber Spark defended a pedophile, so
surely he must be guilty." Right? That's
like an insane line of logic that people
are genuinely choosing to align with,
which is completely idiotic to say the
least. Right? I could say significantly
worse things about that line of logic,
but here we can see that this isn't that
that Saber Spark is is obviously very
apprehensive about about like any
potential
degenerates behavior that these
individuals might be engaging
in. At least behind the scenes he is, as
we can see from these from these like,
you know, DMs. So, so even if you did
want to claim as an argument that that
Saber Spark defended a pedophile, so he
should be labeled as a sexual
abuser, even if you did want to use that
idiotic logic, as we can see here,
that's not even an accurate
representation of his character. KB and
I resolved that issue a few days ago,
actually. So, everything is okay then,
if you don't mind me asking. Not that
it's my business to know details, but
just making sure all is good and on the
level with the people who work with me
and the team. Everything's fine now.
Yes, it was resolved amicably. He
wouldn't want me to divulge anything.
That's all right. Her privacy is
important. Understood. Doing my part to
be viligent with my own people. Glad
you're all resolved. See? So, look. See,
if he had a reason, if he had a reason
to cut away any anybody who was known
for doing any like malicious
interaction, it appears that he would
actually take the counter measures to
like avoid these individuals, right? And
an argument that needs to be presented
here is that even though Saberspark may
have defended an alleged pedophile,
right? An alleged pedophile back in the
day at the time, he could have just
defended the individual because he
didn't believe the allegations to be
true, which is a completely normal thing
to do, right? You know, innocent until
proven guilty. So that's actually not
indicative of Saber Spark, you know, of
Saber Spark's character or or indicative
of any action that he might take or
commit against any individual. Him and
KP. I took his word on that and assume
that KP would reach out to me directly
if that was not the case. On November
12th, 2024, this response good so far. I
mean, it's coming off really strong and
it's setting some interesting it's
setting like like a lot of like building
blocks, a lot of foundations, but it
hasn't like in the first three minutes
hasn't dispelled anything yet, but it's
too early to like say anything. It is
definitely way too early to say anything
to be, you know, explicit or
expressively
clear. Imagine taking sexual harassment
so seriously that the first thing you do
is try to make the victim sign an NDA.
Absolutely [\h__\h] games and Sabers
apparently for keeping Chris hired. It's
a poor look. Video coming soon. Yeah.
So, this it appears it appears that KP
definitely had like a vindictive bone
and wanted to like, you know, take a
shot against these people from what
we're seeing, right? I mean, if you if
you guys were to look at my previous
coverage, I'm not going to go too in
depth because I don't want to make this
too long of a of, you know, I don't want
to make this too long,
but all of the signs are there. All of
the signs are there. Like in a previous
interview with an individual known as
like Lord Slug, if I recall correctly,
AP literally said that she believes the
allegations were true because it sounded
like something that Saber Spark would,
you know, would do based on his previous
behavior, right? So these people didn't
think twice about platforming
allegations that may have potentially
been like been coming from a place of
malice or vindictiveness on their own.
They just went full [\h__\h] send because
they disliked the guy. And it appears
that this, you know, vindictive uh this
vindictive feeling or this scorned
feeling has been there for quite a
while. KP made a tweet where she was
upset that Chris was still working on my
projects. She then posted video coming
soon. On January 6th, 2025, KP emailed
me demanding I take action due to Chris
and what she claimed.
Good afternoon, Stephen. email is your
request private communication regarding
Chris and the overall sexual harassment
situation that he has caused. Our full
incident report can be found here if
needed. Since you publicly displayed
confusion at best about my attempted
communication with you prior to this
point, hold
on. Below are screenshots of my
conversation with Blank, aka the
French/MP employees I pass Chris
information to. Conversation with blank
specifically mentions a possible
stalling change through blank based on
Chris
actions. And I honestly cannot fathom a
situation where there would be that
drastic of an employee change or
discussion without your knowledge.
Screenshots can be found here, here, and
here. I do not appreciate you calling me
a liar publicly. I would like some form
of apology or some form of public
apology. Additionally, your public
statement states that you know the
confrontation between me and Chris was
recorded as a matter of community
safety. Combined with your email
interaction with DA Games leads me to
believe that unless there was some major
miscommunication, you were aware of the
situation that you have been cho like
you have chosen in action. You will have
the choice either you will you will have
the choice to either hold Chris
accountable i.e. firing him with proof
or keep him on staff. Should you choose
the former? Please communicate this to
me as soon as possible to avoid any
miscommunication, any public statements,
information present
after. So she was literally like she was
literally threatening the guy. She was
literally threatening like she was she
was making an ultimatum. This is
literally an ultimatum. You either fire
him with a proof that I provided, but as
we know KP's standard of evidence is
completely dog [\h__\h] completely garbage.
And she was really hoping that Sabers
Spark would fire this guy off of, you
know, potentially low low evidential uh
or or allegations based on like very
very low standard of
evidence. Th this this reeks to me of an
individual that is just completely
vindictive, ju just wants to take the
revenge shot. That's what this smells to
me like. And don't get me wrong, I'm
going to be charitable. There's always
the possibility that there was some sort
of foul play here, right? But but given
like the repeated pattern of behavior
with KP being as vindictive as she is
and wanting things done her way because
of like these personal
gripes, it's very
hard to see it in like in any other way
but a reputational hit job or hit piece.
