Sabers Spark has responded to the
allegations levied against him, which we
read in full in the first part of this
series. In his video, he completely
denies the essay story, saying that it
never happened at all, along with going
after Brony Fandones, the original
poster, and I love Kim Possible a lot,
the woman who made the expose video,
which she deleted, saying that they both
completely botched the story along with
claiming he believes they did everything
maliciously in order to attack him. In
the video, he shows segments of a heated
email exchange that happened between
himself and I Love KP a Lot a couple
months back, where it's also revealed
that there were talks of a romantic
relationship between the two. But he
also posted an archive of this email
interaction in full, and man, does it
get crazy. On top of this, the internet
is somewhat split on Saber's response
with many accepting that the SA case may
very well be fake, but a select few
wishing that he would address his
defense of Black Griffin, a friend of
his who also has allegations against
him. Welcome to the internet versus
Saber Spark's response. It starts when
Saber Spark tweets out his video with a
caption, "My response to recent events."
And of course, if you haven't watched
it, it will be linked in the
description. But Melo replies by saying,
"See, it's happening yet again." Like,
someone makes an allegation. Almost
everyone believes it. Then a response
video comes out and people shift to
believe the response. This is why I
don't do fandoms anymore. Bunch of young
people that believe everything. Hot
Wheels Jack replies, "So it's another
quite situation then." Nobody that you
know coter by saying, "At the end of the
day, no matter what you think, it's
still [\h__\h] up to cheer for serious
accusations just because you don't like
that person. Just saying." And attaches
an image of a tweet that we read in the
first part where someone celebrating
saying, "Saber Spark exposed. This is
the greatest day of my life." Creature
of the garden quotes Saber by saying,
"Popular creator known to defend a pee
named Black Griffin has essay
allegations. Fans, I won't pick a side.
Victim's testimony gets misused for
clout by the YouTuber they trusted to
talk about it properly. Creator responds
to say I didn't do it. Fans I knew he
was innocent. The video doesn't even
address his own allegations to disprove
them at all. He sneaks in another
defense of Black Griffin. Talks about
how his editor was a scumbag to divert
attention from himself. Points fingers
at the YouTuber for making a shitty call
out. And that's it. Nothing in the video
proves that he didn't essay that person.
He doesn't even directly talk about it
or prove his innocence in any way. It's
just one big don't look at me, look how
this YouTuber botched the call out. as
if the victim wasn't upset about that,
too. All of his fans went, "I don't
know. I'm going to wait until he
responds until I can believe a victim."
Then he responded with a nothing burger
statement to just claiming he didn't do
anything without any proof of his
innocence, and they ate it up. And Led
Pipe replies, "If the alleged victim
can't have evidence of it because it was
such a long time ago, then why would
Saber have it?" Eda tweets out a
screenshot of Saber Spark's response
video, captioning it, "Saber just posted
a response to the allegations." And an
18-year-old on Twitter replies, "Bro may
be a serial gooner, but anyone who tried
to shun him for these false allegations
owe him an apology. Myself included."
And Trey replies, "I can't believe
innocence until proven guilty is
non-existent on Twitter." Zeus the
Doodler says, "The allegations are fake,
but he still defends his pee friend."
So, and an 18-year-old replies, "Yeah,
he still isn't innocent for that."
Courtsy tweets out, "So, the Saber Spark
allegations were false." And Creep
replies, "Fuck." And K says, "So, you're
pissed that someone didn't get arred?
You should probably start questioning
yourself, dude. Frank Z also tweets out
a screenshot of the response saying,
"Y'all, he just dropped a response to
the allegations." And Beneficial Gamer
says, "The dumbest part of the
allegations for me was the part where
after both essays, Saber held out his
hand and said, "Friends." Like, who the
[\h__\h] does that? And Harley TBS quote
tweets Frank by saying, "I need you guys
to wait for a response from the person
being accused of monstrous [\h__\h] before
you put it all over Twitter as a fact.
Are we serious? When did it become
normal for a gimmick account to platform
allegations to millions of users? If it
gets proven wrong, I'll take this down.
You shouldn't be tweeting that a person
did vile [\h__\h] before it's been proven.
