and ecasy conceited with low selfesteem.
She's a teenage dream if you hate
yourself.
Bright dyed hair and obnoxious clothes.
Thinks communism is the way to go. She's
a [ __ ] a [ __ ] I'm a dozen Jezebel
minds
there for all those guys that you [ __ ]
and suck before you came along.
[ __ ] on politics likes to listen to
shitty music. She drinks and smokes and
out of a dirty bar.
She saw a of flowers and felt so
empowered by a movie made in Hollywood.
It's a picture someone's daughter like a
lamb to the slaughter. But honestly, I'd
still hit if I could.
BPD and ecasy. 30 years old, but act
like she's 16.
She's so [ __ ] cool.
Bright dyed hair but dead inside. Plan B
lifetime supply. She's a [ __ ] Gave
head since middle school.
If she's anything worthwhile her
lifestyle drives you wild.
She's an alic loser [ __ ] that likes to
listen to shitty music. She drinks and
smokes and pokes and chokes on dick.
She saw Ramona Flowers and felt so
empowered by a movie made in Hollywood.
It's sad to think she's someone
like a lamb to the slaughter. But
honestly, I still hit if I could.
She saw Ramona Flowers and felt so
empowered by a movie made in Hollywood.
It's sad to think she's so much like a
lamb to the slaughter, but honestly I'd
still hit if I could.
She saw Ramona flowers and felt so
empowered by a movie made and would
say she's
like a lamb to the
but honestly
if I Good.
You can call me a king or a ruler.
We're getting%
like
it's time to wrap this up. We're getting
20% cooler.
Seven colors in your hair.
Don't care about it.
No need to perform. Hands on our buddies
going to keep our skills warm. We need
social reform cuz we're just so
criminal. Damage is minimal.
Massive attraction.
Stop that. We're going to need a red.
You already got your reaction. I'm going
to keep on
going. I got a pull back from the
jeweler. You're getting% cooler.
You can call me a king.
We're getting 20% cooler. We had a great
day out. Calling my name like
it's time to wrap this up. We're
getting% cooler.
We're getting cooler.
that trouble. There's an or like a rebel
in a bunker against you with a bump up
cuz I think you're ordering
your hips. I'll be flashing my pink
with a drink out
like a room on the third floor.
I'm kind of
dexterity%.
You can call me the king.
We're getting% cooler. We had a great
day out.
It's time to wrap this up. We're
getting% cooler.
We're 20% cooler.
We're getting 20% cooler.
We're getting 20% cooler. Yeah. You can
call me
a mic. We're getting% cooler. We had a
great day out like
it's time to wrap this up. games.
>> Good
evening. Good evening. Good evening.
Good evening. Good evening. Good
evening. Good evening. How is everybody
doing? How's everyone doing? We're back.
We are so [ __ ] back. KP is back.
We're like, we're a little family again.
It's so nice. I missed you, KP.
Guys, right off the bat. Okay, listen
guys, right off the bat, right off the
bat,
this document is incredibly [ __ ]
stupid. I don't know whether to tell you
this now or I don't know whether to open
with it cuz I'm going to have to talk
about it later. But actually, hold on.
For those of you who were there for the
first song, for those of you who who've
been here, who sat down and were like,
"Yes, I like listening to Beckett's
intro music. Becket's intro music is
[ __ ] awesome." Well, I'm trying to
point you to this examples of
misogynistic language by KP in the above
message. Below are examples of language
used by Beckett that KP referenced
during the above text conversation and
call with Lio. These excerpts are
included to demonstrate the tone and
rhetorical frame that contributed to
KP's concerns regarding misogynistic or
gender-based language in related
commentary content. Sources: K uh
Copcast uh I love Kim Possible's
deranged attack. So, so listen, that's
where we're starting. Sexual creation.
Use of explicit sexual imagery directed
at women as an insult rather than
commentary on behavior. She drinks and
smokes and pokes and chokes on dick. Hm,
that's interesting. That sounds Doesn't
that sound familiar? Didn't we just hear
that line a second ago? Infantilizing
character framing. 30 years old, but
acts like she's 16. Oh, dude, that seems
like it's ringing a bell somewhere. That
seems like it's ringing some kind of
bell. Um, it's sad to think she's
someone's daughter. Like a lamb to the
slaughter or
that doesn't sound like something I
directly would say. It's really weird.
Bright dyed hair and obnoxious clothes.
I This is really odd, guys. I feel I
feel like I've heard those lines before,
but not in my own voice. Almost as
though they were sung to me in some way.
I flicked through this. I flicked
through this and happened to stumble
across this section. I was like, I
wonder what misogynistic things I've
been saying. And it's not even [ __ ] I've
said.
It's not even [ __ ] I've said.
She's quoting song lyrics. She's quoting
I'm losing my voice. Literally, I've
streamed like 15 hours over the last two
days. I did not expect to have to do
this [ __ ] stream. Now I've got to
read a Google document. It's a I just
wanted to prime you for how [ __ ]
stupid this is. This is this
the Google Docs are actually getting
worse. You've had practice. How are they
getting worse? Malfium with the tomb. Oh
gods, not again. Can she just stop
already? No. There will be no end. I'm
going to be dealing with this [ __ ]
idiot for the rest of my life. Cartoon
Cartoon. She [ __ ] DM'd me. Cartoon.
DM'd me and he was like, "Becket, I'm
going to paraphrase him. I'm going to
paraphrase him. This isn't exactly what
Cartoon said, but Ktoi messaged me and
he was like, "Becket, I'm only mentioned
four times in this document.
You're mentioned like way more and
that's unfair.
Why aren't I mentioned more? I'm the
bigger content creator back.
Did I not do enough?
See, I do the five.
careful, Becket. You're probably next on
her safe report list if she can get
anything on you at all. I mean, like,
what's the point? She's already sort of
tried to write one on me and gave up.
Like, I don't know. I don't know what to
tell you. This It's just not happening.
Random web abuser with the six. Becket,
the docky is already taken down by mega
mount. They don't want you to host that
slop on their servers. So true. There's
an entire section about how like
apparently she moved it to Mega because
like her Google document on Barbie got
taken down off Google Docs.
I've got a copy though. I've got a copy.
I've got to download a copy. It's all
good. Random Weber user. There we go.
Thank you very much for the sex. Uh
super out with the two can't stick
around, but I want I still want a
sticker. Um, go on if you can't stick
around just for the VOD and have a quick
Avy sticker. There you go. Enjoy your
Avy sticker as you are so nicely. Uh,
Jack Walker with the V. Becca exposed
for playing a song. What is she dumb?
You know that. Uh, you know what? Cut
that. Lol. Yeah, I just I can't believe
I can't believe she's this [ __ ]
stupid. I know. I shouldn't be
surprised. I know this should be like,
oh yeah, no, another day ending with
why. She shouldn't even slander me. I'm
disappointed. I can't tell. She's just
like, "For [ __ ] sake, bro." Um,
just your nightmare with a five. I see
Griffy Bear Supreme is grifting off KP
again. You just hate KP because she's
woke. I bet you like Critical Drinker in
every frame is a pause. So true. So
true. I do love those guys. Uh, Fen
Dragon trying with the two. Uh, can you
call this KP Doc when it's clearly chat
GPT? Yeah. What's the co like we we'll
get we'll get to uh we'll get to
copyright stuff in a second actually.
We'll get to that [ __ ] Family Guy Funny
Moments with the one. Thank you very
much. Much appreciated. Uh Miss Bon
Taylor with the five. KP was really
worried utterly no would steal her
stupidest person title. Don't worry, it
was never in dispute.
Is that all of them? We good? We caught
up. [ __ ] hell. Oh, dude. I mean,
where do I even [ __ ] begin? Where do
I begin?
Oh, dude. Which one was it? Hold on.
What was this?
Um, let me see.
Um,
okay. Oh, I've not I don't think I ever
read someone send me something about KP.
I I might have a look at the end. I
don't think I've seen that before. Uh, I
don't think I read it when you sent it
to me originally months ago.
Dude. Okay, cool. Right, there's your
intro. There's your intro. What a great
[ __ ] intro as I slowly lose my mind.
Holy [ __ ] Um,
remember I apparently didn't do anything
illegal, but this dock was necessary.
Yeah, look, I mean, how was your
weekend? It was good. It was good. It
was good. It was better than the [ __ ]
court rings though. The bar is very low.
Nova with a two. Thank you very much.
Um, okay.
Okay. So,
um, where the [ __ ] do I even begin with
this? Um, after a short break, our
latest safety report on YouTuber Leo
Convoy is now available below. YouTube
version, video version. Um, please read
full post on our YouTube community page.
Oh, I don't think I did that. I don't
think I did that. Let me have a let me
have a little look see. I love him
possible a lot. I love us so much, guys.
I can't believe I can't believe she's
put this out. I actually I actually
cannot believe it. I'm I'm stunned. I'm
stunned. Let's have a Let's have a full
look. Now, you'll note
you'll note that there's no comments on
this, which is very curious. Usually
Usually KP gets a lot of uh a lot of
comments, but unfortunately comments are
turned off.
H dude, you suck. Um Sister Gdiver with
the member for 15 months at coping. Did
you see Chibi back pedaling? I did. I
did see Chedd Chib back pedaling over
the Mimi [ __ ] Um
[ __ ] head.
Due to potential access or censorship
concerns, the report and any potential
future reports are hosted on Mega
instead of Google Drive. A readon
version has been uploaded to YouTube for
reference. I mean,
it's kind of [ __ ] already deleted,
apparently. It's already been hit. It
didn't last very long. Very funny,
though. Very [ __ ] funny. Um, I
listen, I don't know why she's
concerned. KP, we're all going to
preserve this document in perpetuity
because all of us were going to [ __ ]
cover it. Like, this woman is so [ __ ]
unbelievably dumb. She's so stupid,
guys.
I mean, she's watched. She It's been a
year. Everything she does, we just cover
and laugh at every single time. What did
she think was going to happen this time?
No, this is it, guys. This is the Google
doc. This is This is where I'm going to
start turning things around. This is
where
this is where things are going to get
super We're done. We're done.
Wanted to update you. The mega link has
been taken down and the account
terminated for breaking to slam mau. Um
did
fantasy adapts u adopts adapts. We'll go
for adapts today. Thank you for the
tune. This is a very ironic stream to
open while stoned.
Ain't that the [ __ ] truth? Um hold
on. Give me a second. What's this?
Oh [ __ ] Yes, someone sent me. Okay, so
I know what cartoon she just sent me.
Uh, I don't know whether it's going to
kill me for like hit me for uh copyright
though. So, I'm trying trying to stay
green. I want to stay green.
Um,
no more mega account for KP. No, no, no.
Not allowed it. for someone who doesn't
understand copyright. She's off she's
apparently very confident that she's
going to get like a deal with Disney
using it like [ __ ] her KPC's
bro.
Additionally, a separate YouTube account
and Twitter has been created to separate
the safety report video logs from the
main channel and log supporting
material. The channel is linked below.
Now,
I don't care much about this channel,
but I will point out this is the
KP Safety Report video archive. You'll
notice it's mostly just my streams and
videos. It's just it's just literally
Becket content. That's that's her
current playlist.
It's uh stuff Becket what stuff what
Becket has made. KP is such a fan. KP is
such a fan of my work that she needs it
preserved in perpetuity forever.
Which I find touching. I'm really I'm
really I am genuinely touched. Okay. Um
if you could actually watch any of them
and bring yourself to do that, you
[ __ ] coward. That'd be great. Um
anyway,
she has to transcript search them guys.
She can't she can't watch me say these
things. She used chat GPT for for two
safety reports a year after the same as
Spark drama and has created an archive
of coping scene streams. Most sad
impressed.
I don't like I literally don't get it.
She should just make a video on me at
this point. She should just be like here
are all the horrible things Beck has
said about me. He bullies me. So I'll
use it as a promo. KP, make a video.
I'll upload it. help another channel for
you. It'll be great. It'll be great.
It'll be great. It'll be banger content.
I love it. As far as this uh the
channel, the focus for now remains on
safety related issues rather than
standard channel content as behavior has
gone beyond criticism and HAS EXTENDED
TO POTENTIALLY illegal activity.
Potentially illegal. Now, that word
potentially is doing an awful lot of
[ __ ] lifting there.
That's
A lot of things are potentially illegal
activity, much of which is totally legal
activity. I mean, like once again, KP
has gone to the police about people and
the police, as far as I can tell, have
done, you know, literally nothing
because they're like, "Wow, you're a
crazy [ __ ]
I'm actually surprised you haven't been
sectioned.
As opposed to actual illegal activity
which KP has done to [ __ ] Dude, listen.
I don't I don't care about the
potentially illegal uh potentially legal
or legal illegal things that KP has
done. I care that she pissed on
someone's couch.
I
dude, imagine moving somebody in.
Imagine imagine poor Riddle moving in KP
and her pet dog. And the thing that
pisses on the furniture isn't the dog.
It's [ __ ] KP.
Dude, he thought he'd be safe. He's
like, "Listen, is the dog housetrained?"
And KP's like, "Yeah, she was telling
the truth. The dog is housetrained. It's
just that she isn't.
Bro,
it's fine, guys. She was just marking
her territory. Um, this has included
multiple attempts by third party
commentary channels to access details of
KP's private life, including sexual and
medical history. I mean, to be fair, you
don't have any sexual history, KP, so
there's not really much to access. I
think you're kind of safe really. Um,
for public uh publicization
and monetary monitoriization purposes,
isn't it like monetary purposes? Like,
isn't that the accusation? I want to be
clear as well, throughout this entire KP
drama, I personally have not gained a
single dollar to my name from this whole
drama. though I am. Okay, we are
planning to build a new PC. Okay, so
hopefully things will improve like
super chats must improve and must must
continue until uh [ __ ] PC improves.
That's that's where we're at at the
moment. But I mean hopefully hopefully
it'll be good. Hopefully it'll be good
and I can start doing like video game
streams again and my stream will stop
dying. It's going to be great. uh C with
the two legend says it still smells to
the uh to this day of failure. True. Um
it is currently undetermined whether
future uh further reports will be
published. It is currently unknown if
slash when normal content will resume.
We thank you for your patience and
understanding as safety related issues
continue to escalate revol revolving KP
and the community at large. What do you
mean community at large? You have like
12 people left. That's not a community
at large. That's barely a [ __ ] That's
barely a cult here for the KP snark.
Hello, Willis. How you doing, buddy?
Thank you for the two.
Montoriization is just really [ __ ]
hard to say, dude. And she turned off
comments. How is the community at large
meant to tell you how they feel, KP? How
they went to tell you how they feel?
Now, before we get into this document,
before we get into this document itself,
I do want to just check in. I just want
to check in with our friend Brony Fand.
How you doing Bonk? Now I will say
I will say that like uh Bonk has has
publicly given his first name. Now I'm
is not Den. He has publicly given that
information out himself and like owned
it. Uh because basically during this
whole Brandon Rogers thing, he put out a
tweet saying, "Just so you know, I'm
only saying Brandon Rogers every time I
say like every time I post about him."
F. Are we done? Are we dead? No. KP got
him. I'm dead. Okay, we're back. What
the [ __ ] was that? What the [ __ ] was
that?
Just as I talk about a new PC. Just as I
talk about a new PC that my current PC
is like, "You're replacing me. You're
replacing me? How can you replace me?
[ __ ] you."
God got so pissed at a bonk being
mentioned again that he cast the stream
down to hell. True. A classic rock kid
with a five. The internet villains
according to KP. A German woman, an
Irish, an Irish man, a guy from Texas
who collects toys. True.
If only Careful's knew. If only
Careful's knew. We back. We back. We
back. I think I think we're back. I
think we're back. Okay. So, uh, so
what's Bonk's name? I'm not going to say
Bonk's name, but he basically referenced
it in reference to Brandon Rogers
because that was his excuse for saying
Brandon Rogers every time. It wasn't to
farm engagement. It was because he was
like, "Oh, I can't say I every time I
say Brandon Rogers without the Rogers
bit, it like references my own name."
And I'm like, "Okay, cool." So, you're
just telling people your own name now.
That's awesome. Great, buddy. Thanks.
Well done. Well done. Awesome. Okay,
cool. Just just acknowledge your docs, I
guess. That's a [ __ ] idiot. Anyway,
I see so much of myself in him. I see so
much of myself in you, Brandon Rogers.
It's just painful for me cuz I'm so not
racist and stuff.
Oh my god. [ __ ] hell, these people.
Okay, so fan don't posted out earlier.
It's still [ __ ] disgusting that
people spread around the idea that Emmy
is a proven liar. The only reason people
even believe this is because of a video
that ends with the uploader also stating
that he is unsure about the whole
situation. You're all horrible people.
Now, what's the problem with this? It's
that Fandon is once again [ __ ] lying.
You little [ __ ] liar.
Cooper apologized for clipping me out of
context. Fandone, I do not believe, has
not seen this video at this point. I
just don't believe it.
I didn't say this. I didn't say I was
unsure about the whole situation. I said
I was unsure if Emmy was malicious, but
that the information we have vindicate
Saber Spark. That's what I said. That's
that's the full stated section of that
video. You [ __ ] liar. This is why no
one can trust this [ __ ] guy, cuz he
just lies constantly all the [ __ ]
time and then cries about it.
Absolutely [ __ ] absurd. The casual
texts do not prove consent. And that's
the only [ __ ] thing you're going off.
Something that def uh definitively
proves nothing. This is a guy who calls
Sab Spark a rapist and Black Griffin a
pedophile off
nothing. Nothing. There is a You do not
have the evidence to make those claims.
Fanown. It's really funny, isn't it,
that when any ever anybody else makes a
claim about anything, oh no, we need to
be we need to be really c, you know, you
need to be locked in. But if Bando says
something, nah, it's just, you know, I
just really feel that these people are
pedophiles, you [ __ ] [ __ ] It's
absolutely like I can't believe this guy
is still going. It is quite nice though
that despite all the pickup he's had,
cuz he got one tweet that was like I
think it was like 9,000 likes.
Um, it's not translated into anything.
It's not He's not getting any wider
pickup from the community. No one's
really like latching on to him. And I
mean, that's funny because I like seeing
him like fail, but at the same time, I
want Fandote to grow because then it
will justify me doing a Fandote video,
which I do want to do. It's one of those
things that like is entirely like if
Fand don't becomes relevant enough, I
can make a video. And I am waiting for
that day.
I want you to do better. I want you to
do better, Bonk. Because then I can make
a [ __ ] video on you. Please, you can
do it. I believe in you.
Just like that, you're all happy to tear
her life apart because she's spoken on
her own rape versus two pedophile
defenders laughing it off. Bro,
the [ __ ] is wrong with you? If anyone
was simply not wanting to say anything
definitive without proof, that would be
fine. But yes, it's morally [ __ ] vile
to tell her Saber Spark defeated her as
if he did a goddamn thing other than
prove he's a liar between revealing his
text compared to the to the first vid.
I mean, again, I don't really want to
retread the whole Saber Spark drama,
but it shows clearly what their
relationship looked like. It shows
clearly what uh Emy's issues
in that relationship were with how it
ended and it gives a clear timeline of
her freaking the [ __ ] out when he
unfollows her on Twitter. You can see
it.
Uh there is no reason for me to doubt
what happened to her. So, I believe her.
I thought that was the normal reaction
of people, but apparently people only
use the phrase believe victims when it's
convenient and popular. What you mean? I
like how you constantly claim that
Claire and Michelle are lying. The very
people you're claiming are victims, but
when they don't align with your
narrative,
they're liars.
It's just it's just endless. Love that
the KP tent is even more wild [ __ ]
Thank you, Alex. Yes. Thank you for the
two day never ends. Anyway,
that was um
that was that.
So yes, KP is now doing this safety
report video archive, which is
interesting as well because it also
includes uh the Anon KP leaks explained.
This was her like original staff drama
that she's like re-uploaded.
It's completely It's completely
irrelevant. He's got [ __ ] Michael
He's still mad about Bogsy. She is still
mad about a 16-year-old who caused her
PTSD. That is why KP has PTSD. a
16-year-old on the [ __ ] internet has
caused this uh like woman years of
[ __ ] trauma. Six views. Yeah, two of
those are me to be fair. Uh cuz I I
flipped a counter midway through when I
opened it.
Anyway,
that's that's that's that one. Now, we
have
122 pages to get through. 122 pages.
Oh, dude.
Everyone comfy? I'm going to have I'm
going to have another cigarette. I'm
going to have another cigarette.
Are you also both her subscribers? No, I
haven't subscribed. I'm assuming one of
them is her.
Becca is KP's biggest fan. I mean, I am
very excited. I am very excited.
I like the way she refers to like
herself as KP in this. Like she's not
the one who wrote it or at least put it
into chat. GPT
report Convoy drama/c commentary
YouTuber. Lio is a toy YouTuber. Okay,
that's the new narrative. Lio is a toy
reviewer. He's not a drama or commentary
YouTuber. I don't know what you're
talking about, bro. Bro just reviews
toy. He's such an innocent little guy,
guys.
Honestly, what's even ever really done
wrong?
She didn't write it. Her team wrote it.
Yeah, true, true. Monstrous. I forget
that. Her her wise team of volunteers
concerned for her safety and well-being.
Um, I would love to know what the [ __ ]
is going on in her Discord. I would I
would actually love to know what's going
on in her Discord. She's such an
innocent little being. True, true.
[ __ ] Uh, other lighter. There we go.
Okay, let me just catch up on some quick
messaging stuff. What we got?
Um,
oh yeah, also I just want to say this
because it's been pointed out to me by
um by Killjoy. Um, KP has struck
archives. She struck like two archives
um and made sure that her original Saber
Spark video was to the best of her
ability taken down from the internet. Um
she is anti-arching. Now this this is
actually unironically what copyright
infringement looks like. Now my position
is that I think archives are absolutely
fine. I don't really [ __ ] care. I
have no intention of taking any action
over this. Um, I think this is fine. I
think this is fine. But KP doesn't. And
once again, we're sat in the place where
KP is entirely rules for thee, not for
me. When she does something, absolutely
fine. Nothing. No laws broken.
When anybody else does it, I'm in
danger. This is a threat to my safety.
They're trying to come after me. They're
trying to destroy my lives.
did
read first. Oh my god. Okay, I need to
move this over the screen a little bit
because I need to actually like get into
a comfortable position where I'm not
[ __ ]
Dude.
Oh, I used to have a guy who read Google
documents. What happened to him?
Didn't we have a guy for this?
I swear he was here just like a month
ago.
The reasons they are called safety
reports is because this is a copy of
what the server the Senate did back in
the day. Oh, dude, that's true. That's
so [ __ ] ironic.
Oh, dude. Okay.
Call Chris to read it.
And we might take some call-ins like uh
I've said to Cartoon, he's welcome to
call in if he gets time, wants to talk
about some of this. I've also said liar
is welcome to call in if he gets time.
Um where's our Italian maid? Yeah, I
know. Terrible. Terrible. Uh can you
read it in a Trump voice? No. What the
[ __ ] Do we need some background music?
Do Okay, look guys. uh put one in the
chat if you want a bit of background
music while we do this cuz again it's
120 pages and if you don't want
background music then I will play it to
myself and like mute it for the stream.
Diesel would read it in a Trump voice
for us. Yeah, he would. But Diesel's not
here. Um transite with the two. My bit
pug uh my pit pup's legs got funky. So
I'm at the fat. Well, I hope he starts
feeling better.
Okay.
Okay. Okay. Okay. We got one. Yeah.
Sure. Background music. Let me find
something. Let me find something to put
on quickly. Um maybe lowfi.
Maybe some lowfi. We'll go lowfi. I like
a bit of lowfi. Um
do lowfi.
Is that actually chill? No, I think I
think chill's good. I think chill's
good.
Better not be Nintendo music. Okay, tell
me if you Yeah, this work for everybody.
Listen, we're all in this together. It's
a nice community event. Just your
nightmare with the five. I'm sure a guy
who just reads Google Docs would never
get into controversy. As long as he's
not Italian and wears maid dresses, all
will be fine. True.
Cool. It's good. It's good. Okay. Tell
me. Tell me. Tell me if it's not. Tell
me if it's not.
Okay.
Okay. This document is intended solely
as a safety notice for adjacent online
communities. Bro, you don't have your
own online community. What adjacent
communities exactly are you [ __ ]
talking about? No one should contact,
harass, or engage with this individual.
I think Aiden would agree with you. Uh
the purpose is to present an unbiased
unbiased reports and events to promote
safety, awareness, documentation, and
preventative measures. Not to retaliate.
This is not retaliation, guys. This is
not because I got bullied on the
internet. No, no, no, no, no, no, no.
Anyone claiming this is some sort of
retaliatory measure is out of their
[ __ ] minds. Do you know what else is
out of its minds? These [ __ ]
stickers. Please enjoy these stickers,
guys. Thank you so much. Thank you for
being here on this wonderful Monday
evening for a brand new bit of KP
content. I love to see it. Oh, the funk
with a five. Oh god, not KP. This will
be a great stream. Lau, welcome in
buddy. Kicking the Swede with a 50
Swedish grounds. We used to have a guy
for that. You mean the guy from internet
Jason's last video? Yeah, I think I
think so. Thank you guys so much. Let me
get let me get that goal for you. Let me
get you a little top up at the table.
Beautifully done, guys. Love to see it.
For best viewing, use a desktop. Google
Docs can distort images on mobile.
Listen, if you want to really engage
with this content, you need to put in
the effort. You need to sit down, grab a
cup of coffee, make sure you're really
going through this.
Alex with the two. The document has
already been taken down for toss. Yeah,
I know. It's beautiful. Listen, I can't
I don't want to put it up myself, but
like there will be archives. I might
post I I don't know. I I might try and
find a way to post a PDF on Twitter. Is
there a way to do an article on Twitter
where I can just post the entire thing
there?
Girl, this isn't a Google doc. I mean,
okay, meta mega doy then. We happy mega.
A whole new genre. Mega docky Google
Docs weren't good enough
content rating are due to discussions
involving allegations connected to a
sexual assault case, privacy concerns,
and sensitive interpersonal conduct
topics. While no explicit or graphic
material is presented, the subject
matter involves mature themes related to
allegations of sexual misconduct and
community safety. Reader discretion is
advised. This report is intended for
documentation, education, and
preventative safety awareness purposes.
Due to the combination of privacy,
consent, and potentially criminal
implications, the material rises above a
PG-13 sensitivity and enters a high-risk
category.
Guys, listen. As always, if you're under
the age of 18, you probably shouldn't be
watching me anyway. But, uh, if you do
need the support of a parent or carer,
you need to go and listen. I want you to
pause the stream. I want you to go and
ask like a family member, "Hey, can you
watch this with me? There's this there's
this ginger British guy wearing a drag
with a drag avatar reading a Google
document, and it might be a bit like,
oh, might be a bit much for me. Watch it
with your mom.
Who is Leo Comboy? Leo Comboy is a
commentate uh commentary creator known
for covering online controversies, often
positioning himself as a pragmatic and
outcome focused rather than emotionally
driven. I mean,
he does do that. His content frequently
emphasizes personal responsibility,
skepticism towards unverified claims,
and the potential real world
consequences of public accusations.
While he is not a journalist by
training,
I've heard rumors that she talks about
liar's job in this.
I'm like, this just so [ __ ] funny,
bro. He's not a journalist. Neither are
you, KP. I mean, could you imagine if
this became like the [ __ ] like
standard? Like KP is like, I have to
take down the Lily Orchard video now.
Cammy with the five. My gay ass may have
lost my job, so I'm what I like to call
stress animating. Keep up the good work
and don't get sued. Thank you, Cammy.
And I'm really sorry to hear that. I
hope you're okay. Uh guys, if if you
need some work if you need some
commissions done, maybe go talk to Cammy
in the Discord. That might help. Um, I
hope you're good though, Cammy. I hope
you're good. I hope it'll be okay.
As actually, if you need anything, let
me know. Uh, 404 with two. Does that
mean this is a drag story time then?
Yes. Let's let's go with that. Um, like
[ __ ] hell.
Uh, Ace with the five hurt this Lo guys.
Bad news. Have you ever heard of the
Shivers Rosa? It is really messed up.
Take cover. Tenses up. True.
True. Absolutely true.
Okay.
Uh where were we? Uh well, he's not a
journalist by training. He often frames
his commentary using advisory or
cautious language that can resemble
professional or legal guidance. In past
online discussions, Lio has been
associated with several controversies
within the commentary and art community
spaces. These have negatively uh these
have generally involved participation
in extended confrontation calls or group
discussions. Dude, can you imagine
referring to a Senate call as a group
discussion uh of the funk with the two?
It's crazy how scared of liar they are.
It is really [ __ ] bizarre. It is
really [ __ ] bizarre. Um Bro, bro just
like reviews toys. I don't I do not get
it. I do not get it. It's like this
thing of Liario will shout at you. Lio
and I have had full-blown [ __ ]
screaming matches. It doesn't it
literally doesn't matter. It just
doesn't doesn't matter. Don't know what
to tell you. Oh, dude. Okay, I'm sorry.
Cassie with the fire. Blow has a
redemption art purely because every one
of his haters has turned out to be a
massively obnoxious Well, some of it's
like some of his haters. Yeah,
absolutely. Yeah, massively obnoxious.
Some of them are just, you know,
literal animal [ __ ] I don't like one
of his major ops is a guy who recorded
himself having sex with his own dog and
then gave it to people. I mean, at this
point, really, like, what's the standard
here? Nesqu with the five. The reason
why they're afraid of him is because he
acts like their dad and these guys are
all stuck in stunted adolescences.
That's actually so true. Yeah, like Lo
is going to show up to their houses or
something. Yeah, he's never done that.
He keeps inviting people to his though.
C with the two. That's That was
unnecessarily mean. C with the two.
Everyone fs the toy man with a
transformer gun. So true.
Um dude. Okay.
These are generally involved.
participation is in in extended
confrontation calls or group discussions
addressing alleged misconduct in online
communities. One widely referenced
example is the January 2003 Rosa call.
Hey, there we go. A multi-hour Discord
discussion that drew criticism from some
observers who felt the tone became
excessively confrontational towards a
vulnerable individual. Third party
coverage example here. Uh I'm not going
to click on any of these. I can't be
[ __ ] Uh I think this is just some
random person's video. Lio has also been
involved in broader disputes within the
art commentary community, including
public disagreements with other creators
such as Hopeless Peaches.
Yeah. No, he had a public disagreement
with Hopeless Peaches. That's that's a
good way to put it, KP.
These incidents have contributed to an
ongoing debate about Lion's approach to
accountability discussions online.
Supporters often view his actions as
attempts to investigate or address
misconduct within internet communities.
Well, critics argue that the
confrontational format of these
discussions can escalate conflict and
create hostile environments. As with
many events in the online community spa
uh commentary spaces, perspective on
these incidents vary depending on the
source and the community discussing
them.
Dude, is Lanza getting a [ __ ] shout
out? Lanza's getting a [ __ ] shout
out. Approximately one year prior to
this report, another YouTuber, Lanza,
Lanza with the KP. Dude, you finally
made it. Lance has [ __ ] made Lance
has finally made it, guys. He's made it
into a safety report. That's so bad. I'm
so happy for him. I'm so happy for him
right now.
Has anyone let him know?
Okay. Lanza published a long form video
examining alleged problematic behavior
involving Lio. Additional coverage. And
I don't know what this is. I don't care.
Uh although it is important to note that
these videos have their own biases.
There are a multitude of overlapping
issues covered in this report. I mean
you're writing a report where you quote
song lyrics. You quote song lyrics as
though I said them. I don't know. I
don't know if you can start accusing
other people of having [ __ ] biases.
Oh, dude.
[ __ ] dying. Okay.
The issues include handling and
circulation of private or sensitive
information, information shared in
limited or private context being
referenced or used beyond its original
scope. This aligns with current concerns
regarding the use and dissemination of
recorded conversations and private
interactions,
blurring of private and public. And I'd
like to remind everyone KP is going to
[ __ ] and cry constantly that private
calls were released, that like
information she gave people was
released. She gave it to like [ __ ]
multiple [ __ ] people. But also, a big
part of the way this drama started was
KP cutting a recorded call
out of context
that was not on the record.
Like KP is just as guilty as somebody
like as any of the people that she's
like accusing of doing this [ __ ]
[ __ ] Once again, rules for thee, not
for me,
dude.
I really want her to come back and just
make normal content. I think that would
be genuinely very funny because like no
one's going to watch it and the comment
se you'll have to turn off the comment
sections for it. She just put out like
[ __ ] cartoon videos and it would just
be like no pickup, no comments as she
slowly spirals into like manic dep like
like even worse manic depression.
Is this what she spent the last 6 months
of When was the last one? When was the
last one of these? It's like December,
wasn't it?
November, something like that. It's been
like five six months.
You've had six months to pick yourself
up and pull yourself together and she's
still doing this [ __ ]
I mean,
what do her parents think? I think I
can't believe they're still supporting
her
about 5 6 months ago. Yeah. Anyway,
uh this aligns with current concerns
regarding the use of disinformation, uh
dissemination of recorded conversations
and private interactions, blurring of
private and public boundaries, movement
of issues from private discussions into
public facing content or commentary.