If you believe this is only a one-time
incident, this document link below has
long some of Chris's other inappropriate
behavior, including but not limited to,
making beastiality jokes to someone he
knew was a minor, the use of the n-word,
and Nazi imagery with himself, and will
of DA Games. You can find more
information on page 429 of this
document. I've been given clearance to
show unedited screenshots of the
Beastiality Incident requested. I
believe we can clearly communicate that
going this going forward. I have no
desire to get into internet squabble
with you, so let's please work this out
as adults.
I mean, I'll give her I'll give her
credit for attempting to resolve this
privately, but it's very like it's very
obvious to me that she has uh that she
has like her own personal qualms that
she wanted uh that she wanted like Saber
Spark to to act by or or that she wanted
to like, you know, she had like her own
standards that she wanted Saber Spark to
uphold. Uh, granted at the end of the
day, right, beastiality jokes, Nazi
imagery, and all this
garbage, while it is while it is gross,
while it is while while it can make you
have an emotional response, right? While
it can while it can elicit some sort of
like negative
reaction that that like, you know, in
the grand scheme of things, that is
hardly comparable to like sexual assault
or or or rape. that is hardly
comparable. So, it would be incredibly
it would be like incredibly uh what's
the word to like to like hold those up
to the same standard and attempt to get
somebody fired over something like that.
Um when when this is when this is like
you know a private employee for the most
part until until he was like
outed is is incredibly is like going to
like incredibly drastic
measures. Uh
granted, I mean I wouldn't employ
somebody like this, right?
personally if I if I were in a position
like that. But who is she who is she to
like you know hold Saber Spark
accountable or like you know hold like
you know put put uh put Saber Spark on
on this like you know on this scope for
the actions of another
individual. I hope that we can clearly
communicate about this going forward. I
have no Okay, I already read that.
Anyways, moving on. He did nearly 10
years ago due to a leaked call between
Chris and KP. They recalled the full
story. Chris made a sex joke in regards
to KP and she found out about it many
years later. What shocked me was when I
was informed this call was recorded
without Chris's knowledge or consent.
Chris profusely begged for forgiveness
at the end of the call and it looked
like both KP and Chris ended on amicable
terms which matches what I was told by
Chris when I initially confronted him
about the situation. Yeah. Yeah. Chris,
you want to say anything?
Uh, I guess I'd go first. Yeah, go go go
for it. All right. Well, first I think
it's the obvious thing is
one just want to profusely apologize for
that terrible [\h__\h] thing I did. Mhm.
And that
God was an absolute horrible person so
many years ago and you didn't deserve
that. So, all right. Um, so I don't
really have anything else that I feel
comfortable saying, dude. This is so
gross. I mean, was your whole when it
when it comes to situations like these
when you're trying to like hold somebody
accountable, isn't the accountability to
like rectify the wrongdoing? Is an
apology not enough for KP? She actually
just want to like ruin this person's
life. I mean that that just goes to show
that just goes to show like you know
that that uh that somebody like KP is is
willing to go the extra mile over being
like slight you know even even even
slighted in the in the smallest way but
you know I just I'll just leave with uh
good luck and may God have mercy on your
soul um and you know this too shall
pass. Okay, all those things to you.
Okay, thank you. All right well have a
good night. Um and um I think this is
I'm going to limit my my um
communication with you for obvious
reasons, but um no, that's perfectly
reasonable and I understand. In
addition, after listening to this call,
okay, look there while while there might
obviously be some very like don't get me
wrong, right? I'm I'm not I'm obviously
not going to like, you know, uh to avoid
the elephant in the room. While there
might be some like very um highness
allegations being pushed against Chris
himself, right?
when it comes from somebody who's like
personally motivated or has a vendetta
like KP, they should not be the ones to
try to like platform that those
allegations and bring them forward
because there's obviously going to be a
conflict of interest or a bias there.
So, it's already going to like muddy the
waters. this person is already going to
have like, you know, um a ve a very
biased like, you know, uh tunnel vision
expectation or or you know, they're
going to they're going to want to have a
very specific outcome from their actions
or the way they go about exposing this
guy.
It appears KP was asking Chris intrusive
questions in order to find more
information about me. Um, okay. So,
which is a very shady thing to do, by
the way, if you're going to interview
somebody.
You shouldn't be asking like leading
questions to get them to say something
that they typically wouldn't. So, you
you want to be clear and transparent
with your uh I want to say
intentions. I mean, every step of the
way, these people seem like incredibly
shady, deceptive individuals. Very
conniving. Um, as far as your
relationship with Saber, like is it like
just so I know, um, is it something
Yeah. And it's okay to have a bias, but
don't let that bias overwhelm
objectivity and fact. But the thing is,
the problem here as well, a very big
problem that that needs to be like
understood as well is that that's
exactly what occurred with KP when she
released the
video and she slathered the uh Saber
Spark allegations towards the end of the
video just to like, you know, take a
shot at Saber Spark as well. Again, when
you when you uh cross analyze that with
the Lord Slutka
interview, obviously she let her bias
absolutely cloud her judgment and
objectivity, right? She wasn't
impartial. She literally pushed these
allegations because yeah, in her mind,
it sounded like something Saber Spark
would do. So, she was like, "Fuck it.
I'll platform these allegations anyways
with no due diligence, with no uh, you
know, regard for the truth, right? with
no concern about whether these
allegations were real or not. She just
believed them at face value with no
evidence. Her own words, by the way. Her
own words. Are you guys like friendly or
is he just giving you kind of contract
work and that's it?