What an awful gimmick. And it shows
Santa decides a correct version saying
Saber Spark is on the naughty list. Vile
[\h__\h] If it gets proven wrong, I will
take this down and you can disregard
everything I said. With it also having
47,000 likes and 3 million views. Comic
book reader posted a response video on
the YouTube drama Subreet. Your local
manager says, "I wish he included more
evidence, bro." The original claim had
almost zero evidence. And we know that
because of the stream Kim Possible did,
saying that this was all hearsay. And we
also know that because the alleged
victim and Kim Possible knew this
information for almost a year and were
both completely fine interacting with
Saber on Twitter. And for almost a
month, Kim Possible was attempting to
hype up, "Oh [\h__\h] this is going to
break the internet." But he didn't
provide evidence of him not doing what
is alleged. I'm sorry, but you have to
thank Kim Possible again for that [\h__\h]
Because of how terrible the video is and
awfully she conducted herself, all Saber
has to do is point and people will
automatically see that she is a doofus
with a grudge. But what about Black
Griffin? I don't know why on earth he'd
be talking about someone's allegations
in his own video responding to his own
allegations. Look, deadass, I think
Saber Spark is a weird gooner. The
entire community he came up with are
just as bad. But if anything, his
response video shows how significantly
KP [\h__\h] up by not getting the alleged
victim justice they deserve. And Salvtor
says, "I'm not at the liberty of
defending him, but the response to the
allegations is good. For those curious,
no, he doesn't address Black Griffin
stuff. As a matter of fact, the last few
minutes are him talking about abuse
victims around the world." To clarify,
he mentions him at 13 minutes and 20
seconds and nothing else. We will
probably never see him enlighten us
about the Black Griffin, and he's more
than likely firm on his stance on
defending him. Saber did the right thing
to defend himself as there was no
evidence towards him. But Griffin has
had so much evidence come out over the
span of the past few months. In fact,
there was a whole month where new things
came out weekly about him. The last few
minutes of this video have no weight,
and I hope Saber acknowledges that
people are going to give him a lot of
[\h__\h] for it. In space, Fluttershy
replies, "Pretty [\h__\h] up that he
doesn't even touch on those impacted by
Black Griffin at all. He's apparently
all for standing up for victims except
for when they're victims of his best
bud." Like regardless of the
truthfulness of the allegations against
Saber Spark specifically, his adamant
defense of his racist predator buddy has
been enough to sour him in my eyes
already. And so Laptor says, here's a
quote during his last couple minutes.
There are consequences for those actions
and we have to take those matters
seriously or more people will get hurt.
There are actual victims of SA in the
world and stuff like this detracts from
those who really need the help. So
combine that with a screenshot of him
defending BG and oh boy, Mr. Enter
tweets out, "Yes, I have seen Saber
Spark's response video." And JC Denton
replies, "What's your thoughts on it?"
And Mr. Inter says, "You will know soon
enough." Josh tweets out, "Saber Spark
today showing this comic of someone
flinging [\h__\h] with a caption," lying
about freedom tunes for clouts and to
try to get them cancelled. And then [\h__\h]
getting flown back at them. Oh no,
someone is lying about me for clouts and
trying to get me cancelled. And fresher
Luke replies, he's still going with this
[\h__\h] And Josh says, "I saw his video
about it today, and almost every single
point that he makes about what his
accuser is doing to him is something
that he had done to Freedom Tunes. The
hypocrisy is just astounding." Ellie
says, "Are you really comparing his
opinion on cartoons to real accusations?
Grow up." And Josh replies, "He
literally tried to cancel Freedom Tunes
by heavily implying that the team is
racist. That's a lot more than cartoon
opinions. You literally don't know what
you're talking about." Allor tweets out,
"Sabers Spark has now entered the hall
of the hollowed few who were accused of
essay/grooming, but effectively blew the
accusations out of the water with
receipts. I salute you, Saber." And
every cafe replies, "He has joined the
ranks of George Notfound, Slazo, Zapai,
Pyro, Gilly Master, J Schlatt, and more.