This mirrors the transition of private
calls and conversations into public
framing and narrative discussion.
Escalation patterns in interpersonal
conflict. Situations where conflict
increases in intensity rather than being
resolved or contained. Situations where
conflict increases in intensity rather
than being resolved and contained. What
you mean like when Chris apologized to
you in that call 3 years ago and you
then still made a safety report on him
and then basically we're going to do an
entire video trying to slander this guy.
What you mean? [ __ ] like that where
stuff was resolved and you kept dragging
it up. Doesn't that sound [ __ ]
familiar? Contrarian child with the
five. Can I ask what the [ __ ] point
of this doc is? Like what's the end goal
of this being posted? What does she
think will occur because of this notice?
So, what she thinks will happen is she
thinks she'll start winning people back
over because the way KP thinks is that
if she cries hard enough about being a
victim, people will eventually feel
sorry enough for her that they'll start
listening to her side and ignoring other
people. That's what KP thinks.
That's obviously not going to work
because
I I mean obviously I don't I I mean just
obviously I it's ins like how do you
like how do you explain to this woman
you know? [ __ ] There's so much other
behind the scenes stuff that I've heard
that I can't tell you. But I will say
this KP has lost her [ __ ] mind. She's
she's actually gone crazy.
She
You know what? [ __ ] it. [ __ ] it. [ __ ]
it. [ __ ] it. Someone can [ __ ] at me
later. Um, she tried to get somebody
She tried to get somebody
to talk to a therapist about me.
She was so concerned that this person
was friends with me that she wanted them
to talk to a therapist about it. That's
that's that's completely [ __ ] true.
That is that is 100% true.
Like
um
like what am I going to say to that?
Listen, I think you need an
intervention. I think you need an
intervention about being friends with
this Becket guy.
Right. Please enjoy these stickers.
Um like Pastoral member for 7 months. My
money is on her evolving into star
giant. We're getting there. Uh just a
girl with the five. Maybe she can reread
the bride of discord and compare it to
Gabe and cla dude. Blue phantom. Blue
phantom with the two. I don't even think
a labbotomy could fix this. She'd power
through it. Uh grey knight with the
five. Nice. Crabman is back in the best
uh in the best avy model. That's the
rundown on the document we're going
What's the rundown on the document we're
going over today? Uh, we're going over.
Also, this is a this is a take one. This
is a take avatar. Um,
yeah, we're going over KP's endless rage
against me. Uh, as she slowly loses her
mind, she's now blaming. It's like she's
trying to attack everyone who's even
vaguely associated with this other than
me directly, which is really weird.
Like, surely if you're going to write a
Google doc on somebody, I'm sorry, a
mega docky on somebody, it would be me,
right? Where's my safety report, KP?
Where's my Where's my safety report?
Imagine haunting someone's nightmares so
much they push for people to talk to a
therapist about you.
You know, I don't think I'm ever going
to achieve the levels of like
psychological torment I've caused this
woman with anybody else on the internet
ever again. KP, like, it's very
depressing, but KP is probably my
magnumopus.
It's all [ __ ] downhill from here,
okay? I'm never going to do this much
damage to anyone ever again. It's like
literally not possible. Like,
I mean, to be fair, to be fair, Courtney
did freak out so badly that she ended a
seven-year relationship over it. So, I
mean, it's close. She's now like
homeless and [ __ ] because of like
fighting with me, which is a close
second. It's a close second. She's mad I
didn't loudly and publicly defend her
against you and others. Yeah. Yeah.
Um,
this is a is is consistent with the
progression from initial concerns to
broader public dispute and
amplification. You made a video accusing
Sabr Spark of being a rapist. What did
you think was going to happen?
You did it to Fan Don't. I don't think I
don't think I've hurt Fandone as much as
I've hurt KP. I think fan don't at least
like like fan don't didn't jump
refraraming or selective presentation or
events
dude of the funk with the five you
caused a couple of breakdowns and
traumatized a [ __ ] respect crap respect
dude I've done dude there is a bit of a
list it's it is getting there
emphasis on certain details while
omitting or downplaying others affecting
interpretation.
You You got Emily You got Emily Jones to
change her witness victim testimony to
make Sabre Spark look like more of a
rapist. What do you mean emphasis on
certain details while admitting or
downplaying others? You literally got
like the supposed quote unquote victim
to change their statement.
Uh grant five Becket safety report is
honest. Honest uh Becket Sage report is
honest with people is crab pinches sharp
something with a bucket. True. Ginger
new goal. Oh, thank you Ken. Yeah, I
should do that. I should do that. I
should do that. I should do that. There
we go. There we go. There we go guys. I
got you. I got you. I got you. Well,
Kekken's got you. Um okay.
Um inconsistencies between private
interactions and public positionings.
Um, differences in tone, intent, or
representation depending on whether
communication is private or public.
What? What?
Dude, what what does this even mean?
This aligns with observed discrepancies
between private conversations and
subsequent public characterizations of
those interactions. Bro, I have watched
KP lie about conversation. Like, KP did
this to Lio. Like she went into a
conversation with Lio and lied about one
of what one of her friends who I'd had a
conversation with said about me.
She just [ __ ] lied.
That This is bizarre. This is actually
bizarre. These are all things KP has
done more than anyone else. Use of
narrative framing to guide audience
perception, language, and presentation
choices that influence how individuals
or events are interpreted. What you
mean? Like painting Saber Spark as a
Also, we're not even getting into the
whole like stuff that she said in
Courtney's video about Black Griffin.
Like you've accused Saber Spark of being
a [ __ ] rapist and you've and you've
like co-signed on a video accusing Black
Griffin of being a [ __ ] pedophile.
What do you mean?
Transite with the two. I can make her I
can make her for one. She's how I found
you. Aw.
A that's all good. I mean that's nice.
See silver linings.
Silver linings. Wait, she's back. She's
back. She's back. This is classic AI
summary. Yeah, it does. Involvement in
additional parties in ongoing excuse uh
disputes. Expansion of conflicts through
the inclusion of more individuals over
time. This parallels the increasing
number of participates involved in the
current situation. I mean, again, what
the [ __ ] Okay, we'll get into it.
challenges around consent,
communication, clarity, and boundaries.
Ongoing tensions regarding how
conversations are conducted, recorded,
and shared.
Okay. Summary. She put memes in.
She put memes in the Google document.
Why are there memes in your safety
report Google document on LEO? What do
you mean there are memes? Why are there
memes? Have you learned nothing? Have
you learned nothing? No, guys. Okay,
this is really This is really serious.
This is really serious. We need a
Spongebob meme here just for emphasis.
Otherwise, how will the people reading
this goo? Isn't this rated R? When When
ever have you thought, "Oh yeah, rated
R. This is highly controversial,
difficult stuff. We need to have a
Spongebob meme." Maybe just to calm
things down for any of the children
reading this. Absolutely [ __ ] absurd.
This prior coverage is relevant because
multiple concerns individ identified in
that video appear consistent with newer
patterns observed in the current
incident. While each situation is
evaluated independently, the overlap
suggests these behaviors may not be
isolated. The reoccurrence of similar
concerns across separate contexts may be
re uh relevant well my brain just broke.
relevant while eva when evaluating
patterns of behavior particularly in
matters involving private communications
consent and public framing.
I just want to say that you know I
[ __ ] hate reading Google documents.
Great night with the five not going over
jar having a thought stuck in him by
YouTube. Wait had a fork stuck in him by
you uh by YouTube. What do you mean? Is
that the demonetization stuff? Yeah,
it's down to AI. I have been looking
into more of the AI demonetization [ __ ]
that's been going on and like while this
isn't true of every channel, most of
them are every single one I've come
across I think other than Aiden Paladins
is just AI slop. It's literally like
I've just gone and checked like a load
of the channels. He got demonetized.
Yeah, I heard that. But I mean he uses
AI so like and he speak he sounds like
an AI to be fair.
Dude,
was that just his secondary channel? Was
that his main one as well?
Anyway, it to be fair, no one was
watching. So what money was he making
anyway? Didn't Jaw have to get a real
job?
A couple of people I know got false hit
uh hit falsely. Can you send those to
me? uh Toast Fire because I am because
I'm I'm interested in looking into it
and I keep just coming across AI slot
videos uh AI slot channels. So because I
am I am I am genuinely interested. Can
you send me their channels? Great night
with the tomb. Yeah, he's been
demonetized.
Oh well. Oh well. A contrarian child
with the five crazy ex-friend who
cheated on their boyfriend named their
trauma after my initials last year
because I told them to stop. I feel you,
Becca. Yeah, it's bizarre. Like I saw
like uh I saw somebody talking about um
how we've started to reframe
relationships as well. Like it used to
be if you broke up with somebody, you'd
be like, "Oh, I hate you. I hate you.
You're a terrible [ __ ] person and
you're a dick or whatever." Now it's
you're so toxic. You're like the trauma
you bring into like this relationship is
like so damaging. You're really like
you're really like manipulative person.
I think you're very narcissistic. We've
like therapized um like all the language
we use about personal relationships and
it is ultimately really [ __ ] up. It's
like not doing anyone's favors. Like if
I was dating somebody and they're like
really traumatizing me, I'd be like,
"Good,
good. I should be
dude. That's going in a Google doc in
there." Becket once said on stream that
if he was traumatizing his partner, he'd
be like, "Good, you stupid bitch."
I do it to myself. I can't even
complain.
Right. Okay. Anyway, anyway,
uh the prior coverage is relevant
because multiple uh concerns identified
in that video appear consistent with
newer patterns observed in the current
incident. Okay, that's referring to
Lanzers. Lanzas though. Um while each
situation is evaluated independently,
the overlap suggests these behaviors may
not be isolated. The recurrence of
similar concerns across separate
contexts may be relevant when evaluating
patterns of behavior, particularly in
matters involving private
communications, consent, and public
phrasing. HOW MANY TIMES do we have to
teach you this lesson, old man?
Summary of issues identified in this
case. This report identif out outlines
concerns regarding the conduct of LIO
convoy in connection with recorded
communications, framing of allegations
and responses to the misuse of private
information involving KP and other
parties. The issues identified include
potential illegal sharing of private
assets sent to other parties, including
raw audio from KP to Ly Lyo Lio for
reviewing purposes only.
Uh, Grey Knight with the five. Becket,
please. Not that voice with that model.
I spit gamer slurs on my screen.
Oh, dude. Glad I could help.
Because I'm noting anyone or being
needlessly cruel to disabled in this
drama. Yeah, it's a difficult one. I
like the way he's like in this drama.
Listen, he hasn't been he hasn't been
needlessly mean to anyone disabled in a
while. Okay. He's doing well. It's been
a It's been like six [ __ ] It's been
like 3 years.
Okay.
Um,
so this is this is in reference to KP's
original um apology accountability draft
thing which uh got shared around. Um,
now importantly, I didn't get my copy of
the script from Lio. I got it from
somebody else. Lio was like, I did I did
hear it, but Lio didn't uh correct. I've
only been mean in necessary ways. Yeah,
but Lio didn't didn't allow me to put it
out, which is probably best overall. It
was a great [ __ ] video. It was so
good. It was so good KP needed to have
it taken down from the internet. It's
back up now. It's back up. You can go
watch it.
Undisclosed or inadequately disclosed
recordings of private conversations.
Oh my god. You can't [ __ ] about this
when you do that.
Undertaken without clear informed
consent and later uploaded publicly
raising concerns regarding regarding
consent legality and appropriate
handling of recorded communications
while noting that separate recording in
another context involved documenting
alleged illegal misconduct, including
sexual harassment. KP has never been
sexually harassed. I'm sorry. KP has
never been sexually harassed. It's just
not something that's [ __ ] happened.
What Chris did is not sexual harassment.
It is a gross [ __ ] joke, but it's not
sexual harassment.
It's ju it It's just simply not. It just
simply doesn't meet the definition.
That's why KP has to keep [ __ ] lying
about it.
Oh my god. Okay,
where were we? uh framing of serious
allegations with implied certainty,
including character judgments and
conclusions presented without
adjudication or professionally verified
evidence. What the [ __ ] does that mean?
Despite uh despite such determinations
being reserved exclusively for criminal
courts under US law.
Wait,
wait, wait. What?
Hold on. KP has constantly made claims
about being sexually harassed or even
har these are all things that like you
could make the same argument for, right?
You could be like, "Well, you haven't
taken anyone to court. Prove that they
sexually harassed you."
Did she just run this entire thing
through chat GPT? Is this all chat GPT?
Unauthorized use of stolen or creative
works. Documentation indicates private
creative materials have been obtained
and circulated through a secondary party
without clear knowledge or consent.
Well, unfortunately for KP, so much of
this is chat GPT. I'm not sure she owns
the copyright to it.
Potential harassment adjacent conduct.
Harassment adjacent conduct. It's not
harassment, guys. It's not even definite
potential har It's not even definite
harassment that's adjacent. It's
potentially harassment adjacent. Okay.
Haven't we all been there when you just
like accidentally potentially sort of
kind of harass somebody? Haven't you
done that? I I've done that all the
time. Rocky with the tomb. I guess she
didn't get the job with Disney. Yeah. I
I Yeah. Wasn't she meant to have a pitch
meeting like 8 months ago? What happened
to that? KP, aren't you busy working on
your new [ __ ] Kim Possible Disney
show?
Including instances of escal escalatory
escalatory
escalating communication, name calling,
and the use of gendered language.
Gendered language. What you mean like
French? Isn't French a gendered
language? Isn't Spanish a gendered
language? What do you mean by gendered
language? KP, I know what she means. I
know what she means. I'm just being
facitious. Uh, great night with a 10.
Something about recording people uh in
voice calls in the US. The laws that the
person recorded. Okay. Something about
recording people in voice calls in the
US. Laws uh the laws um that the person
recording state of residence is in the
law that it applies if it's going to be
used in the court of law. Um
okay. So the big thing here with Thank
you for the 10 by the way. So, the big
thing here is Discord's rules are
actually different and your expectation
of privacy is different. I did actually
speak to some legal people about this,
especially for group calls and things
like this. Your expectation of privacy
is monumentally [ __ ] lower. And it
also comes down to how Discord's like
actual terms of service work. So, it's
like if you're in like a group, like if
you're in a public VC for example, you
have no expectation of privacy. Uh,
Becket stroking out. Yeah, I'm getting
there. Thanks. Uh, Rocky with a two. She
happened to do that. Lau. Yes.
Spanish is gendered because we don't
have the equivalent of it. So, we use
she or he for things? Uh, is that what
she's talking about? I just assume so. I
just assume so. Right. There's been a
lot of Spanish speakers in this drama.
No, she's she's talking about gendered
language to mean that it's like we're
specifically targeting her cuz she's a
woman is what she's trying to say. the
accusations that she's going to bring
up, I'm assuming anyway, because I
haven't read
much of this document, um, is basically
that we're calling KP stupid because
she's a woman, whereas we're calling,
we're actually calling KP stupid because
she's, you know, [ __ ] stupid.
Something to do with her gender
in the same way I called Noah [ __ ]
stupid because he's dumb. All these
people are dumb. Gender has nothing to
do with it. Okay, it's equal
opportunities. These people are equal
opportunities retards. Uh Doc Glock with
the five Disney, we may have [ __ ] up
multiple franchises, but even we aren't
stupid enough to bring on KF.
They should release that as a statement
cuz you dude, she'd actually kill
herself. Like that would be it. That
would be the actual end of KP.
She'd never recover.
she'd never recover. I mean, the funny
thing is like KP hates her dad. Like she
she's talked about this like with
multiple people now. She hates her
parents. She particularly hates her dad.
But from what I can tell, from all the
stories everyone has told me, she's
basically the same [ __ ] person, which
is really hilarious,
which again explains why she [ __ ]
hates herself. Anyway,
including Oh, there we go. Dismissal or
minimization of documented boundary
violations. It's a documented boundary
violation. Including awareness that
leaked or private materials concerning
KP were being used by third party
commentators without evidence of public
correction, intervention, or
condemnation. Lio. Lio. Why weren't you
calling me out? Lio, why weren't you
calling me out?
You You failed her, Lio. It's
unbelievable. breach of trust within a
private interpersonal context, including
confronting KP in a manner that
discounted her stated safety concerns.
Her stated safety concerns,
developing understanding of the
situation, and express boundaries
regarding communications and
documentation.
Failure to discourage harassment
adjacent audience behavior, particularly
in situations where individuals are
criticized or publicly discussed.
Bro, this is that's an entire sentence
saying you didn't tell people not to
harass me. Liario.
Liario. Why didn't you tell people to
stop being mean to me? Why didn't you
tell your audience not to be mean to me?
And Becket's audience not to be mean to
me. It hurt my feelings so much. Liar.
passive enabling through a mission,
wherein prior vouching for third-party
commentators occurred alongside a
failure to address or challenge the
unlawful or unethical use of private
information once such misuse became
known.
Your silence means something.
Your silence means something. Lio, we're
doing the Idubbbz thing. We're doing the
Idubbbz thing. Our silence says
something.
How could you How could you remain
silent? How could you remain silent?
This uh report does not allege criminal
intent or malicious conduct. Why is it a
safety report then? Why is it a safety
report then? If it's not alleging
criminal intent or malicious conduct,
why is it a safety report? Isn't this
isn't this a concern report? Like isn't
this a concerned for liar report? A liar
a liar we're worried about you report
then rather it documents patterns of
behavior that rise raise raise concerns
regarding judgment, consent, framing,
and ethical responsibility in situations
involving sensitive allegations and
vulnerable parties.
You had Emily change her statement and
you accuse Saber Spark of being a
rapist. KP,
what the [ __ ] are you talking about?
My god.
I mean, this woman must be sub 80 IQ,
right? The inability to like
the inability to self-reflect to this
extent. She must be sub 80 IQ. There's
no [ __ ] way. There's just no [ __ ]
way.
Okay. A note on use of private
communications.
Private messages referenced within this
report are included only when necessary
to clarify or respond to information. I
would like to point out that like KP is
leaking DMs in this thing. She leaks DM
conversations. Now, you'll remember that
one of the things KP struck my channel
for, one of the ways she was trying to
have me deplatformed,
cuz she struck my channel multiple
[ __ ] times in an attempt to have me
removed from the [ __ ] internet. One
of the things she struck me for
was sharing my DMs with her. That was a
genu that was She was like, "No, those
are my DMs. That's a copyright
infringement. They're mine.
Why are they in the document then?
Huh? Why? Why is it Why is it evidence
when you do it, but copyright
infringement when I do it? Huh? KP, any
answer? Let me know. To in uh to
information that has already been
publicly disclosed without KP's
authorization. These materials are not
presented to introduce new private
information, but rather to provide
context, accuracy, and clarification
regarding communications that were
previously made public by third parties.
This report does not seek to originate
or expand breaches of privacy. Any
inclusion of private correspondence is
limited to instances where such
information is required to address
existing public claims, correct
misunderstandings, or contextualize
statements already circulating publicly
wherever possible. Identifying details
are minimized and materials are used
only to the extent necessary for
documentation response. I'm really glad
to hear that because in your last
document you doxed a load of [ __ ]
people.
Listen, I know in my last piece of work
I doxed like tons of people, but this
time this time it's different, guys.
You know, if I wasn't as lazy as I am, I
would actually write a safety report on
KP.
I feel like that could be like really
useful.
I think it would I I think it would
help. I think it would help, right? Who
doesn't love a good safety report?
Someone should get on that. Someone
who's not me and isn't as busy.
Introduction and context. We're on page
seven. We're on page seven of 121. We're
going to be here for such a long [ __ ]
time. Background on Lio Convoy and KP's
relationship or friendship.
Lio and KP have been friends since 2021
and maintained a genuinely a generally
positive relationship prior to the
events described in this report. During
the outcome from KP's original expose
alleging misconduct by DA Games and
Saberspark, you accuse DA Games of being
pedophiles
and you accuse Saber Spark of being a
rapist. This is not an allegation of
misconduct. Why you downplaying? Grim
with the five, sorry, Grim with the six.
Long time watcher, first time streamed
catcher. Glad it was KP a [ __ ] uh glad
it was a KP's a [ __ ] stream. Well wishes
from Ireland accept even if you're a
Brit. I'm actually listen I've got the
accent, but I'm more Irish than anything
else. And I was born in South Africa, so
the British the Britishness is minimal.
And also like I love Ireland. I want to
go back and live there.
It's the best country. Are you republic
or you don't don't answer that. Listen,
I really I really like living in
Belfast. Belfast was great. Anyway,
dream of better times. I just want to go
to the pub.
Lighter introduced KP to Becca on the
commentary channel Cop and Seed. Yeah,
there we go. who has expressed interest
in covering the situation. At the time,
KP was extremely hesitant to discuss the
issues with outside commentators, but
trusted Liario's judgment and believed
Beckett's coverage would focus on
critiquing the structure, tone, and
execution of the video while reporting
on all involved parties in a neutral and
balanced manner. My video is neutral and
balanced. [ __ ] you.
Uh, copen season mentioned true. Yes.
Yes. Republic of Ireland. Ra. What the
[ __ ] is a boring church?
Based based
Irish Catholics represent. Okay.
As the situation evolved, there is
evidence that liar was aware that other
commentators were using leaked and
private information that KP as about KP
as content yet did not intervene or
publicly condemn this behavior. Although
he is not responsible for the actions of
others, then why are you bring it up?
There is no evidence, public or private,
that he took steps to discourage or
challenge this conduct despite having
previously vouched for Becket and
facilitated the connection.
I He's not responsible for me.
It's okay. Unironically, I I don't like
I get the impression KP thinks that Lio
is in some way because Lio's maybe the
because Lio is the bigger creator in
subs that Lio could like I don't know
leash me or something which is just
absurd.
Like, dude, it's not my fault KP didn't
look into who the [ __ ] I am. Okay, it's
I feel like that's really not my
responsibility or liios.
Uh, pre 2025, pre video publication and
general involvement. Prior to May 2025,
KP was Dude, happy anniversary by the
way, guys. Happy anniversary. Has it
been a year?
There is no way. most I could do is ask
you not to do something. Yeah, I mean
there are things that that Leo has asked
me not to do and occa and and like
depending on what they are I've agreed
like that's pretty much it but most of
the time if Leo goes I don't think you
should do this I'm going to go well I do
it anyway. Um or he talks like there was
one particular situation actually where
Lio of all people [ __ ] optics checked
me on something. He was like you can't
do that.
You're like, you know, you He was like,
you know, you can't [ __ ] do that.
That's a [ __ ] absurd thing for you to
to want to do back here.
And I hate to say it, he was actually
right.
Uh, premade 2025 prevideo publication
general involvement. Prior to May, KP
was developing a video project examining
safety and accountability concerns
within DA Games online community space.
The scope of the video expanded over
time to include multiple related topics
included reported issues affecting
additional individuals connected to the
community, employment and moder
employment and moderation practices. KP,
you don't pay your staff and you treat
them like [ __ ] Was it the billboard? It
was something to do with the billboard.
Yes, it was um
the absence of consistent third party
oversight or review of online conduct.
I can't no I'm stuck on employment
practices. How is this [ __ ] going to
claim that LIO in some way is
responsible
like sorry that DA games is
irresponsible for the way it deals with
its employment stuff when you have more
staff comp.
I'm not kidding here. KP has more staff
complaints than any other YouTuber I
have ever come across.
She's literally in a league of her own.
It It's I don't know. I don't know how
you [ __ ] achieve this. Every single
person pretty much over the past what
what are we talking here? 12 year like
13 14 years seems to have fallen out
badly with KP after working with her.
every single person
more than Star Drive. More than anybody.
Also, sticker time. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes.
Please enjoy these stickers. We're going
to have a TIG sticker. I think we're
going to do a TIG sticker. Yeah.
Lost in Worlds with the two. KP
stupidity is Eldrich in nature. It's
kind of incred. We're lucky it's not
infectious. Land Clipper with the five.
KP really is the new jar. We're going to
get 100red years of content out of her.
Drew, dude. Like, it's it's sparse. She
like she lay she like spreads it out as
well, which is nice. Whenever things hit
a lull point, she releases it. Actually,
to be fair, KP always releases content
at the worst time for me personally, cuz
I would have liked a day off today where
I could have just chilled out and slept,
played some video games.
But here we [ __ ] are.
The absence of consistent third party
oversight or or review of online
conduct. Discussion of circulation
sexual uh circulating sexual allegation
uh assault allegations involving online
creators once again without proper
evidence. And Lio told you not to do
this as well. You accuse somebody of
being a rapist and broader commentary on
online accountability and community
safety concerns. So, so when I point out
that KP is a vile, detestable piece of
[ __ ] it's
harassment or being mean on the
internet. When she tries to do it to
somebody, it's a safety concern.
I just woke up to a DM. What's this?
Um,
oh yeah. So, apparently KP has also
Wait, what the [ __ ]
KP safety report. She uploaded Khuk
stream, dude. What the [ __ ] are you
doing? Listen, I've already said that
I'm not going to take any action on
these, but like and I don't think anyone
else should either, by the way, because
I think it's funnier this way. But um
dude, absolutely [ __ ] unbelievable.
Caronic with a five. Going to catch up
on the first half when the VOD drops.
Dying from fabrication finals projects
and it's only Monday. Have a Fiverr.
Thank you very much, Carthonics. Uh hope
your finals go well. Grey Knight with a
five. Lio isn't everyone's dad KP. He's
not responsible for info other people's
uh got not through him. And if they did,
he's not responsible for what they do
with it. True.
Liar's like, "Listen, I'm more petty
than Beck is." Okay. Oh [ __ ] Um,
during this production period, KP
collaborated directly with Lao, who
contributed voice work and participated
in production discussions related to the
video's production. Um,
that I don't think that's a very I mean,
that's technically true. That's
technically true. It's a very dishonest
way to spin it because Lio's
contributions were going, "Don't do
this. Don't put don't put this out live.
You can't do not trust this person.
There is something wrong with this
story." That was Lio's contribution.
When sexual assault allegations
involving an individual identified as
Emily became part of the discussion, Lio
advised that police report should be
considered. Although Emily did contact
her local police on this matter, she
expressed hesitation towards the option,
citing that under the California Public
Records Act, police reports may become
accessible to the accused party and
could contain identifying information
such as addresses.
Bro,
she's a public figure. You knew it was
Emily. You knew it was Emily. Why, dude?
Additional concerns about potential
doxing and personal safety were
communicated as reasons for reluctance
to pursue immediate law enforcement
involvement. Readers can read more about
the California Public Records Act here.
This report does not seek to evaluate
the objective uh objective valid of
validity of filing a police report or
the reason behind Emily's decision not
to do so is intended solely to document
the present and available uh and present
the available information. The confusion
most likely originated between Lo and KP
because there was no documented
discussion about how the absence of a
formal police report might later be
interpreted publicly or how it could be
affect uh it could affect perceived
credibility of the allegations. This is
a lie. This is a [ __ ] lie. Liar was
like you like you have random testimony
from at that point in liar's
understanding a completely anonymous
individual.
And he told you not to run it.
Dude,
how do you suggest going forward with
the victim? Honestly, we can't we can't
do anything unless she files police
reports. I'm sorry. This doesn't even
[ __ ] align.
We can't do anything unless she files
police reports. I'm sorry.
At the time, KP understood that the
allegations were already scheduled to be
made public through other sources,
including discussion by Brony Fandot
Fand dot fand dot
via Twitter. The framing of the video
with the breaking of the allegations was
an attempt to reinforce credibility of
both the public accusations and the
issues presented in the video. Because
of this, KP believed she was commenting
on an allegation that was already
entering public circulation rather than
independently breaking the story
herself. You had Emily change her
[ __ ] statement.
I What the [ __ ] are you on about?
If Brony Fan don't objected to this idea
or had issues with the dual framing of
the video and the allegations, he could
have easily declined the offer. I'm not
saying that to punish him, but I'm tired
of being blamed for other people's
actions. KP No, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no. You had Emily change I've got
the DMs. They're in the first [ __ ]
video.
You had Emily change her statement to
make it more damaging.
You broke these allegations when Brony
Fandone first posted them early, by the
way, cuz he posted them in April. You
had him take them down.
You wanted to break this. You were
posting on Twitter about all these memes
about how you going to take out
Predators tomorrow.
You absolutely were breaking this
[ __ ] story. God, you're such a
disingenuous [ __ ] [ __ ] Krise with
the five. Missed my first donor, but
yeah, KP just lies all over this dock.
Lol. Also, the chatbot starts to make up
new people, Becket L. Lol. Lal, you'll
see. Wait, what?
Oh my [ __ ] god. Right. Okay. Also,
did I miss I missed your first one? I'm
so sorry, buddy. Um, let me see if I can
scroll and find it.
God damn it. Damn it. It's always people
whose names begin with K. I don't know
what it is. I'm so sorry. Okay. Anyway,
question. Why did KP find Emily credible
in the first place? KP's assessment of
Emily's claims were based on prior
pattern recognition. These instances
include blurred boundaries between
professional and personal interactions
in initiation of emotionally or
romantically suggestive interactions
followed by withdrawal or reframing use
of platform or influence creating
unclear power dynamics. Okay, let's just
be clear about why KP believed these
allegations. Because Saber Spark
rejected KP. It's in the emails.
It's in the emails.
She talks about it. She's like, "How
dare you date Black Griffin's sister
rather than me?
That's why you wanted to go after him."
And you were jealous that he was he had
been successful where you are a abject
failure.
Okay, one sec.
Sorry, opening another can of Coke. I
didn't want to deafen you with the sound
of it. Okay. I still don't get how
people can have this much of an
instinctual habit to do stuff like lie,
but then never have the drive to put it
uh to a skill like acting or phone
service.
I think like the core problem with
someone like KP is she KP is incapable
of seeing herself as the villain
and she's smelly. Yes, Hos. Yes, she is.
Indeed, she is based.
Based and true.
She can't put she had a personal
vendetta against Saber. I mean, she can.
She just won't.
Hang on one sec.
Um,
sorry. Someone DM' me like, "It's okay,
Becket. If KP won't release a terrible
cancellation document on you, I will
based. Thank you. I appreciate you." Um,
okay.
I'm getting I'm getting new headphones
in the next day or so. Jesus.
Additional note, consistency between
Emily's account and KP's prior personal
experience informed how the claims were
interpreted. This is insane. KP has no
romantic entanglement with Saber Spark.
They never slept together. They never
slept together. What do you mean KP's
personal experience? KP, you're a
virgin. You've never had sex.
That this makes no sense.
Wait, what chat bot? Uh, but did we
check to see if this was written by an
AI with a checking? Uh, this is Yeah, I
mean, this is AI. Uh, thank you Grey
Knight for the five. We don't need to
check. We know that KP uses AI and also
there's lots of little things in the web
uh about the way it's structured that
show it's AI.
This is not a statement on the objective
truth of the claims, but rather an
explanation of the patterns that made
them appear plausible within KP's
understanding. Potential statements by
KP regarding uh referring to the
allegation as spicy were taken out of
context. What? What context? What
context?
This was shorthand language used
privately by KP and functioned as a
coping mechanism using humor to process
discomfort, not as a reflection of how
the situation was understood or taken
seriously. Yeah, guys, when KP said that
it was spicy, she was just feeling
uncomfortable.
Hey guys, welcome to the stream tonight.
If you're just tuning in, we're reading
the Google document of a delusional
woman.
Oh, [ __ ] me. Hold on. I'm actually going
to change these headphones over. Give me
a second cuz my uh this is super
uncomfortable.
Oh, dude. And I need to be comfortable
for the Google Docy reading. Okay.
I'm sorry. I just don't have the I just
don't have the skills of some other
people who are no longer with us who
have who have passed into the ether.
Okay, there we go. Best base. Based.
If I can do that without strangling
myself, that would be [ __ ] awesome.
Oh [ __ ] do these fold up? I didn't know
that. That's useful. Um, okay.
Okay,
there we go. Lovely.
Um
anyway, additional the additionally the
argument that KP was promoting the
project for attention overlooks the
multiple private attempts to prevent
unnecessary exposure and does not
account for the efforts made to handle
the situation with discretion.
What? What? What? What do you mean? What
does that mean? You were planning to
make a video, but you Okay. Oh, sorry.
KP had got a private apology from Chris
years before this. It wasn't enough for
her. She tried reaching out to people
who told her that this was the wrong way
to handle it. She didn't care.
She tried to drag Sabers Spark in
despite the fact that he was nothing to
do with any of it.
This again is just a [ __ ] lie. The
idea that I would promote a sexual
assault claim out of maliciousness,
validation, jealousy, or attention is
disgusting. It is disgusting, KP. It's
disgusting that you [ __ ] did that.
That is exactly what you [ __ ] did.
And it's even [ __ ] worse that you
refuse to take any accountability for it
and you cry victim when like dude this
woman can never come back to the
internet. This is her life now. So KP
fed an AI garbage fact so it
hallucinated are uh hallucinations are
even wackier and decided that was fine.