I mean, I guess you could say it's both,
but I don't have like long conversations
with him because he's so busy. The most
I ever see him is at conventions if he
happens to be at the same one. Okay. So,
you know, you're not an environment
where this would have come up anyway.
Never. Oh, he would probably be unaware.
He's 100% unaware. Like again, I I can't
uh stress enough is that in the times I
ever told the story, it was as you
described it, locker room talk with a
very small amount of people in a private
call. I never told it publicly and I
never ever told it to anyone like Saber
Spark. As far as Chris goes, we took the
situation seriously from the very
beginning. The joke was inappropriate,
but it was told nearly 10 years ago. He
profusely apologized to me as well and
admitted to his faults. I believe in the
inner growth of a person and that they
can change for the better, which is an
argument that I made, by the way, which
is an argument that I made uh that I
made previously as well.
Right. So, so, so, okay. So, uh, Chris
obviously owned up to his own misdeeds,
to his own
wrongdoings. And I don't think I don't
think that somebody's like, you know,
shitty behavior should haunt them
forever. I don't think like so long so
long as as they haven't gone out of
their way or have legitimately harmed
anybody in a way in a way that's
permanent, in a way that uh that is like
extremely
egregious. I don't think that extreme
condemnation should be something that
should be cast on them, right? So let's
for let's say for example like the
beastiality stuff. Yes, it's extremely
inappropriate and gross and like
absolutely indefensible. But despite how
gross it is and the emotional reaction
that somebody may
elicit, they can always grow past that
so long as they don't continue to like
potentially endanger minors in the
future. Like that's always something
that they can grow past.
like like like obviously not everybody's
going to be asked forgiving. Not
everybody's going to be able to see uh
past that. And that's perfectly
understandable, but some people are are
more willing uh especially when it's
somebody that's close to them, right?
Like like say for like let's utilize
like the you know the dad example. Like
let's say let's say you found out your
dad or your mom was uh making
inappropriate jokes on the internet.
Obviously, there's going to be like a
level of bias there where you'd be
willing to look past their actions and
misdeeds. Is it gross? Can you can you
like judge somebody for it? Absolutely.
But I would imagine most people given a
situation like that, right? Given like,
you know, given a Saber Spark
situation would probably be able to
like, you know, move past that so long
as the person exhibits some sort of
growth or
change. He did good work for the team. I
was surprised though that KP thought she
had the ability to dict. Yeah. And
that's another thing too is like while
some jokes can be considered extremely
egregious, right? And some people might
elicit like a very strong reactions like
such as people on Twitter, right? Like
you know how so many people overreact at
like slurs and whatnot. Um while some
jokes may be extremely disgusting so
long as there isn't like any any
legitimate harm being done, right? So
long as you're not like traumatizing
anybody, so long as you're not um like
grooming a person, for example, per se,
then I would imagine that somebody's
capable of growing past something like
that. Dictate who I hire and fire for my
own team. On February 5th, 2025, KP
emailed me again, but this time with
false allegations. Jesus, Stephen, it is
clear to me that you do not wish to
correspond with any direct communication
despite you personally requesting so. To
say I am disappointed by your behavior
would be a severe understatement. So
yeah, she literally did just want to
like, you know, it was literally an
ultimatum. She just wanted She just
wanted Chris killed. She just wanted to
get Chris killed by Saber
Spark. You called me a liar publicly
without even asking for the truth or
further clarification. My understanding
is that My understanding is that you
have jerked around your employees and
generally treated them with very little
consideration. The horror stories I have
heard about repeated employee reforms
going unhonor to you. Yeah. stories
you've heard that apparently you have no
history of validating or doing due
diligence for. So why should you be
taken seriously? Shows to me how little
you really care about your friends/
employees this on top of your treatment
of me when you were romantically
sexually interested in me which I'm
happy to elaborate on. Wait, so yeah,
like like she's abs she absolutely has a
vendetta. She absolutely has a vendetta.
She has like every biased reason to like
come after Saber Spark and ruin his
life. She has a grudge. She has a chip
on her shoulder. Combined with your
inquiries of hosting polygamist
relationships with fan girls to
employees is misogynistic,
inappropriate, and disrespectful. Not
just that, but she has like those types
of brain worms where she can't look past
her own nose. Like everything has to has
to has to abide by her own moral
framework, which could be completely
skewed in an unrealistic
perspective. To me, it
seems to me, wow, redundant. It seems to
me the only reason why you wanted to get
involved is that your name was attached.
Yeah, because why would you want to be
smeared by like why would you want to be
smeared by association with somebody?
Why do you want to be like why? Like,
you know how the internet is. If you're
associated with somebody, as we have
seen with the Saber Spark stuff, guilt
by association is something that people
very much do apply on the internet. Of
course, he would want to like rectify
some issues here. And you're more
interested in damage control for your
brand than your brand's actual
integrity.
Yeah, you would probably be doing the
same if you had a successful channel,
but you don't. I feel like we wouldn't
even be having this conversation if it
was not another YouTuber in your space.
If I was not another YouTuber in your
space. I mean, yeah, probably because he
then he probably wouldn't have met you.