People who disproved allegations against
them, clearing their name, massive Saber
W." And Pylo replies, "Take Pyroynical
the [\h__\h] off there." Now, the email
exchange that Sabers Park showed
slightly in his video was linked in full
in the description. And this whole thing
gets messy with talks about Chris, the
former editor that KP was upset by,
along with what seems to be her saying
what the inappropriate joke was that
Chris made to her many years ago. And
Saber and KP go back and forth whether
they were and/or weren't romantically
interested in each other, with Saber
threatening to get lawyers involved due
to KP's posts and, as he says,
misinformation. The first email is from
KP2 Saberspark in January 2025 with a
title Afficionado's Chris SH case. Good
afternoon, Stephen. This email is your
requested private communication
regarding Chris and the overall SH
situation that he has caused. Our full
incident report can be found here if
needed. Since you publicly displayed
confusion at best about my attempted
communication with you prior to this
point, below are screenshots of my
conversation with Redacted, aka the
friends/ employees I passed Chris's
information to. The conversation with
Redacted specifically mentions a
possible staffing change through
Redacted based on Chris's actions. And I
honestly cannot fathom a situation where
there would be that drastic of an
employee change or discussion without
your knowledge. Screenshots can be found
here, here, and here. I do not
appreciate you calling me a liar
publicly, and I would like some form of
public apology. Additionally, your
public statement states that you knew
the confrontation between me and Chris
was recorded as a matter of community
safety combined with your email
interactions with DA Games leads me to
believe that unless there was some major
miscommunication, you are aware of the
situation and that you have chosen
inaction. You still have the choice to
either hold Chris accountable, i.e.
firing him with proof, or keep him on
staff. Should you choose the former,
please communicate this to me as soon as
possible to avoid any miscommunication
and any public statements/information
presented after. If you believe this is
only a one-time incident, this document
linked below has logged to some of
Chris's other inappropriate behavior,
including but not limited to making
obbyiality jokes to someone he knew was
a minor, the use of the nword and
imagery with himself and will of DA
games. You can find more information on
page 4 and 29 of this document. I have
been given clearance to show unedited
screenshots of the BCity incident if
requested. I hope that we can clearly
communicate about this going forward. I
have no desire to get into an internet
squabble with you, so let's please work
this out as adults. The second email is
again from KP to Saberspark. This time
talking about employees and how Saber
had a romantic interest in her. And it
starts with her saying, "Steven, it is
clear to me you do not wish to
correspond with any direct communication
despite you personally requesting so. To
say I am disappointed by your behavior
would be a severe understatement. You
called me a liar publicly without even
asking for the truth or further
clarification. My understanding is that
you have jerked around your employees
and generally treated them with very
little consideration, especially
redacted. The horror stories I have
heard about repeated employee reforms
going unhonored to you requesting
Redacted to move states for a project
only to disregard it after he and
Redacted moved shows me how little you
really care about your friends/
employees. I am also friends with
Redacted's exartner as well. And the
emotional stress you put both of them
through via your carelessness is
unacceptable and selfish. This on top of
your treatment of me when you were
romantically/sly interested in me, which
I'm happy to elaborate on, combined with
your inquiries of hosting polygamist
relationships with the fan girls to
employees is misogynistic,
inappropriate, and a disrespectful. To
me, it seems that the only reason why
you wanted to get involved is that your
name was attached, and you're more
interested in damage control for your
brand than your brand's actual
integrity. I feel like we wouldn't even
be having this conversation if I was not
another YouTuber in your space. I hoped
that you could be a professional about
this going forward, even though frankly
you haven't been through this entire
nightmare ordeal, but clearly that is
not possible. So, see you around, kid.
Rachel/KP. Attached are the previous
images I tried to send earlier since
they didn't go through for some reason.
Not that you seem to partially care. And
Saber Spark responds to the email by
saying, "Hey, Rachel, to start things
off, I replied to you on Twitter the way
I did out of frustration due to the
misinformation you have about me and how
you were talking about me without ever
contacting me directly prior. I'd
imagine you'd feel the same frustration
if someone had incorrect info about you,
and you probably do with how some people
went after you in the past with false
information. I truly don't want to
engage in internet drama that operates
off of gossip, but the amount of
misinformation you have is staggering.