I I don't know if she was even able to
read this.
Can she read? Is she like at that point?
I kind of assume she's just stuck in a
weed and ketamine induced coma. Thank
you for the five, Grown Eye.
Readers are encouraged to compare Enemy
Emily's testimony here with current
evidence and determine their conclusions
independently of this report. Notice how
she doesn't point to any of my stuff
directly, right?
Like don't don't go listen to those
people. Listen to the person who, you
know, has been widely discredited
anyway. Mad Fox member for one month at
coping. Sorry I'm late. Got a little
sidetracked. Good to have you in.
Welcome in. Thank you. And thank you
everyone who becomes a member and
everyone who super chats and everyone
who subscribes. You're all [ __ ]
based. Uh readers are encouraged to
There we go. Additional evidence
provided on the DA games victims is
logged here for independent review. The
assumed expectation was that the
information would become publicly
available regardless of her video and
that referencing the allegation within
the context would provide sufficient
grounding for discussion. Subsequent
developments following publication
indicated that this assumption was
incorrect.
That wasn't an in this wasn't her
assumption that again you're just
[ __ ] lying. Potato member for 14
months. Did someone say uh ketamine
share? Shut up. Thank you for the 14
months though. Um, subsequent
developments following public uh
publication indicated this assumption
was incorrect and the underlying issues
remained unresolved. KP on this man. If
I knew including enemy Emily's testimony
in the video would question the ethics
of the rest of the thesis of the video,
I would obviously not have included it
and let it stand on its own to not over
complicate either issue. There's a lot
of things I learned from this whole
experience.
There's a lot of things I learned from
this whole experience.
Can you name any of them? Can you tell
us what you [ __ ] learned? Because it
feels it feels like we're a year later
and you've learned nothing. Why the [ __ ]
are you live again? Because KP released
a document. Mally, hello wifey. How you
doing?
Safety report posting will continue
until morale improves.
[ __ ] hell.
Oh, dude. Okay, hold on. I need to
change the music up.
Uh,
listen. This technically counts as a
bonus stream. Okay. Um,
does this work?
I think so. We We'll change it up. We'll
go for some [ __ ] synth wave. Okay. I
need a cigarette.
She hasn't learned not to include memes
in serious stock. She hasn't changed at
all. No, this is I mean, how can she?
Okay, that's way too loud.
There we go. You know what's mad you
don't get to pretend to be a horse on
the internet. So true. So true. Potato
light with the five. Just one more
safety report, Becky. Did one more.
They'll all admit they're wrong and come
back,
bro.
You're so mean for not calling Khawk
last night. Yeah, we'll do I'll I'll
jump on Khawk's stream sometime. Maybe
in the next week.
Maybe in the next week we'll do
something.
Okay.
Okay, we got some synth wave. I'm
feeling a little bit little bit more
love a bit of synth wave.
Um, and this one's like 12 hours long,
so we're covered for the whole stream.
Okay.
Additionally, accounting for potential
communication gaps early on, it is
important to know that on April the 8th,
2025, Li was provided with an incomplete
render of the project specifically for
feedback purposes.
To be transparent, it is acknowledged
that Emily related uh the Emily related
portion of the video was likely
incomplete at the time of the render.
However, there is no documented evidence
of consistent or meaningful feedback
provided on any other of mi on any other
of material/ unspecified reason. Leo
later criticism regarding prevention and
escalation is therefore inconsistent as
he had a clear opportunity to raise
concerns and did not act on it.
Sure thing. I don't think I don't think
Lio actually watched it. I think that's
the problem. I don't think Lio [ __ ]
watched it. Hidden heroine, thank you
for the raid. Welcome in. Great night
with the five. This makes sense that
she's sp uh spend uh spending this out
from the bottom of a cape. Sending this
out from the bottom of a cape. Yes.
Well, she wanted to get ketamine
therapy.
And her parents said they'd only get her
ketamine therapy if she got a real job,
which I assume didn't happen because who
the [ __ ] is going to hire this woman?
Uh, sure. Speaking of passing, can I
Sure. Speaking of passing, can I pass
along the exposed draft? I gave some
options to the Saber victim for
alternate ways to go about things. So,
waiting on her her in the meantime. You
mean my draft? I mean, the video about
DA games and Saber. I don't see why not.
So long as you trust whoever you show it
to. I mean to you for feedback. Uh,
specifically. Oh, ye. And he never
responded. I mean, again,
dude, what was he meant to say? Hey, KP,
this video is [ __ ] awful. What are
you doing? No, I did, but I told her not
to do that. And that was uh and I was
aware of what she was trying to do. Get
my clearance so she could blame me when
things went arry. Interesting.
Yeah, I'm sure Leia will go over this or
call in and give me the DMs. Sure.
Speaking of passing. Okay, whatever. Um,
oh, she actually, yeah, she puts the
text there. That's nice of her. Also, an
update on the saber victim. She's going
to come out on Twitter first. Uh, warned
her about the harassment and potential
risk of her anonymity being compromised.
So, she seems aware and still wants to
go forward. All right, then. That'll be
on her.
Oh, it's the Saber stuff again. Why? Oh,
KP's released a new document, this time
on Lio and how Lio is evil. Malle,
because didn't stop me. He didn't st he
didn't He didn't stop. Stop me, Malie.
He was meant to He was meant to protect
her. He was meant to save her. Topaz
with the five. KP should do a Chris Chan
and make a comic about how she sees
reality. I'd read it. I'd read that,
too. I'd read the [ __ ] out of that.
That'd be [ __ ] awesome.
Introduction to Beckett of Copen.
In May 2025, as online discussions
surrounding KP's video continued to
develop, Lia introduced KP to content
creator Beckett from Copen. Becket was
presented to KP as a trustworthy third
party who would provide her with a fair
opportunity to explain her perspective
and discuss the surrounding controversy.
Now, I want to be really clear about
something. I actually caught quite a lot
of [ __ ] heat of be for being too nice
to KP in my video. And I get this all
the time because like I try and be
charitable uh to people. Um the idea
that KP is like, "Oh yeah, Becket Becket
just came in and tried to turn me into
content." Bro, my video on you is super
nice to you compared to like what you
actually did. It is super [ __ ]
charitable. It's only after you came
out, flipped sides, and tried to like
reverse your position that I started
going after you.
And I said publicly that if KP just came
out, took accountability, apologized,
and offered heartfelt apologies to like
Saber Spark and everyone else involved,
I defend her.
I said this publicly.
People have watched me do this. They
have watched like again like right now
with the Noah stuff, like I'm being
charitable with Ant. I've still got
plenty of things to say about Ant, but I
know I've caught flack there. It's like,
nah, just [ __ ] rip his throat out
back. And I'm like, no, no. I want to
see what his next response is. I want
like explanations to things. I want to
know who else was covering [ __ ] Noah.
Random web abuser with the six. Nice of
KP to finally introduce us to the
elusive becket of cop and see. I know.
I'm just a little guy. I'm just a little
guy on the internet. Hold on. What we
got,
dude? Send Liono is now sending me
[ __ ] memes. Okay, it's Captain Hook's
suicide attempt on [ __ ] on the in
from the Hook movie. Jesus Christ. Okay,
it is important to note that later
revelations of Beckett's bias to certain
parties of the case were not clearly
presented or communicated this time. If
these biases were communicated to KP,
she would have likely declined the call
altogether. Now, what KP is talking
about here is the claim that I was a
Saber Spark fan
before any of this, which is absurd.
It's absurd. My first tweet on this
drama was that Saber Spark is probably
just a random autist who got bullied at
school. I was like I was like, he
probably got still got images of being
shoved into lockers. I was What the [ __ ]
do you mean?
I I don't think I'd ever watched a Saber
Spark video all the way through before
this drama. I wasn't a fan. I'm I'm I
mean, I like Saber Spark now. I would
describe Saber Spark as somebody I'm
friends with now, but that's because of
this [ __ ] drama.
During this period, an audio interview
related to the first uh shaming of Saber
Spark video was recorded. Both Lio and
Beckett were presented on the call
alongside KP. KP does not currently
possess a copy of this recording.
Therefore, the audio itself will not be
shared or cited directly within this
report. The following screenshot shows
Lio first bringing up Becket. I mean, I
include most of the audio at this point.
I've released most of it
and there are mo multiple [ __ ] calls.
Um, there is a reason why I'm not
releasing the whole call. It's because
there's quite a lot of the stuff that's
cut out of it is like really personal
stuff and KP crying. KP breaks down in
tears during that [ __ ] call. And I
thought that would be a little bit too
mean to [ __ ] release. Maybe I'll
reassess. Maybe I'll put it out on
Twitter. I'll go and I think I've still
got that call. I think it's like on a
hard drive somewhere. Maybe I'll go find
it, dig it out, and just like put the
section of KP crying.
Why the [ __ ] didn't you release that?
Cuz I'm not that mean.
Um, and I don't tend to release full
calls. That's just not something I tend
to do. Um,
someone wants to talk to you about all
this. I trust this p. I truth this
person. I know. Um, he needs to be run
through the timeline. KP agrees.
According to KP's recollection of the
conversation, Beckit asserted that Emily
Jones's sexual assault allegation
against Saber Spot was false. uh against
Sab Spark was false, which it is,
relying primarily on statements obtained
from direct sources and interpretations
of Emily's prior online behavior. I
mean,
the fact that her story doesn't make any
[ __ ] sense, the fact that the
timeline doesn't make any sense, the
fact that she's had 12 years to save the
dis uh the Skype blogs and never did.
What you mean all that stuff? That [ __ ]
You mean all the evidence? Yeah. As
discussed in the Barbie report, these
factors alone are insufficient to
objectively prove or disprove a sexual
assault allegation, which typically
requires formal investigation or legal
adjudication.
It's not it's not about disproving it.
Like, here's where everyone gets [ __ ]
like mixed when they do like accusation
content. It's not about anyone else
having to disprove the uh claim. It's
about you having to prove it.
You do not have the evidence to prove a
sexual assault.
Neither does Emmy. Emmy herself, by the
way, had stood by this retraction that
even if she was uncomfortable during the
interaction, Saber Spark would have had
no way to know this because she is by
her own standards a people pleaser.
She'd have no way. Sorry, he'd have no
way to know.
KP also completely seems to admit this
and has never like again burden of proof
and all that. Yes, that's how the legal
system works. I mean again, could you
imagine if I did this like KP actually
like [ __ ] KP's had multiple dogs and
KP's had multiple dogs. She keeps like
letting them die. They starve to death.
Prove me wrong KP produce the
non-corpses of your previous dogs.
Otherwise, you're a puppy killer.
Does that sound absurd to anyone else?
That said, we are going to be going
forward referring to KP as a puppy
killer during the stream. Additionally,
labeling an allegation false without due
process, such as a proper review of
evidence, reporting to authorities, or
formal investigation, can create broader
harm. Listen, if someone comes through
and makes an accusation, we have to
treat that accusation seriously, such as
the accusation that KP murders puppies.
This conduct can lead potential victims
such as puppies with similar experiences
to question their own situations,
reinforcing doubt in discouraging them
from seeking help, reporting or engaging
in established trauma research or
engaging in established trauma research?
What the [ __ ] is established trauma
research?
Like what you Oh my god, was I sexually
assaulted? Let me go and read a
peer-reviewed paper.
The [ __ ] are you talking believable dead
dogs?
I've actually held a seance with some of
KP's former dead dogs,
right? I held a seance with some of them
and they were they they to the things
they told me, guys. Absolutely [ __ ]
stunning. I personally couldn't believe
it.
I couldn't believe it. Okay, I think
that's a good sound level.
Um,
again, these reports do not determine
guilt or innocence of any party, but
underline lack of objected evidence in
an official legal capacity.
Sorry, someone just DM' me. Um, KP
recalls that the framing of discussion
led her to feel that she was be had been
misled or manipulated into platforming
Emily's claims, suggesting that Emily's
motivations were malicious or personally
retali uh personally retaliatory in
nature rather than rooted in a
legitimate accusation. Now, this is the
idea that Emily is either malicious
or essentially like creating it in her
head, right? whether she's essentially
misremembering the events or her
feelings towards them because of later
like of how badly
um she feels towards Saber Spark because
you know he unfollowed her on Twitter
and it's like her own statements read
this way. Say she says it herself. Saber
Spark played with my emotions. That's
what she focuses on. It's what she
focuses on in the text messages. It's
not hey Saber Spark you know you raped
me. It's Saber Spark. You played with my
emotions and you unfollowed me on
Twitter. Q with the five. Becket talks
to dead dogs at 3:00 a.m. streaming. The
JStation art begins. True.
I'm not going to tell you who sent me
this, but someone just sent me I love
killing puppies a lot. Dude, that's so
[ __ ] funny.
That's so [ __ ] funny.
bit of calm.
Okay.
The framing significantly influences
KP's understanding of the situation at
the time, leading to KP to privately
question Emily until KP conducted her
own research after the conversation over
the course of the summer 2025. This
isn't true, by the way. KP didn't
conduct her own investigation. KP got
mad at me because I said she was stupid
and then she tried to like get in
Emily's good graces again. also trying
to manipulate Emily.
Trying to manipulate Emily to go after
me. Like in the Google in the like
[ __ ] doc that Hidden leaked um she
talks about how Emmy was Emily was
accusing me of questioning her pre like
other sexual assault instances which is
not true which is not something that
happened and also importantly not a
claim Emmy has ever made about me. Emmy
has never [ __ ] attacked me
and she just hasn't. Emy's Emmy has like
Emmy has a lot of [ __ ] going on and is
like has things that I'll criticize her
for, but Emmy has never actually
attacked me. KP really wanted her to
though.
Um, this is supported by screenshots
like this. I think the alleged victim
played you. I'm going to pro them to see
what they do.
Okay. So, what's the argument here? Lio
gave his gave you his opinion. I gave
you my opinion. And then you're so dumb
that you don't have any opinions of your
own. You didn't disagree with us. You
were like, "Oh, that makes sense."
What is more important to acknowled uh
what while it is more important to
acknowledge the seriousness of Emily's
allegations and the legitimate
complexity involved in discussing such
claims publicly, the concerns raised in
that in the conversation to KP's
recollection shifted towards definitive
character judgments regarding the
claimant and the circumstances
surrounding the claim. I mean, the clues
are in the video.
I don't know what to tell you. This
approach emphasized conclusions about
motive such as assert assetation
assertions sorry of malicious intent or
deception rather than maintaining a
positive a position of evidentary
uncertainty. The discussion then focused
on assigning credibility in absolute
terms. If the concerns had been
presented through a framework of
caution, acknowledging uncertainty,
potential risk, and the need for careful
handling, the resulting dialogue may
have allowed for a more balanced and
constructive exchange.
Bro, Lio said this to you before you
went live with it. He was like, "You
don't have the evidence for this. You
shouldn't go live. You shouldn't present
this information."
That that was the like carefully
constructed balanced dialogue. Liar was
informing you that going live with this
is a mistake and you didn't listen to
him.
The [ __ ]
Is she tone policing? Yes.
Yes, she is. Thank you. Hidden. Yeah,
I've seen
Wait, what?
Hold on.
Yo, it seems KP is striking originals of
the content.
Oh, is KP sending out more [ __ ]
copyright strikes?
Give me a second.
I want to check something.
That's interesting.
So,
hold on. Is liar still in chat?
I need to check something.
I'm sort of getting fed information. I
don't want to know it's true. I need to
know I know I need to know if Lio's
stream has has Lio received a new
strike.
Might be a great time to mention the
clips channel. True. Lio, have you
received a strike on your Barbie report?
Because apparently there was a KP like
KP's archive
has been has been removed like one of
the archive videos. That's interesting.
Has mine been removed?
No, this is all still not. But there was
one for Lio and uh his his Barbie report
has been removed already.
I'm just I'm just curious now.
Are we doing this again? I mean, I
wouldn't be surprised. I don't think
I've received any strikes. No, no, no.
Not that I can see. Okay. Anyway.
Anyway, anyway,
um
I remember sitting in that call crying.
Yeah, I told you she cried. Thinking
that I'd been manipulated into
platforming someone with an agenda. But
once I did my own research, evidence
seemed to point to more complexity. In
hindsight, I understand the concerns
with platforming something serious. But
the issues here was was how character
framing was used to automatically
dismiss Emily's claim.
Oh my [ __ ] god, dude. Please note in
the full recording of the call between
KP Li and Beckett uh if uh if a full uh
full recording of the call between KP Li
and Becket is released at a later time,
KP did not consent to its publication.
The release of such material may be
legally questionable and may function to
redirect attention away from KP's
recollection of events and should be
evaluated within the broader Wait, hold
on a second. Hold on a second. Firstly,
that call was on the record and KP was
aware of that. That call was on the
record. It is not legally questionable
in the slightest for any of that call to
be released at all. Which is why, again,
which is why the videos are still
[ __ ] up.
Secondly,
may function to redirect attention away
from KP's recollection of events. So
what you're saying KP is if that full
call doesn't align with any of the [ __ ]
you're saying here it's like oh well you
know I may just be lying
now I I will just I I will straight uh
straight up say that call is very long
but we do talk about like Emy's
credibility within it because that's an
element of the discussion. It's like
well who is this person because there's
a point in the call where like did you
know this was Emmy Jones? Do you know
this person has a like large platform?
And KP is like, "Yeah, I knew who it
was.
I just dude
[ __ ] god."
Also, this is a lie. KP did consent to
its publication. KP did consent to its
publication.
Leak it. I don't know if I can be maybe
maybe I don't really like putting out
full calls like that cuz when I record
things that are on the record for
interview purposes it's generally
what's useful in the call. There is also
actual personal information in that call
that's like like personal private
information in that call. I couldn't
release it just as it is. I can't put it
out. It it ironically actually contains
medical information about somebody
who's not KP
because she goes on a whole tangent for
like 20 minutes
about how one of the people who's been
her friend for years doesn't like her
anymore and she starts discussing their
medical history.
Maybe it's a it's a lot of work to go
through and edit and make sure
everything's just taken out.
So maybe I'll think about it, but no
promises. Don't don't hold your breath.
Why did Lio introduce KP to Becket and
how did that dynamic shift over time?
Oh, dude. Taking everything into
account, Lio's introduction to of KP to
Becket may have functioned as both an
attempt to reduce credibility damage for
both KP and Lio, as well as a way to
redirect communication and involvement
away from Lio and towards a third party.
How does that make any [ __ ] sense?
Lio's mentioned in the [ __ ] video. I
leaked some of his DMs.
I question Lio's involvement. I lay it
all out. I don't understand how how how
Lio is involved in this. I don't
understand how Lo is accountable for any
of this. He literally tell told you not
to release it. It's in the [ __ ] DMs.
Becket wants an answer but then ignores
it. Cry. Oh, sorry. What did you say,
Lara?
Uh, wait. Are you asking if I got
something removed or if KP submitted
another one against me? Either or.
Either or. Either or. Either or.
Or both.
Um,
okay. Um, over time, as Beckett, uh, as
Beckett's approach appeared to become
more aggressive or less controlled,
there was no clear indication that Lio
intervened or challenged that behavior.
This behavior might imply that Lio had
potential hesitation to challenge
Beckett. This behavior,
this behavior might imply that Lio had
potential hesitation to challenge
Beckett. He was scared. Lio convoy is
afraid of me.
Um, I'll cut it out for you. Uh, free
dog. Thank you, Bee formats with the
two,
dude. Less control. I did get a little
bit more unhinged. That's true. That's
true. That's accurate.
Please enjoy these stickers, everybody.
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Much
appreciated. Much appreciated. Much
appreciated.
You're actually liars, dad. You skip it
out back, dude. I'll be honest with you.
Some of the streams I did on KP, even
I'll admit, were pretty [ __ ] mental.
Some of those streams I was like, "Yeah,
this crossed a line."
But I only became more unhinged with KP
when she just started lying more.
Yeah. Because we haven't had arguments
before. I mean, yeah. Like Lio and I
have screamed at each other.
I don't know. Again, could Lio come out
publicly and try and attack me? Yes. It
wouldn't really make much difference.
Like, it would just lead to a dispute,
but he could do that. It's just that
unfortunately the Okay, let's just be
honest. The reason Lio didn't challenge
me is because
Lio agrees with me.
we were on the same [ __ ] page. That's
that's it. That's that's the simple
truth.
If one individual introduces another
into a situation, then steps back while
that third party takes a more es active
or escalatory role, it can create
ambiguity around responsibility and
oversight. In this context, KP's
interaction shifts from one party Lio to
another, Beckett. While the original
point of contact does not appear to
re-engage or clarify boundaries, this
can result in reduced accountability,
unclear lines of responsibility, an
increased risk if the third party's
conduct becomes more aggressive or
unpredictable.
I think I'm pretty predictable. I
listen, I don't like to say this about
myself, but I think I'm pretty
predictable. If you lie to me and then
lie publicly,
I'll come after you.
Christopher with the five. I'm late
watching a streamer play DS1 for the
first time. How regarded is this
document? Very, very regarded.
First instance of sharing private
materials. August on or about August
8th, 2025. KP provided Lio Convoy with a
draft recording containing updated
commentary reflecting a change in her
previously stated views regarding the
save spark Emily Jones situation. The
recording was shared privately for
review and feedback purposes only and
was not intended for public disc uh
distribution.
Subsequent evidence from the Barbie
report indicates that this draft
material most likely had been shared
with additional third parties without
documented authorization. Individual
ident uh individuals identified as
having received heard the audio or
discussed material include Cartoon.
Well, he I don't know if Cartoon is
still here, but she stopped calling you
cartoon sheep, which is good. That's
nice. YouTuber Ying the Yang. Ying the
Yang. Who the [ __ ] is Ying the Yang? I
don't know. I don't know anyone named
Ying the Yang, unfortunately.
Oh, dude. Ying the Yang. Yeah. Important
important important commentary
commentary YouTuber Ying the Yang Becket
associated with the YouTube Copen Teeth.
I Okay, I'm actually fine with that.
Below are screenshots acknowledging
this. For legal reasons, I refrain.
Yeah, we've seen this before. This is
Tui. So, Yen Yen the Yan
pointed out something in her YouTube
short. Audio of KP's August draft is is
out, so thought I'd make an edit so you
can uh hear this in her own voice. KP's
been crying about DA Games abusing legal
threats to silence her, but she has no
issue doing it herself. Pathetic. La
Mau, the circulation of the draft
appears to have occurred prior to any
finalized or public publicly released
version by KP.
Beckett later confirmed during a public
stream that Lio had possession of the
audio and had shared that information
with him directly. the sources logged
here for transparency to our readers.
Now, this is really important. This is
really important because I confirmed
that Lio had shared the audio with me so
that I could confirm it against the
draft script that I'd received. That's
why Lio shared the audio with me at that
time. And that's what I say in this
stream. Yes, it was because I went to
ask Lio who I knew had the audio and he
said, "Hey, does this script script
match up line up with the audio?" And
Lio said, "Yes, though there are some
slight differences,
am I not meant to ask Lio?"
Becket further uh clarified that he
personally verified this because Liario
had already shown him the recording. I
know Lio has the audio cuz he showed it
to me. These statements indicate that
Becca was aware liar possessed the
recording publicly admitted it and had
access to it through him prior to the
audio circulating publicly. I mean this
is after your release has come out and
after I've got the script cuz I was
given the script by somebody else. Why
might share private material?
Cuz you're a liar. Cuz you're a liar and
you're trying to use like for cover
maybe.
I don't know. Real [ __ ] mystery
there. Real mysterious, bro.
Although motive cannot be definitively
assigned, the following represents
possible reason, bro. She's going to
[ __ ] mind readad you. She's going to
mind readad you, Lio. I can't wait for
this. I can't wait for the uh like
psychological evaluation
of Lio Convoy. Jesus [ __ ] Christ. for
why Lio might have shared the draft
based on surrounding communications and
framing used afterwards. Transparency
concerns. Lio may have believed that
sharing the draft pro uh prompted
transparency regarding future
interactions or collaborations between
himself and KP particularly as
disagreements began emerging publicly
because the draft referenced other
creators and addressed prior commentary.
Lio may have viewed the disclosure as
clarifying context rather than
distributing private material. I mean,
that's how certainly, actually,
unironically, that's how I viewed it.
The fact that her final video is so
different in so many ways from her
original draft is, I think, quite
relevant public information on this
story because it shows that her original
intention was very different.
And it once again paints her kind of as
a [ __ ] liar who's just trying to find
a way out of any of this.
Correction of perceived misinformation.
The draft contained clarifications
addressing statements made earlier in
earlier commentary videos. Example, in a
prior video, KP's comparison involving
John Stewart was characterized by
cartooni as an expression of ego or
self-importance. This draft clarifies
that the reason was tied to KP's Jewish
cultural background and identity,
meaning the early interpretation was
inaccurate. Lio may have believed
sharing the draft allowed third parties
to verify reassess those interpretation
or warn additional parties how that
narrative could be challenged perceived
safety or risk management giving given
escalating public discussion. Leo Leo
Lio may have viewed the draft as
relevant to protecting himself or others
from potentially uh potential
misunderstandings or future disputes.
This could include a brief that docu uh
belief that documenting evolving
positions functioned as a precautionary
measure. Perceived legal concerns at the
time. Discussions surrounding legality
and potential liability were
increasingly present within the broader
discourse. Sharing the draft may have
been an interpretation as a way to
demonstrate awareness of shifting
positions or to mitigate perceived legal
exposure connected to ongoing
commentary. What the [ __ ] are you
talking about? I mean, honestly, what
the [ __ ] are you on about, you weird
[ __ ]
Did you read Did anyone read any of this
back? It's [ __ ] nonsense. Who was on
her team now? Who is left? Who's Who's
doing this?
Even Courtney has abandoned this woman.
Okay, Optimus with the 10. She somehow
managed to get John Delansancy to voice
a video for her. She had over a 100,000
subscribers in this 2010s, which was
pretty big at the time. Generational
ball drop. Yes.
Yes,
there is a timeline. No, actually, you
know what? There's not. There's not a
timeline. I was going to be like, "Oh,
there's a timeline when KP could be just
as successful as Saber Spark." There
isn't. She is a fundamentally damaged
[ __ ] Okay? There's There's no way she
can not [ __ ] this up. God hates this
woman. Okay?
Sorry, I was about to say something and
I realized it would probably be too far.
Christopher with two. You know, this is
just chat GPT like last time. Yeah, I
know. I know. But it's KP's like I don't
know. What's uh curation of chat GPT?
She thinks chat GPT is the lawyer. Yeah.
Yeah. Courtney abandoned KP. I'm shocked
actually. Um,
yeah, she just got sick of her. I mean,
can you blame her? She's so [ __ ]
annoying.
Reaction to KP's changing position.
Following the additional research
conducted after the shaming of Saber
Spark video, KP's P uh perspective on
the Saber Spark Emily Jones case
evolved. The draft reflects
clarifications that KP's opinions
changed after reviewing more
individually.
KP had previously been led to believe by
Lio and Beckett that Emily's allegations
were malicious and all. Okay, once
again, this is a [ __ ] lie. The reason
KP's positions changed is because she
came to me KP came to me about her
response video and said she wanted to do
an entire section on like uh what's her
name? Casey, one of the old brony group
who called her out on Twitter and she
wanted to challenge that and I said she
was an idiot because why the [ __ ] would
she respond to that? Who cares? Respond
to the main parts of this and she got
really pissed off at me and then stopped
talking to me. That's why
that's why she changed her position
because I wasn't nice to wasn't nice
enough to her and because what KP really
wants is somebody to validate her
schizophrenic nonsense.
That's that's all KP wants. She just
wants yes men around her, which is why
she's ended up in this position because
if anybody ever challenges her, she cuts
them off and says that they're toxic and
manipulative and narcissistic and
abusive and says that they're causing
her trauma.
Subsequent research into the ph uhology,
I mean, hold on. Has she What? Give me a
second.
How do you even pronounce that?
Okay. Okay.
I don't know how to pronounce this word
psychology. But I want to tell you what
it is. Subsequent research into the
psychology discussions and mental health
professionals. Do you want to know what
fycology is? Fology is the scientific
study of algae. a diverse group of
photosynthetic mostly aquatic organisms
ranging from single cell planktonian to
complex multisellular seaweeds. As a
branch of life science, it covers the
taxonomy, physiology, ecology and
economic applications of algae,
including their vital roles in producing
oxygen, forming food webs, and providing
sustainable sources for bofuel and
industry. Like
after studying the algae.
Jesus Christ.
Get alive with the two. You forgot in
love with her in that list. Yes. No. How
could I forget?
Subsequent research into algae
discussions with mental health
professionals and public documents about
sexual assault research led KP the puppy
killer to reassess that conclusion. It
check DM's new fan art. Hold on a
second.
What is this? Hold on. Um,
okay. No, no, no. Hold on. If it plays
any music, I'm not doing it. I'm not
doing it. I'm not doing it. Also, we're
going to get um
try this.
That too That's too vibrant. That's too
alive. 80 synth wave.
80 synth wave will do.
Okay.
Puppy killer strikes again. So true.
Wait, KP's dog died.
She needs to produce the bodies of all
the puppies she allegedly hasn't killed
for me to believe it. Yeah.
Give me a second, guys. Let me catch up.
Transnack for the two. In honor of KP's
dead dogs, I posted my boy and pet base.
Thank you, Transnack. Starbird with the
two. Why are we calling her a puppy
killer?
Uh because KP believes that allegations
need to be disproven
and you need so you need to prove that
allegations are not true. Otherwise, you
have to take them seriously. It's the
only responsible thing to do. So, I'm
just saying that KP with the way that
she's around her dog and the stories we
know, I think that she's had multiple
dogs and she keeps replacing them. Prove
me wrong, KP.
This is obviously a joke and sarcasm.
Okay,
I feel like I shouldn't have to say
that, but I know in the next document it
will be Becca has accused me of
murdering puppies.
Allegation. She believes in allegations
are evidence. She's froming. She's from
menoing all over the place.
Algae are evidence. True.
Okay.
Following additional research conducted
after the shaving of Saber Spark video,
KP's perspective changed. There we go.
Um, sharing of the draft may therefore
have been conducted to concern uh
connected to concern or disagreement
regarding this shift in viewpoint.
Okay, I think about that for music. Why
this matters legally? US context.
Regardless of intention, if a privately
shared audio draft recording was
redistributed without permission, even
without sharing the full file has
several legal considerations may apply
under US law. Copyright ownership. What
you mean like uploading other people's
videos in your archive safety report
channel? She's done this to like Khark.
I think she's done this to Hidden.
She did it to Malcolm, by the way.
What you mean? copyright infringement
like that.
Unpublished work pro protections, drafts
and unreleased recordings received
higher protection because the creator
maintains exclusive control over first
publication and distribution. So this is
actually something I agree with. This is
this is something uh Malcolm Khu and
Lio. Interesting.
So this is something I actually agree
with. Unfortunately for her, it doesn't
matter because I am not the first person
who published. You are KP.
Your final draft is your first
publication.
Your earlier drafts don't apply to this
because they're not unpublished work.
They're a draft of a published work.
There's not It's just not the same. Like
again, you don't seem to understand. We
waited for you to put your first draft
out
and then anything that comes out
subsequently does not receive
unpublished work protections. It's not
unpublished works.
Misappropriate uh misappropriation of
private communication. Sharing materials
provided within a limited interpersonal
collaborative context may raise issues
related to implied confidentiality or
breach of trust depending on
circumstances. It was over Discord.
Uh, derivative use risks. Third parties
receiving or relying on unpublished
materials may unintentionally
participate in redistributed uh
redistribution of copyrighted content.
Oh, dude, I don't want to hear anything
about copyright from this person. Also,
I cannot find music I like tonight.
I just can't do it. Where where we
going? Where? Where?
What?
We're going back to We're going back to
uh Loi.
We're going back to Loi. That worked for
me. Okay, there we go.
We're all over the place. Uh just
getting here. TLDDW.
Uh didn't watch. Uh basically, we're
going over KP's new LIO document cuz of
course we [ __ ] are. What time to be
alive? Jesus.
Um, right. Where were we?
These considerations do not
independently determine liability, but
explain why unauthorized sharing of
draft media can create potential civil
exposure. Why is this concerning? It
demonstrates that Liario is willing to
share private material without consent
or knowledge by others, potentially
illegally, even when privacy concerns
are explicitly stated. Regardless of
Li's relationship with KP or his
understanding when the uh with the
developing case, KP's privately shared
material was circulated and extend
externally confirmed beyond the
collaborative extent by Lio. Such
actions can lead to potential increase
in harassment, misinformation, or
further safety concerns for all parties.
Dude, I want to hear the end of this
safety. You accuse somebody of being a
rapist. Is that not a safety concern? Do
people not get like attacked for
accusations like this?
We can be bees. This is good news. This
is good news.
If audio or written material was
verified through outside parties, this
indicates that individuals with access
to the material were discussing or
validating it beyond the original
purpose for which it was shared. At no
point was KP clearly informed that her
materials were being distributed,
reviewed, or confirmed externally and
only determined the material was shared
after the fact. From a trust and ethics
standpoint, this represents a
significant breakdown in expectations
surrounding confidentiality. Bro, you
leak things all the [ __ ] time, KP.