I hope that you could be a professional
about this going forward, even though,
frankly, you haven't been through this
entire nightmare or deal, but clearly
that is not possible. So, yeah, she
she's completely like she's completely
stuck in her own head. She's completely
stuck in her own head. She she obviously
has a
bias. She claimed that I had quote
jerked around my employees and genuinely
treated them with very little
consideration. She also claimed that I
was quote hosting polygamous
relationships with fan girls, which is
as ridiculous as it sounds. On February
25th, 2025, KP sent her final email to
me. In it, she said, quote, "To add on
to this, this I will fight you for the
truth tone. your whole last email and
the Twitter thread is drenched in
undermines the actual issues of the
conversation on top of assuming I'm
going to publish falsifiable
information. End quote. However,
incorrect information and hearsay was
included within the release video. She
also stated that the reason she messaged
my members of my team instead of
contacting me directly was that I quote
triggered the [\h__\h] out of her. And at
the No way. So she she literally Yeah.
So this was all literally just a grudge.
This was all just a like this was
literally just a grudge a grudgefield
hit piece. I don't have the patience or
emotional bandwidth for your tone. If
you don't have the the patience or
emotional bandwidth for something like
this, then you should probably
disconnect yourself from a situation
like this. Slow the [\h__\h] down.
Rationalize your thoughts. come to a
rational
conclusion instead of continuing a fight
that can end in a very messy display,
which it ultimately did, and now we're
all looking at it like the spectacle
that it is. Your constant
villainization, or to discuss this
further with you at this point, for your
own perceived direct benefit. To be
blunt, you trigger the [\h__\h] out of me,
Steven, and I still tried multiple times
to communicate with you, but ultimately
was met with silence until now. You were
screaming on Twitter like a child at me
after months of trying to get any kind
of internal word on Chris and the
information being in the public eye and
you still haven't [\h__\h] apologized for
any of it. Why? Why should he apologize
to you? Realistically speaking, because
you feel entitled to
it because you feel entitled to it
because you felt personally
wronged. Like take take a second. He's
not, you know, he's not responsible for
the actions of another individual. If he
if he had it on good authority that
somebody could have changed since then
or or if he had it on good faith that
that you know somebody could have
changed u through their like you know uh
should can change past their actions
over time and has it a good authority
that you know some of these allegations
could be uh embellished or
falsified then then why should he
apologize to you? Have you not
considered Sabers Spark's like side like
his his own his own thoughts his own
sentiments? This person is completely
self-centered and vitriolic. What do you
think that says about your character? On
top of that, casting aspersions
immediately. Great [\h__\h] stuff. Only
then to even be taking it seriously
because I might make a video and hurt
other people's reputation really shows
how me being affected by all this really
matters in the long run to you. Yeah.
Because if you feel personally affected,
that doesn't mean that you have the
right information or have the authority
to be like taking shots at people
utilizing very poorly vetted
information. This is clear like like
this is obviously a
display. This is obviously like, you
know, a grudge a grudgefield display.
This is obviously like, you know, a hit
piece like like she like [\h__\h] she
obviously had a vendetta. She obviously
had a vendetta and that's why she went
out of her way to do all of this
because she she like she just had this
grudge. She had this very intense
grudge. Sexual harassment use of Nazi
imagery, pedophilia, fine to sweep it
under the rug. Just don't bring it up on
Twitter. But this is like all of this
stuff again. Nazi imagery as gross as
you may want to call it. Who [\h__\h]
cares? Who [\h__\h] who? Worst things
happens in the world. Sexual harassment.
Any proof? Any evidence? Any legitimate
evidence? Pedophilia. Any proof? Any
evidence? Can you prove Can you Can you
prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that
this person is legitimately a
pedophile? Finally, sweep it under the
rug. Just don't bring it up on Twitter.
Which I'm pretty sure at the time when
these allegations were coming up, it was
actually very difficult to uh to vet
these allegations because there was a
lot of like, you know, um there was a
lot of issues with like verifying the
identity of this supposed victim me
directly was that I quote triggered the
[\h__\h] out of her and at the end, so are
we still in KP as a as a part of this
response? Yes. of the email, she told me
to never contact her again. And
following that request, I never
contacted her again. At this point, I
was bracing myself for a hit piece video
from KP, but I never imagined she would
use false sexual assault allegations
against me. Oh, also, real quick, for
all of you who have tuned in for the for
the response, if you guys want to be
like fully filled in on on all previous
information, uh here's a here's a full
breakdown video. Uh, please subscribe to
the second channel if you if you would
be so kind. Thank you very much. Thank
you very
much. But
anyways, continuing. I also noticed this
particular Twitter exchange the day
following KP's final email to
me leading up to the release of KP's
video. She was telegraphing her
intentions and who they were against.
She advertised a video schedule, a watch
party, a YouTube premiere. All of this
we've already discussed about, right? It
was obviously a hit piece. She obviously
advertised it because she wanted this to
be a kill shot and a slew of other post
in order to build up hype for her
expose. Yeah, she she wanted this to be
as hard-hitting and as damaging as
possible and even coordinated with some
prominent
individuals to make this as widespread
and as damaging as possible, right? like
like she she was eager to get this
information out, which is not typically
how you execute stories like these.