So, I will set the record straight. I'll
begin by saying that the information you
have about me, Redacted, is 100%
incorrect and can be objectively proven
false. Unfortunately, it sounds like
Redacted has vented his opinions and
frustrations with the conclusion of
redacted people in his circle. But to
say it was misinformation is a far cry
from the truth. and I have the payubs
and messages to back that up. I paid for
his move. I assisted with his rent. I
paid for his salary. And I personally
packed up the U-Haul and drove him back
to Redacted after we both mutually
agreed to enter a project. I offered to
launch the collaboration at the time.
Redacted. You probably didn't know that,
but I have messages to back that up
clear as day. Also, Redacted never moved
and I can have him testify personally to
the fact. He's in a call with me right
now. He currently works for me as one of
my team leads, so if you think he
believes he's been mistreated, I think
you'll be surprised. Again, your
information is incorrect. So, if you
plan on holding it against me, you need
to hit the brakes or you will be called
out accordingly. I take incredible care
of my workers and pay them a living
wage. And I'm ready to fight to prove
that with my CPA and all of my receipts
that I have for tax purposes. As far as
you and me, I'm dumbfounded. We hung out
and that was it. I'm not sure what you
saw in hanging out with me, but we just
went our separate ways. Also, I have no
clue about hosting polygamous
relationships with fan girls. Not sure
where you got that from, but maybe the
same source that incorrectly said I
mistreated Redacted. Again, I'm reaching
out to them to wholeheartedly condemn
that hearsay. All in all, I feel
blindsided by your emails, Rachel. They
of bad faith and incorrect information.
How can you say that you came to me as
an impartial individual? As far as Chris
goes, I heard through secondhand
sources, the ones you pursued via
redacted of his stupid joke, that Chris
made amends with you and that was the
end of it only for me to get accusatory
emails months later. You never reached
out to me officially, so how could I
know anything besides what Chris told
me? Again, you're operating off of
incorrect information and through
secondhand accounts and people to build
a bad faith case against me. I implore
you to wait and hear things out from
redacted. You have 100% objectively
incorrect information that I can
disprove through receipts and
corroborated accounts. Finally, I do
have a lawyer and I will gladly bring
him into our conversation to clear the
air if needed. Now that it has come to
this degree of misinformation on your
end, I will do everything in my power to
clear the record for the truth and that
includes exploring legal avenues if
necessary. I hope this information helps
and convinces you to reconsider your
position, Steven. And KP fires back with
this email starting with her saying,
"Stephen, the main issue is Chris's
conduct, and you have passed the a lot
of time I have personally given you to
deal with the situation privately by not
responding to any of my concerns in my
first email, which I feel is ridiculous
considering you had access to this
information regarding Chris for a year,
regardless of where it came from. If you
are now going to sit there and threaten
me with legality after this many private
attempts at communication, I count six
between my first email, the Twitter
thread, and via mutual contacts, I will
not be entertaining any further
discussion with you after this last
correspondence in cutting contact with
you at this point. The reality is I am
incredibly uncomfortable with the
general approach in which your previous
email and how your public correspondents
have been addressed as well as with you
in general. So, I will keep this as
brief as possible. To add on to this,
this I will fight you for the truth tone
your whole last email in the Twitter
thread is drenched in undermines the
actual issues of the conversation. On
top of assuming I'm going to publish
falsifiable information, is that how you
talk to someone who was treated poorly
by a current employee in the past based
on all of our previous conversations.