Private creative drafts are typically
shared under an assumption of limited
use, especially when they contain
evolving viewpoints, sensitive subject
matter, or unfinished analysis. The
concern is therefore not only the
potential sharing itself but the
confirmation uh the confirmation and
handling of private materials through
third parties while the original creator
remains unaware. This creates the
appearance of bias in how the material
was handled and suggests a sub a breach
of reasonable trust regarding privately
shared work. In summary, liar's own
judgment and understanding of the case
does not grant him sharing rights to
private material and does not exempt him
from privacy law and other legal
concerns.
I don't know. Sue him then. I would
Would you
know? Test it.
Jesus Christ.
There is like there is no like
there is no way at this point that
surely her parents have noticed there's
something not right with her. Surely
you'd think, right? She can't carry on
like this and her parents would like
this is fine. This is fine. Obviously,
this is fine.
Cartoon has later stated that he only
heard versions of descriptions of the
audio but did not personally possess the
file himself. Based on these statements,
the current identifiable access chain
appears to be KP Libecket Yinyang.
Cartoon appears to have been a passive
recipient of information about the audio
rather than a direct holder of the file.
Okay. But at that point, I'd never
spoken to Cartoon. I don't think Ying
the Yang, whoever Ying the Yang is, did
either.
My god, dude. She's just theory, dude.
She's She's Pepe silvering. She's
literally Pepe silvering trying to like
piece together a [ __ ] conspiracy.
Ying the Hedgehog. True.
Uh, this clarification is included to
outline how the recording may have
circulated among the involved parties
and to document the statements each
individual has made regarding their
level of access.
Li is aware of private information being
shared. We're only on page 23. Get back
just to see the final time I mentioned.
Incredible. Good timing, buddy.
Thank you, Cartoon Sheep.
No, it's a Listen, hold on. Also, also,
cuz like two people have messaged me.
It's Pepe Silver. Like, it's it's not
Pepe silvering. No, no, it's Pepe
silvering because it's a verb. Like,
you're She's doing the thing. It's a It
becomes a verb. You're Pepe silvering,
right? You can't You can't Pepe. You can
be like, you could do a No, you be Pepe
silvering. It's You're It's a verb.
You're doing the thing. Mac with some
cheese with the two. Is Ying the Yang in
the room with us right now?
Don't know. Don't know who that person
is.
Additional documentation indicates that
Liar was aware that private
communications materials related to KP
were circulating within the commentary
spaces. These materials included private
recordings, alleged private details
about KP's life, and documents whose
method of acquisition and authorization
for distribution were disputed. Despite
this awareness, there is no available
evidence that liar publicly objected to
the circulation of these materials or
discouraged their dissemination from
others in the commentary community. In
the available transcript, the discussion
instead proceeds with commentary on the
materials themselves rather than
questioning whether they should have
been circulated at all or whether
consent had been obtained from the
individuals involved. Similarly, there
is no indication in the available
records that Lio attempted to privately
contact KP to verify the status of these
materials. clarifi uh clarify whether
their distribution had been authorized
or raised concerns about the potential
legal or ethical implications of their
circulation.
This absence of objection is notable
given that the materials in question
involved private communications and
potentially sensitive information in
situations where the legality or consent
surrounding such material is unclear.
commentary uh commentary participants uh
typically face a decision between
engaging with the material or declining
to participate in its dissemination
until it's uh its provenence and
authorization are clarified.
Dude, I'm pretty sure it would still be
Pepe Sylvia because the character saying
it is misreading Pennsylvania. Can we
just say it's Pennsylvania then? That's
also not a word. Uh, the available
record does not show Ly Lio taking sets
publicly or privately to discourage the
use of or spread of these materials
prior to commenting on them.
Okay, [ __ ] me.
Patternbased analysis. Oh my [ __ ]
god, bro. KP KP needs to Can you imagine
KP's voice reading this?
That's not his job. It's not his job. KP
wants Lio to be the police.
Have to clarify that I have misspoken,
that I didn't actually hear the audio
and only heard a description of it, as
KP will very likely use this stream chat
in a court of law at some point.
I got you. I got you, Cartoon Sheep.
Don't know who this cartoon sheep person
is, though. Um,
there is no Easter Bunny. There is no
tooth fairy. And there is no Ying the
Yang.
True. cake with a 20. Only 100 pages to
go, Daddy Becket. Yay.
What page are we on? 24. What's the rest
of this even look like?
Oh my [ __ ] god.
Oh my god.
Pan based analysis of available evidence
suggests that reputational risk may have
been limiting a limiting factor in Li's
response. Yeah. Liar's reputation.
Listen. Liar's squeaky clean reputation.
Imagine the tarnish this would leave on
it.
Specifically, reluctance to challenge a
prevailing public narrative,
particularly when his im within his
immediate social or professional
networks may have discouraged more
direct involvement. No, he just agreed
with me, K. He we were on the same page.
In summary, although liar was aware of
the scope of the lack of privately
circul uh uh lack aware of the scope of
lack of privately circulating
information by other comment that
doesn't make any [ __ ] sense. Uh there
is no proof that he used his position to
question the legal and ethical
implications of the actions of others
despite identifying KP as a friend. A
that's so sad. That's so sad.
Cave B informs Lia that she discovered
Barbie was leaking private material. Oh
my god. [ __ ] hell.
I need a hand now, please. No worries,
Kicking. Let me get you a sticker for
that.
Thank you guys for your continued
support and also keeping me company
while we go through this [ __ ] dude.
This is
my favorite part is where she uh says
that her filing a police report on me
must be difficult for me.
Dude,
no [ __ ] way does she say that. That's
[ __ ] hilarious.
Please enjoy these stickers, guys. Thank
you. Thank you. Thank you. It's super
based of all of you.
Yeah. Sorry, Jack. I literally woke up
to this dropping. If I don't defend her
mindlessly, I'm a bad friend. But her
reframing what happened between Peaches
and I as a disagreement is fine, I
guess. True. Listen, don't you know
Peaches stole $8,000 from Lio. Okay.
He's never going to see that eight grand
again.
You could have given that eight grand to
me. Think of what I could do with eight
grand. Leo,
okay.
KP should interview Peaches for the hit
piece. Dude, that'd be so [ __ ] funny.
I' I'd watch that. I'd watch the [ __ ]
out of that. You could buy a new
computer. I could could be great. On
such a dick.
On October 10th, 2025, KP informed Lia
that she had identifi uh identified a
likely source of the unauthorized
information leak. KP alerted Lia that
evidence indicated Barbie had been
sharing private materials and informed
beyond the original agreed collaborative
ef uh context. This communication served
as a direct notice to LIO that
confidential materials previously shared
in God. She's going to look one day
she's actually going to [ __ ] sue one
of us. She's going to sue one of us and
all the filings are going to be through
chat GPT. That's what's going to happen.
She's going to try and sue us using chat
GPT as a lawyer. I swear to [ __ ] God.
I'm calling it now.
The communication served as a direct
notice to lie that confidential
materials previously shared in trust
were circulating through third parties
without KB's consent, raising concerns
regarding privacy, scope of use, and
potential misuse of privately shared
context
or privately shued uh shared content. I
see the person you're remembering me
referring to wasn't hidden. It was
Peaches. And that was two years ago.
Okay.
She confused him for Peaches. Easy
mistake to make. Uh, apologies.
Apologies. Time is a bit wonky these
days. Also, you did tell me. So, these
are pre-ensored, but if you need this,
I don't know what these images are. Do
you do you show the images?
Okay, you do. You do. Um, with the
combined timeline in mind and his own
sharing of private material, it is now
understood that Lio was aware that
script assets via Beckett were being
shared. Essentially, although Lio
acknowledged that KP independently
identified Barbie, he failed to disclose
that he had he was involved. He was the
individual who originally verified the
script to Becket in the first place.
Well, it's in the [ __ ] video. Like,
would you It's in the video.
And I asked Lio, can I verify this with
you? And he said, yes, cuz it's in the
video.
Why li's response raises concerns?
Breakdown of trust and direct. Dude, can
I stop reading the title? I'm going to
stop reading the titles. if prior
knowledge cuz dude
[ __ ] me the bullet points bro the
[ __ ] bullet points be for mats with a
five reminder I had to read these screen
caps and her terrible grammar give me
another scro uh stroke reminder I had to
read these screen caps and her terrible
grammar gave me another stroke
dude
this is [ __ ] dire
just just stop if prior knowledge or
involvement exists The absence of
disclosure, particularly when KP later
identified the source independently,
resulted in KP having to reconstruct the
situation without direct clarification.
When material is vetted or treated as
credible, there is a reasonable
expectation that this context is
disclosed, especially when the same
material becomes part of public claims.
The presence of undisclosed text
followed by minimal or non-substantive
response once the source was identified
creates an imbalance where one party is
operating with less information about
their own situation. Presenting,
evaluating, or critical commentary while
emitting one's own potential role in
assessing the same material may be
perceived as inconsistent with
transparent good faith good faith
communication. Hello, Jeremy. KP's
transformed.
She's quartering out, guys.
[ __ ] hell. It's just not very good
faith.
She admits to using AI in this later,
too, by the way. Oh, [ __ ] me.
KP sought okay escalation of events
between hidden heroine Lio and KP
KP sought clarification on all the
puppies she'd killed. Sorry. KP sought
clarification from Lio after becoming
aware that YouTube YouTuber hidden hero
YouTuber hidden heroine not mod hidden
heroine not researcher hidden heroine
YouTuber hidden heroine had published a
call involving sorry needless to me
publishing a call involving her without
her prior knowledge or consent at this
point despite sharing motiv motivations
KP cons do you remember when we just
used to say that Hidden was like
secretly a Nazi and she like made Nazi
Nazi X-Men fan fiction that was more
fun. That was more fun than this. This
like that was that was a way more fun
way to do things.
Who remembers the BK server?
It's so much better. Oh, those were the
good old days. Anyway,
Hen's just like, "Fuck you, Becket. [ __ ]
you."
Okay. Anyway, KP approached Lio about
concerns that Hidden had leaked
information, including script assets in
relation to a private call later
uploaded to YouTube. To KP's
recollection, Liia had previously
vouched for Hidd and recommended her as
somebody who could could help during the
situation. Lia denied any direct
connection as shown below. Hey, I think
we need to talk. I'll have some time
tomorrow evening. Why would you let me
talk to heroine if she was going to leak
a call? I can't explain another person's
actions to you. I'll be able to call
tomorrow at 6 p.m. Did you have any
knowledge that was her intention,
though? I'm trying to give the benefit
of the doubt, but it feels like I've
been set up.
Although
[ __ ] hell.
Although there is no direct confirming
evidence that Lio did recommend KP to
hidden to KP.
Wait, what? Although there is no direct
confirming evidence that Lio did
recommend Hayden to KP, further reviewed
evidence include a cool time stamp
between Lio and KP that closely aligns
with when he hayden was added as a
direct friend on Discord to KP by KP in
May 1st. There is no evidence of prior
independent communication between KP and
Hayden before this point. This is
[ __ ] so stupid. Lio didn't do [ __ ]
Lo didn't do anything. And they're like,
yes, I remember this now. Li wasn't even
[ __ ] involved in recommending Hidden.
This is [ __ ] absolutely [ __ ]
No. What the [ __ ] are you doing,
Hidden? I don't think you were here for
this. Hidden, I don't think you were
here for this. Give me a second. Hold
on. I need to show this to Hidden before
she goes to bed or something. Where is
it? Page 45.
We'll come to this when we get to it.
But just to be clear, I don't know if
you caught this. Sexual degradation in
These are lyrics.
These are lyrics from Scott Pilgrim
versus the world ruined a whole
generation of women. It's a negative XP
song. All of these are a negative XP
song. She quotes lyrics from a song as
though I said them.
God, this woman's so [ __ ] dumb.
Where were we?
Okay.
Oh my god. Okay.
Okay. Time stamp show evidence show
hidden was added by KP only 2 minutes
after a conversation with Leo ended.
She added me on recommendations of a
random chatter.
God. While this does not confirm an
introduction directly, it raises a
reasonable question as to how can it's
Wait, what do you mean? Okay, sorry.
This is so [ __ ] stupid. You yourself
don't know why you added hidden. You
don't know why you added hidden.
Shouldn't you know? It's you. It's you.
You're the one WHO DID IT. WHAT DO YOU
MEAN? THIS IS YOUR DOCUMENT. LISTEN,
there's no direct evidence of why I did
Hidden, but I strongly suspect it's cuz
liar recommended her.
Well, Hidden disagrees with you, and you
you apparently don't know. You're like
[ __ ] making this up. This is [ __ ]
absurd.
Okay.
As it would generally be unlikely for KP
to involved a completely unknown person
in a sensitive situation without some
form of private uh indication or
vouching. That's not [ __ ] true.
That's not [ __ ] true. KP, you'll add
anybody as long as they say nice things
about you. You're a [ __ ] [ __ ] This
is just not This is just a lie.
Additionally, available documentation
shows that Lio and Hidden had some kind
of working relationship, including
collaboration on art, thumbnails, and
related materials. Supporting evidence
of this continued collaboration is also
provided below.
[ __ ] is this, man? I don't even know who
that person is, but that that thumb is a
masterpiece. It was done by Hidden
Heroin. Link is in description. Oh my
god. She did Oh, dude.
She did some art. Therefore, she is
liar's cappo. Okay.
Okay, bro. Sure. Whatever. Whatever
works, I guess.
Okay. Other document uh other documented
conversations include a recorded call
between Hidden and Lio covered by
YouTuber Godamn It Malcolm. Malcolm gets
a shout out in December 2025 indicate
discussions of coordinated activity
related to an ongoing project involving
multiple individuals. Within the call,
participants reference having worked on
or discussed aspects of the situation
over a period of time. suggesting prior
communication and planning rather than a
single isolated interaction. Malcolm
also remarked, "Oh, this should be
good." Lio and Hidden said collectively
that they had worked on a recent project
for weeks. And something that I want to
make very, very, very clear is that I
think that Lio is orchestrating all this
behind the scenes. I think that he's
talking about the goat cat thing. He's
talking about the goat cat thing. I
think that Lio knew knows he is under
intense public heat right now. He knows
that a lot of his goodwill in other
communities such as Beckett, such as
Falgy. Who's Falgi? Are contingent.
Sorry, that's so mean. Uh on contingent
on him are behaving well and not
engaging in the same behaviors that he
used to. I'll be very clear. I think
he's behaving exactly the same. He's
being calculated about it and he's
letting Hidden off the leash to do his
dirty work for him. It's important to
note the statement only reflects
Malcolm's interpretation of the
interaction based on the tone and
content of the conversation presented in
his coverage. It's about something
completely [ __ ] different. While this
observation does not independently
establish the nature of scope of any
collaboration, indicates an external
external reviewer perceived coordinated
activity or joint involvement between
the two individuals.
Oh my god. Are we the USSR now? Yes.
Although yes. Yes, we are. Don't know
who Fouch is. I don't know who you're
talking about. Ying and Yang. No, I
don't. Although this assessment So So
Scrables. So Scrabbles. Who's so
scrabbles? Really weird. Although this
assessment remains an interpretation
rather than a verified fact, it is
included there is a contextual evidence
suggesting that the relationship between
hidden and liar may have evolved a level
of cooperation or familiarity beyond
that of of cause or incidental contact.
Why was Lo acting this way following
KP's call with Hidden? During the Hidden
Call, KP introduced multiple points that
reflect an earlier shift in how evidence
to the case was presented. specifically
emphasis on legal framing and due
diligence. Questioning bias in previous
coverage.
Sure, buddy.
Dude,
she went to hidden to cry.
That's what happened. She went to hidden
to cry and gain sympathy.
That's it. And highlighting concerns
regarding conclusions presented as fact
without sufficient evidentary uh
support. If you were doing research, by
the way, if KP was so so ingrained in
doing her research and her due
diligence, wouldn't she be like, "Hey,
isn't
doesn't Hidden turn up in like um
in in in Beckett's chat? Isn't Isn't
Hidden like a Becket fan? Becket
viewer?"
What cool? There is no cool in Bing say.
True.
Is this just AI making up YouTubers? No,
I mean other than ying and the ying the
yang. Yeah. And highlighting concerns
regarding conclusions presented as fact
without sufficient evidence support. Uh
this includes statements such as
concerns over conclusions being
presented as fact when it's not
objectively fact. Emphasis on the need
for independent research and legal
context. And it bro you're asking chat
GPT. You're asking chat GPT. What the
[ __ ] are you talking about? and direct
critique of how narratives may be formed
without f full evidentiary grounding.
You accuse somebody of being a rapist
and another person of being a pedophile
of vibes. Following the call, liar's
response appears to align with a
perceived shift in perspectives that may
challenge or conflict with pre-existing
narrative structures. Summary. While
intent cannot be determined, the
alignment between KP's shift in framing
and li subsequent response without clear
engagement with the sub uh substance of
that shift may reflect underlying
concerns with how conflicting
information is received, processed, and
integrated into a broader narrative.
I'll be honest with you guys, listen,
we're on page 31. 31 of 121. And I'm
gonna ask you honestly, if I wasn't
reading this for for content, so you
guys like donate super chats and things
and watch the stream, would anyone else
be reading this?
Would anyone else be reading this? What
about Falgi? Who's Falga?
Andy Walssky's fiance coming in
hallucinating people. Very weird.
Uh, first Dickens and now Ying Leanne.
True.
Let's be fair. Half of you are only here
to watch me suffer going through it.
Uh,
I don't even know how this happened.
Hope you're good. Hope you're good,
Liliana.
I have a cigarette crack. I need to
pause. It's a lot of reading. I used to
have a guy for that. Once again, can't
recall his name.
You are our grand leader. That's how we
start the cult. Okay.
How we keep the cult going. I'm here for
drag story hour. Yeah.
Um I can't I can't remember who it is.
They weren't very important in the first
place.
I need to create an AI voice of him. He
can read the documents for me.
We need Robo Falga.
You seriously need to start breaking out
the scotch for [ __ ] like this. Do you
hate yourself? I couldn't drink while
doing this. You imagine the [ __ ] mass
battle skinwalker when I don't know.
Does anyone want to start a YouTube
channel where you just read Google
documents and I I don't want any
commentary. I just want someone to start
a goo I I want you to start a YouTube
channel and you just read Google
documents. Okay, that's it. And then I
can react to them and that would be
great. Like I'll promote the [ __ ] out of
that. Liar with the five here. here to
hear you suffer. Now your background
noise will I figure out how to transform
Raj Gino for a review. Where is my
[ __ ] armored core review? Lio.
He's This guy has promised me an armored
core review of one of the models for
over a year now.
So I want to know whether it's worth
buying. Like I actually genuinely for
the first time ever want him to do a
[ __ ] toy review for me. He's got it.
He bought the model. Where's the [ __ ]
review? Liliana Taylor with the 27.99
Canadian. Thank you. I'll do it. Based.
Let's go. I will that dude. That'd be
awesome.
I dude, that would be a [ __ ] great
channel. Matt with some cheese. It's
basically like Twitter versus um but you
know, good. Matt with some cheese with
too. I do VA work. I can make a docky
reading channel. You should I think a
docky reading channel would do do
[ __ ] numbers actually. Unironically,
I think it would do numbers.
This is why things like Internet Versus
are so useful because they they they're
useful both for bringing you up to speed
on generally like the news and like the
Vox Pop, but also cuz they're great
stream resources
liar with the five. I've been told not
to give you that review until you do a
stream at Chatter Paid for [ __ ] sake.
It's coming. It's coming. It's coming.
Christopher, it's actually coming. We're
going to do I'm going to do it with
rags. Christopher with a two. Last time
you drank while streaming, it got nuked.
That is very true. We're not doing that
again. Uh Boomer Man with a two. Where
is my Clone Wars review? Lio
Cammy Collaborative Docky Reed channel.
You need extra voices to read the
different DMs? Yes. Copen Reed. [ __ ] Do
I just do I do we brand it? Do I get Do
I get somebody? Listen, you need to
start a Copen Reed channel. I totally
[ __ ] do that. That's a bad badass
idea.
Okay. Okay. Anyway,
clarification on KP's involvement. I
need to move my mouse actually and do
that. Ah, [ __ ]
Get a bit more comfy.
I need a bigger desk. Next on my list.
Right, there we go.
Right. Clarification on KP's evolving
perspective. Some commentary has implied
that KP changed in perspective indicate
uh change in perspective
indicates malicious intent, including
suggestions that her positions shifted
due to third party influences or
manipulation. These interpretations may
reflect frustration with her evolving
position following independent research
and verification. I can tell you exactly
when KP's position shift shifted. It's
because she got in a call with Emmy and
Emmy was nice to her.
I know because the person who moderated
that call told me about it and while
they didn't record it, I know that KP
like fully rolled over for Emmy,
the opinionator with the two. You're
doing a KP Google doy, you poor soul.
Thank you. Thank you for the two. I
deserve it.
Much appreciated. In complex situations,
individuals regularly reassess and
update their understanding. This isn't
regularly reassessing and updating your
understanding. You flipped between I
believe Emmy to I don't believe Emmy to
I do believe Emmy to maybe it's not true
to like [ __ ] Becket.
That was your That was your position.
You flip-flopped between whoever was
nicest to you. That's what happened.
However, such conclusions are not
supported by how cognitive processing
works. How the [ __ ] would you know?
What cognitive processing do you even
do? This woman is clinically [ __ ]
Blue Yoki with the two. Unlike some
people, Becket fulfills promises to
chat. That is not true.
What I did give you though is stickers.
Who wants a sticker? Let's [ __ ] go.
Please enjoy these stickers. Much
appreciated, guys. Thank you very, very,
very much for your continued support. It
is very much appreciated.
Okay,
it's Yok, not Yoki. Yokai. Yokai. Yokai.
Uh, I'm cognitively processing it,
Becca. I'm cognitively processing
processing it all over the Google doc.
So, I'm commenting uh blah blah. In
complex situations, individuals
regularly assess and update their
understanding and engage with new
information. Conduct uh conduct
independent verification and refine
their interpretation of events. This
process can naturally result in changes
of perspective over time. A shift in
position alone does not indicate
deception, external control, or
malicious intent without clear
independent evidence demonstrating such
intent. Here's your demonstr uh
demonstrable intent.
You wanted to go after people to such a
[ __ ] extent. You filed police reports
and tried to have people's channels
removed.
It's obvious what your [ __ ] intent
was
and it's obviously [ __ ] malicious.
Mattish with the five finally caught you
live to atone for kid gloves with aunt.
when you watch the blackish dish track
on him. Um, yeah, sure. Not tonight, but
yeah, you can send it to me.
Uh, kick in with 20. Skipping super
chats as usual. Wait, did I Sorry. Star
Sprinter with the two KP gives me
anxiety. Who did I skip?
Kick in with the 20 Swedish. I'm here
for stickers and not that and not what
moral said.
Understandable, right? Additional
evidence that KP was discussing the
issues with mental health professionals
independent along what?
Wait, what?
Evidence that KP was discussing issues
with mental Hi, Rachel. This is a
reminder that you have an appointment
with services at 400 p.m. ET, your
unique video appointment before
what? What? What?
What?
Additional evidence that KP was
discussing the issues with mental health
professionals independently are logged
below.
You went to see a therapist and you
telly health.
Okay.
What the [ __ ] are you talking about?
What actually are you on about?
She's saying beggar drove her mad.
What the [ __ ] do you mean? What are you
doing? This is so [ __ ] insane,
guys. She went to [ __ ] whatever this
is. Better health or whatever it is.
Is it better health? Yeah.
Oh my god. Listen, I was doing my due
diligence. I went to see a [ __ ]
therapist.
and you put it in THE GOOGLE DOC. DON'T
DISCUSS my medical information, guys.
Don't discuss my medical information. By
the way, I had to go and see a [ __ ]
therapist because of a ginger British
guy. No [ __ ] shot.
Oh my god, this is so [ __ ] funny.
What the [ __ ]
Wait till you see her proof for legal
counsel later. Holy [ __ ] bro. Okay,
listen. I'm not going to read these
additional sources. I don't care. Uh
Liario then suggested continuing the
discussion directly. However, KP
reiterated that her primary concern was
the possibility of being recorded
without consent. According to evidence
log below, Liia stated that he did not
have the time for text communication.
We've already gone over this in another
thing. Um, so I I listen, there's a lot
to get through and some of this we may
actually end up starting. Okay,
whatever. KP then felt obligated to
participate in an audio call despite her
reservations, but then reiterated that
her primary concern was the possibility
of being recorded without consent. KP
followed up by directly asking whether
the call would be recorded.
Uh, and KP asked, "Do I need to? I can't
text all night." Basically, he was like,
"Yeah, you just get in a [ __ ] call
with me. Uh, can Sabre please sue her?
It's the only way to stop this. People
like her and Bonk have coasted off
others indifference or charity. End
this. Look, RX and thank you for the
five.
I think this is funnier. I I
unironically think this is funnier. Like
at this point, what is Saber Spark suing
her really going to do? She has no money
to take. She lives off her parents.
She has nothing to take. the like all
she's gonna do is keep putting out stuff
like this and have to see and moan and
whine as people like watch me laughing
at her. This is worse. This is what
actually to be fair I wonder whether the
one of the reasons that keeps her cuz if
she like sued me she'd have to talk to
me through legal counsel on a regular
basis.
Such a good diver with a 50 Swedish. I
once sat behind a couple discussing some
stupid vampire up on the train for like
5 hours. Is that what the therapist had
to endure? I think that you got off
lightly. Um, okay. Why is Leo's approach
this conversation concerning? Oh my
[ __ ] god.
Oh, dude. Is anyone still in her
Discord? What the [ __ ] is happening in
there? Has anyone like is does she have
any community members left? Who could
possibly be supporting this woman?
Sorry, let me check DMs.
Come out.
Uh,
okay. This interaction reflects a
prioritization of creating a recorded
account of the conversation.
Okay.
A recorded account of the conversation
um over respecting state boundaries
related to consent, potential legal law,
and privacy. The invaluable record
suggests that efforts were made to move
the discussion into an audio format.
Despite these concerns, shifting the
focus from resolving the issues to
establishing a defensible record, this
approach may introduce pre uh introduce
pressure within the interaction and
raises concerns about the
appropriateness of prioritizing
reputational or evidentary positioning
over mutually agreed communication
conditions.
Oh, dude. Framing note. This section
summarized the primary concerns
articulated in Lio uh to by Lo during
the recorded call. We've heard this
call, haven't we? Is this call out? I
think it's public.
Um, followed by an analysis based on the
transcript and available evidence
whether where relevant. The analysis
notes when conclusions appear to rely on
interpretation, tone, or assumption
rather than specific documented
examples. The call has been archived
here for transparency purposes. You do
not understand how the real working
world Oh, dude. KP did not follow advice
and escalated the situation. quotes. You
do not understand how the real working
world works. That's true. You are
continuing on a destructive path. That's
true. You didn't listen to me. That's
true. Liar frames this concern as a
broad assessment of KP's judgment and
decision-making. The language used
conveys frustration and functions as a
general evaluation rather than
referencing specific instances where
advice was explicitly given and
disregarded. What do you mean?
You've in this document you have said
Lio gave you advice and you disregarded
it. What do you mean? Like does he have
to reexlain in the call why you have
done like what you've done? What do you
mean? This is [ __ ] I could ah Oh my
[ __ ] god. This is so frustrating.
Why is she speaking in the third person?
Because she didn't write this. You've
got to remember this is a safety report
written about her. She's the victim.
There's also It's also very funny
there's no post defending her and that's
funny to me. Yeah. Well, I mean there's
no one left. There's no one le left.
The transcript shows KP engaging with
liars feedback by asking clarifying
questions attempting to understand his
perspective. The record does not show a
clear unambigu unambiguous directive
from Lion instructing KP not to respond
publicly. Only guidance frame framed
conditionally. If you feel like you need
to not do DMC,
he's like you shouldn't DMCA strike
people. He says this in the call,
doesn't he? KP on this. No hate to Lio,
but my understanding is that his job
involves vending machine repair. Wait,
is she just outing what Lio's job is?
My understanding is that his day job
involves vending machine repair or
similar work. That's fine, but it also
means we come from very different
backgrounds. So, I'm not sure his
perspective on these issues is
especially applicable. What do you don't
have a background to come from? You're a
[ __ ] trust fund kid.
Also, now I have images of Lio putting
Bible verses into TR. Like, do do you
think anybody in like Lio's like general
area ever goes to a vending machine,
like orders a Coke from it or something,
and a Bible drops out with a little note
like, "Ha, less sugar, more Jesus."
He'd blatantly stock them with like
[ __ ] Transformers toys.
You don't want a coke.
Have a [ __ ] Optimus Prime.
concern. Misconduct by third parties is
unrelated or minimized. That's not
Becket's fault. It isn't my fault. I
don't know what lie is referring to
here, but it's not my fault. That's just
who Barbie is. Also true. Your
perception is screwed. Is skewed. Also
true. Analysis. In addressing third
party actions, Lo consistently redirects
focus towards KP's interpretation and
reaction rather than evaluating the
conduct itself. statements minimize
responsibility by attributing behavior
to individual p individual personality
rather than examining its impact or
appropriateness. The analysis finds no
factual explanation offered for why
boundary violations such as unauthorized
recording or distribution of private
materials should be treated as
inconsequential.
So liar worker I respect way more. Thank
you Lo with the two um concern emotional
presentation undermines credibility. You
need to eat gravel and harden up. Stop
word lawyering. This is unbecoming. The
opinionator with the five. KP is taking
a pot shot at liar convoy for working a
blue collar job is done when KP is a
lazy trust bunk kid and now wants to
simp and kiss Emily Jones. Yeah, I mean
KP has, as far as I can tell, never had
a real job ever.
Ever.
Oh my god, that sounds wonderful. You
can get little uh $4 models. Why not put
them in vending machines? That does
actually sound really good. Leo, you
should do that.
Oh, dude.
I hope you're entertained, Malie.
I hope you're happy, wifey. Um, okay.
These statements function as value
judgments regarding communication style
rather than evidence-based critiques.
The transcript shows KP articulating
concerns and boundaries without overt
escalation. The concern appears to be
driven by discomfort and emotional
framing rather than identifiable
conduct. Okay, KP, you falsely accuse
somebody of rape. You're [ __ ]
You have constantly dodged any
accountability for the fuckups you have
made and you refuse to apologize for any
of the glaring issues which you know you
have under like you've agreed to me and
two other people on calls were mistakes
and you keep word lawyering to try and
get yourself out of it. You are a whiny
little [ __ ] You need to eat gravel and
harden up. This is unbecoming. You
literally literally you are somebody who
pisses on people's couches. You are in
your 30s. This is your life. Please get
your [ __ ] together. This shouldn't be
hard.
Hugh with the 10. When KP writes your
name repeatedly on the walls of her
bedroom during her grippy of her room
during her grippy sock vacation when her
nurse asks, "Huh, I thought that was
only with one T only for KP to snare and
scream. It's two T's face." [ __ ]
hilarious. Thank you. QD gray night with
the two. Did you miss my last super
chat? I think sorry Q if I did. Give me
a second. Where is it? Give me a second.
Oh, Gray with the 10. Potentially, in
theory, as a hypothetical, if KP's
parents are claiming her dependent on
the taxes, Sabre could pierce the veil
and sue her parents through KP. In
theory, of course. Yeah. I mean, again,
I don't think it's I don't think it's
worth his time. I don't think it's worth
his time.
What's What's the worst that's going to
happen? KP ends up living on the street
with Courtney. Actually, that would be
funny. You should sue her.
Also, you need some stickers. Please
enjoy these stickers. Please enjoy these
stickers. Please enjoy these stickers.
Uh, what are we going to do? Let's go
with this one. Thank you so much, guys.
It is much appreciated. Much
appreciated. everything that Don't
forget. Don't forget all your super
chats are going to making this stream
better by me actually having a [ __ ]
computer that stops freezing on me. That
would be great. Don't you want to see
more Becket Gaming streams?
I can finally play Elden Ring on stream
without it [ __ ] freezing every 5
seconds. It'll be great, guys. It'll be
incredible [ __ ] content. We can do
this.
I'm basically subing a PC build at this
point. I need a contract. I need a I
need a sponsorship with MetaPC. Lo with
a five. Don't trust Li. He's a
hardworking blue collar Christian who
tries his best uh tries to help people
to the best of his ability.
She will be peeling off the wallpaper.
Yes.
Okay. Um
KP, this is ridiculous. I'm not doing
text. KP explicitly states safety and
comfort reasons for preferring text
communication, including prior
unauthorized recordings and the need for
documentation. Lie rejects this
preference without articulating a
functionally functional necess necessity
for a voice call. Dude, he doesn't want
you skiting out in his DMs.
He doesn't want you skiting out in his
DMs. That's it. That's it. It's very
simple.
You know, I dox myself regularly. Never
told people what I do for a living,
though. Thanks, KP.