Bernie Fandom was involved too,
foreshadowing the release of the video
on their Twitter leading up to the
release. According to KP, the anonymous
story would be posted on Twitter by
Bernie Fandone at 10:00 a.m. with her
video premiere about my false
allegations 2 hours later. What was to
follow would be a video that was not
just tonedeaf, but dangerously reckless
with the lives of others. KP has gone on
record saying that the video was
originally intended for DA Games, but
included me and the allegations a month
prior. Yeah. So, this this detail is
important here, right? This detail is
important
here. Most of the video was intended for
DA Games, but but this paint like this
all of this information paints all of
this in an entirely new light, right? We
we've already we've already sort of
semi-established that KP was taking
like, you know, was making a hit piece
over a grudge. But now it's more it's
more solidified. It's more concrete. She
received some last minute information as
she was working on this video against DA
Games and
Chris. And then as she received these
unvetted sources as we saw through like
you know the Lord slug conversation
which I can see he's going to include
right here she decided to tack them on
at the end just to like you know like
ruin all of these people like you know
despite not vetting any of the
information and not gathering any
evidence to the release of the upload.
The video itself was titled what ruins
Saber Spark in DA games and was over 2
hours long. It was primarily advertised
as breaking the news of my false
allegations, but the section in question
was only 5 minutes and 40 seconds long.
According to this, the section in
question was 5 minutes and 40 seconds
long. I I can verify that interview with
KP hosted by Slug Entertainment 2,
uploaded on May 5th, 2025. KP admits
that the story she featured was purely
hearsay and had no substantiated
evidence. So just to be as objective as
possible here. So what you're saying is
that
basically the evidence that you were
given was more personal circumstance and
hearsay rather than like objective
evidence. Correct. They didn't have any
Skype logs or um anything because of how
long it was ago and and we did ask. So,
were there other people that went in to
verify these claims or were there other
attempts to verify the claims being
made?
Um, not to my knowledge. Um, I believe I
don't know the history of um Bon's um
relationship
with the the victim itself. I don't know
to what extent he knew about everything
before um the statement was prepared. Um
but I do know I do know that Amy um was
vouching for them and that was also um
because I knew Amy was on or has been on
the convention scenes. That's how she
met which
again this is not something that you
should take at face value because people
may have their own biases, right? They
may have been told the story in a way
that makes them believe the situation or
they might be missing their own details
and some people may be uh skewed in the
direction of you know believe all
victims which uh which as much as I hate
to say it has turned into something
incredibly toxic because now that gives
ability it's like it's like the slippery
slope sure you can believe everybody but
as soon as you start believing literally
everybody without substantiated
information Right? You will eventually
start believing false allegations. You
will eventually start believing
completely falsified stories or stories
that are skewed and embellished in a way
to make them appear in the worst way
possible when the reality and what
occurred and those moments that are
being recounted may be significantly
different.
Um, Peter knew her husband. The video
would be unlisted and eventually removed
from KP's channel the same day of its
premiere following a massive public
backlash against it. Apparently, based
on the comments in the video, a number
of the assets included and voiceover
actors involved were allegedly not
informed of the nature of the video
being made or had their work used
without permission for video bureau and
memes. On Twitter, I was ridiculed with
many people calling me a predator. This
was due to the initial sensationalized
traction of Brony Fandone's post, but
then the post itself began Yeah,
exactly. began to receive push back due
to public scrutiny over the alleged
claims. Following KP's video, Bernie
Fandone began to backpedal, claiming
that they never watched the video prior
to promoting KP's upload. Rooney Fando
would, which is incredibly reckless to
do, by the way, which should tell you
everything you need to know about this
complete and utter [\h__\h] [\h__\h]
eventually throw KP under the bus in
order to distance themselves from her
video's backlash a few days later. Yeah.
Yeah. You you believe unsubstanti like
you believe unsubstantiated
allegations. Now, as more and more
evidence continues to be compiled or as
more and more information continues to
be compiled in regards to these
situations, you can no longer hold your
guns in a situation as messy as this
one. So, what do you do? You kick the
ladder from underneath you and you let
other people eat KP alive to try to
protect your reputation. Let it be
known. Let it be known that this [\h__\h]
right here should not go on without his
own accountability. Okay? He is equally
as dangerous as KP for going through
with something as idiotic as this. So
what does this mean? As far as Bernie
fandom goes, one of two things seem to
be true. Either one, they watched the
video, approved it, advertised it, and
now they're backpedaling because it did
not go the way they wanted it to, or
two, they never watched the video in the
first place, yet they still endorsed it.
Either option is reckless,
irresponsible, and speaks to a greater
problem. By KP's own admissions, she
does not like me, and I believe she Oh,
yeah. We already established the like,
you know, the bias that he that she has
against Saber Spark holds a grudge
against me after we had a falling out.
Already established. Slug
Entertainment's interview with her seems
to demonstrate her malicious intent.
From the context of her video, it looks
like it was done with a desire to use
this drama to boost her channel's
popularity. It was a hit piece, plain
and simple. Though she denies having a
vendetta against me. If you were to say,
it's it's incredibly obvious. It is
incredibly obvious that there that that
this was, you know, that this was a
vendetta. Given given all of the
information that we've seen, given, you
know, all of the circumstantial
evidence, seeing her tweets, seeing her
promotion of the video, seeing her
actions and the way that she said
things, you know, looking at all these
grudges and and wanting to like, you
know, expressively come out of the or
you know, expressively come against
these individuals the way that she did,
this was very obviously fueled by a
grudge. She obviously very much did have
a vendetta
that this is this is a pretty good
response so far, but we haven't really
gotten to the meat and potatoes yet. Is
he going can he provide any any story
that is more believable or any
information that can completely combat
and debunk the uh the allegations of
coerced rape because even though even
though it is unlikely or or well no no
no never mind that's reckless to say.