Forgive me if you are not at the top of
the list of people who treat me with
assumed respect. In regards to your
response to my Twitter posting, your
heated response calling me a liar and
questioning my character publicly is
unacceptable. how you were particularly
feeling at the time. It doesn't justify
calling people names and treating them
poorly. As well, you could have DM'd me
as requested several times or asked for
further information before responding in
such a tone. When all I asked regarding
this exchange is for you to apologize
publicly for something you did publicly,
you instead double down in your last
message and try to justify your feelings
and only privately at that. That doesn't
strike me as someone who is dealing with
this situation with the utmost maturity,
but a desperate attempt to distract from
the actual issues and make yourself the
victim. The fact that you were going
about this route again after I had to
prove I wasn't lying the first time is
[\h__\h] deranged. Regarding your access
to the information around the incident
regarding Chris and your insistent that
I was the one who directly discussed the
information about Chris instead of your
general access to said information seems
to be misguided. Do I have to directly
tell you what to do with an employee
incident of this scale for anything to
happen? I shared the confirmation I had
from both redacted and redacted that you
had said information which came off as
indifference based on what I felt as
well as your correspondent Sudia games
alluding as such as well as there being
a public safety report available with
public contact information present for a
year regarding the situation. So I don't
understand how it is particularly
relevant how you learned your employees
sh to someone in the past. It just
matters that it happened. Even assuming
you didn't know about Chris's actions up
until the Twitter exchange, I still
emailed you directly to discuss it
before it reached this point, and you
seemingly ignored that email and only
responded to a second after my
frustration became clearer. To be frank,
it also doesn't matter how the
perpetrator feels how the resolution
went. But the fact that it happened in
the first place is unacceptable. Chris
is very obviously going to tell you
whatever you need to hear to keep his
job. It's all right, guys. The criminal
said the crime actually wasn't so bad
after all. Hell, it doesn't even matter
how I feel about it. Still, if you were
so concerned with my personal opinion on
the matter to the point where it would
directly dictate your decision to keep
Chris on the staff or not, I do not, for
the life of me, understand why you
didn't reach out to me directly or
indirectly through our friends.
Regardless, this isn't a joke, and your
insistence as such is the underlying
problem in this whole situation. How is
it a [\h__\h] joke to say you finished on
your boss's clothing and tell that to
other men multiple times? It cannot and
should not be belittled as just drama.
Why would I have gone through the
trouble of corresponding with DA Games
or having a safety report be written if
I just thought it was just a joke? I was
and am worried about the children Chris
and the greater DA Games community still
have access to. Even if I had forgiven
Chris for some reason, it wouldn't be
relevant. Even still, you seem to show
anger that I got Chris's confession on
record in comparison to, you know, what
he actually confessed to with your
comment to stating, "Are you going to
record the call without telling me the
same way you did Chris?" To be clear, he
is not the victim. Full stop. Neither
are you for that matter, Mr. Truth
Seeker. Publicly throwing the actual
recipient under the bus and siding with
the sher just because he did not know he
would be on the record as a safety
concern on top of being incorrect about
your information is one of the most
idiotic parts about this whole ordeal. I
felt it was very obvious the intention
was a recording for the public record
and a possible angle and interpretation
of him being blindsided for a bad joke
turned public only because I want to be
a [\h__\h] and cause problems is just
insulting and disrespectful on so many
levels or how you put it publicly
discussing halftruths to gain sympathy
and slander your name. Additionally, the
fact that I went out of my way to
privately talk to you directly after
several attempts to seek resolution with
the staff and what I have asked on the
Twitter thread and still did not receive
a response until sending a second email
outlining my frustration is just
ridiculous. I then even provided
additional proof of the racism and
imagery that Chris and Will displayed.
There are even incidents
of/p and sharing that material with
minors allegedly accidentally in the
document I linked as well as Will dating
a minor in 2015. This additional
document has been publicly available for
longer. The DA Games community server
has had P's that were quietly kicked out
if slash when discovered instead of
publicly acknowledged. One has a
[\h__\h] mugsh shot on the document
since this all seems to have gone
ignored until now. On top of the safety
report of the incident being publicly
available for a year solidifies to me my
original assumption that you do only
care when you have consequences for your
lack of action. God forbid someone is a
creep on my staff. Just don't tell the
public he works for me. Does it not seem
like common sense to fire someone who
talks this way about others, especially
women, regardless of when it happened?