Go and buy the $4 Transformer toys and
put them in the [ __ ] vending
machines, bro.
How you treat people is problem. You
need to reassess your life. I mean, look
at the state of your life. KP, does he
need to expand on this? You're living in
a pot in an apartment paid for by your
parents. Previous to that, you were
living in someone else's house basically
hiding from your [ __ ] parents. You
spend all your time smoking weed and
eating chocolate. You like smoke weed to
the point where you pass out and piss
yourself. You can't take care of your
own medical issues. You have nothing to
show for the past what 15 years. you
need to reassess your life.
Like like
if you were in Canada, they would
recommend you for maid as a mercy.
Unironically, they'd be like, "Listen,
we understand that you're quite
depressed and quite traumatized from
bronies, like a 16-year-old brony, but
maybe you should get in the tube. Get
get in the pod, KP. Maybe that is what's
best for you. The only reason you are
still alive is because you live in
America." Okay? Like
you forgot the kettlean. Yes, great
night. Thank you for the two. Yes. And
your only hope is ketamine therapy,
which your parents won't pay for until
you get a [ __ ] job. I mean, is that
not the point where somebody reassesses
their life? Is that not the point where
you go, huh, maybe things aren't working
out very well.
I found the perfect romantic partner for
KP. Ottery Noah
be a hell. They'd be a power couple.
Unfortunately, Otterly Noah is more
successful than KP. I don't think she'd
be able to deal with that.
This concern is framed as a general
character assessment. No specific
incidents, dates, or examples are
provided to sub substantiate the claim.
This proves it was never about
children's safety. This conclusion is
presented without reference to platform
policy or legal standards. As already
discussed in the Barbie report, KP has
documented in documenting information
for further protection and potential
police investigation, something LIO
doesn't consider. Privacy strikes in
DMCAs are commonly used to address
dissemination of private or sensitive
information. No, they're not.
No, they're not.
That is what a privacy strike is for,
KP.
And our supporting mechanism within
platform frameworks. No, they're [ __ ]
not. A DMCA
is a legal action for copyright
infringement. It is a statement that you
have infringed copyright and you either
remove it, it will be removed for you or
you go to court. That is what a DMCA
strike is for. If you have issues with
the like dissemination of private or
sensitive information, that is a privacy
strike.
That is. And again, KP knows this
because she tried to put in a privacy
complaints to YouTube about me and it
didn't work because YouTube assessed it
and went, "No, this is fine."
Can you get in trouble for false DMCAS?
Theoretically, yes, but no one ever
does.
You can theoretically lose your channel
for it, but I only know of one case
where that has ever happened
because the problem is that YouTube's
position is, and this is this is the
reality. I appreciate this reality.
YouTube has to take any copyright claim
that it deems reasonable quite
seriously. So, I know that there have
been copyright claims against my channel
that YouTube has never sent on to me
because it's assessed the copyright
claim and gone, nah, this doesn't you
don't actually have a claim here. And
then they don't they don't proceed with
it. It is only if they look at the video
and go, I can see that you may have some
kind of legal argument, however weak or
however strong, so we'll proceed. You
can actually see this in the way that
Chudlo Logic was struck by Dark Viper.
YouTube originally pushed back on that
copyright strike against Chud until Dark
Viper got his lawyers involved and the
basically YouTube finally gave up and
said, "Fine, you guys can dispute this
in court then." But originally YouTube
did not think that claim was strong
enough to take to strike the video.
U magical raccoon with the five. It's
crazy to think that everyone who's wrong
has a job except her. I know. Really
weird. Really weird order of events.
Cammy, technically lying on illegal dock
is perjury, but no one gets done uh in
for perjury unless it's like real bad.
Yeah.
Um it's kind of like it's kind of like
recorded calls are a legal thing, right?
If you record and release a call, you're
probably nothing is going to happen to
you. But if you're a newspaper like say
I think it was the Daily Star that got
[ __ ] for this in the UK record like
received like got hold of I'm trying to
remember exactly how how this happened
multiple recorded calls between
celebrities and published them and it
destroyed the paper. It ended the paper.
So, like it can happen, but it needs to
be like pretty [ __ ] major for anyone
to actually do anything, right?
Germany, and again, depends on where you
are. Germany takes that [ __ ] a bit more
seriously, but it's also Germany and you
know, we know what they're like. Anyway,
that does not track for Saber Spark as a
person. This concerns relies on personal
familiarity rather than documentation or
investigation and reflects a affinity
bias.
What lio doesn't like Saber? I don't
think he's got any positions towards him
at all now. But like to begin with this
to begin this
didn't have like a positive opinion of
Saber Spark.
But it's like, oh, what? He's provided
some charity uh charity or a decent
opinion about something to do with Saber
Spark. So, obviously, he's biased. Now,
this is the same thing of Beckett's a
Save Spark fan. That's why he did all
this. This will follow you into your
real life. You have never met uh you
have met uh every known legal marker.
These statements are speculative and not
supported by cited legal standards or
precedent. I mean this will follow you
into your real life. This will
absolutely follow KP into your real
life.
You like VAS know who KP is. Animators
know who KP is. People who are
professional in the industry know who KP
is.
I know that there are people who are not
connected to some of these fandoms who
are professionals in the industry who
have watched my [ __ ] because of this.
I just like his reviews and how he
conducts himself. He's a weirdo. Doesn't
mean I'm going to stand for him being
falsely accused.
Yeah, I don't think Sabre's a weirdo.
Personally, I like Sabre, but anyway,
these statements are speculative and not
supported by uh by citing cited legal
standards. I mean, again, you can't even
get the use of DMCA's correct.
I don't know if I just circled the right
thing. I've got no [ __ ] idea.
Probably not. Oh no, there we go. This
one. Um, the claim that KP's actions
have caused reputational harm should
also be viewed within the broader
context of public discussion. Oh my god.
Much of the reputational narrative
surrounding this situation has emerged
within the same commentary ecosystem
discussing the material rather than from
independent sources evaluating the
documented conduct. In other words,
reputational claims are largely being
asserted within the same community
conversations that are actively framing
the narrative. Wait, hold on, hold on,
hold on, hold on, hold on, hold on.
Doesn't that undo your own claims, KP?
Doesn't that undo your own [ __ ]
claims? Because if your argument here is
much of the reputational narrative
surrounding the situation has merged
within the same com uh commentary
ecosystem, like that's not your
ecosystem though. You're like a brony
like cartoon analysis person. So, if
that if the reputational damage to Saber
Spark could only have potentially like
involved commentary, which isn't true,
by the way. That's a [ __ ] that's a
complete [ __ ] lie. Um,
doesn't that mean that you haven't
suffered any reputational harm?
God, this woman's so [ __ ] stupid.
Sorry, give me a second.
Um,
sorry.
Okay.
Um,
okay. Based. Um, okay. Sorry, I was
getting a DM about something. Hive with
the five. like this is all pe uh uh
pagantry. She broke the law due to press
uh pressing criminal charges against
someone in another country. KP is a
I can't pronounce that word today. Clea
cloa. I know what you're saying. It's
like the [ __ ] like
genital thing of like a bird, isn't it?
Um, breather of the highest.
Cloia Cloia. Cloakia.
Clawia. I don't [ __ ] know, guys.
Thanks, guys. Uh, Christopher with the
five. Didn't they wiretap a family after
someone disappeared so they could get
the first scoop on the story? I vaguely
remember something like that. Yeah.
Cloa.
This is teach Beckett to speak section.
I'm sorry.
Cloa. Cloa. Okay, whatever.
Uh, two master's degrees. It's only one
master's degree. I've got a basic degree
and a master's degree. None of which
none of which in required me to
pronounce uh Cleoka.
Cloa. Cloa. There we go. Thank you,
Cloa.
One day somebody who actually like
taught me and lectured me is going to
find one of these streams and be like,
"Yeah, we we shouldn't have passed him."
Where's Where's that copy of his [ __ ]
dissertation?
Oh, dude.
It is definitely yogurt. Shut the [ __ ]
up. It is definitely yogurt. It is not
yogurt. You're wrong. Americans are
wrong. I don't [ __ ] care. It's even
spelled differently in the UK. It's
yogurt.
Uh the claim that KP's actions have
caused reputational harm, blah blah blah
blah. Um the dynamic can create a
circular effect in which community inter
uh intercepts uh procedural interprets
procedural reporting actions as
reputationally damaging. Those
interpretations are repeated within the
same community discussions. The
repetition itself is then cited as
evidence of reputational harm. The
purpose of the presented documentation
is therefore separate to narrative
framing from the underlying actions
being recorded, allowing readers to
evaluate the situation based on
verifiable events and procedural
responses. Okay, just to be clear, also
kick him with a 20. Daddy Becka, I'm
getting evang Evangelion flashbacks. Um,
okay. Just to be clear, the accusations
against Saber Spark did very real
reputational harm. We know this. We know
this because people in the comm not in
commentary pulled away from him. They
made statements like like condemning
him.
There is reputational harm to Black
Griffin that you have been involved
with. There is reputational harm to DA
Games. These are within your
communities. the if your argument is
that the narrative about you has spun
out in within commentary that just means
that you've received no reputational
harm from anything I or anyone else here
has done.
Great night with the two. At least we
don't spell tire with a Y.
I mean, we spell tire with an I when
it's like for a car, and we spell tire
when we're like we're tired with a Y,
but they're different things. I feel
very bullied. Okay. Anyway, the purpose
of the of the presented documentation is
therefore to se separate narrative
framing from the underlying actions
being recorded, allowing readers to
evaluate the situation based on
verifiable events and procedural
responses.
Lio's personal experience with trauma.
My god. In the call reference uh Lio
references his own experiences with
personal trauma in relation to the pro
uh the product situation.
Although liar's personal experiences are
valid and deserving of respect, they do
not constitute a professional or
clinical background in trauma psychology
or related uh fields. Um what is your
professional and clinical background?
you've been to therapy because you're
[ __ ] That's your like again to be
clear, she posted a picture of her like
reaching out to like better health.
That's her clinical experience is the
fact that she needs a therapist.
Essentially, lived experiences can
provide perspective, but it is not a
substitute for established research,
clinical training, or evidence-based
frameworks, none of which KP has.
Relying on personal trauma as a primary
lens for interpret interpreting broader
situations can introduce risk.
Okay, I don't want to go and find the
page, but earlier on she said she
believed Emily because of her personal
experiences.
Not because of anything like [ __ ] me.
This woman is infuriatingly stupid,
particularly when it is used to define
standards for others or to challenge
established understandings of trauma
response, consent or victim behavior.
This can unintentionally shift
discussions away from evidence-based
practices and towards subjective
interpretation. Additionally, using
trauma as a rhetorical benchmark or
point of authority can create a moving
standard that is difficult to evaluate
consistently. You constantly and
endlessly talk about how traumatized you
are and how you're a victim of
everything and how the stuff Chris did
to you to reputational harm. This is a
[ __ ] this dude. This woman, someone
needs to put like someone needs to sit
KP down.
What we need to do is someone needs to
sit KP down in a room where she's
attached to electric shock machine and
she has to talk about all of this and
every time she says something completely
[ __ ] insane.
We shock her. Just give her a little
shock and they get stronger each time
until eventually she'll stop responding.
Um
it's a it's learn or get cooked. Okay.
It's learn it's learn or get cooked.
This report therefore prioritize
external professional grounded sources
when discussing trauma related topics to
ensure the conclusions remain
consistent, safe, and aligned with
established knowledge rather than
dependent on individual interpretation
alone.
Okay, look, I don't care about any like
KP again has never read any of this
[ __ ] stuff. Oh my god, she's talking
about PE yesterday. It's going to
actually trigger me. Um,
fly with the five. Couldn't just say it.
I have more expertise with trauma than
KP. Mostly because I had to deal with
peaches and KP. True. Beef mats with the
two. Go out and get real trauma. Yes.
True. Get get real trauma like a real
man.
That's what's important, dude. Substance
abuse and mental health services. Trauma
inform. Oh my [ __ ] god, bro.
The call itself is structured largely
around Liar's framing of events with him
directing the conversation and
positioning his perspective as correct
and authorative. His remain his focus
remains on accountability, evidence, and
the consequence of KP's actions. While
KP's response is more reactive,
reflecting uncertainty, emotional
strain, and an attempt to process the
situation in real time. This results in
an exchange that would not that is not
evenly balanced, but instead guided
primarily by Lo's interpretation of what
occurred. While the call does captures
KP acknowledging gaps in her
understanding and expressing a need to
reflect, it does not represent a neutral
or fully mutual discussion. Rather, it
reflects a dynamic in which one person
is defining the terms of the
conversation and the other is responding
to the structure. That's because KP,
you're a mouth breathing [ __ ] You are
[ __ ] dumb.
You cannot have an equal conversation
with KP.
You can't you can't have a mutual
conversation. She's not on the same
intellectual level as a [ __ ] toddler.
She is thick as rocks, dumb as two short
planks. She is knitting with one needle.
She does not have a full deck of cards.
She is an ex parrot.
[ __ ] me.
As such, the call should be evaluated as
a single perspectived driven
interaction, not as a comprehensive or
definitive account of a broader
situation.
Oh, dude. Context regarding the final
direct message. Lo uh KP cut low off
after allegations of sharing private
information reached her. As this report
shows, these allegations were then
proven to be correct. Okay, look, uh,
we've read all of this in the past. Why
would Liar remain in contact with KP if
he was actively leaking private material
based on the timeline and observed
behavior? One possible explanation is
that limit like, so here's the thing,
okay, the what this document is trying
to do is like, oh, this is a possible
explanation because she's trying to look
unbalanced.
She is not like unbalanced, unbiased,
but it's not unbiased. It's This is just
a hit piece dressed up as a concern
document. Did you actually just
MontPython us? Yes, I did. Yes, I did.
Um, Lio maintained contact with KP in
order to preserve access to information
and proximity to the situation. Lio
waited so [ __ ] long. He really didn't
He really wanted KP to like just
acknowledge what she'd done and sort her
[ __ ] out. It's like cuz I said to Lo,
"Hey man, look, we've agreed on this.
Why don't you just come out and tell
like just tell her to shut the [ __ ] up?
And he's like, "No, Becket, I'm not
doing that. She's my friend. I want to
believe that she can reflect and learn.
Just give her time."
That's why he maintained contact because
Lio once again was too [ __ ] nice to
somebody.
And he's always he's always nice to the
wrong [ __ ] peoples.
Guac told him to drop her. Everyone told
him to drop her. He was arguing with
people about it.
[ __ ] hell.
Continued communication would allow for
ongoing awareness of KP's involving
material uh position, materials, and
responses while also maintaining a
degree of influence over how events were
interpreted or handled in real time.
From a behavioral standpoint, this can
align with the form of risk management
through proximity. Oh my [ __ ] god.
Remaining close enough to monitor
developments, participate uh anticipate
potential outcomes, and adjust
positioning if needed. Maintaining
contact may also reduce uncertainty,
particularly in a rapidly involving
situation involving public narratives,
private materials, and reputational
stakes. If I'm nice to the right people
too, they just don't explode, so you
don't see it. I mean, understandable. Uh
this interpretation does not assume
intent but it reflects a pattern in
which continued uh assess and
involvement access and involvement can
function as a way to manage information
flow expose or exposure or personal risk
within an unfolding conflict. Examples
of misogynistic language referenced by
KP in the above message. Below are
examples of language used by KP uh by
Beckett that KP below are examples of
language used by Beckett that KP
referenced during the above text and
cool with Leo. These excerpts are
included to demonstrate the tone and
rhetorical framing that contributed to
KP's concerns regarding misogynistic or
gender-based language in relation to
commentary content sources. Coke cast. I
love possible deranged attacks.
Sexual de degragation. Use of explicit
sexual imagery depicted at women as an
insult rather than commentary on
behavior. She drinks and smokes and
pokes and chokes on dick. Infantilizing
character framing. Language portraying
an adult woman as inherently immature
and incapable. 30 years old but acts
like she's 16. Statements framing the
subject as an object of pity or
destruction rather than an individual
participating in discourse. It's sad to
think she's someone's daughter. like a
lamb to the slaughter. Appearance
focused ridicule. Criticism centers on
physical pres uh presentation rather
than actions or arguments. Brighteyed
hair and obnoxious clothes.
Uh context. These we're going to skip
this one for a second. These excerpts
are presented solely to document the
language KP reference while describing
concerns about misogynistic tone of
rhetoric. Their inclusion is for context
analysis and documentational purposes
only. Now, I'm going to do something
very quickly.
and ecasy conceited with low selfesteem.
She's a teenage dream
and obnoxious clothes.
Bright dyed hair and obnoxious clothes
on politics likes to listen to shitty
She drinks and smokes and pokes dick,
dude.
>> I can't [ __ ] believe this [ __ ]
someone's daughter.
>> How are you? How is this possible?
Did you think I opened a stream saying
this about you? Didn't you notice it was
lyrics?
>> She's so [ __ ] cool.
>> She didn't include that one. That's
depressing.
Like
was this like what was this not a hint?
Bright dyed hair and obnoxious clothes.
Does that sound like you? You don't have
bright dyed hair. KP
describes Courtney Pete better than KP.
Honestly, yes, it does.
I just I don't even know what to say.
It's so [ __ ] stupid.
It's so [ __ ] stupid. Thank you for
the two, Christopher. It's just
genuinely unbelievable that this is
where we're at.
And we're meant to take this seriously,
by the way.
She download She's re-uploaded the vid
to her archive.
She hasn't watched the streams.
Ironically, this song sounds like
something from the Scott Pilgrim movie.
Yeah, I mean it it to be fair, it's
meant to.
Does this imply she thought you were
doing karaoke?
Liar with a five. I still want to know
who KP reported to ice. I hope it's me.
Thank you guys so much. Much
appreciated. Much appreciated. Much
appreciated. Thank you. Thank you. Thank
you. Very helpful. SL gets ever closer
to giving me eight grand,
dude. Okay, another cigarette.
AI summarize your streams for any
problematic language. Yeah,
it's Oh, dude,
it's actually unbelievable.
Like, it's a new low. She's done this
before. She did this in the Barbie
document where she quoted me reading out
what's obvious.
What's obviously a [ __ ] comment from
chat and then accuses me of being
anti-semitic because of it.
If you want me to be anti-semitic, KP,
you can just ask. Be like, "Becket, can
you say something anti-Semitic?" And I
I've got you. I've got you covered.
[ __ ] unbelievably [ __ ]
Um, great night with the five. Did she
just feed your raw streams wholesale
into AI as part of this and not cut out
the music at the beginning and use parts
of the transcript from it? Yeah, pretty
much.
Pretty much.
Do you know AI knows knows who Copen is,
which is really funny. I find this
hilarious. I I didn't think I'd have
that much of a presence to get picked up
by AI, but AI is like, I can see there's
a channel that takes serious topics and
treats them in an irreverent manner. And
I'm like, that's bass. Thank you. Thank
you, Chp.
She didn't look at it and based at it
based on the transcript because she
would have uh she wouldn't have misqued
that song lyric about choking and
poking.
I think it's another line. Uh there's
another line later where it matches that
more closely. I think it's um I think
it's later in the song. I just don't
want to replay the entire song. Um
clarification regarding Lily Orchard
reference. Oh my [ __ ] god,
dude.
In the above message, KP referenced a
past friendship with Lily Orchard for
context. During the period of that
friendship around 2023, or so, KP
intentionally avoided seeking out
information that could be personally
triggering, including allegations or
docu documented controversies involving
Wait, what?
In the above message. Okay. So, she's
referencing something she said about
Lily.
For context, during that period of that
friendship around 2023 or so, KP
intentionally avoided seeking out
information that could be personally
triggering. So wait, so wait, you heard
rumors that your friend was a pedophile
and you thought that might be too
triggering, so you just carried on the
friendship.
Is that your actual argument? That's the
most insane thing I've ever [ __ ]
heard.
That's the most insane thing I've ever
[ __ ] heard. Malcolm, welcome in.
Malcolm viewers, thank you guys. I'm
sorry.
I just I can't I literally can't imagine
a situation
where like you're like, "Oh, yeah. No,
so your friend John like might be a
pedophile." Oh, well, that sounds a
little bit much. I I'm going to go down
the pub with John later, so I don't
really want to know if he's a pedophile
or not. It would ruin the evening. It
would really It would really damage the
ambiance.
And she's blaming me for it. The other
people had told her. This is [ __ ]
unbelievable.
Of course, chat. GPT knows you. KP
whines about you all. Yeah, KP is
probably single-handedly responsible for
pushing me in the algorithm at this
point. In in fairness, it would. Yeah, I
suppose. I told everyone to behave. If
everyone was too antagonistic, please
let me know and I will feed them to Lio
Convoy for an accountability call. XOXO.
No worries. Listen, glad to have you
guys in. Hope you guys have had a
pleasant evening. You're all very
welcome here. All very welcome. You're
all good.
Uh Lia was aware of KP's friendship with
Lily at the time, but did not directly
inform KP of known concerns or
controversy surrounding Lily's behavior.
From KP's recollection, when she
directly asked Lio about potential
allegations of omi Lily, Lio discouraged
her from investigating further, citing
that if Lily was personally helpful, she
should not engage in commentary around
her. That's interesting. Is there any
evidence for that? That doesn't sound
like Lio.
Sorry, Becky. Uh, Becky, I hope KP
leaves you alone. I don't
I hope this woman does like That's not
what I said, but okay. I like I hope KP
makes a [ __ ] video on me. I want her
to do more. I hope the next Google Docy
is on me. The problematic behavior of
YouTuber Copen Seeds by I love Kim
Possible a lot known puppy killer. KP
later became aware of these issues
independently when testimony from
Courtney Pete Lily Orchard sister was
publicly shared which included
allegations of abuse. KP raised this
example during conversations to
illustrate a broader concern that if Lio
that Lio appeared to make judgment calls
about what information KP should or
should not know rather than allowing her
to make informed decisions
collaboratively. From KP's perspective,
earlier awareness of public discussion
discussed allegations regarding Lily
Orchin would have allowed her to make a
more informed personal professional
decisions prior to these issues becoming
wide widely public through third party
testim. This is [ __ ] [ __ ] This
is [ __ ] [ __ ] bro. KP was part of
the analysis community. Discussions
about Stockholm and Lily Orchard
potentially being a pedophile
have been around since at least 2018. I
covered them back in 2022.
This is ridiculous. This is actually
insane. I told KP Becket was Rhdesian as
you should. Also, that dude, I hope she
puts that in. Uh, Becket is just jealous
the safety report isn't on him. That's
actually true. I am annoyed by it. Um,
okay. This report does not attempt to
adjudicate these claims or any other
stances on Courtney. It notes that only
clarify the timeline of KP's awareness.
This is a lie. [ __ ] it. If Liar is going
to address this on his own stream, let
him. I want I want to see those
messages. The relevant context uh is
that KP engaged without full knowledge
or prior claims and that after being
explicitly advised not to pursue
additional information. This undermines
later assertions that KP acted with
intent strategy or manipulation in
relation to Lilia Orchard or Let's be
clear. KP did do this. KP absolutely did
do this.
KP was prepared to keep Lily around
because Lily was like her only friend at
the time and she will overlook any
problematic behavior as long as you're
nice to her. We know this. She's done
this with Emmy.
She's done this with other people as
well. She did this with Courtney.
She lied to her audience that she had
stopped talking to Courtney and then was
continue like Courtney was involved in
the [ __ ] like her response video.
you. Okay, I will be. Where is that
from? Lily's server. I left it.
Understandable. I If I make too big of a
deal, I will most likely be harassed. I
need to take it slow. And real quick,
I'm sorry you got uh dogpiled last
night. Those people have been
reprimanded and should be giving you
apologies. Okay. Again, I don't know the
wider context of this. I'll let Li deal
with it. JG Free, welcome to Coping07 in
the chat. Thank you very much. I
appreciate it. I saw your thing. I think
you would have told me directly at some
point. You just been too busy. Agreed.
Shitty way to find out. Well, I didn't
want to message you as early as that
tag. As far as the stuff about Lily and
her siblings, that's new to me, too. I
mean, that was new to everyone. That was
like the Courtney stuff was new. Lily
defended KP during her drama. So, of
course, she stuck around. People who
kiss up uh kiss up to her. Yes. But like
the wider conversation around Stockholm
was from Josh Scorcher, and that had
been since like the late 2010s. KP was
fully aware of it.
On October 10th, KP issued a direct
apology to Emily after initially
accepting or repeating the framing of
events as they had been presented by Lio
and Becket. This apology reflected KP's
reassessment of the situation and her
recognition that the framing she relied
upon exceeded what could be established
with certainty.
Dude, listen, it's fine to accuse
somebody of rape without evidence.
What's really bad is saying that it's
not true without without enough
evidence. You need, you know, we really
need the recording from the room. Okay,
that's that's the only way, dude. [ __ ]
off. Gray knight with the five. At this
point, I would drink the power thirst
and I will let whatever happens happens.
Yeah.
Regardless of personal opinion made by
any party on in who is innocent or
guilty party in this case under US law a
sexual assault allegation can only be
legally deemed false when intentional
fabrication is proven by evidence and
formally determined by a court.
Oh [ __ ] off.
That's not even true. That's not even
true.
There is a difference between saying,
"Oh, okay, actually that is false." to
like a court turning around and saying,
"No, no, no, no, no, no. This isn't like
this is like maliciously fabricated."
But for like until you are convicted by
a court, you are innocent.
That's just the reality.
Now, in cases like this, you can like
have a really good supporting evidence
and people can go, "Listen, even without
going to court, we can see that this is
most probably true." But you don't do
that off one random [ __ ] testimony.
Then again, then again, until KP goes to
court to prove that she didn't murder
previous dogs and has been replacing
them to keep the illusion of a single
dog alive, KP is, I would argue, a known
and proven or allegedly proven
puppy murderer.
And I think that's deeply concerning.
And people should uh
people should talk about how she
suffocated one of the dogs between her
thighs. Anyway,
how many pages left of this mess?
70.
Oh, dude. Okay. In other words, only a
court of law can determine if an
allegation is false. until then is
officially and legally classified as
unfounded or unverified.
Oh my [ __ ] god, bro.
KP's apology was issued in
acknowledgement of this distinction and
of the limitations of commentarybased
conclusions when addressing serious
allegations.
You platformed it. You broke the story.
You leveled false rape allegations
against somebody, bro.
And you're still word lawyering. You're
complaining about liar being like,
"Listen, you need to stop word lawyering
while word lawyering." KP's apology was
issued in acknowledgement of that
distinction. Um, dude,
wait, are you leaking? No way. No
[ __ ] way.
No way are you leaking [ __ ] that you're
sending to [ __ ] Emmy and dragging
Emmy into this.
KP apologizing for believing uh the
wording of a false rape allegation and a
general response. The small text
screenshot is KP breaking off contact
with liar which is already logged above.
Dude, what the [ __ ] are you doing?
Guys, it's about the victim. Here, let
me use them as a shield. What?
Following the breakdown in communication
with KPM Liario, Liar publicly uploaded
the recorded call to YouTube. This
occurred despite prior privacy concerns
expressed by KP. Oh my god. Okay. Is
this is this legal?
Not really. Since private information
was discussed and published without KP's
consent, legality falls back into US
privacy law. No, it [ __ ] doesn't, KP.
No, it [ __ ] doesn't.
That is not how any of this works. You
are not a [ __ ] lawyer.
You are firstly a public figure. You
have different expectations of privacy
than a normal member of the public.
Secondly,
there is no expectation of privacy from
the fact that you know you're talking
about an ongoing drama.
Lio has rights to record the call.
The potential exposure of third-party
information doesn't apply because LIO
censored that third-party information
which you gave to LIO in the call.
Copyright ownership of recorded speech.
You don't own the copyright
and consent to publication. You do not
have like the control of the
publication.
Although liar resides in Texas, a one
party consent recording, the legality of
recording a call and legality of
publishing that call online are separate
issues. You are a public figure. While
one party consent laws may promote
recording under certain circumstances,
public distri distribution, especially
on monetized or widely accessible
platforms such as YouTube, introduces
additional legal considerations.
It's really interesting how she always
comes back to monetized. I mean, I don't
know. I think you shouldn't be so scared
of monetization. Maybe then you can move
out of the apartment your parents have
had to pay for after the supporting you
for your entire [ __ ] life. What is
she going to do when her parents die?
Like cuz like she'd piss through that
money instantly whatever they leave her.
As discussed elsewhere in this report,
recording calls do not automatically
grant permission to publicly distribute
them. Then why did you distribute the
call you had with Chris? Are you
admitting that you believe that you
should be criminally pro prosecuted?
Crayon with the two. Funny how she
hasn't mentioned protecting children.
Yeah, funny that, isn't it?
Additionally, witness witness witness
testimony from inside Lio's privately
run server indicates either the call and
or video release was turned into a
serverwide event with a without KP's
prior knowledge. Why is that relevant?
Potential reasons for live broadcasting
trans. Oh, dude. Okay. Audience
engagement, narrative po uh posting,
control over framing. [ __ ] off.
Additional comparative analysis lies
video framing versus document. Dude,
no wonder this document's so [ __ ]
long. It's like what's what's
interesting is she's tried to make this
like idiot proof to like you will
understand my perspective,
but she herself doesn't understand her
own arguments. They contradict her own
positioning constantly. Happy five
months in KP content. Let's go. Thank
you, the purgatory knight. Welcome in.
Thank you for the five months of
membership at coping07 in the chat.
Also, did she say privately run server?
Where is this
provide?
Anyway, anyway, okay.
The section does not dispute the
existence of the underlying events or
materials referenced in live video. The
factual basis of the events is supported
by documentation remains independently
verifiable. The purpose of this analysis
is to evaluate how those events are
interpreted and presented. Specifically,
this section
examines the distinction between the
characterization of events within live
video and the presentation of these same
events across documented communications.
Becky's just dropping super chats
everywhere. This document is getting to
them.
Thank you. Great night with the five.
[ __ ] hell, I'm breaking
my sp Oh, sorry. I missed JG with the
five. My spouse who is Catholic. Wasn't
this uh my spouse who is Catholic?
Wasn't this the guy talking about demons
last night? Yeah, it is. Yeah, it is.
Funny how we move. Um any others? any
others that I've missed because I'm bad
at this point. I would drink the power
thirst. I think I think I've got them
all. I think I've got them all. Uh,
Little Fly with the one. Thank you very
much. Pinker with the two. A professor
would fail her for this, dude. She'd get
kicked out of university for using AI.
Not utterly Noah wouldn't put something
like this out. Otterly Noah would look
at this and go, "Oof, this is a bit AI
AI and heavy, isn't it? Is this my own
work?"
Oh, dude.
Like, and I'll do it again. No, he's
talking about me. My stream last night,
we were talking a lot about demons and
Catholicism and religion. It was a whole
thing. Okay.
The wig may be throwing him off. It's
okay. What's doing my head in is the
fact that she repeats sentences. I don't
know if you've noticed this while I've
been reading through it. She repeats the
same statements over and over and over
and over again, just constantly. You
could you could cut this document down
to about 60 pages if you avoided the
repetition.
We got bored and kept track uh
triggering his Catholicism. Yes, you
did.
Oh, I did the other night, too.
[ __ ] Okay, hold on.
This could have been an email. Don't
worry, I'm sure it was to somebody.
The only thing I can remotely think of
is that that's Lio ating everyone about
his coverage. Yeah, it probably is.
Cath Catholism. Yeah, Catholitism. We'll
go with that. You should go do it again.
You know, you want to rate those popes.
I do indeed.
every time. It'll happen one day. I did
so back on Twitch, I did actually do a
stream where I rated like the first 30
popes, I think it was. I had an Excel
table and everything.
Um, the issue under review is not
whether the events occurred, but whether
their interpretation accurately reflects
the full context. Okay. The narrative
framing. What gen Okay, sure.
The video relies on broad evaluation
evaluative conclusions regarding uh
regarding judgment, responsibility, and
behavior. Specific interactions,
timestamps, and Oh my god, dude. Clear
distinction between What is this?
What What are these? What are these?
What are the point of these? I've read
so many of them. I don't understand what
the [ __ ] point of them is.
I literally I'm starting to lose my mind
a little bit. What's the point? You're
not actually pointing to any specific
thing.
You're like
[ __ ] moving like just
random [ __ ]
It's literally chat GPT. Yeah, she's
literally just put it in.
Okay. Uh, specific interactions,
timestamps, and supporting transcript
evidence. You do not have a grasp of how
to treat people. You seem to not truly
understand how the real working world
works. It's pretty clear to me that KP
was scrambling to find anybody to be a
scapegoat. These statements reflect
broad character judgments rather than v
verifiable uh discrete actions. What you
What the [ __ ] are you talking about?