Even though the story gets increasingly
less believable, right? And the
skepticism keeps going higher and
higher, that does not necessarily mean
that nothing didn't
happen, right? That does not necessarily
mean that nothing didn't happen. It's
there's always a possibility that
something did happen. It's just that it
becomes less and less likely that that
is the case. Something that needs to be
taken with the utmost seriousness
despite no evidence.
Um, would you believe that it would be
fair for people to disregard it entirely
due to the lack of actual evidence?
Yeah, I think that's fair. Okay. I
wanted to at least ask that given the
fact that these are serious allegations
that can get Saber
killed because people are crazy and I'd
rather not have someone get killed over
an allegation that has not been proven
beyond a shadow of a doubt.
Yeah, that's that's fair.
At this point in the video, I want to
talk about the Twitter account Bernie
Fanzones. This Twitter account has been
purposely targeting Thank God. I was
about to say this idiotic [\h__\h] should
not be should not go on without their
own accountability. Me for a while now.
By their own words, they believe that
internet justice is more effective than
courtroom justice. Wrong. absolutely
incorrect. They seem to see themselves
as judge, jury, and executioner and
launch naive,
idiotic,
egotistical, hubris-filled morons like
brony fan
don't do not belong on the internet is
the
kindest and most amicable way that I can
put it. These people suck. They
absolutely
suck. Any any individual like Brony
Fanote who preaches in such a in such a
like in such a moral flaggy way being
the arbiters of what's right or wrong
are probably some of the most dangerous
people on the internet because they will
push things unvetted, unverified, no
substantiation, nothing to back their
claims because they feel like it's the
right thing to do. But that right thing
to do that they feel comes from a
completely naive and skewed place that
only serves to ruin people's
interpretations of situations like these
which absolutely destroys the
believability of victims in the future
and absolutely destroys any possible
accountability that somebody may
actually face for any true allegations
in the future.
These people should not be taken
seriously.
Harassment campaigns against multiple
online creators such as Billy Bustup,
Prince whatever, and Black Griffin.
Bernie Fandone has on multiple occasions
use falsifiable information to attack
people with. According to KP's post,
Bernie Fandone was in her Discord server
and according to this person, they were
allegedly friends. On May 1st, 2025,
Bernie Fandone shared KP's false
allegations against me. After public
backlash for their post, Bernie Fandone
was constantly arguing with people in
the replies. Some people asked if he
suggested professional organizations to
the victim prior to reaching out to KP
and he said no. Many were inquiring
about Rain and he had no idea what that
was. at the time of
Rain is uh Rain. He has it linked here.
I was going to point that out. Rain is a
resource
center. What a complete absolute
[\h__\h] filled with their like, you know,
like a
self-righteous, hubous, egotistical head
up their own ass individual that should
never be taken seriously.
This guy sucks. Recording this video,
the post is still up on Twitter and has
not been corrected despite being false
and
unsubstantiated. Finally, I want to
bring up Sophie Scrugs. She is a comic
artist for IDW and is on record sharing
the Brony Fandone account. She was
friends with KP prior to the premiere of
the video and even collaborated on other
drama videos with her. She even makes an
appearance in said video and talks to
both KP and Courtney Pete. I believe
that Sophie's involvement with the
Bernie Fandom account is concerning and
irresponsible. She seems to be more of a
facilitator of moving parts and
frequently replies to the account. Yeah.
Like this person doesn't actually care
about real justice or protecting
victims. He only cares or she only cares
whoever these individuals are, right? to
be clear because you can lump them all
in at this point given their behavior
and the way that they all like you know
function in a similar matter or in a
similar way right the way that they all
operate very
similarly these people don't care about
victims or about protecting anybody
right and I'm going to be very honest
with you with all of you too as well
that are watching me right because
transparency is
important I I couldn't I I also I also
like you know I also don't care right I
also don't care I'm not emotionally
attached cash to these people. I am not
emotionally invested in these people,
right? I only do this I only I only do
YouTube and I only and I'm only here to
to like, you know, potentially rectify
any misinformation, right? Anybody who
who pretends to care are lying to you.
Any YouTuber that that that that is
like, you know, doing this sort of like,
you know, virtue signaling [\h__\h] are
lying to
you. They're lying to you. They they
don't actually care. All they care is
about is about like, you know, is about
their own vindictive
worldview. And it's very and it's very
obvious. It's very obvious when when you
look at this, right? They don't care
about these victims actually facing any
sort of justice or or or like, you know,
or their um victimizers, right? Or their
abusers potentially being uh tried in a
court of law or potentially being held
accountable for their actions. These
people just dislike
somebody for whatever reasons they may
have. So when they talk about internet
justice, they just want to see
somebody's career
ruined because to them that would that's
like the most satisfying outcome. They
don't actually care. Nobody cares.
Realistically, nobody cares. And you'd
be hardressed to find anybody who
actually
cares, right? the these people are are
absolute lying
frauds. It's just that most people
aren't willing to be transparent about
it. If they actually cared, they they
wouldn't and they wouldn't be like, you
know, propping up internet justice over
like legitimate accountability that
somebody may face in a circumstance
where somebody may actually be a a like,
you know, an abuser or what's it called?
a um or or a legitimate criminal
with her own main account. At the very
least, we can confirm that she shares
the account and has essentially
co-signed what it
posts. At this point, I want to talk
about the state of Twitter, but mainly
the internet as a whole. I have been on
Twitter since 2012, but in early 2020, I
noticed that the culture of the website
had begun to change. KB completely
tarnished these victims for her own
gain. Absolutely true. Absolutely true.