Regarding Redacted, he has expressedly
asked not to be involved in any further
discussion regarding this topic. And the
comments about redacted moving was a
misreading on Wednesday when I stated
general mistreatment. I'm honestly upset
you even shared the email I sent with
him and your staff at large and my
general distaste of the situation in
private communications were not an
invitation for open discussion with your
whole staff team as my multiple DMs from
others seemed to tell me. Additionally,
Redacted were under the impression that
they were going to be name dropping them
in an upcoming video. I would never
blindly and irresponsibly name drop full
names of friends in a public video. But
like everything else, you could have
asked about that instead of assuming the
worst and reporting such to them. How
you communicated assumptions on what you
thought is or was happening and shared
that information has added to my
reservations to continue discussing
Chris or the situation with you in
immature tone and privately villainizing
me to our friends based on your personal
assumptions is not acceptable. We can
leave the other claims and general
allegations I shared on that note. But I
obviously still have opinions based on
the information I have been told. In the
interest of openness though, I am open
to do an on the record three-way
conversation between you, Redacted and
myself to get to the truth of the matter
at a later time. But that will be at
your discretion as his boss and at his
comfort level as I want to honor
Redact's request to not be involved any
further and not emotionally distress
him. At the very least, the mutual
decision at the end of whatever project
was in the works doesn't seem like that
way to me. And on top of these social
and emotional implications, I do not
think you are seeing and I have the
right to those opinions. But bloodly, I
will not tolerate the consistent
implication of untruthfulness until this
happens. Redacted can reach out to me in
the future if he is interested and
comfortable about a possible
conversation. Lastly, as I do not want
to get too personal, but it is
absolutely laughable that you considered
your romantic interest in me and our
friendship ending as mutually parting
ways. Like, what [\h__\h] planet are you
on? Is that how you summarize every one
of your failed courtships? Let me
refresh you of the experience. After
months of spending time together in
person, and your insistence that we were
just friends, it was foolish of me to
take you at your word on that. In
hindsight, your goal seemingly was
instead to spend time with me and see if
I would change my mind and be open to a
romantic relationship. In that time, I
felt I had finally found a like-minded
content creator and friend close and
distance to me. I think I even said
something along the lines of, "These
feel like dates. I'm just making sure
we're hanging out as friends, right?"
After you grew distant, I felt
manipulated and pressured to say I was
open to dating in order to not lose that
friendship. To be 100% clear, I was
never interested in you romantically in
any capacity. You then dated redacted
sister over me and had the question
about my dating availability immediately
after that ended. I tried to play it off
but was uncomfortable with the whole
situation. I guess it felt like I was
only important to you if I was datable
and a backup option at that. Would I
have been treated the same way as a new
potential friend if I were male
identifying? This was the whole reason I
went to your staff in the first place
and not you directly. I felt objectified
by my direct experiences towards you and
did not wish to repeat said experience
for the sake of my own mental health.
But you implied you needed the
clarification. At this point, I feel
exacerbated with the favor I have given
you and others personally and
professionally. So, I will be ending the
conversation here to remind you I am not
a third party in this situation and
trying to get a cheap and easy views off
of a popular content creator. This is
how Chris treated me behind my back.
This is how he never owned up to those
actions until I had to find out about
them myself. This is how this behavior
has continued. This is how the greater
DA games community could be potentially
harmful to children. This is on top of
Chris's misogynistic anti-Semitic
behavior that I stupidly forced myself
to tolerate when he worked for me. And
the fact I have to sit here and fight
and scream and kick for anyone to take
this seriously is so emotionally
draining, triggering, and insulting.
This whole situation has been a
nightmare, but I'm not going to sit here
and let everyone else pretend it's just
a joke out of public convenience. And I
would bet good money that he is still on
your payroll. I'm at a loss for words.
Frankly, I do not have the patience or
emotional bandwidth for your tone. your
constant villainization or to discuss
this further with you at this point for
your own perceived direct benefit. To be
blunt, you trigger the [\h__\h] out of me,
Steven, and I still tried multiple times
to communicate with you, but ultimately
was met with silence until now. You were
screaming on Twitter like a child at me
after months of trying to get any kind
of internal word on Chris and the
information being in the public eye, and
you still haven't [\h__\h] apologized for
any of it. What do you think that says
about your character? On top of that,
only then to even be taking it seriously
because I might make a video and hurt
other people's reputation really shows
how me being affected by all this really
matters in the long run to you. Sh. Use
of imagery. P find a sweep under the
rug. Just don't bring it up on Twitter.