Okay, so here's here's like here's an
actual analysis and assessment of why
this is [ __ ] because it relies
entirely on uh KP taking each individual
call or message or conversation or video
completely as an echo like as a as a
vacuum.
it it relies on ignoring all the other
context that a viewer or anyone involved
in any of this would have any knowledge
of. So the only way like that you get to
these conclusions where it's like well
there's no evidence presented. the
evidence has been presented throughout
this entire [ __ ] drama and you're
ignoring it because like you're a [ __ ]
and you expect everyone to recap
literally everything that has happened
over the past year before making any
comment on you which is obviously an
absolutely absurd [ __ ] standard to
have. Like you'll note throughout this
document KP barely talks about what she
actually did.
She downplays her own actions constantly
because that's the only way this
document even makes a lick of sense even
to someone as [ __ ] as her.
Grey Knight with the five. Becket needs
some power thirst so he can power
through this and win everything forever.
Bro, I am I haven't had I haven't had an
energy drink. Actually, that's not
entirely true. Other than like a like a
vodka and a couple of vodka and Red
Bulls a couple of months ago. I haven't
had an energy drink since May last year.
I completely quit and I am sat here
going, I know I have an emergency box of
Monster Mango downstairs.
I keep it there just in case. And I've
never been so [ __ ] close. Kevin with
the member for 11 months at coping
almost a year. Found found you through
new now recording. RIP. Yeah, based
based based but also rip now recording.
I miss I miss the guys.
Doesn't Coke have caffeine in it? Yeah,
but okay. Like I I haven't quit caffeine
cold turkey. I'm getting there. I'm
drinking much less of it.
I quit energy drinks. Okay. like with
all the other harmful chemicals then.
Um,
I want my third energy drink. I drank
too many of them. I drank too many of
them. Okay. Retrospective framing versus
contemp. Oh my god.
The video presents conclusions with
retrospective clarity, implying that
outcomes were foreseeable and avoidable.
They were. Lio warned you that putting
out Emily's statement in your video
would lead to this happening.
What happened to our recording? Matt Pit
quit. That's what happened to our
recording. He left us. He went for
cigarettes and he never came back. Chat
decisions occurring under incomplete and
evolving information. and the presence
of competing considerations, eg privacy,
safety, credibility, changes in
understandings, and additional
information became available. Now,
here's what's really interesting about
that. Additional information became
available to like Lio and myself and
other people, but they didn't become
available to KP.
There is no new information that ever
turned up for KP.
Again, this is a lie because KP knew who
Emmy was. She's known who Emmy Jones is
for years because they exist in the same
space. She knew who Emmy was when Emmy
was making the accusation to her.
And she knew like she knew that uh she
needed like more evidence before going
live with this. So there is no new
information. What's the new information
that KP received that chose that made
her re-evaluate her position after
talking to me in Lio? There isn't any.
There's literally none. Which is why
she's never presented it. She has never
presented a counternarrative of actually
guys, there is more information here.
Okay, there's more information that Emmy
has provided me. It that never happened.
Gray Knight with the two LL super sorry
old me uh super uh lal sorry super old
meme power thirst no you're good I think
I vaguely recognize it
uh supporting transcript evidence I
hadn't seen the video but I had heard
she included the accusation as time as
more time and data came out that didn't
seem to be the case these reflect
real-time uncertainty involving
interpretation not fixed foresight but
you had the fixed foresight KP,
you knew you had more information than
anybody else.
The only new information that's being
presented to KP is the counternarrative
from Saber Spark's side and all the
[ __ ] huge amounts of evidence, both
circumstantial and hard, that shows that
like Saber Spark is [ __ ] innocent.
That's the only new evidence. So, I'm
not sure what you're pointing to.
The thing that changed was I got pissed
at you and then Emmy said something nice
to you and you forgave her and sided
with her. That's what happened. That's a
new evidence. Emmy Jones may be my
friend is KP's new evidence.
Attribut attribution of personal fault
versus contextual causation. Individual
shortcomings, flawed judgment or
emotional instability. All of these are
true about KP. They are demonstraatably
true and have been demonstrated multiple
[ __ ] times.
Specific triggers and external factors,
explicit stated boundaries and
limitations, responses shaped by
circumstance conditions rather than
fixed traits. This entire debacle
happened because you refused to listen
to me. You have a tendency of getting
all your information thirdand. I mean,
what what do you mean? These are just
[ __ ] true.
It shows contextual misunderstandings
and information gaps, not purely
inherited traits. Oh my [ __ ] god.
Listen, guys. I'm not genetically
predisposition to be [ __ ]
Therefore, you can't be mad at me. What?
Wouldn't it be better if you like I like
the way she pushes back on the
narrative. Like the thing that annoys KP
the most is I constantly keep calling
her a [ __ ] idiot. And it's funny
because that is a way better narrative
for her if she just held her hands up
and went guys. I'm just kind of
[ __ ] That would be better.
That would be better, right? Cuz
otherwise it's it really is only it's
either you're [ __ ] or you're
malicious. And it's actually probably
just both. In fact, it is just both.
[ __ ] off. It is just both. KP is a
malicious [ __ ] This shows contextual
misunderstandings of information gaps.
The video prioritizes character-based uh
attribution whereas documentation
reflects context driven causation.
I would love I would pay money
for KP to be able to explain to me what
she means by that because there's no
[ __ ] way she would be able to
actually explain what she means by
context driven causation.
I mean even these little Okay, actually
listen. I'm done with this section. I
can't I can't do anymore. I I can't let
Lio do it. Conclusion. The divergence
between the video's framing and the
document documented record is not
limited to disagreements over isolated
details, but reflects a broader
distinction between inter uh inter
interpretive narrative construction
and contextual ev evidence-based
reconstruction of events. The available
I can tell you why she put this out as a
YouTube video with no [ __ ] audio
because there's no way she'd be able to
read all this. The available
documentation does not contradict the
occurrence of events referenced in the
video. Rather, it provides additional
context that material affects how these
events may be reasonably interpreted.
Your AI is hallucinating again.
Accordingly, the essential discrepancy
is not factual but interpretive.
Specifically, whether the conclusions
presented align with the full documented
context in which the events occurred.
Media standards in reporting sexual
assault allegations. Oh, [ __ ] I can't
wait for this. It is important to
clarify that mainstream media does not
require direct evidence, eg physical
proof or legal adj uh adjudication as a
prerequisite for reporting on sexual
assault allegations. In practices, these
cases are often evaluated using
established journalistic standards
designed for situations where direct
evidence is limited or unavailable.
These standards typically include
corroboration across multiple
independent sources, which you don't
have. Consistency of accounts over time,
which you don't have. Documentation and
circumstantial evidence, which you don't
have. Messages, timeline witnesses, you
don't have that. You don't [ __ ] have
that. You didn't have that when you
published. You still don't. Pattern
analysis involving repeat behavior on
multiple accounts. Oh, yeah. Where are
all the other rape victims of Saber
Spark? You don't have that either. on
record testimony where possible. You
have that once
which you made Emmy modify.
In the case of Emily Jones, analysis is
primarily based on documentation and
circumstantial reporting evidence on
documentary and circumstantial reporting
evidence. Pattern analysis, no, it's not
on the record testimony while also
accounting for the known limitations of
trauma infold memory and delayed
reporting. This is not an assertion of
the claims themselves, but a
clarification of how they are being
evaluated and presented. This is just a
[ __ ] lie. Stop killing your dogs, KP.
Accordingly, while the proposition that
the allegations should not be made
without direct evidence reflects a
general caution, it does not fully align
with how sexual assault cases are
asserted and reported in practice. Media
frameworks rely on layered verification
and contextual analysis to determine
whether claims meet the threshold for
responsible publication. There is no
[ __ ] reputable paper in the world
that would have printed these
allegations.
None. They'd be terrified of getting
[ __ ] sued. And in cases where like
media sources have reported on cases
with such little information, and that
does happen, they get [ __ ] sued and
overwhelmingly they lose in court. And
look at, listen, you want to know how
[ __ ] bad this [ __ ] is? Look at the
Amber Heard Johnny Deppa uh case
because that's to do like that's to do
with media sources being sued over
printing that uh that story particularly
in the UK and the only way the Sun won
in the UK was saying that we're so
disreputable that no one should have
believed us. That was the Sun's legal
defense in the Johnny Depp case in the
UK and the judge accepted it. Yeah, The
Sun is a disreputable newspaper.
Therefore, no one would reasonably
believe the allegations. That's the
actual defense. So, the only way your
argument works, KP, is if your argument
is that you are so [ __ ] and so
untrustworthy that nobody would actually
believe your video. That's the only way
this angle even makes any sense.
Grey Knight with the two. Can we report
KP to Chris Hansen at this point? Chris
Hansen's got his own [ __ ] problems.
Thank you guys so so much. It is much
appreciated. Please enjoy these
stickers.
Very very very based of each and every
one of you.
I'll get you a top up for that.
Oh, that was clever for the sun to do.
That was our only defense.
sources. Oh my god, [ __ ] off. New York
Times reporting Harvey Weinstein. They
had more than testimony.
Um, why sexual assault cases are hard to
prove.
Explains how journalist responsible uh
responsibil
uh responsibly report on sexual
misconduct allegations, including the
importance of corroboration, multiple
sources, and editorial standards rather
than requiring definitive proof. But you
didn't have any of that. You don't meet
journalistic standards.
I'm not saying that we can't bring
things out. I've never said that.
I didn't say this in the I
never stuff.
They had audio calls. Yeah, they had
actual recordings.
Dude,
you had multiple people in the Weinstein
cases.
You didn't just have one person who
wanted to remain anonymous.
Public perception of the published uh
contraction video. Um
AP did not request to be recorded, nor
did she ask. Okay. An observable
response pattern surrounding this video
as reflected in the comments on the
uploaded video below suggest a mixed and
in some cases critical audience
reception. Well, KP,
you would know all about mixed and
critical audience reception, wouldn't
you?
Once again,
this is why you have the [ __ ]
comments turned off.
Two likes, no comments here. What about
What about your comments on this one?
Cuz I know you've started deleting them.
No one's going to read your crybully
doc. Wow. Imagine closing the comment on
your liod doc because he cut ties with
you. Oh, so only fans career when sex
work suits you. Considering you lie to
get clout and dollars. You're a [ __ ]
coward, Rachel. I think somewhere in
that twisted shell you call a brain. You
know you're wrong. You know you've lost.
You know you can never come back from
this. But your ego would dwarf the Milky
Way galaxy prevents you from admitting
it. Why would you keep uh closing
comments? To stop the trolls or because
you still can't take criticism? Give up
the ghost and go away. Delete the post
with the Google doc. I see. Glad it blew
up in your face, too. I heard of I heard
of never meet your hero because people
uh people and people are crap, but you
are the biggest one I have ever known.
Goodbye, Rachel. It was fun while it
lasted. I don't believe you'll ever
change for the better, but for the
worse.
Even though you lost Even though I lost
a lot of trust in you, I hope you do
better this year. Whether you you're on
YouTube or not, please do and learn
better and and happy new year. What's
the response? I'm from the future. I
have some bad news,
dude. That was three months ago. That
was three [ __ ] months ago, dude.
Trash mammal. Trash mammals. [ __ ] pro
pathetic.
Can we listen?
Give that a [ __ ] like. Trash mammal
over here [ __ ] putting the gun down
in the first act. Absolutely [ __ ]
incredible. Absolutely [ __ ] absurd.
That's so [ __ ] funny.
That's the best comment in this entire
drama. That's so [ __ ] good, bro.
That's so [ __ ] good. Great night with
the two. KP also isn't a journalist.
True. Getty. Hey, Gatsbury. How you
doing? With the five. You still reading
the hate crime against the dyslexic?
Yes, I am. I think this is just designed
to [ __ ] with me. Um, give me a second.
I've got a load of messages. Um,
if you need a reading break, I can read
to you for like 15 minutes.
What page are we on? We're on page 63.
Do I bring on someone else to read the
[ __ ] document for me? Give me a
break. This is [ __ ] agony. once
again. Had a guy for that. Um, okay.
Oh,
Apollo throwing around the gift of
prophecy to a random YouTube
commentator. Yes.
KP couldn't remove Becket's channel, so
she tried killing him via dyslexia. Yes,
Mitch.
Rather not. Yeah. Okay. observable p uh
response patterns surrounding this video
as reflected in the comments uh suggest
a mix in some areas critical audience
reception rather than informed uniform
support. Some viewers accepted and
repeated the framing presented using the
information shown to dismiss KP's
position or reinforce pre-existing
assumptions about her intent and
credibility. However, other viewers
expressed skepticism towards the framing
itself, raising questions about the
necessity and purpose of the call, the
way the interaction was structured and
presented, and the handling of recorded
disclosure. Those responses indicate
that the very video did not produce a
singular uncontested interpretation, but
instead prompted varying
interpretations, including critical
engagement with both the content and its
presentation.
Where are these
third party commentators questioning the
existence? Why did KP even need to be in
this call? She didn't even need to be in
this [ __ ] call. I don't even need to
be here. None of us need to be here. No,
hold on. Hold on. Dude, you're
misinterpreting this [ __ ] I don't need
to be here. None of us need to be here.
These statements reflect external
confusion regarding the necessity of the
structure of the call itself. Bro,
they're taking the piss out of you. This
is so messy. Just tell them, dude. All
these people are [ __ ] rats.
Bro, these remarks indicate frustration
with the communication dynamics, lack of
uh clarity in overall handling of the
interaction. This isn't a defense of
you, KP. Uh reaction. Just tell them uh
tell them, dude. I'm going to record
this. Just so you know, it's etica. This
is this is in relation
I believe to like, you know, um h
the standard disclosure thing of like
I'm recording this call. Well, it sounds
like we recorded it anyway. I mean, that
just sounds like a joke. These sentence
emphasize an expectation of clear
disclosure and suggested concern. Wasn't
this part of the conversation as well
over the fact that KP herself like
recorded the call with Chris and
released them? Oh, it's from Malcolm.
Malcolm's video reflects a broader
challenge to the structure and
credibility of the call. What you mean
Malcolm's community that hates Lio? Of
course it [ __ ] does.
Like, like I'm glad that there was an
unbiased. Look, I love Malcolm, but like
his community [ __ ] hates Liar and
hates me.
Like the way she sees uh the way she's
like, "See, Malcolm defended me." Like,
Malcolm [ __ ] hates KP probably more
than me and Lio do. His community also
raised implicit concerns about the
extent to which Lio's interpretation can
be treated objective. Yeah, I mean, I
think I remember seeing some of
Malcolm's coverage where he's like,
"Well, Lo is friends with this person."
Given the selective presentation of the
information, lack of clear clearly
defined context, and Malcolm's going to
be critical of liar. He's a detractor.
That's his job.
Following the release of the Barbie
report, Liar's public response, as
archived here, appears to follow a
pattern of dismissal, speculation, and
reframing of the report contents rather
than direct engagement with the specific
alleg uh allegations raised throughout
the stream. Li repeatedly characterized
sections of the report as unserious or
fabricated rather than addressing the
substant uh substance of the claims. At
several points, he dismisses sections
outright without reviewing them in
detail. For example, there's no AI.
There's no way AI wasn't involved. Oh,
this is the Barbie report thing. [ __ ]
This framing attempts to undermine the
credibility of the document itself
rather than engaging with the evidence
presented. Similarly, when encountering
legal references in the report, Lao
explicitly declines to examine them. I'm
not going to get into all that. I could,
but I don't feel like it. Yeah, because
we don't trust that your interpretation
is like legitimate and you're already
getting caught out on things. You've
done this with the DMCA stuff.
You do not understand copyright law or
fair use. You don't understand what
harassment is. You don't understand what
[ __ ] false allegations are.
You're relying entirely on chat GPT
because you are clinically [ __ ]
mind of a [ __ ] toddler.
This indicates a consent a conscious
decision to avoid evaluating the legal
claims being discussed. To further
clarify additional claims, AI assistance
was used only for editorial support such
as spellchecking, proofreading, and
basic fact cross referencing. It's
important to know that all claims in
these reports are referencing
independently documented sources. The
use of AI does not alter or replace the
factual basis of the reports. You are so
[ __ ] dumb, bro. You are posting
verbatim the AI output.
We all know what an AI output looks
like. KP,
you you're doing it here. You don't
write like this. I know you don't write
like this. I've seen how you write. I've
seen your scripts.
They're on your [ __ ] channel.
You don't use language like this. You
don't use structure like this. This is
obviously AI.
We encou I mean at one point one point,
hold on. Where the [ __ ] is it?
What page are we on? 65.
Um,
dude.
um
at one point further subsequent research
into pis psychology
pcology right I'm going to do this again
I'm going to do this again I'm going to
read to you for anyone who's joining
late what that is
fology hold on what was psychology
>> phychology thank you is the scientific
branch of research search of boty
dedicated to the study of algae
including their taxiderermy, physiology,
ecology, and economic applications.
I'm sorry. Sorry, KP. You're doing
independent research.
>> Tell me what how does
>> psychology
>> apply to this drama? Because I
personally think
>> psychology
>> doesn't have much to do with it at all.
Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe psychology
>> is incredibly important to the Saber
Spark discourse. I don't know. Maybe I'm
just uninformed. Maybe I'm not as smart
as you. But personally, I find the
connection with
>> psychology
>> dubious at best.
You miss the probiotic part of the dog.
She writes about Wait, does she?
Give me a second.
Wait. Lo makes broad claims about KP.
This I ain't got to it yet. Lo makes
broad claims about KP processing and
understanding the situation by using
probiotic terms.
Liquid cloudy with the toe. Can you get
me in touch with KP? Need the support
right now. So true.
Dude,
this is so [ __ ] [ __ ]
Okay, anyway.
Anyway,
>> psychology,
>> dude. I love I love doing that. That's
so that's so much fun.
Oh my god, you're so stupid.
You're so dumb. You're so dumb.
We can be algae. Good news, chat. We can
be algae.
Okay, whatever.
Where were they?
Reliance on spec. Oh, dude. Uh, we
encourage all readers to check and look
for our sources section to understand
how information is being sourced in
these reports, particularly
our sourcing on
>> psychology. I want to keep doing it.
It's great. Um,
Lio also openly acknowledges that some
of his statements are speculative while
continuing to assert them in a
dismissive tone towards the report. I
said it's what I think. I did not say I
have solid evidence that evidence that
was speculation. Why is that a problem?
This admission demonstrates that part of
his critique is based on personal
interpretation rather than verified
information. Bro, all your [ __ ] is
personal speculation.
Oh my [ __ ] god.
Use mocking or dismissive language.
You're not a business. You are not a
business, you dumb cow. The stream
frequently shifts to ridicule or
personal commentary directed at the
reports or the individuals mentioned
within it. Instead of maintaining
analytic critique, portions of the
response contain over overt insults.
Example language includes, "You are not
a business, you dumb cow." This type of
commentary suggests a mocking tone
rather than a subjective evaluation of
the report's findings. I mean, I I would
say that's an objective observation, you
stupid [ __ ]
work cited. Meth pipe and meth meth pipe
and chat GPT only Courtney was on the
meth meth pipe. Well, was it wrong?
Yeah, true. Suggest a mocking tone.
Dude, just come and make a video, KP.
Make a video on me. Do a super cut of
all the times I've called you a dumb
[ __ ]
and explain why you murdered your dogs.
Um,
dude,
she's definitely going to put that in
the next document. Becca went on an
incredibly long rant about murdering
puppies for some reason.
Prove me wrong, KP.
Um, another observable pattern is
pattern is that Lio skips large portions
of the report rather than addressing
them directly. At one point, he
explicitly states, "I'm not going to
read all this. This is dumb.
Yeah. No [ __ ] I'm doing the same I'm
doing the same thing with a couple of
these pages because it's meaningless
[ __ ] nonsense.
You're lucky that I haven't turned this
into a game where we skip a page every
time chat gives me a [ __ ] super chat.
This approach results in commentary. Oh,
go back. Dude, we could do the we could
do the um do you guys remember when
Connor
uh was reading the document? I forgotten
what document it was. Connor was reading
the document and it he made it into a
game which lasted like a week and had
punishments in it and he had to like um
and every time someone gave him money
they like had to spin a wheel.
Was that I am Alex? Was that the I am
Alex document dude? That was [ __ ]
Kino. That was so funny.
Transnack with the five. By the way, my
papo really likes your voice. So, for
some reason, so here's five for helping
keep him calm through the vet visit and
ride home. No worries. I hope he is
feeling okay.
He looks like a very good boy.
As most dogs are. Um, right. This
approach results in commentary uh
commentary that responds to summarize uh
summaries or assumptions about the
material rather than the full context of
the report itself. A reminder to the
reader that even though Lio and others
use dismissive or aggressive language to
not do the same to anyone referenced in
this or other reports. To be clear, no
one other than me is reading this [ __ ]
And maybe Lio and Hidden and Malcolm.
Okay. Only people who [ __ ] hate KP,
right? She's got no fans left. who is
seriously going to be like, "Listen,
this is really serious. We need to go
after this LIO guy for this KP shit."
Even Listen, even LEO's detractors think
this is this is [ __ ] [ __ ]
I mentioned Malcolm. I mentioned
Malcolm. I said Malcolm.
I was messaging him earlier.
You already know the megapile got taken
down, right? I cannot remember. My brain
cells. Yeah, the mega file got taken
down. My girlfriend usually won't uh
won't like to listen to any YouTube
drama streams, but she likes Becket's
voice. It's cuz I'm British. That's
touching. That's nice. I like it.
Listen, I remember somebody said uh that
their partner was complaining and their
partner said that, "Can we have one
night where you don't listen to the
British man while going to sleep,
please?" It's like, "Cool. Can we do
that?"
It's just really funny. I've just got
images of this like poor partner being
sat there listen like in bed listening
to me [ __ ] ramble on about [ __ ] being
like I love this person. I care about
them but [ __ ] me. I hate the ginger guy.
Great night with the five. Also,
Becket's chat kept uh kept on going on
about something called power thirst.
Really weird stuff. Yeah, true. Thank
Thank you. Great eye for the five.
Was it Courtney saying that to her BF?
No, it wasn't. And it was an actual fan
as opposed to Courtney who's a super
fan. Oh, Courtney. I did hear rumors. I
heard rumors that Courtney found out
about the spring fling contest where
somebody drew art of me and Courtney
getting married or something and she was
really upset about it and she was like,
"Look at look at this. Becket's trying
to commission art of us as a couple."
And I'm like, "I did not ask anybody for
that art. They only drew it to upset
me." Okay.
The idea that I would seriously
commission KP and Courtney and Becket
art is [ __ ] absurd. You're you're a
Listen, there's a reason you're [ __ ]
homeless, [ __ ] Anyway,
across the coverage, there appears to be
a consistent pattern wherein the
discussion becomes more critical or
uncertain. The response shifts towards
public deflection through ridicule and
dismissive framing, mockery or
belittling language, broad character
judgments, and statements that position
the subject as inherently invalid or not
worthy of engaging with. Pattern
functions to red uh redirect attention
away from the underlying issues,
reinforce a simplified narrative for the
audience. No, it is. Listen, it's not it
really isn't complicated, KP. You're
just [ __ ] Access with the five. Go
back two pages, loser. No, we're not.
Listen, we're not I'm not doing that.
No, no, no, no. I said you're lucky.
We're not doing that. I'm not torturing
myself. Not for not for not for $5. [ __ ]
that. Right. Okay.
But I but I applaud your attempt. Uh
interpretation of the pattern. Well,
intent cannot be definitively
determined. This type of response is
commonly. Oh god, this is just chat GPT.
Right. Additional concern liars use of
emotional or gendered labeling regarding
KP's behavior.
It is observed that at this point in the
timeline, Lion makes broad claims about
KP's processing and understanding of the
situation by using probiotic probiotic
terms.
What about 100?
H I'll go back a couple of pages for
100. Yeah, sure. The use of such terms
as crazy and stable and emotional to
describe a woman in the context of an
argument reflects a well doumented
pattern of gendered framing and
communication in social psychology
research. This type of labeling is pro
problematic for several reasons. It
replaces arguments with
characterizations rather than engaging
with the substance of the claim,
evidence, reasoning or context. And the
focus shifts to perceived mental or
emotional state, which is not a
verifiable measure of argument validity.
It reflects documented gender bias.
Research that shows women are more
likely than men to have their behavior
interpreted as emotional or irrational,
even when presenting equivalent
arguments. This creates unequal
standards in how credibility is
assigned. Oh my [ __ ] god, bro.
Labeling a speaker as unstable
encourages the audience to discount
their claims without engaging with the
underlying evidence. No, no, no. We went
through all the underlying evidence.
We've done that for months. You're just
unstable.
You're just unstable.
Shifting analysis from fact-based to
perception based. It functions as
tonebased dismissal. Emotional framing
can be used to delegitimize arguments
without directly addressing them,
reducing the quality and reliability of
discourse. Importantly, this effect does
not depend on intent even when they use
casually. Such language introduces a
gendered uh gendered interpretive bias
that is not grounded in evidence and is
not valid and not a valid substitute for
engaging with the substance of an
argument. Listen, I'm not saying that
you're unstable or unhinged because
you're a woman. I'm saying it because
you're Yeah, we call bonk. I called
utterly Noah insane.
Have you seen the [ __ ] I've said about
chibi reviews? I treat everyone equally.
Those aren't academic pages.
Oh, dude.
Find that women are more likely to be
judged as overly emotional or irrational
when expressed. I mean, you're not doing
in yourself any favors in that regard.
If you don't want to be judged as overly
emotional, don't be overly emotional. I
don't know. Harvard Business Review
explores how gender Oh my god, [ __ ] off.
demonstrates how lang uh gender language
and power demonstrates how language is
used to reinforce gendered power
dynamics. Oh my [ __ ] god, bro. She's
such a perpetual victim.
They're just mean to me cuz I'm a woman.
I'm just a poor weak woman. Why is
everyone so cruel to me? Why can't they
see how much this is hurting me? I
didn't ask for this, guys. I'm so
oppressed.
So, Isn't Isn't this why we need
feminism, guys? Isn't this why we need a
little feminism?
Okay. Why video liar's video response
matters? The reliance on these continued
communication patterns and the
escalation within his Barbie response
video is significant because it shifts
the discussion from
evaluating information, evaluation
information to managing perception. This
scan limits space for new. Okay, listen.
We're going to start skipping these.
Summary. The obser observed use of
ridicule and dismissive framing as a
response to conflict suggests a pattern
of public deflection and narrative
control rather than direct engagement
with the underlying issues. The obser
observed response pattern is consistent
with an increased emphasis on
reinforcing. Okay, listen. Listen. Okay,
we're going to go to KP on this, but
we're going to start moving to the point
where cuz we're on page 72 and a lot of
this is just me reading AI outputs. And
I listen, it's funny. It's funny, but
we've been doing it for 4 and a half
[ __ ] hours.
I'm going to have to take a day off
work, aren't I? I like I'm Listen, it
was bank holiday Monday today, but I'm
actually going to have to call my boss
in the morning and go, "Listen, I need a
I need a day's leave.
I need an additional day's leave, okay?
I'm really sorry.
I'm sleeping today. That's what I'm
going to have to do at [ __ ] like 8:00
in the morning."
Oh, dude.
Hey, Hydra dancer. Um, KP on this. I
genuinely don't understand what the
issue is. The Barbie report was grounded
in documented facts and avoided name
calling or personal attacks. Yet, liars
seem to frame it as retaliation. That
raises the question is the expectation
that only he gets to define a public
narrative. And if others attempt to
correct the record or clarify
information about consent, harassment,
and safety, do that. Do uh safety, do
that somehow become a threat?
Does it's meant to be. Does does that
somehow become a threat? Do that somehow
becomes a threat?
You dox Barbie. She docks multiple
people in that [ __ ] document.
Let's be let's be ultra [ __ ] clear.
Releasing these documents is
retaliatory.
It's that's the only reason to release
them. That's the only reason to do any
of this. It's because you're [ __ ] ass
mad.
Who's this? Who's this a safety report
for? Do you think people don't know
Lio's law? Do you think like if anything
this makes look Lio look better?
The purpose of these reports has never
been to prove a specific outcome or
attack individuals. The goal is to
correct misinformation and document
concerns so that discussions around
harassment, consent, and survivor
behavior are grounded in actual
psychological research and safety
awareness. You use chat GPT and you're
clinically [ __ ] [ __ ] off. When the
public conversations dismiss or
misrepresent those topics, it doesn't
just affect this case, it reinforces
harmful misunderstandings that can
impact other survivors and communities.
I'm so glad you said that. leveling
false rape accusations makes actual
legitimate victims more fearful of
coming out for how they will be treated.
It makes audiences and the general
public more concerned about uh false
reports and therefore more likely to
disbelieve the next person who comes
out. This is an observable trend that we
have seen when people come out with
false uh false claims they go well
remember Slazo remember quite and even
when people come out with true
accusations there is an element of the
public that just go well you know we've
seen this [ __ ] before
I watched this happen to Kirsty during
the Inabber stuff.
Girsty, in my opinion, had a legitimate
claim against Inaba and it was
completely [ __ ] disregarded.
It's not us that have done [ __ ] like
this. It is people like KP.
KP is far more responsible for people
not believing victims than Lio and I
ever will be. Remember Turkey to Tom
[ __ ] Yes, exactly. Grey Knight with the
two. It's clearly It's clearly for the
advertisers of Power Thirst. So true.
Speaking of, by the way, I'm just
curious.
Is Fano going to respond to the fact
that I called him out for lying about
me?
Come on, you little weasel.
No, he's scared. He's scared.
The fear has gripped him.
Oh my [ __ ] god.
Um,
what the [ __ ] is this?
Sorry. I just heard I just heard KP's
bitching about me. Anyway,
not KP. Courtney. Courtney. Courtney's
bitching about me.
Okay.
Oh my god.
What? Oh my dude.
I can't believe I can't believe the
homeless chick is screaming about me in
her Discord. What an actual [ __ ]
[ __ ]
Courtney, maybe you should focus more on
getting a roof over your head rather
than what I'm doing. Just I'm just
saying, okay,
you've already destroyed your entire
life by crying about me. Maybe get your
[ __ ] together and it won't be such a
problem, okay? I'm just a little guy on
the internet. I'm not that important.
I'm not that important. I'm not even
really talking about you tonight
anyway.
When public conversations dismiss Oh,
there we go. I'm not interested in
fighting LIO or ex escalating personal
conflict. The goal here is simply to
correct the record and ensure that
discussions about harassment trauma
responses are informed by evidence
rather than narrative convenience.
God, you're such a little [ __ ] liar.
I put out money and time to try um to
try and help victims. What did KP do?
Piss herself on a couch while she made
others do a video for her? True, Lio.
Following the release of the Barbie
report, Lio issued responses explaining
his perspective and intentions. However,
many of the core concerns raised were
not directly answered. Instead of
addressing specific factual issues, much
of the response focused on
interpretation, disagreement, or
personal reasoning. The following
question remained unresolved. Did Lio
share or confirm KP's private draft
material? Oh my [ __ ] god. [ __ ] off.
Who cares? Um,
leaking or hack leaking and or hacking
of private information January and
February.
Oh Jesus. Between January and February
2026, several incidents occurred
involving the unauthorized access and
dissemination of private materials
associated with KP. These incidents
include the apparent compromise of KP's
DeviantArt account incl during which the
account was uh accessed without
permission and all work was deleted.
I've never heard this before. What the
[ __ ] is this? Additionally, fraud
attempts reported on KP's private bank
account and private or unrelated
materials were subsequently circulated
online. I've never heard any of this.
What the [ __ ] are you talking about? How
is this anything to do with [ __ ] Lio?
Gray night with the five. What do you
mean, Becket? They're now the spokes.
You're now the spokesperson for Power
Thirst. I'm touched. This is This is a
big day for me. Thank you, buddy. Dude,
send me tell me what the [ __ ] Power
Thirst is. Um, regarding the deviant art
hack, KP noticed that the account was
additionally made to follow
anthropomorphic animal furry adjacent
accounts. While this is not a direct
connection at present, it is important
to clarify overlapping evidence and
known public information that Lio has a
public association with those
communities.
What?
What the [ __ ] you listen?
LIAR.
WHAT? LIO. Oh my [ __ ] god. Already
did. Thank you. Great eye with the two.
Let me get this straight. Let me get
this straight. The accusation here is
without any evidence. Lio has gathered a
furry army of some kind. Lio has
gathered a furry army of some kind to
hack KP's DeviantArt account. and attack
and like report her bank. Is that Are
you serious? Did you seriously?
That's your accusation? That's the most
[ __ ] insane thing I've ever heard in
my life. What do you mean? What do you
mean? What? What do you mean? What is
going on? Radiant super hackers.
What the [ __ ] are you talking about?
This is This is so insane. This is so
insane. This is so I can't I can't I
can't What do you mean?
All my streams start with me muted. What
is this? This is
what What is this? If you're seeing this
or somehow reading this, I apologize for
breaching into your account. This is a
pony burner.
You think Lio is involved
in a furry army taking down your Deviant
Art account?
I literally can't. I literally can't
even. This is insane. This is actually
This is actually crazy.
you should be sectioned. KP to put this
in the document to make an accusation
like this and be like, well, there's no
proof, but you know, LIO's kind of
adjacent to these groups is a new level
of [ __ ] crazy that I I've never heard
before. Kiwi, like Lio's Kiwi Farms
thread wouldn't say something this
crazy. Loal farms wouldn't say something
this crazy.
