[Music]
Hi, my name is Hayden and the YouTuber I
love Compossible a lot just fault the
copyright struck my channel. This video
will have minimal editing because
frankly this is not a video meant for
viewing pleasure, but something I need
people to hear. On the 13th of October,
I love Compossible A lot, who I'll be
referring to as KP from now on, struck
the video I made from a draft of a Q&A
script, and it will be taken down on the
19th of October, leaving me with a
copyright strike on my channel and the
opportunity to appeal said strike by
leaving my docs with KP. If the video
disappears, you know why, but there are
other resources to find it. The Q&A was
handed to me with full consent. I did
not steal it. In my call with KP linked
in the description, you can hear her
give me full access to a draft of what
she was meant to put out. This is
blatant abuse of the copyright system.
My video, despite being based on a draft
of a script, falls under fair use. In my
opinion, fair use is usually defined
under four categories which I've plucked
from the article on fair use on YouTube
from Google. Purpose and character of
use. Is the new work transformative?
Does it add new meaning or a different
purpose or is it a direct copy? I would
argue given that KP has never uploaded
the Q&A herself and it only being a
draft, it was transformative. I added my
own visual rather than showing the
script on screen. Had my husband read it
out with commentary, used the AI
screenshot that KP uses, something she
doesn't have copyright over, and read
those off. Added both my intro and
outro, and more. I do not see a space in
which it could argue this is a direct
copy, nor does it serve the same purpose
as KP's Q&A would. While she hoped it
exonerated her, I used it to warn people
and make the audience aware that she
planned on accusing someone she
disagreed with of a sex crime. Again,
nature of the copyrighted work. It's a
draft of a script, something KP can
change and upload on her own at any
time. It was not a finished script as
she demanded my input on it. Amount and
substantiality of the portion used.
While I did use the script in its
entirety, huge part of it are generated
through AI and therefore do not fall
under KP's copyright. We have also added
our own commentary jokes and other
things such as the entirety of the
visuals. Therefore, there's a
substantial part that isn't KP's work.
Effect of the use of the potential
market. My upload barely impacted KP's
market. I am a 300 sub channel with a
video that barely reached 2K views. KP
still has the opportunity to upload her
version of the Q&A, which I assume would
be revised, changed, and reach a much
larger audience given her 123K sub
count. I barely made it end. And on a
much more important note, KP admitted
that she was going to strike people
based on her levels of comfort over
actually copyright infringement in a
message that she sent to a fellow
YouTuber that I'm currently showing on
screen. She actively uses malicious
language such as tell you little friends
and calls her uploads a violation of her
boundaries and a threat to our safety.
Neither of which are parts or reasons
for a copyright strike. As an
infringement of copyright is the use of
works protected by copyright without
permission for usage where such
permission is required thereby
infringing certain exclusive rights
granted to the copyright holders such as
the light to reproduce, distribute,
display or perform the protected work or
to produce derivative works. None of
which has anything to do with a very
subjective feeling of a threat, a
violation of boundaries, or being upset
over a leak. KP literally admits to
falsely striking people based on her
hurt feelings over valid copyright
infringement. And that's not okay. I've
already reached out to team YouTube over
it and am currently waiting on entering
AI response hell to fight tooth and nail
for them to realize that I fi from the
oblock back it from copen and apparently
other smaller creators have been struck
based on false premises. Truth of the
matter is KP is upset that an unhinged
version of her spiteful anger was
leaked. A Q&A in which her writes
history based on her own safety ru board
from February of 2024 to accuse Chris
Afficionado, someone she held a grudge
over for almost 2 years now based on a
decade old distasteful joke of a literal
sex crime. The original story, and I
have to retell this here, is that Chris
made up a story about jerking off in a
shared bathroom at the con he attended
with KP and others in 2015, got
lightheaded from the orgasm, and fell
face first into KP's underwear. that she
left in the shared bathroom. In her Q&A,
KP tries to rewrite the his story
without proof, mind you, into Chris
jerking off onto her clothes in order to
frame it as if it actually happened
despite previously and repeatedly
acknowledging it as made up so she can
point at him for sexual misconduct and
argue that people like DA Games and
Sabers Spark would be legally obligated
to fire him over a madeup joke from a
decade ago. Even in her report, she's
willing to misrepresent the very
apologetic ingenuine call with Chris as
him admitting to sexual assault to try
and force Chris into another call with
her. She again makes her personal
grievance with Chris, DA Games, and
Saber Sparks problem, claiming it
reflects on the hiring ethics, when in
reality, all she cared about was Chris
being fired and blacklisted from the
community, something she called for at
the end of her safety report. I've
linked the damn thing in the
description. It's supposed to be public,
by the way, so don't try and strike me
over it, KP. The other half of a Q&A is
her being mad over being personally
slighted again. This time spinning in
the face of Becket from Copen Sees who
lend her his platform and credibility in
order to expand her thoughts, feelings,
and whatever else during the Sabers
Spark video debacle. And when he dares
to be critical of her and point out that
she's extremely biased and absolutely
spiteful because she's mad at Saberspark
for rejecting her. She tries to paint
them as someone who doesn't care for
children's safety, and even goes as far
as to weaponize a message from Emmy, the
alleged Saber Spark victim that she's
advocating for, possibly without
permission. Not for Emmy or how she was
allegedly treated, but her narrative for
why Becket was way too mean to KP. KP
attempts to use her Q&A, which is
supposed to be the better version of her
abhorrent apology to still push the
narrative she established based on her
own bias. in spite. She is a woman who's
willing to lie to her audience about
associations, such as saying she cut
public ties with Courtney Pete while
still engaging with her behind the
scenes and accuse men that personally
heard her of actual literal sex crimes
with literally no backing other than
CGBT and her spite such as Chris and
Saberspark. This behavior can and should
not be tolerated. If we want to talk
about systemic issues, KP, your behavior
is part of that. Falsely striking your
critics over your Fifi's being heard,
lying about sexual assault and
platforming it out of spite and not for
the sake of victims being heard, and
lying to your audience for PR are
massive issues that you cause and
partake in. This video is meant to be a
PSA as to what's currently going on and
spread the current actions of this
malicious, spiteful creature further
than my 200 Twitter account to better
content soon.
[Music]
Down.