To be absolutely clear, do not contact
me again or involve our friends in the
matter farther. Ramsies, you bring this
upon yourself. Then Brony Fandones, the
person who originally posted the
allegations, tweets, wait a few hours,
maybe less. And at the time of this
recording, it has been about 10 hours
since this tweet was posted. But
continuing on, Angel Bell replies,
"You're cooked. It's just that simple.
Probably best if you just stay off of
Twitter until the heat dies down."
Rather than us having to hear a Saab
story and have you jump on people for
saying, "I told you so. The victim card
is going to go hard here." And Brony
replies, "You're jumping the gun." And
the alicorn says, "You clearly need
glasses than if you don't know how to
read." Brony then tweets out, I'm
documenting your responses. And Bloombox
replies, "I don't even understand how
you think documenting our responses even
helps." And Brony says, "People need to
understand that they are reactionary and
unreasonable. I don't want anyone being
able to delete these posts and pretend
they didn't make them." And Bloom says,
"I get the point, but I feel like
focusing on the situation itself is more
important than a bunch of responses of a
bunch of random nobodies." Plus, she
replies to Brony by saying, "Putting
random people on blast because they
rightfully criticize you for the way you
handle this situation is not the one you
think it is." Boo replies to Brony by
saying, "Document this." And it's this
meme saying, "Blow me." And Brony says,
"I have documented it." and Boost
replies again, "Document my frog next,
dude." Brony continues to tweet out when
he says, "I can say that neither me or
Sophie were friends of KP. I know it's
not the biggest problem, but it is an
example of misinformation to Saber puts
out there." He also subtly defends
Griffin again in his video. The bigger
rebuttal will come soon. I think a lot
of people who have been aggressively
demanding no one condemn Saber without
proof are now taking his word without
any. He did not address the allegations,
aside from saying they were fake. All it
takes for his response to be null and
void is one thing. Give me a few hours.
If nothing happens, hate me all you
want. I've said all that I can for now.
In a few hours, what I can't now. I have
never accused anyone on this account who
didn't deserve to be. Then 8 hours
later, Ant replies, "So, where is it?"
And Brony says, "Everything that was
talked about last night that I thought
was happening has been [\h__\h] up due to
an intervening drama channel. I hope
it's today. It was supposed to be this
morning. I'm trying, but it's not up to
me." And Tat replies, "How exactly is a
drama YouTuber halting the information?
If you have the details, just share it.
You already screwed your position by
promising it hours ago. Brony continues
to tweet, I love Compossible a lot is a
stain. I don't cover drama. I cover
serious worst of humanity problems,
predators, bigots, those who support
them. KP is, to my knowledge, not that,
but has still put herself in a category
needing to be treated the same. Give me
time. I need to gather what I can, get
permission for some of what I know to be
put out if possible. I'm not trying to
hype up anything. I'm trying to not to
say specifics without the information to
go with it, but it's worse than any of
you possibly know. Queen Caroline Moon
replies, "Girl, what if IDW finds out
you're making these false accusations?
They'd fire you so quickly." And Brony
says, "No accusations were false." And
Queen says, "Then why keep doing this
[\h__\h] if you truly know you could lose
your job." And Brony replies, "Because
someone was arred. Also, you're not
speaking to who you're assuming you
are." And Queen says, "Yet you're not an
artist for IDW comics." And Brony
replies, "No." And Queen says, "If not,
then why not try to apologize to Saber
Spar? Cuz I saw his response video on KP
lying was really stupid." And Brony
replies, "Because he's an artist." And
Queen says, "Where's the proof? Actual
proof." And Brony doesn't reply, so Ugly
Barn says, "The proof is me. I am the
proof." At the time of this recording,
Brony still has not put out a statement.
Subscribe with notifications on so you
don't miss it because I will make a
follow-up video. Shout out to our tier
three members, Internet Representatives,
and Kiko and Salad. Thank you guys so
much for the support and I'll see you
all in the next
[Music]