Little did we know Lio's walls were just
furries. True. finding Dragon Tamer with
the two.
This This is This is [ __ ] wild.
Deis Clot. True.
Um, okay guys, thank you so much. Thank
you so much. This is how I feel right
now. I actually need to take a break for
5 minutes. I I need I need to go and get
another can of Coke. Should I get an
appetizer? I want an appetizer.
Um,
I I need I need I actually I actually
need a break. I need a break for 5
seconds. This is beyond This is beyond
insanity. I'm going to leave you some
music
and I'm literally going to walk I'm
literally going to go into my garden and
just like breathe some fresh air or
something. I don't I don't [ __ ] know.
Um because I don't I What am I meant to
What am I meant to say to this? What
what possible response could I give?
[ __ ] god. Right, I'll be back in five
seconds.
>> The paradigm of absolute control. And
that's why we're just out here doing
simple things, pointing out that we're
meant to be in nature and be natural.
And this is where we find the source
that God made to transcend the new world
order. And that's why they want to try
to keep us out of it.
factories keeping babies alive.
What do you need to know about these
people?
craw
babies.
I have them on video.
She sleeps in the same room with that
creepy weird woman whose mother wears a
foot over.
>> That woman number one is ugly.
Imagine how bad she smells.
I'm told
after
that evil I feel it go
We're such crap. We don't even know it
rising up against us.
>> Millions of people.
I'm so
stab
at the mall.
We're going to
stab you with a butcher knife. And then
the police chief is going.
>> I'm back. I'm back. I'm back. I'm back.
I'm back. Okay.
KP is actively breaking Becca, dude.
What am I meant to say to this? How do I
respond?
Like,
what possible commentary could I
provide? She's claiming that Li was Li
was controlling an furry hacker army.
The most absurd thing I've ever read in
my life.
I've done like 13 14 hours of streams
over the weekend. Now I'm dealing with
this [ __ ]
In the last 3 days I have been live for
21 hours.
Is it 21
or No, probably not 21.
Uh
probably 18 actually.
What am I meant to do with that?
Okay, give me a second. I'm just
checking some messages. Um,
very,
thank you for no one spoiling this for
me.
What am I meant to do with this?
What the [ __ ] is What?
Why is there a What? What is this? Okay.
What is this? Oh, apparently it's porn
artwork. Okay.
Proof of unauthorized bank access.
I'm I'm sorry. Wait. During the same
period of time, creative assets and
private materials were not that were not
intended for public distribution began
appearing in external discussions and
online content. So, wait, hold on.
Proof of unauthorized. This is an ATM
withdrawal
for like $400. How is this proof?
Are you
look away for two seconds and suddenly
there's Pony BDSM on screen? I'm I'm so
confused.
I'm so confused. I'm so What? What?
What? So, you're claiming that Lio got a
furry army to steal your bank card and
make ATM withdrawals?
Is that the claim here?
Is that the claim? Are you serious?
What you mean?
These materials have not been released
public publicly by KP or the
collaborating artists were shared
without consent from the individuals who
created them. The circulation of
unfinished or private work regarding a
fanfiction adjacent project raises
concerns regarding both unauthorized
access and the ethical handling of
creative materials. Uh, pistons for your
troubles, father. Thank you, Zeke, for
the five. Much appreciated. JG with the
two Leo somehow had KP's debit card. I
mean, this isn't an even accusation
against Leo. This is an accusation that
some random p like Leo has a furry army
doing it.
This is
additional commentary about the scope of
the work is incorrect, meaning that Lio
may have had limited access to the work
and used incomplete information when
describing it and sharing it publicly.
Lio, how the [ __ ] did you get access to
the draft? I set that folder to private
and she she was the only person I shared
the link with. I'm Batman. No, you're
just a [ __ ] dumbass. I mean,
what?
Look, I know how those materials got
shared around.
It's not hard. KP is terrible like
information control.
Anyak with the two. Yo, can we hire the
furry army for crimes?
Don't hire the furry army for crimes.
Response art by anonymous. I'm Batman.
Did you kill him that lying uh and
stealing Did you tell him that lying and
stealing was okay? I thought you did.
I'm sorry. You You're putting in
response art.
What? What?
Are we hitting the point where this is
just sad?
Is this just Is this just actually sad?
Man, this [ __ ] is so ass. Yeah,
riddle. It wasn't me who drew it. I
didn't do that. What is this? That's a
good [ __ ] question.
Source of leaked materials. At the time
of the incident, there is an
overwhelming evidence that former team
member Alex was the source of the
breach. This access occurred due to
files being mistakenly placed in a
shared drive for environment and remain
drive or environment that remained
accessible through Alex via their prior
permissions. Connections to the team or
connected via third uh private third
party. Evidence of Alex's involvement in
leaky material is suggested in this live
stream archived him. That's Khug one,
I'm assuming. Transact with two
quartering son or KP daughter. Oh,
quartering son. Are you kidding?
Quartering son.
At least at least Jeremy for all his
[ __ ] problems has been successful
enough to buy a plane and like do some
[ __ ] I mean, he's a complete [ __ ]
[ __ ] but like I'd rather have Jeremy
than KP. You kidding? The smell wouldn't
be as bad, which is saying something.
That's how low the bar is.
I'm looking at her tumbumber and she's
re uh recent art that looks very similar
to that. Wait, you think that she drew
the art herself? Kame, that's an
interesting theory.
That's That is an interesting theory.
Interesting.
Um I think it was Alex who sent me
something else that's rather interesting
that happened on the 9th. Additionally,
Alex request files observed around the
time the leak aligns uh when with with
when the leak occurred. Additional
statements from Alex that supports
contact lio KP. Oh, I'm going to file a
police report getting you uh getting
your do information to report you for a
bad thing. Liario. Okay. If you wanted
my docs to file yet another frivolous
police report, you could have just asked
or looked at any of the various streams
where I doxed myself. Lol. Um,
yeah, they weren't exactly subtle. PP,
dude, why are you trying to play Billy
badass? You're a quivering, terrified
wreck.
Okay,
if you're not afraid, KP, put a video
out. Why don't you put a video out? Why
don't you put a nice animation video
out? Do an animation review, KP?
If you're not scared, post a normal
average video. I'm sure it'll be fine.
Presently, there are concerns that other
forms of private information may have
been exposed, including potentially
financial or identifying information
associated with compromised accounts.
While the full scope of what information
may have been accessed or recovered
remains unclear, the possibility that
personal data or account information was
obtained further increases the
seriousness of the incident as shown
from the bank statements below. Is that
is there more below? I mean, it's not
below, it's above, you [ __ ] [ __ ] I
mean, I will say this about the bank
statements. This just looks like you
you're a victim of identity theft. I
can't think of in all the dramas I have
seen, I've never seen like how how how
would they go at how would they ATM
withdraw stuff?
These are multiple ATM withdrawals.
That's not from online drama. That is
somebody getting possession of your
card, KP. What do you mean?
Why is your bank info and a password in
your Google Drive? Well,
okay. Anyway,
pressing uh presently there are concerns
that other forms of private information.
Uh
why is this so serious? Oh my god. Why
doesn't KP just go to the police? KP has
already tried. KP has made multiple
attempts to pursue formal reporting,
including reporting behavior related to
information discussed in the Barbie
report due to legitimate safety concerns
and to establish a formal paper trail.
These instance highlighted limitations
within the current US legal framework.
These instances highlighted limitations
within the current legal framework.
Guys, it's Trump's fault.
It's Trump's fault, guys. KP cannot
pursue legal actions because Trump is in
power.
That's the truth. Her hands are tied,
guys.
Responses reflected judicial
uncertainty, particularly given the
online and cross regional nature of the
conduct. Procedural limitations in how
the report could be processed rather
than a clear pathway for action. limited
follow-up or escalation despite the
nature of the concerns presented.
Eventual dep prioritization within the
system rather than resolution of the
issue. Okay, so I'll summarize this. KP
doesn't have a legal case that she went
to the police and the police [ __ ]
laughed at her.
And even when the police were kind of
forced to look at it a little bit more
seriously, they realized that it was
[ __ ] irrelevant and stopped looking
into it. There you go. I've just
summarize
it than this chat GPT nonsense.
Oh, dude. The distinction is important.
The outcome reflects structural and
operational constraints, not an
indication that the report's concern
lack uh concerns lacked credibility or
severity. More broadly, this aligns with
known challenges in how online and cyber
related cases and crime are handled in
the United States. These include
fragmented enforcement across state
lines requiring coordination between
multiple jurisdictions. No centralized
framework for addressing platform based
or cross-reional online conduct.
Inconsistent training and prioritization
of cyber related offenses across
departments. Limited or even spe uneven
specialization specialized training in
cyber crime at a local level. Look, the
reality is that this is just not that
serious. It's just not that serious. And
you cannot prove because obviously
there's no it's not true that Lio has a
furry army that's harassing you.
You [ __ ] idiot. As a result, even
when conduct raises clear legal
concerns, which it doesn't, the ability
of law enforcement to act can be
inconsistent in practice. This contrasts
with certain UK and EU jurisdictions
where more centralized or nationally
coordinated enforcement structures exist
for digital offenses. Legal frameworks
such as communications based offenses
and online safety regulations provide
clearer pathways for addressing harmful
online conduct. Certain categories of
online behavior are more explicitly
defined and actionable. Enforced bodies
are generally better structured to
handle cross regional digital cases
within their uh jurisdictions. Oh my
[ __ ] god. Okay,
I don't want to get into how the UK
deals with its online stuff,
but even in the UK,
nothing that I have done would be a
[ __ ] issue.
It just wouldn't. That's not how this
works. The UK has problems with like
posts, but they're to do with like like
hate speech essentially. That's the UK's
like crimes focus. I don't know of a
legal case in the UK where somebody's
actually prosecuted for talking [ __ ] on
the internet.
Zeke with the five liar and Trump
shaking hands in the Oval Office while
KP screams and bangs on the windows is
as a furry army demolishes a bank
account. Yes.
Suffer with me. Oh my dude.
Um,
how many sent me this? Sometimes I feel
like the raccoons are Oh, he's
the dock is more padded than her ego.
True, Shadow Star. Thank you for the
two,
bro.
I actually really like this one.
It's got a bit of a Cartoon Network
flavor to it. I like it.
Also, how do you misspell Raku?
Wait, is this KPR? Oh, [ __ ]
I've just
Yeah, that's interesting. Hold on. Look
at this style here.
And this is KP's on
interesting.
Yeah.
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. No, I'm totally with
you. I'm totally with you, Cammy.
Yeah.
No, totally with you.
Okay, where were we?
As a result, while similar conduct may
raise legal concerns in both systems,
the act uh the ability to act on that
conduct is often more consistent in the
UK EU frameworks than in the US, where
jurisdictional fragmentation and
variability in training and resourcing
can limit enforcement.
Wait, wait, what? Context examples.
non-consensual image uh intimate image
distribution. This pattern is also
reflected in the more widely recognized
cases involving serious forms of online
harm such as non-consensual
intimate image distribution revenge porn
despite being criminalized in many
jurisdictions and widely acknowledged as
harmful victims in this
Wait, I'm sorry. What the [ __ ] What?
You're saying that you're comparing your
situation to someone sharing revenge
porn?
Thank you, Finn. You sent me a meme.
Thanks, buddy.
Dude, what the [ __ ] are you on, guys? I
don't understand why people don't take
me seriously. By the way, this online
stuff and what people have been people
talking about me online is basically the
same as if they were sharing revenge
porn of me.
What is liar aware of regarding
reporting online crime? There is no
direct direct evidence to determine
liars uh level of awareness regarding
the practical limitations of reporting
online or cyber related incidents to law
enforcement. Um, actually, I hate to say
this, but there is there actually is
because Lio has talked to multiple
people, including Courtney, about the
limitations around this. He's said this
to multiple people in dramas. There's
recorded calls of it of Lio saying,
"Listen,
it's very unlikely that with what you've
got, you will get a criminal
prosecution." When people have come to
him and gone, yeah, I've got this. Seems
like this probably isn't enough to go to
the police with
it. He's actually done that. Like that
is that Listen, you can accuse Larry of
many [ __ ] things, but he has had
these conversations. They're recorded.
Traditionally, the idea of directing
online facing users to the police is a
gauge whether the potential victim will
engage with filling real life facing
information in regards to online issues.
This implies the seriousness. No, no,
no, it's not. It's that you need to
display that there is some kind of paper
trail somewhere like and if it's a
serious accusation they're going public
with an accusation. They need to be
prepared to go public with that
accusation.
And if they haven't even gone to the
police or filed a report, it's
indicative that they're probably not
ready to go uh to like they don't think
it's strong enough to go to the police
with. So they probably should be
questioning whether they're prepared to
go to the public with it.
Additional pattern analysis. Oh, dude.
Behavior suggests that liar reasons for
originally doubling uh doubling
doubting. It's meant to be doubting
Emily Jones were based on these
reservations because she did not file a
police report directly. No. Le was
skeptical all the way through. He was
like, "The least you need is a police
report."
Oh my [ __ ] god.
Okay.
As a result, the framing simplifies.
Sorry, I am skipping paragraphs. As a
result, the framing simplifies a complex
issue and does not account for the
structural fact. Dude, it's like
KP on this. It's extremely disappointing
to see Lio resort to using private
leaked assets to publicly criticize or
mock me. Regardless of the commentary
around them, those materials are
outdated, were not public, and were not
intended for distribution. Not to
mention the sheer guesswork about other
circumstances surrounding the material.
I do not care about criticism that falls
within fair use. Yes, you do. Yes, you
[ __ ] do. It's why you struck a load
of [ __ ] channels, bro. But using
non-public creative work as a way uh in
this way raises serious ethical
concerns, and it risks crossing lines
into harassment when private files are
circulated simply to score points in an
online dispute.
Earlier complaints and DMCA filings were
submitted primarily to document the use
of these materials and create a record
of how they were being circulated. The
purpose was transparency and
accountability, not retaliation or
reputational damage. And yet you use
that information to dox people.
How does that align?
You use that information to [ __ ] dox
people. You use that information to file
police reports on people.
Once again, you are [ __ ] lying. Can
commentary on leaked materials raise
legal concerns even if the leak has
already circulated? Yep. Under US
copyright law, distribution or publicly
displayed of copyright material without
authorization may still constitute
infringement even when the material was
obtained second uh secondhand. Okay, so
she has one example here. I don't have
like some of mine to hand, but the one
that jumps to mind is a case in in the
mid 2000s
where basically voting machine data was
obtained through a leak and the company
in question tried to use DMCA to remove
that information from the internet and
the judge ruled that it was of public
interest and therefore they had no
rights to it. Even though the
information in question was private
emails,
this has been tested in court. KP is
wrong. And that and that we're not just
talking about a little personal case
here. We're talking about voting machine
data. And a court ruled that it was fair
use and ordered the company to release
their DMCA claims on the like on the
email information
also. Yes. Yeah, Kim Possible does not
in fact belong to her. Yeah, the actual
copyright holder of the images KP
creates is Disney
analysis at this point. Escalation
narrative. Oh my [ __ ] god. Shut up.
We've done this before.
DMCA notice for stolen assets and legal
council s KP filed a DMCA takedown
notice regarding the video that
contained leaked and privately held
materials associated with and released
work. To be clear, the purpose of filing
the MCA was not to suppress criticism or
commentary. Was not to suppress
criticism of commentary. Yes, it [ __ ]
was. But to create a formal record and
paper trail, that's not what that is
for. Documenting the unauthorized and
potentially illegal use and distribution
of private materials. Response to
transformative use claim in DMCA counter
notice. In his DMCA counter notice, Liio
argued that the video qualifies as
transformative work under fair use.
Um, right. Okay, let's just email uh
Li's email response. Fair use is a legal
doctrine in the US copyright law that
allows limited use of copyright
materials without permission from the
rights holder for specific purposes such
as criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship or research. The
purpose of and character of the use.
Okay, sure. The nature of the
copyrighted work. We know all this. We
talk about it to death. Fair use is not
automatically granted. It is a case- by
case determination. True. Based on how
these factors are balanced,
but at the same time, there are things
that obviously come under fair use. You
can challenge them.
But we consider these things fair use.
And if they are challenged, then that
needs to be settled in court. That's
what it's for. It's a legal process.
Transformative refers to the form of fa.
Okay, listen. I'm not reading this chat.
GPT slop. Where's the analysis?
Um,
does Alex's prior access to T materials
make it legal to share a liar? Nope.
Access does not require authorized uh
authorization or consent. Even if a fold
was accessible, that does not establish
permission to use, distribute, or
publicize the contents. The material is
private and not intended for broader
distribution. It remains so regardless
of how access occurred. Here's part of
the problem with that. My understanding
is that the person who actually
controlled that team material was Alex.
That's one of like that was one of my
understanding like things like the
contracts. They were actually written by
him, not by KP. They were if anything
you could argue they're his content
that KP was just utilizing.
Now, for her like for her draft story
[ __ ]
can you argue that? Probably not.
But
what's a good way to phrase this?
But ultimately,
sharing information and like the
information about what that story was
going to be is not copyright protected.
that is just sharing here. So, and as
the image and for the images themselves,
these are all essentially like Disney
style characters. I don't know. I don't
think your copyright would be
particularly strong because you yourself
don't own the copyright to those
characters.
The her NDA wasn't legally binding. She
doesn't own anything made for her
channel. Yeah.
Um, does it still count as stealing if
the material came from a secondary
source? Um, like Aliio did not steal the
file directly. Yep. Obtaining material
through a secondary party does not
change the underlying issue. If the
original material was not intended for
public distribution. Yeah. But that also
doesn't take into account fair use
reporting or anything else in again.
It's all taken in [ __ ] isolation
because
you're just feeding it to chat GPT.
You're literally asking chat GPT
uh using use of leaked material in new
Avatar Legend of Ang upcoming film as a
contextual example. Similar dynamics can
No, they can't. No, they can't. No, they
can't.
Posting a full movie is not the same
thing as talking about media link uh
leaks. It's just not the same thing.
leaks presented. Like you might have an
argument
if the leaks were just posted in a
YouTube video and there was no like
transformative content, if there was no
conversation about them, but you don't.
If somebody shows clips from the new
Avatar film from the leak, you may have
arguments for like transformative work
because you're discussing the leak in
itself, but showing the whole video is
not the same thing at all. It's
completely different. Wobbler with the
two she burns 6 million trees for AI to
write this. True.
In such cases, important distinguish
between discussion of a leak and use of
leak materials itself. Well, yeah, it
is. There's discussion of the leak. What
do you mean? The distinction is often
misunderstood in public discourse. In
high-profile cases involving large
multinational companies such as
Paramount Pictures or major streaming
platforms, unauthorized unauthorized
material may circulate widely with
limited visible enforcement at the
individual level. Additionally, use of
legal force to contain a leak from a
major corporate company like Paramount
might have the opposite effect where it
amplifies the leak instead of containing
it. refusal refusal to act up the act up
the legality of the distribution of the
leak material from major companies
usually falls under PR concerns
but that doesn't that I mean that may be
true but that doesn't change the nature
of the situation
okay look this is I'm going to do the
live thing this is dumb I don't care
this is ah dude
the only way KP's arguments [ __ ] works
if she herself agrees that her entire
channel is basically copyright
infringement and should be removed from
YouTube. What is your argument here?
If your entire argument is this KP, your
channel should be you should personally
remove your channel from YouTube because
if this is what you believe, you are
guilty of years of copyright
infringement.
Years of it
legal resources and consideration.
Something that has not been fully
considered in the public discourse is
there are specific organizations that
specialize in supporting artists and
creators in cases involving authorized
use, unauthorized use, distribution,
theft, or handling of creative work.
Examples include volunteer lawyers for
the arts, lawyers for the creative arts,
and the copyright alliance. Specific
details are being withheld for safety
and privacy concerns. Confirmation
regarding KP contacting legal counsel is
included below. Hello, Rachel. We just
like to uh we just need to note since it
sounds like you're referring to several
primary issues that we only assist with
one specific legal matter at a time.
With that said, please provide
documentation of of a specific instance
of copyright material used without your
permission. The materials will need to
be an artwork of some sort in order for
us to assist.
Hi there. I sent the work in question a
DMCA for evidence/paper trail. So, the
video itself is down for a little bit.
I've attached a claim and counter claim
for you to uh for now. Let me know if
that is enough.
KP has purposely paused legal
escalations right now in order to
deescalate the situation. I just
couldn't do it. I know a potential
lawsuit would just wreck Liar's life. I
just want him to stop stealing, admit
that he shared priv private files, take
potential illegal material down, and
just leave me the [ __ ] alone. Then why
did you release a [ __ ] document on
him, [ __ ] What What would you What?
Yeah, I just want this to be over.
Here's a document on Lio.
Why is she quoting herself? Cuz she's
pretending like she didn't write this.
This is so [ __ ] stupid. It's also
really interesting that it's like it
would need to be an artwork
or some uh of some sort in order for us
to assist
It's interesting that that's where the
conversation ends
because I wonder
I wonder to some extent whether they
looked at this artwork and said I don't
think you can get legal protections for
this
because it is clearly like fan artwork
for Disney.
and Disney would be the uh copyright
holder
and Disney is not going to like Disney
would end like Disney is so ligious that
if if they got wind of this [ __ ] they'd
be [ __ ] I mean again you want to work
for Disney that must have [ __ ]
occurred to you it's not because you
wanted to deescalate and and just leave
me the [ __ ] alone why release a document
on them then there are additional legal
factors involved in the situation that
not fully reflect Ed some assumption
about KP's resources or available
options may be incomplete or incorrect.
Because of this, any conclusions about
what actions can or cannot be taken or
what level of risk is involved may not
reflect the full picture.
Public information alone does not always
show the full scope of a situation.
Further details are not being shared for
privacy and safety reasons. There's also
one other thing you need to consider
with copyright and that's damages.
So copyright claims also include and I I
again I'm not a lawyer. I'm talking
about a lot of legal stuff and that's
partly because I've spoken to lawyers
and people who do understand this stuff
throughout this. But do take it with a
pinch of salt because I'm doing this off
the top of my head from conversations
I've had over the last several months.
But a consideration with copyright
infringement cases is going to be
damages. KP doesn't monetize anything
and that's going to be a that would be a
consideration in any kind of settlement.
So let's say she did take Lio to court
for these images. Well, these images
aren't monetized. They were never going
to be monetized. They rely on Disney
accepting them as like part like
accepting KP's pitch essentially.
So the like damages Lio can potentially
do monetarily are incredibly [ __ ]
minimal.
Um Esco Cruz with the two. She got an
answer. She didn't like it. Um she
didn't like it and post it. Yes. You and
Lio aren't even living rentree in her
head. You are both uh both squatting
there and charging her for the rent.
True. Gets Thank you for the vibe. Guys,
please enjoy these stickers. Please
enjoy these stickers.
I want
I want this sticker. There we go. Thank
you very much, guys. Much appreciated.
You guys are being troopers tonight.
We are getting through this.
Oh my god. Additional concerning
behavior.
Uh following the initial situation
involving KP Lio participated in public
discussion where the conflict was
further escalated through direct
commentary. During the segment, the
framing shifts from discussing specific
actions to broad personal attacks.
The discussion begins with coverage of
copyright strikes issued against Lio,
the sharing of KP's private creative
ideas, speculations about KP's motives,
and so what? Who cares? You're a [ __ ]
idiot. You're a You're a dumb You're a
[ __ ] dumb [ __ ] Get over yourself.
No one is on your side. No one. No one
with a brain cell is on your side.
References to KP is vindictive and
self-destructing. Statements implying
she is incapable of being held helped or
taken seriously. Go get a life. You are
on your own. All of these are [ __ ]
true.
Where's the lie? Demeaning language,
dismissive framing, and assertions that
KP's car about KP's character and
credibility. This creates a dynamic
where the purpose of the segment appears
less about evaluating a situation and
more about publicly discrediting and
dismissing KP as a person.
use of leaks of private material. Okay,
dude.
Sure, whatever. Um,
audience impact because of the framing
is delivered in a public podcast format,
it carries an implicit signal to the
audience. Lack of support, lack of
credibility of personal adequacy can
contribute to an environment where
listeners may feel encouraged to adopt
similar attitudes or language. But I
thought I thought that you couldn't do
any damage to Saber Spark reputationally
because you're not in the same like
audience bracket. KP, you're not in this
audience. Uh your your audience is not
in this bracket. So what damage could it
possibly be doing to you?
This woman would see Lio in jail if she
could, by the way, just to be clear.
Also, oh my god, Power Thirst Rocket
Edition. Jesus [ __ ] Christ, bro.
Uh,
summary. Okay, whatever. Why might liab
Who cares? Actually, interesting. Desire
to control stabilize concern about Dude,
it's the same [ __ ] over and over again.
Anticipated
post-publication response
recasting document action actions as
misunderstanding guidance or attempts to
help reframing behavior as supportive or
oh my god
potential quotes to look for aluminium.
Thank you for the 12 uh for the two
months at seething chugalow.
Um,
this was just miscommunication. I was
just trying to help. This was taken the
wrong way. This wasn't meant like this.
Was this was guidance, not uh not
anything else. Emphasis on emotional or
interpersonal conflicts. Framing the
situation as a personal or emotional
disagreement rather than a structural
issue. Focus on tone feelings. Shifting
discussion away from documented
behavior. Positioning conflict as mutual
or subjective. This is dumb personal
drama. This is a misunderstanding
between people. This was made too
personal. This is just a conflict
between individuals, bro. There's an
entire section for potential quotes.
Look at this. This didn't need to go
that far. I mean, it didn't. It didn't.
This is all KP. No one No one's doing
this but her. I haven't spoken about her
in [ __ ] ages. This shouldn't be a
legal issue. Should been handled
privately. Bring this into formal
channels is overkill. This is
retaliatory. She's using DMCA to punish
people. God, this is [ __ ]
Okay,
dude. This is damaging my reputation.
Okay, whatever.
Minimizing actions. Oh my god, I'm not
reading these potential quotes.
Uh, anticipated commentary patterns from
third commentators. External commentary
following participation may introduce
interpretations that extend beyond the
report's documented claims. Oh, let's
see how well she did.
uh credibility challenge over content.
Commentary may begin questioning the
legitimacy of the report rather engaging
with this substance. This isn't real
documentation. I'm not reading all that.
I have said that. But because it's AI
slop, what to look for, where the
critics engage with, timeline
consistency, documented quotes, source,
attribution, how evidence was
constructed and compiled. What evidence?
What have you done? This is There's
barely any [ __ ] evidence here. There
is barely any [ __ ] evidence here.
These are random like these are DMs that
most of us have seen
all of them before. You're you make a
claim about a furry army coming to [ __ ]
with you that might be attached to Lio
with no evidence that it's attached to
and no real evidence of a furry army or
dismiss the report without addressing
this. I What the [ __ ] am I meant to do?
How are you meant to engage with this
[ __ ] It's AI slop. I would be better
off bringing up chat GPT, putting this
entire [ __ ] document into it and
arguing with that.
We don't actually know what happened. We
know what happened in certain parts of
it,
but we don't know. Like again, this is
the first I'm hearing about a furry
hacker army.
This is just one interpretation. No,
this is a crazy woman's interpretation.
It's not what No sane person would come
to any of these conclusions.
Uh direct counter evidence. I mean,
[ __ ] man. I'm reading an entire
document. You want the direct counter
evidence to everything in this document,
go and watch the multiple streams on KP,
the videos I've put out, like literally
anything that we've talked about over
the last year. if you don't take things
in isolation
of just I listen this is the first time
I've ever heard of this KP person
and I've engaged fully with your
arguments about copyright. You're just
[ __ ] dumb.
Discussion of documentary concerns may
be reframed as definitive accusations.
This report is accusing them outright.
They're presenting this as a fact.
Allegation versus confirmation.
Document. I mean,
okay, I feel like I'm engaging with
these mostly for fun, but they're so
[ __ ] stupid that like I'm not even
sure what you're accusing Lio of
actually. I'm going to be honest. I
actually don't understand what you're
accusing Lio of.
I came into this document less sure of
what you think liars done than I began
than than before I began. This feels
like a hit piece. I did say this. This
is a hit piece. This is just
retaliation. It is retaliation. This is
about attention.
Uh I don't think I've said that. I think
it's more the fact that it's just you're
[ __ ] and you think you can win for
some reason. Um it was just context. He
was defending himself. It's not that
serious. Explaining how the material
exit. Oh, dude. My god.
They're trying to control the narrative.
This is just narrative spinning. This
sounds emotional. This feel sounds
personal. This isn't objective. None of
this is objective. I mean, the only
parts of this are even moderately
objective were the parts written by chat
GPT.
Um, what else have we got? The wording
doesn't make sense. I mean,
psychology.
>> You tell me, chat. What does algae have
to do with this?
Psychology. God, I love hearing that
word.
>> Psychology.
>> Anyway, um this part is confusing. Yes,
that's true.
Content analysis. There is barely any
content analysis in this. It's just
[ __ ] chat GPT nonsense. What the
sort? You You claim that this is like
You claim that this is the equivalent or
at least comparable to [ __ ] revenge
porn, you crazy [ __ ]
Evidence construction methods. Yes,
you're pulling [ __ ] out of thin air. You
site you site your court case citations,
for example, are [ __ ]
And I've done most of the picking apart
of your argument because none of these
arguments are particularly new. By the
way, this is part of the other problem.
None of these arguments are particularly
new.
We've gone over all of these in previous
streams. We can't prove what happened.
There's no clear chain of custody.
Further inquiry.
There's something about Hidden here.
Like Hidden mentioned that um she was KP
said that it must be difficult for her.
I've not seen that yet. Did I miss it?
Okay, give me two seconds. KP has
purposely paused litigation discussions
to prevent escalation. Additionally, UK
police may be contact in relation to
Alex's sharing of unauthorized and
private material, but KP is also not
pursuing it at this time in order to
prevent further escalation.
I might get the police involved. I'm not
sure yet.
Watch the power thirst on stream pallet
cleanser. I don't think I got the
strength. It will go on It'll go on my
list for next stream.
Okay.
Yay. More police reports.
Despite public perception, I don't
really want Liar and or Alex to have
lasting consequences. filling out these
forms and document uh documentation is
timeconuming and annoying and I would
rather all parties have time to reflect.
I know religion is important to liar and
by pausing things I'm trying to be kind.
Are you still going? Do you hate
yourself Becket? Yes, monstrous.
Apparently I do. Apparently I like
suffering.
Oh, dude. Lo is publicly advised to
remove any potential illegal material to
avoid further potential litigation risk.
Alex is also advised to cease sharing
public material without direct consent.
What happens now? For clarity uh for
clarity, future reports or filings
related to the sharing of private
material may occur in jurisdictions
outside the US where data privacy laws
are often stricter and handled
differently because of online activities
across borders. Individuals involved in
the sharing and distribution of pro
information including low may be
referenced in part of the documentation
chain of events uh chain of events if
additional reports or other law
enforcement becomes necessary which can
then ask platforms like YouTube for
identifying information. This is a simp
uh this is simply for uh clarification
of how international privacy laws can
apply not an attempt to act uh escalate
the situation. Any future filing would
be made solely as a response to ongoing
safety and privacy concerns, not out of
malice, retaliation, or personal
conflict. The goal is protection and
documentation, not punishment.
[ __ ] off. Look, if you listen, KP, if
you'd never if you didn't release the
documents, if you didn't keep doing this
[ __ ] no one would talk about you.
Rest with two. 21 hours of streaming in
three days, here we come. [ __ ]
Oh my god. What have we got? So, it's 7
hours. 7 hours on Saturday, 6 hours
yesterday. So, that's 11.
No, it's not. It's 13. What the [ __ ] am
I talking about? And we're now
over five.
Five and a half.
I think we call that like 18 19 hours.
Becky, you taking good care of yourself?
Clearly [ __ ] not.
Um,
statement from KP regarding trust and
future recommendation of liar. At this
point, I no longer feel comfortable
recommending liar as a source of
support, guidance, or mediation for
individuals who may be dealing with
sensitive, potentially harmful
situations online. While I believe his
intentions may have been influenced by
fear of legal consequences, community
instability, or a belief that he was
helping manage a difficult situation,
sharing files without my consent or
recording me without my consent is still
a breach of trust. I urge people to
reach out to professional organizations
and individuals. Instead, information I
shared with him within the collaborative
or private context, including draft
audio, developing viewpoints and
sensitive discussions and feedback and
purposes, was circulated beyond the
scope of what I agreed to without even
my knowledge. regardless of personal
interpretation or believing one knows
better than the other party. What does
not grant legal permission to share
private materials or discussions,
especially when they involve safety,
privacy, or ongoing personal matters?