It was more combative and antagonistic.
And the website started to reward that
kind of engagement. There has been an
ongoing weaponization of online
vigilanteism. People who adopt a shoot
first and ask questions later mentality
and the quest to make a name for
themselves without doing their due
diligence. He's just right. He's just
absolutely right. But which goes back
into what I'm saying. These people don't
actually care about victims. They just
don't. All they care about is, you know,
upholding their own social justice and
their own standards, which can be
completely which can be completely
skewed. And at the end of the day, all
of that comes from a place of
selfishness and a place of being
self-centered. These people want other
people to be subjugated by their
standards because they only want the
world to work the way that would be most
comfortable and most uh and most what's
the what's the word that I'm looking for
here? the most comfortable and the most
feasible for them without taking into
account any sorts of like checks and
balances. They do not
care. They do not care. They are they
are only here they are only here to like
bend people and make people operate the
way they want like the way they want
them to or or the way they would like
them to.
They would prefer to try to shape the
world for what they believe the problem
is rather than actually assisting in the
solution. This whole situation is a
perfect example of how unqualified
strangers can shoehorn their way into
extremely delicate situations. Bad faith
actors are rewarded for their digital
tabloids and hit pieces. Without the
right checks and balances, people can
destroy lives with a single misinformed
tweet. These aren't individuals who care
about the well-being of victims, but
only engagement and exploitative
content. It is important to allow
legitimate victims to come forward and
be heard. But the way the situation was
handled was incredibly irresponsible and
dangerous. This entire ordeal has been
the worst moment of my entire life, and
it has done severe damage to me and my
family. In regards to my channel, we
have lost nearly 10. Oh my god, who
cares? Well, actually, you know what?
Um, obviously this is meant to be like,
you know, to sort of to be like a
sympathy bait, but you could you could
absolutely use this as a display of
damages, right? And you could you could
absolutely utilize this as a display of
damages. And these are some pretty bad
damages. These are these are some pretty
extreme damages. Okay. So, so if he
wanted to sue for slander and
defamation, negative 26,000
subscribers within this period, it could
probably be a huge chunk to
revenue. That's a lot of damage. Okay,
tens of thousands of subscribers since
the release of their video, and that is
with the majority of people watching her
video calling it out for its
inaccuracies and its failures. There are
independent projects which I supported
in good faith and made genuine
connections with people that have now
been ruined because of these false
allegations. And I believe that was the
overall goal of this calculated attack
against my character. Listen, I know
that the internet likes to make fun of
me, call me cringe, make fun of my
videos, and I am totally okay with that.
You can make fun of me, but I draw the
line at this. I love making videos and
I've been doing it professionally since
2015. I have a family and co-workers who
depend on me and I want to take care of
them. I'm not the only one who has been
affected by these malicious allegations.
And while I am disillusioned by these
traumatic events, I am also actively
exploring legal remedies in light of
these false allegations. He's going to
sue. He's going to sue. These people are
[\h__\h] He's going to sue. Dude, these
people are absolutely
[Laughter]
screwed to hold these people accountable
for their lies and actions. But there is
far more beyond just me
here. Despite the damage against my
livelihood and my reputation, I am far
more concerned about the reckless nature
of internet justice. When people take
justice into their own hands for the
sake of engagement, clicks and views,
people can get hurt and it can destroy
lives. There are consequences for those
actions and we have to take these
matters seriously or more people will
get hurt. There are actual victims of
sexual assault in the world and stuff
like this detracts from those who really
need the help. If you are a victim of
sexual assault, there are tools you can
use. File a police report. Creating a
report is at least a starting point and
creates a paper trail that could help
others. It helps you to build a record
for actual professionals to use for your
aid and your own recovery. If you are a
victim, I highly suggest going to rain
description down below. People, we have
got to be better than this. Okay, please
go to So, I'm pretty sure that's where
his response ends.
Um, final conclusions. Final
conclusions. Final conclusions. The
response is overall
good as a commentary against reckless uh
allegations and reckless uh internet
vigilantes, right? However, he still
hasn't done much to dispel the
allegations, right? He doesn't really
talk about the allegations throughout
this entire video, which
is a bit of which which is a big
negative to me. But at the same
time, it's incredibly dis difficult. It
is incredibly difficult to disprove a
negative. It is incredibly difficult to
disprove a negative. So even if he even
if he could trying to like argue in any
way, it would literally just be he said,
she said. So it's not like it even
matters. I I would have liked for him to
like, you know, give his own side of
events. It like recounts his own
story- which which is kind of like it's
kind of a red flag to me, but again, I
wouldn't I I wouldn't be able to like,
you know, I wouldn't be able to expect
them to given given the circumstances,
right? Because even even in the person's
original testimony, even in the victim's
original testimony, they said that they
went through with like, you know, with
the sexual interactions because they
didn't want to get rejected, which alone
is consent, right? A lot of people are
probably going to like shift their eyes
at that and be like, "Oh, but the power
dynamics. Oh, but the coercion." Simply
put, there was no power dynamics. If
there was a sort of coercion, it would
be incredibly difficult to prove by
either party. And based on the wording
of the original testimony, given the
fact that they literally said they went
through with it because they wanted to
get it over with and they didn't want to
get
rejected, that is consent, right?
I if you like somebody because of their
reputation and because of their status
and you go through with something
because you like somebody because of
their reputation, because of their
status and then you feel uncomfortable
with it after the fact. While it might
be a little bit disgusting, that is not
rape. That is not
abuse. You could look at it and shift
your eyes at it and be like, "Yeah, that
that's bad, but it's not rape. And it's
not abuse." I have to double down on
that. I have to like make that very very
clear because a lot of people will talk
about what will say anything is rape.
They will literally say just about
anything is rape with these like very
broad standards. And when you start
utilizing very broad standards like
this, you can call just about anything
rape. You can call, you know, mutual
hookups at bars rape under these
standards. You could call, you know, a
uh a hookup with your partner without
conversing between each other rape. for
those standards. You could uh you could
call, you know, um you could call like
just somebody at going to the club,
getting drunk with the express purpose
of like having drunk sex rape when it
simply isn't. There are circumstances
where you could argue that it could have
been chorus rape or something like that,
but circumstances like that like those
are incredibly specific and need to have
like a lot of uh a lot of like factors
play in before they could even be
considered rape. But
anyways, I would have liked for him to
address more more like you know uh the
allegations more. Uh he didn't really do
that. The response was over overall
fairly decent. um in regards, you know,
as uh you know, it it was decent in in
point and like pointing out the motives.
It was decent in pointing out the
motives that KP had and how and how
these allegations could have been
platformed uh you know, from a from from
a vindictive place obviously meant as a
smeir job, but he doesn't really say
anything in regards to the victim
themselves, which I find really
concerning. But I guess I guess we'll
see. I guess we'll see. Um, maybe the
victim will come out with more
information. Maybe they'll say more.
Honestly, it's a 50-50 split. It's a
50-50 split because he's still open to
like, you know, get get slammed. He's
still open to get
slammed, but but if he did a good enough
job here to like, you know, to like make
these people [\h__\h]
themselves like like even if anything
did happen, which is very very unlikely.
Even if anything did happen, it's going
to be borderline impossible for victims
to speak out because now because like
due due to this response and the way
that KP, you know, um handled the
situation which led into this
response, any victim with any like
realistic story worth believing is just
going to immediately get shot down
because of, you know, the uh the
skepticism that has, you know, reached
boiling point levels, right? record high
levels because because of this
baery. It's just going to be impossible
to like take any allegation
seriously. But uh anyways, I wish he
addressed his involvement with Black
Griffin. He he he did somewhat. He did,
I
believe. And even then, his involvement
with Black Griffin is insignificant in
regards to the allegations, right? Just
because you're involved with somebody
who's like known to be a shady
individual, who's known to be like, you
know, a weirdo in their own right is not
indicative of you committing a crime or
being capable of committing
crimes. But anyways,
um but anyways, yeah, if he if he
actually is an abuser, which I doubt to
be clear, this is his golden ticket and
KP and KP like, you know, and KP printed
it for
him to say the least. Okay, but anyways,
uh thank you all for tuning in. That's
pretty much all I got for for you know
uh for today. That's pretty much all I
got for today. Uh I wanted to do a quick
emergency stream to you know uh cover to
cover this um you know cover this like
response before before you all leave
because I know some of you are here only
for the response. Uh, please look at the
pinned up above and go to and go to my
second channel if you want like a full
breakdown of all the information in case
you've been missing it. Um, in case
you've like, you know, missed a lot of
the story, in case you miss a lot of the
information, I'd appreciate a
subscription. I don't I don't I'm not
going to ask for donations because I
don't think it's necessary. Um, please
head on to Gamma Live where I will also
upload this coverage for those of you
who want to um those of you who want to
do, you
know, for those of you who want to to
get the full scoop on
everything. But, uh, thank you all for
tuning in. Appreciate you. Appreciate
you all. Marcus, if you're going to go
live, do it, do it immediately. If
you're going to go live, do it
immediately so that I can so that I can
raid people out.
If you're going to go live, do it
immediately so I can raid people
out. Yeah, I was about to say thank uh
thank you Crypted for uh or who was it?
Who was it that was it you crypted that
uh that posted in my server and also for
those of you who aren't in the server
who who would like to you know would
like to join the server, please join the
server in case any like you know new
stories uh you know come up. I I will
obviously try to like you know get in
get in here. I will obviously, you know,
try to like cover the story as as
impartially and as fairly as
possible. So, you know, feel feel free
to feel free to join the Discord server.
Feel free to uh check out the second
channel. Um feel free to like, you
know, feel free to come come hang out
and uh and catch coverage
live. Free to come hang out and catch
coverage live.
live. Okay. Dead air. Dead air. Dead
air. Dude, it's so [\h__\h]
hot. So [\h__\h] hot, dude. It is
actually so
hot. I'm just I'm just here like [\h__\h]
just, you know, just wasting
time. Dead air.
Yeah. Yeah. Very very much dead air. I I
have I had like literally nothing
planned. I just wanted to go live with
this uh with this
story. Hey, look. I'm trying to keep
people entertained for at least a couple
more minutes so that not everybody just
like dips the [\h__\h] out. Okay. All
right. Because I'm pretty sure most
people here are just here for like the
Saber Spark stuff, but if they want to
continue watching, you know, more live
people, they can go watch Marcus. Uh
Marcus, however, should behave. You
should behave, right? Okay. Not
everybody not everybody appreciates edgy
[\h__\h] And I'm also not not one of
those people that appreciate edgy
[\h__\h] to be
clear. Give us a give us a song
recommendation.
Um song
recommendation. Hold
on. This one's good.