This rises raises broader concerns for
me about how more vulnerable individuals
might be treated if they approach. Oh,
[ __ ] off. Someone seeking support
shouldn't be able to trust their
information will not be redistributed
based on other person's judgments of
what is strate uh strategically and
socially beneficial or appropriate. To
my knowledge, Leo does not have
professional, legal, or psychological
training and decision. Neither do you.
Neither do you, KP. Uh, I also
understand that my evolving views
between May and August after conducting
my own research and reassessing
available information may have felt
destabilizing or threatening to Lio or
to those who have previously vouched for
me to align themselves with earlier
conclusions.
However, changing one's perspective
based on new information is normal
response. You dude, the final
conversation I had with Liar was
particularly troubling. I made explicit
efforts to confirm whether the decision
would not be record uh discussion would
not be recorded due to the oh my god
we've done this already we've done this
we've done this we've done this
uh additional lies continue framing
verification and pat uh dude [ __ ] off
because of these experiences I would
advise caution to anyone blah blah blah
based on available documentations
transcripts and KP's firstand account
lio's involvement throughout the events
and information surrounding the barby
report and subsequent disputes reflect a
pattern arising concerns across the
timeline review of the risk report taken
together. These actions suggest a
transition from collaborative
involvement towards protective
distancing. Oh my god, dude. Just stop
[ __ ] looping. Primary issue is the
shared circulation of private materials
without consent. Blah blah blah blah.
This is the same [ __ ] over and over
again.
This limited cap's ability to make
informed uh Okay.
Compare comparisons may be drawn to a py
instance in which KP recorded a call
with officiata Chris. This comparison
does not fully account for the context
in which that record occurred. The
interaction took place amid repeated
sexual misconduct claim involving KP.
That's not true. That's a [ __ ] lie.
You're a [ __ ] liar. Why do you lie
all the time? That had not been clearly
communicated or directly clarified to
her and which she became aware of
through third-party reporting rather
than direct disclosure. If these claims
had been directly communicated or
acknowledged KP prior to KP becoming
aware of them through third party
sources, the need for the recording may
have been re-evaluated. May have been
re-evaluated. That's not [ __ ] true.
[ __ ] off, you lying [ __ ] Given the
seriousness of such allegations, the
recording was understood as a protective
measure.
[ __ ] off. Um, final note.
Additional human humanity note.
I don't care about any of this. Okay,
Dioro, thank you so much for the raid,
buddy. Welcome in, guys. Welcome in to
the end of the KP document. This was
hell. Congratulations. You guys have
managed to join at possibly the best
point because I'm done with this stupid
[ __ ] document. Oh my god, it's so
[ __ ] dude.
This is five and a half hours of my life
I am never getting back. It is
absolutely brutal. I hope you had an
awesome [ __ ] night though.
Let me find something hidden.
I want to see like
um for her.
Um
cuz I'm trying to find
Yeah, I can't find what Hidden was
talking about.
Have you or any family members been
super hacked by Lio Convoy and his furry
army? Call this number today. Yeah,
look, look, look, look, look. Um,
where was it? This [ __ ]
This is so crazy.
She's literally claiming that Lio Convoy
controls a furry army that hacked her
Deviant account and bank accounts.
Welcome in, Dior Raiders. We're dealing
with furry Aelian hackers tonight.
I want the furry furry army thing to be
real because the idea of them fighting
some actual real life gang is so [ __ ]
funny to me.
So [ __ ] gay. Oh my god.
I mean, what can you expect? She she
attributed song lyrics to me.
This is the This is the worst Google
document I've ever read. This is
unironically the worst Google document
I've ever [ __ ] read.
Hey, Ying of the Yang. How you doing?
Does she know that Leia no longer
controls the wolves? I don't think she's
been properly informed. I don't think
she's been properly or correctly
informed of that uh of that change over
time,
dude.
Oh, this has been a [ __ ] long stream.
There was something someone sent me I
wanted to have a quick look at,
actually. Where is it?
Where is it? Where did you put it?
I need to find it now. People have been
DMing me all through this stream like
random [ __ ] Some of which has been very
funny. Um
I don't know if I can find it. I don't
know if I can find it.
Okay. Think
No, can't find it. It's lost to the
ages. Oh, no. Was it this? Oh, yeah.
What's this?
Let me have a look.
We're going to go to Reddit. Becket food
shops had a uh someone say they want to
want to show her to a third grade class.
What?
stayed.
Oh, okay. I am aware of this. Uh,
postman, I am aware of that. Um,
I think that's probably a little bit too
deep in the weeds.
Okay, hold on a second. Let me have a
look at this.
We'll do we'll do a quick bit of food
chops. Did she talk about me tonight?
Cuz I talked about her last night and
she was very very upset about it and I
want to know if she actually talked
about me.
>> I show my I show my content to my
family. We all watch you together every
weekend. I show you to my niece and
nephew. Nephew.
>> This Wait, one of her chatters shows
food shops to their family.
No [ __ ] way.
No way. What? What must they think of
you?
Did she stare awkward stare into the
camera awkwardly in silence? No way.
>> What are they even of age to be watching
my content?
>> Solid question.
>> I was thinking
>> don't don't show food shops to children.
If she knows that children are watching,
she won't be able to control herself.
>> Showing you to my third grade class. To
be honest,
>> you're
excuse me.
>> Are you a teacher?
Even food shops, even food shops cannot
believe that a teacher is watching her
content and being like, "Yeah, I show
you to my class all the [ __ ] time."
That's crazy.
of elementary schoolers.
>> Hey kids, let's look at what a pedophile
looks like. It's part of your safety
teaching. Okay, this this is the sort of
person you should watch out for online.
It's educational. Oh my god,
this is getting clipped. Why are you
showing that to them or even considering
it? I I I talk about I talk about
pedophilia, man.
This is so [ __ ] up. This is so [ __ ]
up.
I talk about pedophilia and and rape and
no [ __ ] shot. You think any family
food can be near children legally? Oh,
okay.
>> That's from a [ __ ] chat. Listen, food
shops, we all know that everyone who
watches you has a [ __ ] restraining
order where they can't go like within
100 meters of a school. What are you
talking about?
>> Plus here. Oh, okay. Okay. I guess
there's more reason.
Okay. Yeah.
Wait till Joe Rogan hears about this. I
hope so. So then I can come on. Okay.
Sexually.
>> Okay.
>> Holy [ __ ] bro.
>> So, uh,
>> okay. I want to see if she actually
talked about me. Did she?
>> Content that involves gay. Even though
this kid makes content.
>> Was she Was she brave?
>> If I said,
>> was she brave? Oh, she watched just
talking about her, but not me.
>> You [ __ ] coward. You [ __ ] coward.
Food chops.
>> What? Well, had this experience
throughout the B administration. You can
read about here, right?
Also, 330 views streamed 4 hours ago,
dude. That's dire. That's actually
[ __ ] dire.
This bitch's channel is dying. Like, we
may have we may have like a [ __ ]
There's There's no way she stays sane.
There's no way she stays sane. Holy
[ __ ] bro.
Oh, I feel like Nick was nice enough to
raid into me and we should do some like
last last like end of the night content
that's like decent. Do I have anything
knocking around? Do I have anything
knocking around? I might do. I might do.
Um, was there anything that got sent
into my inbox that I didn't have a look
at the other night?
Let's have a quick look. See, shall we?
Oh, yeah. this.
We're not going to watch all of this,
but we'll do a little preview because I
This is Rob's media Rob Media's new
video, which is Idiot Influences, and
it's on Xanderhal. I like We're not
going to watch all of this tonight, but
Demon Mama, Demon Mama is on the front
page, is on the thumbnail. I want to
know where if Demon Mama's in this. Is
demon mama in this
financial decline irrelevant and
humiliated?
Dude, what is going on?
Let's see if I can just like transcript
search demon mama.
Like look at the look at the [ __ ]
thumbnail.
That's that's demon mama right there.
Say
Oh, and then demon mama, this absolute
freak, pedto jackacket shoe by claiming
her tweet is a form of projecting.
>> If you're so triggered that you see a
piece of leather and and uh, you know, I
don't know, maybe shoe on head sees a
piece of leather next to a child and
starts getting a little, you know, riled
up. Maybe it's a little bit of
projection on shoe on head's part.
Oh my god, dude.
I miss demon mama. She was meant to come
back and then she never did. She's
probably off writing [ __ ] furry
pornography again. That's what she used
to do, you know, before she was a
political commentator. She made furry
pornography.
probably feeding one of her like she was
she became like she had a feeder fetish
with one of her partners. She was trying
to make her partner like super fat. I
wonder if that like that person's died
yet.
>> Or maybe she's just full of [ __ ]
>> Friendship ended with shoe on head. Now
demon mama is my best friend.
>> Oh no, petco.com.
Oh no, THEY'RE SELLING PEDOPHILE WEAR.
>> YEAH, this person is denser than a
[ __ ] black hole. Also important to
note that this person later got exposed
for having a bunch of miners in their
not safe for work discord. So literally
just a nux.
>> Yes. Yes. Base. Let's [ __ ] go. Let's
[ __ ] go.
Awesome.
>> Pacu situation. Oh, when their partner
was allegedly into shakon. So this
really was the plot calling the kettle
black. Xanderhal would end up getting
banned on Twitter.
>> Bro, I love the internet. The internet's
so good. It's such it's such a cool
[ __ ] place to be.
>> Claiming it was due to Shu's fans mass
reporting him. However, it was actually
due to him telling a random Twitter user
to off themselves, which is funny to me
as he was constantly portraying himself
as the victim here. When Shu announced
her video covering
>> Hydra answer with the pipe, well, now I
don't feel bad for sub uh subjugating
the eldering cats to your streams. At
least they can leave when they get sick
of you talking, Becky.
True. But the question is, do they do
they cats like me? Cats like me normally
sometimes. Okay, actually I want to see
financial decline. I want to see the
financial decline section. Um,
also there's 14 mentions of this. Hold
on. What are the other ones? Um,
okay. We're going to watch this whole
thing, but we're going to watch the
financial decline bit. A little bit of
it. I'm interested.
Xanderhal has always been a financially
challenged person with his views
constantly dipping since 2022, but by
election season, he was really feeling
it. It was common to see this guy doom
posting about how his career was
failing, even making this embarrassing
Discord post about not having enough
money to fix his phone. Pretty
>> Oh, bad news for you all today. WHY?
HEY, IT'S Nicholas Dioro.
I picked the perfect moment. Get to hear
Nick reading [ __ ] Xander messages.
Let's go.
>> Ago, my phone fell out of my pocket and
onto my driveway, shattering the screen
and making it so it can't turn on. My
two factor authentication was connected
to my number, so I quickly became aware
that if anything happened to log me out
of Google, I'd basically be screwed
until I could get a new phone with my
number moved over to it. Well, that
something happened today. And when I
came downstairs, my PC had restarted
itself for an update. Normal, but logged
me out of everything. I got back into
most of it, but my YouTube/Google is
logged out, and I need my phone number
to log back in. This basically means I
am locked out of my YouTube channel
until further notice. I am going to do
everything I can short of carrying out.
>> I subbed and waited five minutes just to
say B-ray. [ __ ] Am I still on sub only?
[ __ ] I'm so sorry, guys. I'm so sorry.
That [ __ ] sucks. I am super sorry.
Let me turn that [ __ ] off. Sorry. I got
I got raided the other night and I must
have kept it on subscriber. I'm so
sorry. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
Thank you guys. Welcome in. Welcome in,
Biders. I'm so I'm so [ __ ] dude,
please don't read the sub. Dude, I
[ __ ] hate subs having things on
subscriber world. I told you all stream
I DM'd you about it. I didn't see that
over. Sorry. Yeah, it's cuz I was
getting a load of like [ __ ] [ __ ]
uh last night of people coming in and
posting a load of [ __ ] to like just
slurs and I was like ah [ __ ] I'll turn
it on to subscriber mode then. Sorry
guys. Sorry. Sorry. Sorry. My apologies
for that.
You killed us, Becket. I'm so sorry.
Dude, thank you. Thank you for the
person who like Thank you, Betty, for
actually waiting out 5 minutes to be
like, "No, we're here. We're here." I
always appreciate the Dior raid, as you
know.
>> At an Exfinity store today, but if that
doesn't work, would you guys still
support me if I had to start a new
channel?
>> All of this over needing to get his
phone screen fixed, which Kristen Narf
pointed out only cost a couple hundred
bucks. Does Xanderhal not have enough
money to buy something this important?
>> The OP block. Oh, interesting. Who's
that guy?
>> Well, apparently, yes.
>> We are Soviet Russia. We are Soviet
Russia.
>> As around this time, he began what I
would call his ebegging arc. Rosanne
would go on stream and beg his viewers
to watch and engage with his content
since he wasn't getting as much ad
revenue. However, he does it through
this US. I thought you were in sub mode
because KP would have copyright struck
it or something stupid like that. Yeah,
I know. It's got I just got raided last
night and I was like, "Okay, fine." I
hate that. Like I don't mind people
coming in and trolling. I quite like it.
I think it's funny. It's just like be
funny about it.
>> Versus them mentality claiming it's
mainly an issue.
>> There is no what block in Bing say. So
true.
>> Affecting leftist creators online.
>> Like little over 10% sorry of people
who've gone into the stream today chose
to hit the like button despite it taking
half a second.
That is what kills so many lefty YouTube
channels. just like the low rate of
voting uh participation among
progressives. Uh
>> dude, Xander Hall. Okay, I can't I we
are totally watching this whole video
this week because Xander Hall is a
[ __ ] treasure, guys. If you don't
press the like button, then you're
basically letting Trump win. Okay?
You're basically letting [ __ ] Trump
win.
uh they also think their likes and their
comments don't count when there's
millions that h that that are being
included in an algorithm to uh account
for things and so they don't get
involved. And so lefty channels have
always had really low engagement and had
a really hard time existing online like
going back to the beginning because
lefties don't click things. They don't
engage. They don't vote. They don't make
their voice heard because they're just
one person.
>> Now to me this sounds [ __ ] [ __ ]
There's a lot of lefty creators of good
engagement. They just happen to put some
semblance of effort into their content.
Even Vosch, despite his reputation of
jerking it to animated children, still
gets good engagement on his streams and
videos. I think Xanderhal's main issue
is that he streams in an oversaturated
market and can't compete with a lot of
the big dogs. And nothing shows us
better than the Inuendo Studios
situation. Ian Danskin or Inuendo
Studios is a failed YouTuber known for
his alt-right playbook series where he
complains about arguments he gets into
on Twitter. But after the pan,
>> bro, I have not thought about Inuendo
Studios for [ __ ] years.
>> Pandemic, he stopped uploading as much
blaming it on a bunch of different
factors like his back hurting. Since
then, he's been losing money and
released a video in May 2025 that tried
to garner sympathy from his audience. I
have been running this channel at a loss
for seven years.
And
between back taxes, I owe the government
a maxed out credit card that is in
collections. And dude, there's nothing
sadder than a YouTuber begging for
money. That is like that is like the
saddest thing to do. By the way,
>> money I owe to a few people who've
bailed me out. I have a total
accumulated debt that is um
>> Chibi Reviews defended a Predator. Yeah.
So, Chib's had to back walk back his uh
comments towards Mimi who was arrested
in the UK, right?
>> $100,000.
>> What the actual [ __ ] is wrong with this
guy? It's all his own fault, by the way.
This guy avoided paying his taxes for
years while sitting on his ass watching
movies and playing video games all day.
>> I do these little projects where like I
have a I have a film randomizer list.
It's like a list of this year's list is
like 36 movies where I hit shuffle on
letter boxed and watch whichever one
comes up first and try to get through
the whole list by the end of the year.
And I write little reviews for them. Um
or uh I have like a a video game
cabinet, just games I'm trying to get
through um before the end of the year. I
I do a reading log. Um oh my god, it
sounds so stressful. Guys, go give this
guy some money. It must be so difficult
for him. He has to watch 37 movies a
year and write like a little review for
them. A video game cabinet. Oh, dude.
How is he coping? Where are you? Where
is your sympathy chat? NRC with the 20.
Becca, I feel like this quartering drama
is going to pass without people going
over the Jack Murphy case. The
Quartering, Sydney Watson, Rakita, and
Elijah Schaefer all make cameos. Their
coverage coverage looks ironic now. Sad.
Yeah, I really should do the Jack Murphy
thing. I've got like Sapiens sent me
like a ton of stuff. So, it's it's just
me being lazy. Jack Murphy is such a
good story, bro.
Um, and I make a playlist of a six song
playlist every month that I share with
patrons. But like a lot of leftists, he
gets away with this behavior by begging
his massive audience to donate him
money. And these idiots will give it to
him because they believe he's some sort
of savior to the left. Noah Samson does
the same [ __ ] He went on hiatus for 5
months and said he spent much of this
time playing League of Legends. But Ian
managed to raise over $100,000 off the
back of this, using some of this money
to go on hiatus and take a sbatical.
Xanderhal watched this and thought,
"Wow, this guy is so mecoded. Maybe I
can raise a [ __ ] ton of money off the
back of my [ __ ] fan base." He
justifies this laziness by saying,
"Progressive content creators have it
tough." As if there isn't tons of
potential in it right now with the
current political climate. This is
showing a clear sign of a demotivation
within the online left. And as much as
that might not have an impact on voter
numbers, like sure those people are
still going to go out and vote. I'm sure
they're still protesting, engaging in
direct action and all those good things
that you should not liking the video.
>> They're not liking the stream chat. Are
you really where like listen are you
really a a leftist unless you practice
the practice
of liking a stream
this stream listen right now we're at
152 likes
152 likes chat
Trump is winning
Trump is winning right now is that what
you want is that what you want chat I
don't think they're doing anything wrong
they don't have to watch progressive
content. But I think it's a tragedy that
we're losing that online community that
you could argue brought the right
victory.
>> I engage. I engage because I'm
[ __ ] I don't want to
>> the biggest victory politically they've
had in ages with this election. And so
with all that said,
we've seen a lot of progressive content
creators lately that many of you guys
probably think of as household names
having to take hiatuses or outright
quitting YouTube because frankly being a
pro progressive content creator is not
worth it for the most part. It takes a
lot of hard diligent work to make it
viable. Again, he's doing this to create
an us versus them mentality, thinking
that leftist creators will always get
the short end of the stick because the
algorithm is biased against them. Even
have you guys seen how much [ __ ]
money Hassan has made, how much money
Destiny's made, how much money Vosch has
made over the last several years. Like I
mean I meme on the shilling a little bit
but like even right now I'm trying to
like like look I need to get a new PC
built and obviously like the money from
stream is what that's going towards and
it's really really appreciated. But the
truth is bro just make entertaining
content and you don't need to sit here
and [ __ ] ebeck. It's just [ __ ]
pathetic. It's just [ __ ] pathetic
bro. God I I don't look at Xander much
on this channel. Um, it's very rare, but
he is he is a gift. He is an absolute
[ __ ] gift. He's basically everything
the right thinks about leftists. He's
literally a living meme.
>> Even though in reality, it's probably
the complete opposite. As YouTube has
banned tons of right-wing creators over
political,
>> you can make more money by pretending to
be socialists. Who knew? True. MLS, how
you doing, buddy? I hope you're good. I
hope you're [ __ ] good, bro.
extremism. I mean, the only left-wing
person who ever came close to that is
Destiny, who got his channel demonetized
for either spreading violent rhetoric
following the Charlie Kirk shooting or
because he's a massive head of But for
the hundth time, Xanderhal was stubborn
as [ __ ]
>> Dude, that's so bad.
>> He thinks his failure is someone else's
fault. He even gets told this stuff by a
chatter and automatically assumes
they're a right-winger there to concern
troll him. Uh, from Yasuke Vermuan in
chat says, "Have you considered making
better content? Must be the viewers's
fault. You are clearly a conservative in
chat to concern troll." Uh, and I'll
actually use you as an argument before
we uh we finish up the segment. Like I
said before, you will deal with people
like these constantly anytime you try to
acknowledge this. The right doesn't want
there to be a conversation about
>> God. I was joking.
Stop. People need to stop doing this.
Food shops did this the other night.
Like I'd say something stupid as a joke
and then she'd say the same thing right
afterwards. It was it's bizarre. NRC
with the 10. It all started when Sydney
read that super chat about his article
cultivating erotic energy from a
surprising source. The first red pill
guru to fall. Don't you dislike these
guys? Also Xanderhal L. Yeah. Like Jack
Murphy for those who don't know run ran
something called the Liinal Order.
And um it was a kind of right-wing red
pill uh like Andrew Tate thing. We need
good strong conservative Christian men.
And then it came out that he was pimping
out his partner. There was load of
pictures of him with a dildo shoved up
his ass and he was heavily interest uh
into being a cuck. Uh and he this all
came out on a with Sydney Watson reading
a super chat about it from like I've
forgotten the guy's name. He had a
really like stupid [ __ ] YouTube
handle and uh Jack Murphy like freaked
the [ __ ] out at Sydney Watson. It was
brutal. Absolutely incredible [ __ ]
content
>> about the fact that like algorithms
objectively work the way they do is
going to reach a broader audience than
uh like the audiences have to engage.
They want to try and turn your audience
against you when you have that
conversation by saying, "Oh, why don't
you just make better content? Doesn't
matter how good the content is. Like,
algorithms work the way they do."
>> And to justify this insane take,
Xanderhal later made up this derange
skitso theory that YouTube is AB testing
videos against each other, which
inherently affects Bread Tube. What's
going on here? What's going on? Well, I
have a theory. If you're a content
creator or you watch YouTube, you might
have heard of a phrase called AB
testing. AB testing means you're just
testing thing A against thing B and
thing B against thing A. Trying to see
which of the two things does better at
anything you're trying to test. Here's
the thing, though. I don't think AB
testing as a concept is new to YouTube,
though. I don't think it's new what
>> like two years new. I I don't I think
behind the scenes, maybe over five years
now, YouTube has been internally running
AB tests.
>> This is so [ __ ] insane. We know how a
lot of this works. By the way, YouTube
tests you against your own audience on
consistency. That's actually one of the
major algorithm pushes. It's why if
you're a YouTuber and you go into your
analytics, one of the primary analytics
is viewer retention and viewer return.
It's it's like how YouTube works out
whether you're a channel that people
want to continue watching or whether the
content you put out is a flash in the
pan. It's why often you'll see channels
where they'll have one video at like a
million views and everything else is
like at a couple of thousand. It's
because
essentially YouTube goes, "Okay, cool.
you get a load of new audience in, is
that audience then watching the rest of
your content? Is your audience is that
new audience subscribing to you? How
long is that new like viewership like
watching that video that you've put out?
And essentially what YouTube and the
algorithm is doing is going, okay, is
are are you lucky with a topic title or
or a thumbnail, or is there something
more to your channel that's going to
make it consistent and good in the long
term for the wider like YouTube
demographic that you're targeted
towards? That is what YouTube tests its
algo on. And it does shift over time.
They introduce new things and the way
people are pushed in certain ways. But a
lot of like the time content creators
will blame like the algo shifted. The
algo shifted. You can see quartering and
Melanie Mack doing that right now. But
the algo actually hasn't shifted. The
audience has. And we see this happen all
the time in political content. When
Biden won, left-wing content took a hit
because most people weren't like riing
against Trump. They were like, "Well,
Biden's in power now, so it's not that
much of an issue." When Trump got in,
left-wing content gets a massive pickup.
Right-wing content takes a drop off. And
it's not because of the algorithm. It's
because of viewer engagement. It's very,
very simple. Dead ass. I thought you
were listening to Digi Broid for a
minute. Now,
with the two Becket, check my DM. It's
worth it. Hold on. Give me a sec.
What is this?
Please play this since you're watching
Xanderhal. Okay. Are we not doing any
random plays? I I'll have a look. We're
going to watch this video again. We're
not We're going to watch this video
again. Um, we're just doing this
section. We're just doing this section.
I'll do a full stream on this thing.
>> Like sometimes the algorithm
>> it's really good.
>> Just nicer to you than other times,
right? And has nothing to do with how
much effort you're putting in, how good
your videos are, how well you're
editing, what your topics are. None of
it really matters as much as whether or
not YouTube is just cumitively giving
you some level of favoritism at certain
times. And you can see there have been
times where YouTube has done that where
like nothing about my content has
changed and yet we'll have a flatline, a
massive spike and a huge gain in subs
and then a bit of a dip in flatlining.
>> It's topic. it's topic because here's
the other thing and this is why it kind
of doesn't make sense because like
if you're creating content that people
are consistently returning to like I
have a good return on audience right
like generally speaking whatever I go
live with these days at the moment as
long as it's a drama topic I'm going to
have 250 to 350 people turn up I know
that consistently because it's been
consistent for months that might change
in the future but at the moment that's
where we
Um, at the same time there's a topic
preference as well, particularly with
videos. My last video didn't do well.
It's a topic that my audience isn't
really interested in. I knew that. But
generally, I can predict how something's
going to perform even before I put it
out because I know what my audience
says. It's not complicated. The problem
is that people like Xanderhal and a lot
of these creators don't actually
understand that. They just put out
random [ __ ] with no consideration of
like their demographics of what's going
on. Who the [ __ ] is actually interested
in this [ __ ] They become boring. They
start ebegging endlessly.
279. I got raided. That doesn't count.
Nick sent everyone over to like hang out
and just chill here because he is based.
And like again with Diorio, right, Dior
is a great example of this. Dioro built
an audience uh with like who know him,
who like like his humor, and he can
consistently go live to a num number
that is like the same across the board
with regardless of topic.
This [ __ ] isn't actually that
complicated. It's really not hard, guys.
again.
>> Hey, maybe that's the problem. That
you've been turnurning out the same [ __ ]
for the past 5 years and nobody cares
anymore. Maybe switch it up, do
something new. But nah, just spam out
the same [ __ ] over and over again that
gets a,000 views on average. 100,000 sub
channel, by the way. What he seems to
realize is that all the money and
attention is being soaked up by Assan
and his cronies right now. Something I
believe he's envious of, which explains
why he's constantly taking these pot
shots on Twitter. I can tell you that
he's not making anywhere near as much as
you think he is. No progressive YouTuber
besides Hassan or that like sphere that
orbits Hassan is. Maybe Vosch. Vosch is
the one exception outside the Hassan
orbit that's making money right now.
Obviously, you've got your big channels
like Brian Taylor Cohen and Fair and
Balance and stuff, but that's like
borderline
mainstream news. Now,
>> this shift in viewership has left him
with very few actual supporters with him
probably averaging $20 in donations per
stream.
>> Anyway, guys, let us move on. But first,
I got to update the
>> dude. No [ __ ] way you're make he was
making that little
>> no goal to reflect the generous singular
donation we've gotten so far. Thank you
for the $5, guys. I appreciate it.
>> That was 2 hours into the stream, by the
way. I almost feel bad for the guy if he
wasn't such a moronic windbag. He
clearly isn't trying hard enough to
avoid moving back in with his mommy for
the 10th time. How else is he supposed
to get new weed cartridges? And of
course, if you want to support me
directly financially, help me keep the
lights on and a roof above my head here
at the Xanderhal Studio, then please
consider donating, subscribing, or
gifting a sub on my website,
xanderhall.com/live,
or support me through YouTube, Twitch,
Streamlabs, Stream Elements, Patreon, or
buy some custom Xanderhal merchandise
through the Streamlabs link down below.
Yes, guys, please buy my groundbreaking
merchandise. These things are collecting
dust in a warehouse right now. What's
funny is that he actively refuses to
take sponsorships, something he
desperately needs, though he justifies
it by bragging about his moral
superiority. Fundamentally, we have to
rely on fan support in order to not come
off as disingenuous in what we stand
for.
>> Oh my [ __ ] god, bro. Just listen. If
this is your full-time job, take the
[ __ ] sponsorship. If I was full-time
on YouTube, I don't I don't take
sponsorships. Um, like I'm like, listen,
unless I know the thing, unless I got
like a bit of a load of freedom, I
wouldn't take a sponsorship. But if this
was my full-time job, if I if I quit my
day job, you're damn right I take
[ __ ] sponsorships. Are you kidding?
I'd probably take a paycheck out of the
channel, actually. But, you know,
regardless,
this is your job. You've got to treat it
like a [ __ ] job. His room is empty.
Yeah, I don't get like why you'd have a
studio that looks like a [ __ ] serial
killer's basement. Like, that's what it
looks like. It looks like a serial
killer's basement. Why have you got this
huge studio with all this space and
nothing in it? Get a potted plant, my
dude. Like, what is wrong with you? Is
that not depressing? Is that not
depressing to sit in a huge room like
that with nothing [ __ ] in it?
He takes food stamps. Oh my [ __ ] god.
We are shooting ourselves in the foot
when we take easy opportunities to
become more financially stable and
successful because to an extent there is
a cultural expectation in the online
left that if you're a progressive you're
not exactly rolling in the money. You're
not taking easy money payoffs that might
be somewhat um principally against what
you stand for. And I think that's a good
thing. You know, I'm glad you still have
morals, Xander Hall. I hope they serve
you well when you're living behind a
dumpster in an alleyway next month.
>> Oh my god. Okay, look. This is good.
We'll probably do the whole video. We'll
probably do the whole video in another
stream because this is good. Also, I
want to show you this. I got sent this
uh Cammy. Tell me, thank you.
That is how I feel after reading that
[ __ ] Google document. Oh my god.
The exhaustion, bro.
It's deeply not fair. Okay, guys. This
has been really fun. I'd say I have work
in the morning, but I am phoning in and
going to take a day off. I've got I've
got leave to take anyway.
So, yeah. [ __ ] that [ __ ] Uh, bad.
Who to send you to? Who to send you to?
Guess I'll send you over to Khawk.
Koko's talking about utterly Noah.
That'll do.
Um,
redirection.
Guys, as always, this has been very much
fun and awesome. I'm going to have a
cigarette first, actually. Quickly,
quickly. Cigarette, cigarette,
cigarette.
Can read the Jack Murphy article. We can
do like a Jack Murphy. We can do a bit
of Jack Murphy coverage. Not tonight,
but we will.
Thanks for the whiplash at the end,
dude. Need something else. Needed a
palette cleanser.
Oh, dude.
What a [ __ ] night.
Once again, guys, you have been
incredibly generous. I really, really,
really [ __ ] appreciate it.
Thank you so much.
Um, it makes all the difference. We're
We're like closing in
on 10k subs, which is cool. I guess
I really should chill more.
Um, hopefully I'll get a new PC built in
the coming weeks, which will make a big
difference as well.
Um, I will probably be back later this
week. I need to start working on a
video. That's all on the list to do.
Hopefully, this is hopefully I can't
believe I'm saying this. This is the
last I hear from KP. I want to be free
of it.
Yeah, please DM me license free jazz.
That sounds great.
Yeah, we're hitting the point where I
need a new PC. Rose, it's getting to
that point. I'm tired of the freezers. I
want to be able to play video games on
stream again.
Do I see your DM?
Yes, a few people have offered to read
Google documents. I think that would be
a great channel. I think that would be a
great channel. Just a Google document
like audio read basically.
White bat audio does license free synth
wave 2. Can you link me that?
That'd be great. That'd be great. I need
more I need more backgrounding music
that's not going to get me like [ __ ]
hit. I'm trying to stay green. Trying to
stay green.
AP is in an endless cycle. Yep.
Like we'll hear from her again in a
couple of months when she tries to press
charges on somebody else or sue someone
else. This will be the next stage.
I already have that channel. That's just
not uh there's just not that many
dockies that are relevant right now.
Yeah, it needs like a good audio
audio reading voice. See, your PC better
be the coolest [ __ ] ever. Are you a RGB
lights everywhere guy or would you want
it more simple? Um, I want something
that works and is powerful. That's all I
want. And I need more storage space. I
need a a third hard drive with like a
ton of terabytes on it. Um, that's what
I need and what I want.
That would be useful to me.
As an old internet head, it's fun to
chill here uh sometimes and hear you
talk about the true old law. I know way
too much [ __ ] I I will probably do this
month. So, we've got a new membership
thing. If you'd like to become a member,
uh there are benefits to membership.
Like, if you become molding, you get
your name read after every video. If you
become seething, you get access to my
inbox in the Discord, so you can send me
recommendations and I do read it fairly
regularly. Usually, a couple of times a
week, I'll check in on that and
sometimes I'll take suggestions from it.
Um, but if you'd like to just become a
member and gain access to the membership
streams, that's coping. Just get coping
membership. And one of the things we're
doing for that, because it shouldn't
just be gaming streams, is I'm going to
start doing law streams. I did one last
month. I'll probably do one this month
where we go over like a super old topic.
We go over some like ancient skeptic
stuff or like old internet stories and
those will go member. They'll be like
public while they're happening and then
they'll become member streams.
So, there will be more content for
members as well. So, you get a bit more
for having your name green.
Please don't forget that we have a clip
channel. It is clip and see.
Uh we're trying to get that to grow as
well.
So it's hard to copyright me off the uh
copyright strike me off the platform.
But other than that, I think that's
everything, guys. I've enjoyed tonight.
As always, you guys are based. I hope
you have a great [ __ ] week. Until
next time.
And until then, go get some rest, say hi
to Khuck, and I'll catch you in the next
one. Peace.